Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store














Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.
crashbarbarian wrote:1. The toy marketing and description on back of packaging
crashbarbarian wrote:But, so bay isn't "lying" he'll be named either Galvatron or "the fallen" but he's def in this movie!
Grimpoo wrote:They have mentioned that sam was seeing weird stuff like his grandfather. So maybe we were seeing a taste of that. Sam could be flipping out thinking meggy was gonna get him...then bam he snaps out of it and he is in his bed. idk but we will find out when the movie releases
Kaiser Convoy wrote:crashbarbarian wrote:1. The toy marketing and description on back of packagingcrashbarbarian wrote:But, so bay isn't "lying" he'll be named either Galvatron or "the fallen" but he's def in this movie!
ok umm just to point out that you've kinda contradicted yourself saying that megatron will be in the movie but he won't.
if it were to be galvatron, then hasbro would have released official packaging saying that it was galvatron, not megatron.
yes there appears to be evidence in the teaser trailer that it is megatron thats pinning sam down, but i wouldn't really run out and openly declare it yet that megs is indeed making a comeback... i would take it with a pinch of salt, but then again, thats just me
Archatron wrote:Kaiser Convoy wrote:crashbarbarian wrote:1. The toy marketing and description on back of packagingcrashbarbarian wrote:But, so bay isn't "lying" he'll be named either Galvatron or "the fallen" but he's def in this movie!
ok umm just to point out that you've kinda contradicted yourself saying that megatron will be in the movie but he won't.
if it were to be galvatron, then hasbro would have released official packaging saying that it was galvatron, not megatron.
yes there appears to be evidence in the teaser trailer that it is megatron thats pinning sam down, but i wouldn't really run out and openly declare it yet that megs is indeed making a comeback... i would take it with a pinch of salt, but then again, thats just me
Why all the toy boxart, toys, and whatnot if he WASN'T going to be in the movie?? He's going to be in it and it's been pretty much confirmed already for around a month or better.
Kaiser Convoy wrote:Archatron wrote:Why all the toy boxart, toys, and whatnot if he WASN'T going to be in the movie?? He's going to be in it and it's been pretty much confirmed already for around a month or better.
why the box art n toys? simple.. money, theres been a lot of that, even for characters that havent appeared in the first movie that have had their names used on remoulds and repaints...
i mean megatron is a staple name for hasbro for transformers, so if they dont give him a new form and keep the name every so often, the name comes up for renewal and they can loose it... how do you think instead of shockwave we got lazerwave or shockblast? its all about keeping the franchise going and keeping the names of what they have - thats why they would do it
St. Even wrote:It has already been pointed out that Sam would not dream about a Megatron he has never seen so I will skip over that. The other damning point is the money involved in designing a character. I cannot see how the film could shell out the bread to have a reformated Megatron in a dream sequence. It does not make financial cents. (pun intended)
autobot commander wrote:I just hope that megatron doesn't have a name change because thats what my teacher said, he said he would be galvatron and i was like " no. wtf no hes not."
Saber Prime wrote:As I said in another topic, toys and box art doesn't mean a damn thing.
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:Saber Prime wrote:As I said in another topic, toys and box art doesn't mean a damn thing.
And as i said on thay same topic.....it depends on the subject at hand.
Althou I tend to agree with what your trying to say.
The exsistance of a "Fallen" toy [or Megatron or any toy] in the movie line is not evidence that the character will be in the movie as a fact.
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Shadowman wrote:Do you think a toy marked as The Fallen could be Megatron?
Shadowman wrote:So far, the only thing close to evidence that Megatron might be returning is the toy,
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
Return to Transformers Live Action Film Forum
Registered users: Bing [Bot], chuckdawg1999, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], molleking, MSN [Bot], Yahoo [Bot], Ziusundra