Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
Sabrblade wrote:I'd like this figure more if his altmode was mode TF-like and less "Disney-only"-like.
Diem wrote:He looks way better articulated than Mickey-Robo. Other than that, I'm not that fussed.
Va'al wrote:I keep track of everyone. Backwards.
There are atandarfs to maintain.
LOST Cybertronian wrote:Hey, If Mindmaster survived then you should do just fine.
DavidT wrote:Not trying to be an ass... but if this gets frontpage news, then we might as well frontpage Power Rangers, Voltron, Robotech, and anything else that can change into alt. modes...
Just sayin'
Jeep! wrote:Why do I imagine Dead Metal sounding exactly like Arnie?
Intah-wib-buls?
Blurrz wrote:10/10
Leave it to Dead Metal to have the word 'Pronz' in his signature.
DavidT wrote:Well then why do we never see STARWARS/TRANSFORMERS frontpaged? Are they not Transformer related?
.
Jeep! wrote:Why do I imagine Dead Metal sounding exactly like Arnie?
Intah-wib-buls?
Blurrz wrote:10/10
Leave it to Dead Metal to have the word 'Pronz' in his signature.
Dead Metal wrote:DavidT wrote:Well then why do we never see STARWARS/TRANSFORMERS frontpaged? Are they not Transformer related?
.
Do those still exist? I thought that line got cancelled.
Liftgate wrote:Yeeeeeah, he's a perfect rendition alright. Too bad a perfect rendition has been available for the past decade or more, as you can clearly see in the photo above. Have I somehow mistakenly gone to another website or slipped in to another dimension? Isn't this a transformers site? So dosn't that mean we normally enjoy toys that bare transformers traits and characteristics? Arn't robots and robot modes sort of involved in that?
DavidT wrote:Well then why do we never see STARWARS/TRANSFORMERS frontpaged? Not so sure I've seen the Marvel Cossovers either... Are they not Transformer related?
GetterDragun wrote:Liftgate wrote:Yeeeeeah, he's a perfect rendition alright. Too bad a perfect rendition has been available for the past decade or more, as you can clearly see in the photo above. Have I somehow mistakenly gone to another website or slipped in to another dimension? Isn't this a transformers site? So dosn't that mean we normally enjoy toys that bare transformers traits and characteristics? Arn't robots and robot modes sort of involved in that?
Um, apparently you didn't read my whole post. I didn't say as a figure, I said if Buzz had the ability to Transform. So show me a perfect rendition of a Buzz figure that Transforms into his ship?
Liftgate wrote:GetterDragun wrote:Liftgate wrote:Yeeeeeah, he's a perfect rendition alright. Too bad a perfect rendition has been available for the past decade or more, as you can clearly see in the photo above. Have I somehow mistakenly gone to another website or slipped in to another dimension? Isn't this a transformers site? So dosn't that mean we normally enjoy toys that bare transformers traits and characteristics? Arn't robots and robot modes sort of involved in that?
Um, apparently you didn't read my whole post. I didn't say as a figure, I said if Buzz had the ability to Transform. So show me a perfect rendition of a Buzz figure that Transforms into his ship?
I did read your post. And yes, Buzz looks EXACTLY like he did in the movies, that's not up for debate, it's completely obvious, his ship pretty much too. But that's where the problem lies because this is NOT suppose to be Buzz, it's suppose to be Buzz's mech (see him in the pilot seat?), the same as the other two Disney figures, and all of the Crossovers line. With that in mind it's more than a little stupid that this figure does not have any robotic features, which have been present in every Transformer since the very beginning over 25 years ago. Buzz (and his ship) looks exactly like Buzz, which is all well and great, but the problem is this particular Buzz is suppose to be part of the transformers line, which myself and I'm sure many other fans would agree, should follow some basic TF rules. Not only that, but it dosn't match the other figures in the Disney line and would look pretty silly on the shelf with the rest of one's TF collection.
"Oh look, there's Prime and robo-Mickey and robo-Donald and Buzz Lightyear... Buzz Lightyear?" O_o
I've said all that's on my mind about this guy. I'm picking up Mickey and Donald at Botcon, but Buzz can stay in Florida.
No, I'm not crazy. I understand that this figure rubs you up the wrong way but there's no need to rant and rave at the other posters. I can only assume that you're taking umbrage at me calling the first figure "Mickey-Robo". That is the figure's official name. All I am pointing out is that Buzz (who will probably be called Buzz-Robo) looks better articulated, which he does.Liftgate wrote:Diem wrote:He looks way better articulated than Mickey-Robo. Other than that, I'm not that fussed.
Are you crazy? "Mickey-Robo" looks that way because he's SUPPOSE TO BE A TRANSFORMER. That is the whole idea, the purpose of it's existence. If you wanted a regular looking Mickey Mouse you could just go buy one of the millions of figures that have been produced since who knows when. Same thing with Buzz.
GetterDragun wrote:They kept Buzz's anesthetic as a toy, which he is, for this one mold, which is great.
Return to Transformers Toys Discussion
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Emerje, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], MSN [Bot], RodimusPrimeUkraine1