Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store














Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.
EnergonPrimeRules wrote:First, you call him a bay hater when he hasnt said anything bad about bay
Sheogorath wrote:What I don't get is why people are talking about this like it's even an issue? Are you people going on about deep and meaningful plots just trying to sound smart, or are you genuinely disappointed by the prospect of Transformers being an action movie?
Well not in this case, but I know it might've come across that way. I'm not insulting Bay, what he does he does very well, and this film was perfect for him. If they'd hired Vincent Gallo to do it, then I might've expected a pretty deep and meaningful story, the problem is that Transformers isn't right for that, and plus Gallo's Buffalo '66 was HORRIBLY boring (yet I loved it so I don't know). The point is, I don't hate Bay, and I'm not talking down to action films or anything. I'm just setting aside the 'deep and meaningful' because it's not a concern here, which leaves us with just the action to think about, and we've seen already the action is pretty cool. I don't hate Bay, nor action films. He's suited for the Transformers genre, I honestly don't think someone like, say, David Fincher could pull off better.Burn wrote:No. You don't say? So that whole "All Bay does is make action flicks" wasn't meant in an insulting manner? Because that's how it's always come off when the hundreds of other Bay haters have said it.
Meverix wrote:Sheogorath wrote:What I don't get is why people are talking about this like it's even an issue? Are you people going on about deep and meaningful plots just trying to sound smart, or are you genuinely disappointed by the prospect of Transformers being an action movie?
Okay, going to try straighten this out. I'm not disappointed, I can appreciate an action flick like any other person. It doesn't have a deep plot, I say that because it doesn't (at least not what I would consider deep), but I didn't say that in an insulting manner. As I said, I like action films too, and Bay is THE guy for action films. I'm not going to be disappointed because all I'm expecting is an above-average action movie with giant ****ing robots beating the snot out of each other, that's pretty damn awesome.Well not in this case, but I know it might've come across that way. I'm not insulting Bay, what he does he does very well, and this film was perfect for him. If they'd hired Vincent Gallo to do it, then I might've expected a pretty deep and meaningful story, the problem is that Transformers isn't right for that, and plus Gallo's Buffalo '66 was HORRIBLY boring (yet I loved it so I don't know). The point is, I don't hate Bay, and I'm not talking down to action films or anything. I'm just setting aside the 'deep and meaningful' because it's not a concern here, which leaves us with just the action to think about, and we've seen already the action is pretty cool. I don't hate Bay, nor action films. He's suited for the Transformers genre, I honestly don't think someone like, say, David Fincher could pull off better.Burn wrote:No. You don't say? So that whole "All Bay does is make action flicks" wasn't meant in an insulting manner? Because that's how it's always come off when the hundreds of other Bay haters have said it.
Now hopefully things are cleared up
Meverix wrote:If they'd hired Vincent Gallo to do it, then I might've expected a pretty deep and meaningful story, the problem is that Transformers isn't right for that,
Sheogorath wrote:What I don't get is why people are talking about this like it's even an issue? Are you people going on about deep and meaningful plots just trying to sound smart, or are you genuinely disappointed by the prospect of Transformers being an action movie?
Starscreams bad comedy wrote:Sheogorath wrote:What I don't get is why people are talking about this like it's even an issue? Are you people going on about deep and meaningful plots just trying to sound smart, or are you genuinely disappointed by the prospect of Transformers being an action movie?
Because after we have all seen the "cool" new jagged bot designs transform in all their CG splendor for the 34268346 time and blow stuff up, it will kind of, you know, loose its impact and all that will be left is the poor script/plot and cardboard characterizations.
Sheogorath wrote:edit: btw, were you honestly expecting more from what is not only a Hollywood summer blockbuster, but a Hollywood blockbuster based on a children's cartoon from the 80's?
Autobot City wrote:Er, no offence Kronos mate, but the Spiderman Movies we're pretty much plot no brainers, Lord of the Rings, well, I'm going to go out on a limb here and suggest that not many kids read it and the ones that do don't understand a word of it, and Pirates Didnt -really- have that good a plot. The word play was fairly decent, but plot? Please.
Spiderman succeeded because it looked good. X-men succeeded because it looked GOOD. Pirates Succeeded because it was amusing. No idea why LOTR succeeded, it was a load of homoerotic pants, probably because it looked pretty and Orlando Bloom is the Worlds Biggest Metrosexual and the wimmin loved it.
TF will succeed because it's a big explody action film. Its got the FX, it's got noise. Frankly, Id be a little disappointed if they tried to assail me with a complicated storyline. I just want to see Robots beating the snot out of each other for 2 hours, cobbled together with a paper thin plot, and explosions that will make my eyes and ears bleed for days.
I think, if you expect much more, you're going to be disappointed.
Sheogorath wrote:Kronos, those movies you mentioned didn't have deep, substantial plots, they had exciting plots, and that's what's important here.
I'm just mystified by people who are railing the movie for being a 'switch off your brain popcorn flick' as if there was any possibility of it being anything else. As if they associate Transformers with high-brow, soul nourishing art![]()
I mean seriously people, are you used to having your brain 'switched on' while watching children's cartoons? Are you really that dumb?
edit: forgot to say, if you're saying the plot sucks because you think it's going to be boring and not because it's going to be 'dumbed down', then none of my posts here are aimed at you
Kronos wrote:Sheogorath wrote:Kronos, those movies you mentioned didn't have deep, substantial plots, they had exciting plots, and that's what's important here.
I'm just mystified by people who are railing the movie for being a 'switch off your brain popcorn flick' as if there was any possibility of it being anything else. As if they associate Transformers with high-brow, soul nourishing art![]()
I mean seriously people, are you used to having your brain 'switched on' while watching children's cartoons? Are you really that dumb?
edit: forgot to say, if you're saying the plot sucks because you think it's going to be boring and not because it's going to be 'dumbed down', then none of my posts here are aimed at you
I think you said it best. I want an exciting plot. I'm not looking for highbrow art, but something to make me care about the characters.
As far as my brain being switched on watching cartoons, there are some that you can watch that have good plots (Batman: The Animated Series for example).
Return to Transformers Live Action Film Forum
Registered users: AdsBot [Google], Bing [Bot], Bumblevivisector, Cheetron, Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, Jelze Bunnycat, kuhlio, MSN [Bot], Silver Wind, Yahoo [Bot], Zordon