BeastProwl wrote:Wrong. Twin snakes all the way. It's technically canon to the series, more than the PSX ver.
BeastProwl wrote:Again wrong. There are little differences in the game that are referenced in MGS 4, things that didn't originally exist, technically speaking. Also, the cutscenes are longer in some instances.
Twitchythe3rd wrote:BeastProwl wrote:Wrong. Twin snakes all the way. It's technically canon to the series, more than the PSX ver.
More than the original? They're essentially the same, Twin Snakes just looks prettier.
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
KingEmperor wrote:They're both essentially the same, save for a few updated things, but I prefer the original. I think they really over-exaggerated everything in Twin Snakes, like the action. The soundtrack wasn't as good and the people who had accents lost it in this one (which was later considered as canon in the later games).
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Megatron Wolf wrote:if you have access to both play the playstation version first then twin snakes, the story is the same but the gameplay in twin snakes is better & there are extras. But if you can only pick one then Twin Snakes cause the controls and Voice Acting are better. And just to try and end the "is it cannon" debate, according to the MGS database on the PS3 the PS version is the official cannon game. Yes They are both the same thing but when ever they reference anything from shadow mosses it shows PS1 screens and events.
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Return to Video Games and Mobile Apps Forum
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Lexomatic, Overcracker, triKlops, Yahoo [Bot]