Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store

Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.
Rock Sexton wrote:..........but the telephone operator was sheik humor. Who in this country hasn't had a run in with an outsourced telephone operator from India?
Evolution Prime wrote:Let me also put it this way. If you want three things in a product, you can typically only get two without sacrificing with the other. Here are the three things from this move.
1. More Transformers
2. Indepth stoyline and Plot
3. Lots of action.
You want more Transformers and a storyline, then the action is going to get sacrificed.
You want indepth storyline and lots of action, then more Transformers is going to get the axe.
You want lots of action and more Transformers, then an indepth storyline is getting the boot.
This movie went the way of #1 and #3. You can't have it all.
Steamed_Ham wrote:Rock Sexton wrote:..........but the telephone operator was sheik humor. Who in this country hasn't had a run in with an outsourced telephone operator from India?
I get that, my problem was that it really broke the tension in that scene, and not in a good way, just in a disruptive way.
Rock Sexton wrote:Evolution Prime wrote:Let me also put it this way. If you want three things in a product, you can typically only get two without sacrificing with the other. Here are the three things from this move.
1. More Transformers
2. Indepth stoyline and Plot
3. Lots of action.
You want more Transformers and a storyline, then the action is going to get sacrificed.
You want indepth storyline and lots of action, then more Transformers is going to get the axe.
You want lots of action and more Transformers, then an indepth storyline is getting the boot.
This movie went the way of #1 and #3. You can't have it all.
You can have the middle-ground. It's not just one extreme or the other. But Bay is an "in excess" kind of guy and he saturates movies to the point of overload and incoherency.
wingdarkness wrote:A few facts I wanna throw in about Bay since some people (even his haters) either don’t know or are unaware of this and it's kinda annoying me reading it so,...
The Rock (Micheal Bay’s first Movie) was totally supervised by executive producer Jerry Bruckheimer (and Don Simpson who didn’t even want Bay to direct it IIRC)…Being his first movie for the man who brought him into Hollywood, Bay had no real control other than the filming…He was on Bruckheimer’s leash (something in hindsight that makes me understand why Bay became a monster once he gained his own control) and as a consequence “The Rock” is generally considered his best movie (Also by me)…
In Bad Boys the studio wanted to pull outta the movie because Martin and Will weren’t their original actors for this…Bay hated the script that was written (Which begins the well documented relationships he has with script writers in his movies –HE DOES NOT RESPECT THEM AND HE THROWS THEIR IDEAS AWAY AT A WHIM--for the "blame the writers too" club), he gave Martin and Will free reign to improv pretty much the whole movie, and they were good at it…He was severely under budgeted (almost tanking) and he used his connections with GMC (being their top commercial director) to get all the cars for his action scenes and he swung the movie…I give him credit for that one, but who knew what his ego would become because of that…
So Bad Boys and The Rock are the only 2 movies Bay didn’t really have complete control of and as you can see they turned out arguably well, if not generally respectable…
I won’t go thru the list but every single one of his movies not named BB or the The Rock have had $hitty to $hiteous consensus reviews, 2 winning the Golden Raspberry for worst movie of that particular year (Armagedden & Pearl harbor)…
So understand that when Steven “I made a raptor come to life then forgot how to tell stories after that” Speilberg hand picked him to do the TF franchise, realize that Micheal Bay WOULD NOT DO IT unless he had COMPLETE CONTROL!! He does not listen to the writers of his movies (Most he doesn’t even pick as he has said in countless interviews that he writes his own scripts as a guideline and tries to put the writers stuff within that)…He has been documented to not even let studio picked writers on set while he’s directing or listen to any of their “on the fly” input…This is not just some wiki bull$hit but stuff I have carefully read and discovered starting in like 06 when I found out this hack was gonna direct my childhood…
So all those who want to know how Orci & Kurtz (Who were reportedly not even let on set somedays during TF1 because Bay has no respect for them), how they wrote something as decent if not awesome like Star Trek could write something as sad and pathetic as TF2, understand that MICHEAL F-ING BAY CONTROLS EVERYTHING!! Understand that, because if you don’t you are fooling yourself…Mike Bay went to ILM and told the hand-picked Hasbro TF-creators to scrap all their designs first day …LMMFAO…You people really think this guy deserves a break…This guy wouldn’t let you walk on his yard…Just understand that Bay made this $hit…The sooner that confusion can be handled, the sooner we can bash him intelligently…
Evolution Prime wrote:Let me also put it this way. If you want three things in a product, you can typically only get two without sacrificing with the other. Here are the three things from this move.
1. More Transformers
2. Indepth stoyline and Plot
3. Lots of action.
You want more Transformers and a storyline, then the action is going to get sacrificed.
You want indepth storyline and lots of action, then more Transformers is going to get the axe.
You want lots of action and more Transformers, then an indepth storyline is getting the boot.
This movie went the way of #1 and #3. You can't have it all.
Predaprince wrote:Don't get me wrong, some of the jokes were somewhat funny, but remove five minutes of them throughout the movie and replace them with five minutes of new TF introduction would have worked just fine for everyone including Bay.
