Chris McFeely wrote:This, I won't argue with. At least as regards Thundercracker, Dirge and Ramjet - they feel very "traditional," and seem like something that should have a wider release. I'm on the side of anyone who expresses that emotion - but at the same time, one needs to understand that it was the con, or for them to not exist at all.
Believing that the non-attendee package should be cheaper, though? You hush, chile.
Err, believing the non-attending price should still be considerably marked-up but not as much as the Con is unreasonable? Sorry, can't agree there chief. While I understand that the convention exclusive couldn't ever be as cheap as they would be as individual releases in stores, thinking that it's A-OKAY to expect those who can't attend to pay for all the stuff they can't attend is equally ridiculous.
While *I* couldn't justify even $200 dollars for the set, still over a 200% markup, it'd be a lot more reasonable for pretty much everyone involved.
Making it the sameprice is basically asking for those of us who can't/don't want to attend to help pay for everyone elses fun. Which is even more of a slap in the face.
And yes, reading the entire thread helps. No one said anything about the Non-attendee price until after the fact someone tried to use the non-attending price as a justification for a vastly desired toy like Thundercracker being a con exclusive.