The Energon Pub

by **JaAm** » Tue Jan 13, 2009 8:33 pm

OK, so anyone who hasn't yet already, take a good long look at the wikipedia featured article for 1/13/09.

Now then, for those who have looked or already know, they (name ommitted due to rules one and two) are raging like I have never seen before. This violates their first two, most sacred rules, which has them up in arms.

So my question to you is, do you think that this will get ugly, or will just blow over? Some pages on wikipedia have already been vandalized out of wrath. Is this a serious threat?

News Credits: 5 · by **Sledge** » Tue Jan 13, 2009 9:00 pm

... what?

[zero-kaiser's YouTube Channel] · by **zero-kaiser** » Tue Jan 13, 2009 9:18 pm

yeah.. Im with Sledge on this one.. unless were both missing something that should be very very obvious..

...what?

by **AfterImage** » Tue Jan 13, 2009 10:49 pm

I'm with the rest of the English speaking world on this one. So, uhm...huh? :???:

EDIT: Oh, I see.

...This is news?

News Credits: 402 · by **Mkall** » Tue Jan 13, 2009 11:06 pm

can someone please explain this so that we who aren't familiar can chime in?

News Credits: 7 · by **Roadbuster** » Tue Jan 13, 2009 11:17 pm

JaAm wrote:OK, so anyone who hasn't yet already, take a good long look at the wikipedia featured article for 1/13/09.

Now then, for those who have looked or already know, they (name ommitted due to rules one and two) are raging like I have never seen before. This violates their first two, most sacred rules, which has them up in arms.

So my question to you is, do you think that this will get ugly, or will just blow over? Some pages on wikipedia have already been vandalized out of wrath. Is this a serious threat?

You can't expect everyone to know what you're talking about. Nobody here is a mind reader, from what we know. You started the thread, please be more specific as to what you're talking about.

News Credits: 49 · by **Senor Hugo** » Tue Jan 13, 2009 11:20 pm

Ok, what is the big deal? And honestly who gives a flying flip about 4chan anyway?

News Credits: 1 · by **Venomous Prime** » Wed Jan 14, 2009 1:16 am

Who cares?

News Credits: 226 · by **Burn** » Wed Jan 14, 2009 3:10 am

original sin wrote:Who cares?

JaAm does.

News Credits: 1 · by **Jeep?** » Wed Jan 14, 2009 3:24 am

Oy. Sitch in a nutshell:
4chan is the featured article on Wikipedia for today (14th January).
4chan's userbase does not like Wikipedia.
4chan's users make a point of invading other sites from time to time.
Don't rely on Wikipedia being of any use to you today.

News Credits: 127 · by **Counterpunch** » Wed Jan 14, 2009 8:39 am

I <3 4Chan.

-Anon

News Credits: 5 · by **Sledge** » Wed Jan 14, 2009 11:07 am

I was hoping that this would be far more interesting than it turned out. People vandalising Wikipedia?

I'm shocked to my core.

by **Jazz Reborn** » Wed Jan 14, 2009 4:49 pm

Senor Hugo wrote:Ok, what is the big deal? And honestly who gives a flying flip about 4chan anyway?

What the hell is 4chan?

News Credits: 1 · by **Scatterlung** » Wed Jan 14, 2009 6:31 pm

Rules One and Two only apply during raids.

Also, 4Chan has accomplished very little of much use so I don't think we owe them the favour of adhering to those rules.

And so what? Everybody knows abut 4Chan. And nobody cares either way.

It's just a big site with a bunch of people who have a bunch of in-jokes.

In-jokes that we're all pretty much aware of anyway.

And they made it to the Wiki front page. Big deal. They're just gonna bitch and whine about it then forget about it and find something else to be mad about.

Like Me, Grimlock! on Facebook · by **Me, Grimlock!** » Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:54 am

Why would 4chan making it to the front page of Wikipedia cause peoplea t 4chan to vandalize Wikipedia? I don't think I know the whole story.

News Credits: 5 · by **Sledge** » Thu Jan 15, 2009 11:38 am

You just don't know 4Chan.

You lucky bastard.

by **Blast Cannon** » Thu Jan 15, 2009 11:49 am

News Credits: 9 · by **Editor** » Thu Jan 15, 2009 11:54 am

Sledge wrote:You just don't know 4Chan.

[desu]There are many times I wish I didn't know about 4Chan.[/desudesu]

News Credits: 38 · by **TheMuffin** » Thu Jan 15, 2009 1:38 pm

Eh /toy/ is normally a nice place. Nostalgia, new info on stuff I shouldn't be buying from toy lines I have no idea about. Good times. The entire site gets a bad rap, but honestly most people and sections there are relatively normal. It's just that one section tends to bleed over and taint the others.

News Credits: 2 · by **Shadowman** » Thu Jan 15, 2009 3:44 pm

jazz reborn wrote:
Senor Hugo wrote:Ok, what is the big deal? And honestly who gives a flying flip about 4chan anyway?

What the hell is 4chan?

It's where every forum troll and obnoxious internet meme is born.

News Credits: 5 · by **Sledge** » Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:20 pm

No one can be told what 4chan is, you can only see it for yourself.

by **Robot4762** » Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:28 pm

It started the Caramelldancen fad. BIG DEAL!!! (seriously) It also started Weegee too.

News Credits: 9 · by **Editor** » Fri Jan 16, 2009 10:29 am

Sailor Cybertron 24 wrote:It started the Caramelldancen fad. BIG DEAL!!! (seriously) It also started Weegee too.

Really! Just those? Wow!

#-o

The power of /b/ goes far, FAR, beyond those. Oooh a couple fads, nothing compared to the some of the antiScientology stuff 4chan is responsible for, hell even the eBaum raid stuff is more important in the sphere of 4chan knowledge.

News Credits: 127 · by **Counterpunch** » Fri Jan 16, 2009 10:51 am

jazz reborn wrote:
Senor Hugo wrote:Ok, what is the big deal? And honestly who gives a flying flip about 4chan anyway?

What the hell is 4chan?

Internet Perfection

-Anon

by **Blast Cannon** » Fri Jan 16, 2009 1:25 pm

Okay, I'm clearly not up in my internet lore.

I demand a definitive list of fads and 'invasions' 4chan were responsible for including some explanation too because I can already tell I won't have a clue what you're talking about.