Prime Riblet wrote:If the people paying for this movie wanted different, then they should have been firm. If Bay, or anyone makes an offer or condition, and it is accepted by the people who have a say about it.......then too bad for them. Your points are not valid. If Michael Bay is a dick AND everone knows it, but they still decide to work with him, then it is very hard to give all the blame to Bay. There are other people involved who DO have the power to tell him no and they have not done that.
Predaprince wrote:Prime Riblet wrote:If the people paying for this movie wanted different, then they should have been firm. If Bay, or anyone makes an offer or condition, and it is accepted by the people who have a say about it.......then too bad for them. Your points are not valid. If Michael Bay is a dick AND everone knows it, but they still decide to work with him, then it is very hard to give all the blame to Bay. There are other people involved who DO have the power to tell him no and they have not done that.
Because they need to work to have money to make a living.
Prime Riblet wrote:If the people paying for this movie wanted different, then they should have been firm. If Bay, or anyone makes an offer or condition, and it is accepted by the people who have a say about it.......then too bad for them. Your points are not valid. If Michael Bay is a dick AND everyone knows it, but they still decide to work with him, then it is very hard to give all the blame to Bay. There are other people involved who DO have the power to tell him no and they have not done that.
wingdarkness wrote:Prime Riblet wrote:If the people paying for this movie wanted different, then they should have been firm. If Bay, or anyone makes an offer or condition, and it is accepted by the people who have a say about it.......then too bad for them. Your points are not valid. If Michael Bay is a dick AND everyone knows it, but they still decide to work with him, then it is very hard to give all the blame to Bay. There are other people involved who DO have the power to tell him no and they have not done that.
Money Talks dude, do you not know how this works?? As much as I personally hate Bay's entire mentally towards his profession if Paramount, or Universal, or Whomever called me up to be apart of a project with him unless I was swimming in uncashed winning powerball-tickets I'd have to consider it (If I wanted to further my career)... People in every profession make sacrifices to get established or get to the point they can do things how they want...5 outta 10 people here probably has a boss they hate, or hate the way their boss manages the office, but you're damn sure not gonna throw your career down the toilet because you don't like you're present boss...This is the same as people who work for Bay...I'm sure there are many of them who generally love working with the guy no matter how much I think he's a douche-chill, but I'm equally sure there are those who work for and with him because of the $$$$$$$$$$$$...So let's drop the fronts here...
Oh and movie studios? Well i think we all know that you could put Punky Brewster in a mask and call it Zorro 3 and if it sells they're happy...I never said Bay didn't know how to execute the business side of things...Letting the US Military and GMC rape his movies saving the studio $50mil per project is pretty smart if not artistically sad...So like I said, from all the information I have soaked in over the years,...All the interviews he's given that I have read surrounding TF's and other works of his, I say this with no hesitation, "Micheal Bay is a CONTROL FREAK..." A freak fueled by every superficial aspect of life known to man, splattered on a rectangular screen with glee...Again, keep in mind, until he was ungodly selected to be the head of TFs I didn't really care about his hackiness as much, but funny how you feel when somebody F's with something you love...
Just Negare wrote:Well, regardless of what the fans think, or what anyone thinks, I hope Bay or whoever gets the third one takes some of the comments to heart.
I waited 21 years for a live action TF movie. Now we have two. Huzzah. But after the goodness that was the first, is it too much to ask to have a decent sequel? I didn't expect a Terminator 2 type success. But really, there's no excuse for some of the plot, pacing and editing issues that were in that movie. Frankly, I think its offensive to Bay, to us and to Transformers to just sit back and say "what the hell are you on about dood, we got ourselves a transformers movie with big shiney robots and explosions, we don't need no plot or any of those things like pacing or editting".
We do no respect to Transformers or our fandom to excuse such antics. We deserve better. Transformers deserves better. It does not make us less of a fan to demand better. We're the ones who pay good money to see this, the general public pay good money to see this. There's apparently a recession on, and I'm in full time employment now, I don't have the time or the money to see bad movies! Its perfectly in our right, and perfectly acceptable to ask for a good movie with good flow and structure. Should we really just accept the no plot, bad pacing shenanigans of the 80s cartoon series? Those of us who grew up with this cartoon are adults now, we shouldn't have to be stuck in the past and we should feel no shame or doubt our "love" for this genre by asking, even begging, for a good flick.
But I do enjoy the squabbling between fans who get their panties in a bunch when someone has a different opinion, scathing or glorifying, its always good for a chuckle.
As they say, bad publicity is still publicity.
T-man5000 wrote:I know I made a review before, but I just wanna narrow what bothered me the most. Indeed it was a good movie filled with action, but just felt empty without knowing the Transformers (other than Optimus and BB). I just wanna see it become like one of the new Batman movies(i'm not comparing it to batman) where you have both a great story line and action-packed movie. I don't know why, but I think the Third movie has the potential to make people speechless( in a good way), kinda like Lord of the Rings. I really think Bay and Co.(I know I sound crazy) can make a movie that make has a solid plot and continues with their awesome action and visual for the next movie. All's I suggest is to leave the writers to do their job with the help of Speilberg and leave Bay to all the action and directing to the movie next time.
Return to Transformers Live Action Film Forum
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Bumblevivisector, Cheetron, Emerje, Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, kuhlio, MSN [Bot], Yahoo [Bot], Ziusundra