The Energon Pub

Another good constructicon
Demolishor and the yellow one i cant remember the name for:

DEVASTATOR looks like a **** badass!

Mixmaster looks awesome, Devastator looks even more awesome, and it looks like those two CGI pics are the ones we'll be seeing everywhere (party bags, napkings, party hats, clothes, etc.). I'm not sure about his mouth turning into the vortex of terror though. It looks to Sci-fi-ish and it'll probably be kinda fake looking in the movie.

Bumblebee looks cool too, he might just be my 14th bumblebee

Mixmaster looks alright, although he better be a voayger. Jetfire looks decent I'll get him, I'll pass on the new bumbles now that I've seen more pics he doesn't look as good as I thought. Devi looks alittle better next to the new concept art I still dunno if I wanna shell out $100 for a figure that doesn't even have sep robot modes.

finaly hasbro learns from there previous figures to bad they cant learn samething about devastator.

2 differnt bumblebees i plan on getting deluxe version in car mode voyger version in bot mode i like the battle mask option he comes with

the next ultimate bumblebee for cheap price & better looking

I really like how the Human Alliance series is looking. I will probably get all of them. Sam won't be sitting on Bumblebees gun on my display however.

The Devastator render looks awesome, But I don't like the toy that much. Maybe if I get it on clearance...

There's too many watermarks in that teeny picture of Mixmaster for me to get a good look at him. However, that render of Devastator looks EXTREMELY awesome, and better than the initial picture of him in the blueprint-background! I think having that Sam figure being able to mount on Bumblebee's arms, and in such an unprotective frame is kind of dumb although the HA set is great.

First-Aid wrote:I'm going to give Hasbro the benefit of the doubt on the combiners. My belief is that they are simply too complicated in robot modes to allow for both a detailed bot mode and an accurate combination. That's not saying they won't come up with a better version down the road that DOES combine and is accurate, but with the allotted time frame the engineering may have been impossible.

What will be interesting to see is how many people who are dissing the Constructicons now will "love" the inevitable bright green repaints Hasbro will do to appease the G1 fans.

Oooh, nicely said! Me, I thought that it was mostly the budget and design time restrictions (if designers were given all the money and time to design as they please we'd be seeing over 20 different prototypes of the same toy and all of the released toys would be somewhere before masterpiece-quality...think of it) that resulted in the 2 constructicon sets, otherwise we could possibly have gotten the vehicle/bot/gestalt-in-one constructicons. I...think if I do get him, I'll go for the multi-colored movie version, no patience for waiting for the green and purple redeco to come up, that's just me <sigh>.

Head Shot wrote:Nope, all of you are wrong.

In one of the trailers, a few transformers crash in France, the autobot twins happen to be 2 of them. They crash near the Louvre museum, and some of the first things they see are pablo picasso paintings. Hence the deformed/rearranged faces.

I love if when people don't know the real reason and blame Bay for it all like he's some kid with down syndrome. Some of you need to get over yourselves and realize that you're not kids anymore and that this isn't g1. I grew up with g1, and many of you probably did too, but how about acting your ages, rather than acting like stubborn kindergardeners. (Not directed at anyone specific here, I'm talking about friggin' everyone.)

And all this time, I've been referring to them mostly as Picasso bots. What a coincidence! I myself grew up watching the G1 series and loved it all, and I love all the designs of the Bayformers as well, but those two are just. Irredeemably. Hideous. Cyber-robo-hillbillies. As I stated before, I won't be getting those two unless I'm paid to keep them.

i really LOVE that devestator image.

i wanst the impressed with the pic of it at the toy show and i reckon it'll be one ugly toy but im more jazzed about how it'll look in the film.

cant wait to see em in action.

Caelus wrote:

Head Shot wrote:I love if when people don't know the real reason and blame Bay for it all like he's some kid with down syndrome. Some of you need to get over yourselves and realize that you're not kids anymore and that this isn't g1. I grew up with g1, and many of you probably did too, but how about acting your ages, rather than acting like stubborn kindergardeners. (Not directed at anyone specific here, I'm talking about friggin' everyone.)

I love it when people complain about people complaining, and call them immature for having an opinion about something.

Not directed at anyone specific here.

Having an opinion about something, and calling someone a retard are two different things. Ironically enough, thats exactly what someone did on the first page here.

I have nothing against people voicing their dislikes about something, they have a right to their opinion just as much as I have that same right. But when you start slinging someone's name (like calling Bay or anyone else a "retard") instead of just saying something like "oh, not a fan of the design, I'll pass" then thats not just stating your opinion anymore, its being immature.