DeathAura wrote:Any word on the Seacons? :/
bigprime wrote:WHAT ABOUT THE SEACONS?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
Noisemaze wrote:Great! They decide to continue the Classics but Thundercracker, Dirge & Thrust will NEVER be a part of my collection. Not really interested now.
Seibertron wrote:They mentioned that it didn't seem to make a lot of sense to do Voyagers and Ultras in that line because they're relatively close to the same size.
Blozor wrote:Classics was likely changed to Universe because calling them "classics" was looking too much in the past as if they're admitting a mistake with new designs. Those are two things corporations don't like to do: look to the past, and admit a mistake.
I'm willing to give the Animated line a chance. I rarely watch TV anyway, but I found the last few incarnations of Transformers to be incredibly banal and below my intelligence. If they can offer something that's more like Beast Wars or even the first couple seasons of Batman Animated, I'll be pleased. As one person said, it all comes down to the toys.
Robot Heroes are a big hit = DUH. My local Wal-Mart had two columns full of them and they were empty in a week. The next shipment lasted about two weeks. I hadn't seen a response that big since Classics were first released. Not even the movie line is selling as fast as those little guys.
I'd like a little more stylized Arcee for the Clas—I mean Universe line. One whose hips don't look like she's retaining water.
I highly suspect the alt mode for Universe Galvatron will be a cannon, since that was his primary alt mode in the old cartoon and guns are a little too hard to get away with in America. It's easier to get a real gun in America than it is to get a decent Transformer that looks like a gun.
"Realistic Transformations," next line "one will have a "Tazmanian Devil-like Transformation." Yeah, because that's realistic...
That's all the notes I can remember for now.
Return to Transformers Toys Discussion
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], Yahoo [Bot]