Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store













Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
No offense but that's a very shallow reason.MightyMagnus78 wrote:so on that basis I'd have to say Animated is my least favourite show, for no other reason than I don't really like the character design.
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
Sabrblade wrote:No offense but that's a very shallow reason.MightyMagnus78 wrote:so on that basis I'd have to say Animated is my least favourite show, for no other reason than I don't really like the character design.
Sabrblade wrote:No offense but that's a very shallow reason.MightyMagnus78 wrote:so on that basis I'd have to say Animated is my least favourite show, for no other reason than I don't really like the character design.
I mean, isn't it a little... prejudiced to judge something based entirely on its outward appearance? What about the plot development? Character development? The writing? The acting? The scripting? The effort put into it? Some things are worth looking a little deeper into.Burn wrote:Sabrblade wrote:No offense but that's a very shallow reason.MightyMagnus78 wrote:so on that basis I'd have to say Animated is my least favourite show, for no other reason than I don't really like the character design.
Why is it shallow?
I can't stand the aesthetic of Animated either.
Does that make me shallow as well?
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
Burn wrote:Sabrblade wrote:No offense but that's a very shallow reason.MightyMagnus78 wrote:so on that basis I'd have to say Animated is my least favourite show, for no other reason than I don't really like the character design.
Why is it shallow?
I can't stand the aesthetic of Animated either.
Does that make me shallow as well?
Sabrblade wrote:I mean, isn't it a little... prejudiced to judge something based entirely on its outward appearance? What about the plot development? Character development? The writing? The acting? The scripting? The effort put into it? Some things are worth looking a little deeper into.Burn wrote:Sabrblade wrote:No offense but that's a very shallow reason.MightyMagnus78 wrote:so on that basis I'd have to say Animated is my least favourite show, for no other reason than I don't really like the character design.
Why is it shallow?
I can't stand the aesthetic of Animated either.
Does that make me shallow as well?
Now, I'm not say that you, Burn, have not looked beneath the surface of Animated's looks, but rather that MightyMagnus78 implies that he hasn't. If I'm wrong on this, then well, to each his own, I guess.
But my point still stands that it's what's on the inside that counts as much as (if not more than) just what's on the outside.
But we are nerds, here. Looking deeper into seemingly unimportant things is what we do. That's why we have such topics like "FIRRIB vs. RIRFIB", "Who is G1 Cyclonus?", "1986 movie vs. Bay movies", "The origins of the G1 Constructicons", "The nature of Multiversal Singularities", "Canons and Continuities", etc. etc.MightyMagnus78 wrote:Sabrblade wrote:I mean, isn't it a little... prejudiced to judge something based entirely on its outward appearance? What about the plot development? Character development? The writing? The acting? The scripting? The effort put into it? Some things are worth looking a little deeper into.Burn wrote:Sabrblade wrote:No offense but that's a very shallow reason.MightyMagnus78 wrote:so on that basis I'd have to say Animated is my least favourite show, for no other reason than I don't really like the character design.
Why is it shallow?
I can't stand the aesthetic of Animated either.
Does that make me shallow as well?
Now, I'm not say that you, Burn, have not looked beneath the surface of Animated's looks, but rather that MightyMagnus78 implies that he hasn't. If I'm wrong on this, then well, to each his own, I guess.
But my point still stands that it's what's on the inside that counts as much as (if not more than) just what's on the outside.
It's a cartoon show that you watch on TV not a human being FFS, I can hardly hurt its feelings now can I?
Just because I don't like Animated's rather specific/unique style of aesthetic design doesn't make me a shallow person.
At the end of the day its just a product, produced by a company to make money, like a camera, or a phone or even a car. Visually this particular product fails to appeal to me, and therefore I feel my original comment is justified.
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
Sabrblade wrote:But we are nerds, here. Looking deeper into seemingly unimportant things is what we do. That's why we have such topics like "FIRRIB vs. RIRFIB", "Who is G1 Cyclonus?", "1986 movie vs. Bay movies", "The origins of the G1 Constructicons", "The nature of Multiversal Singularities", "Canons and Continuities", etc. etc.MightyMagnus78 wrote:Sabrblade wrote:I mean, isn't it a little... prejudiced to judge something based entirely on its outward appearance? What about the plot development? Character development? The writing? The acting? The scripting? The effort put into it? Some things are worth looking a little deeper into.Burn wrote:Sabrblade wrote:No offense but that's a very shallow reason.MightyMagnus78 wrote:so on that basis I'd have to say Animated is my least favourite show, for no other reason than I don't really like the character design.
Why is it shallow?
I can't stand the aesthetic of Animated either.
Does that make me shallow as well?
Now, I'm not say that you, Burn, have not looked beneath the surface of Animated's looks, but rather that MightyMagnus78 implies that he hasn't. If I'm wrong on this, then well, to each his own, I guess.
But my point still stands that it's what's on the inside that counts as much as (if not more than) just what's on the outside.
It's a cartoon show that you watch on TV not a human being FFS, I can hardly hurt its feelings now can I?
Just because I don't like Animated's rather specific/unique style of aesthetic design doesn't make me a shallow person.
At the end of the day its just a product, produced by a company to make money, like a camera, or a phone or even a car. Visually this particular product fails to appeal to me, and therefore I feel my original comment is justified.
As fanatic nerds, we go beneath the surface of mere product and use our intellect to obtain a better understanding of it all. If we really enjoy something, we tend to want to know more about it and thus go exploring further into it. That is what separates us from the casual fans who aren't as into the Transformers brand as we are.
That, I can accept, yes. It's the reasons behind one's opinion that matter the most.MightyMagnus78 wrote:Can you please just except that I don't like Animated?
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
Sabrblade wrote:Though, now that I think about, I don't think I've actually gotten to asking this: Have you given the series a fair viewing chance? Or, did its looks turn you off enough to just skip over it?
In that case, since you have seen it all and genuinely did not enjoy it, there's nothing wrong with that. It's your opinion and you have given acceptable reasons to back it.Burn wrote:I personally watched the whole damn thing. I sat through and endured the animation style which I detest, the annoying human characters (except Fanzone, I liked him), and some of the worst jokes i've ever heard.
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
Return to Transformers Cartoons and Comics Forum
Registered users: Bing [Bot], figureguy, Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, Hero Alpha, MSN [Bot], Sabrblade, Yahoo [Bot], Ziusundra