Burn wrote:robofreak doesn't joke. He's all about the serious business of the internet.
ItIsHim wrote:My closet is filled to the brim with plastic children's toys. For myself
Nekoman wrote:More and more people are getting into this hobby because of the movie and more recently Universe. Add to that, the Unicron trilogy toys were all, great figures from a time where you did not need to spend hours in the toy isle finding the one, with the most decent paint applications. Or in other words, these toys were genuine quality and that’s proven by their rising value.
That’d be my guess.
Burn wrote:robofreak doesn't joke. He's all about the serious business of the internet.
ItIsHim wrote:My closet is filled to the brim with plastic children's toys. For myself
DeathAura wrote:I wouldn't vote for the trilogy's alleged QC perfection.
Counterpunch wrote:DeathAura wrote:I wouldn't vote for the trilogy's alleged QC perfection.
I would.
In 4 years of AEC toys I can count on one hand the number of toys I had to return due to QC issues on one hand.
I returned that many toys in the past month in regards to Universe alone.
DeathAura wrote:I wouldn't vote for the trilogy's alleged QC perfection.
Energon Superion anyone? Superlink Superion had the same problem.
I have also heard of Energon Wingsabre having two left or right fists. I'm having difficulty remembering other issues off the top of my head at the moment.
Overcracker wrote:DeathAura wrote:I wouldn't vote for the trilogy's alleged QC perfection.
Energon Superion anyone? Superlink Superion had the same problem.
I have also heard of Energon Wingsabre having two left or right fists. I'm having difficulty remembering other issues off the top of my head at the moment.
Superion's issue is not QC related, its more a design flaw than anything else. Its not like you are going to find one without the Problem.
Overcracker wrote:As for the figures in those lines, they where good fun toys. With cool features.
DeathAura wrote:
I have also heard of Energon Wingsabre having two left or right fists. I'm having difficulty remembering other issues off the top of my head at the moment.
Burn wrote:robofreak doesn't joke. He's all about the serious business of the internet.
ItIsHim wrote:My closet is filled to the brim with plastic children's toys. For myself
robofreak wrote:DeathAura wrote:
I have also heard of Energon Wingsabre having two left or right fists. I'm having difficulty remembering other issues off the top of my head at the moment.
My Wing Saber was just fine.
Lapse Of Reason wrote:
I cannot explain the rising prices for figures like Leobreaker. I passed by so many of them on toy aisles and I kick myself a bit on the inside each time someone brings up this figure. Same thing with Cybertron Galvatron.
DeathAura wrote:Overcracker wrote:DeathAura wrote:I wouldn't vote for the trilogy's alleged QC perfection.
Energon Superion anyone? Superlink Superion had the same problem.
I have also heard of Energon Wingsabre having two left or right fists. I'm having difficulty remembering other issues off the top of my head at the moment.
Superion's issue is not QC related, its more a design flaw than anything else. Its not like you are going to find one without the Problem.
Okay, fair enough. For the sake of debate however, do design flaws not also fall under the umbrella of quality control/issues?
Overcracker wrote:DeathAura wrote:I wouldn't vote for the trilogy's alleged QC perfection.
Energon Superion anyone? Superlink Superion had the same problem.
I have also heard of Energon Wingsabre having two left or right fists. I'm having difficulty remembering other issues off the top of my head at the moment.
Superion's issue is not QC related, its more a design flaw than anything else. Its not like you are going to find one without the Problem.
As for the figures in those lines, they where good fun toys. With cool features.
They are also now part of TF history and lore. So people tend to want them more.
So yeah prices are kind of out of whack.
Heck even Online stores such as BBTS want ridiculous prices for A/E/C stuff. BBTS has an Energon Wing Saber going for 100 bucks.
DeathAura wrote:Lapse Of Reason wrote:
I cannot explain the rising prices for figures like Leobreaker. I passed by so many of them on toy aisles and I kick myself a bit on the inside each time someone brings up this figure. Same thing with Cybertron Galvatron.
Oh man. I recall seeing a few cybertron galvatrons also, and had a really hard time justifying shelling out another $40 at a time i didn't have much money for another megatron repaint, and this, at the time, was just after armada. Armada's galvatron repaint wasn't a big deal at all seemingly, and so i extrapolated that to the next galvatron of the energon line. Though now, I, like you, kick myself over that too.
Counterpunch wrote:Here's what I really think happened to push the value of AEC toys through the roof: Classics.
Prior to Classics there were a lot of fans who were content to leave AEC toys alone. They were the 'kiddie' brand when compared to Alts, G1, reissues, etc.
What Classics did for the collectors out there was show that the modern designs worked and that the toys could be brightly colored and entirely plastic, yet still be really cool. This in turn caused them to say, 'well, now what else did I miss out on?'
AEC did a lot to release toys that would appeal to collectors, however, almost all of those toys were done in significantly smaller runs.
Add up the following: 2-5 year time gap, growing popularity, original limited availability, and the fact that these toys were sold to kids (meaning that many were actually broken or thrown away eventually, leading to even less availability)...and you get a formula very, very similar to the reasons why G1 became so expensive.
It's one of those things about collecting; nothing that says "Limited Edition" or "Collector's Edition" ever really becomes really more expensive than it originally was. It's the things no one expects and so no one keeps around that become expensive and valuable.
Lapse Of Reason wrote:Counterpunch wrote:Here's what I really think happened to push the value of AEC toys through the roof: Classics.
Prior to Classics there were a lot of fans who were content to leave AEC toys alone. They were the 'kiddie' brand when compared to Alts, G1, reissues, etc.
What Classics did for the collectors out there was show that the modern designs worked and that the toys could be brightly colored and entirely plastic, yet still be really cool. This in turn caused them to say, 'well, now what else did I miss out on?'
AEC did a lot to release toys that would appeal to collectors, however, almost all of those toys were done in significantly smaller runs.
Add up the following: 2-5 year time gap, growing popularity, original limited availability, and the fact that these toys were sold to kids (meaning that many were actually broken or thrown away eventually, leading to even less availability)...and you get a formula very, very similar to the reasons why G1 became so expensive.
It's one of those things about collecting; nothing that says "Limited Edition" or "Collector's Edition" ever really becomes really more expensive than it originally was. It's the things no one expects and so no one keeps around that become expensive and valuable.
You have a point here.
I can see people getting into Classics, then looking at previous lines to fill in some gaps. For example, Energon Downshift, E. Galvatron, E. Shockblast, LeoBreaker (Leo Prime), etc... Basically any that could be put on the shelf with classics and fit in.
Delicon wrote:I agree that Classics did a lot to bring people back to the hobby, but you also have to look at the fact that transformers in general are more popular than they ever have been... [snip]
Return to Transformers Toys Discussion
Registered users: Apple [Bot], Bing [Bot], ChatGPT [Bot], FireRoad, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], MSN [Bot], OpenAI [Bot], W3C [Validator], Yahoo [Bot], Yandex [Bot]