The Energon Pub

In 1950, The Ark is on a routine mission in space. They are attacked by Decepticons and the ship is damaged badly and on collision towards the moon. Before it crashes, Sentinel gives his 2nd in command, Silverbolt, something crucial to the war effort and has him exit the ship so the Decepticons won't get it. Silverbolt does this and moments later The Ark crashes.
Silverbolt travels to earth and crash lands. The impact of the landing puts him in stasis in his cybertronian vehicle mode. He is later found by Government Officials in the Nevada desert and taken to an Area 51 base. (This would explain the alien landing controversy)
Now it's 1969, Astronauts arrive on the moon and discover the ark. Sentinel awakens from his stasis and comes across the humans. Sentinel flies off in his cybertronian flying vehicle. He sets off to search the galaxy for Silverbolt. This proves difficult however since he can't pick up his signature.
He finally arrives on earth in 2011 with the Wreckers (whom he came across while searching space). He meets up with Optimus and the gang and they begin searching for Silverbolt and the item.

Please let me know what you guys think. Hope you found it interesting.

First off there are no flying Autobots, so Silverbolt would not be an Autobot, he would be a seeker, like Jetfire said that there were more "seekers" out there.

Secondly, you're missing Dreadbox and "Q".

Finally, I seriously doubt that. If he awakens in 1969 I believe he would be on Earth already, considering that look of his Fire Truck mode it looks like something from the 70s.

But we'll see 7/1/2011...

It is a good theory but I also doubt that it is true. I think if Silverbolt was in the movie we would have heard about it. But kudos for coming up with it. I'm not really sure what causes the Ark to crash. I wonder if when Megatron went after the cube, Sentinel Prime went after Megatron? Maybe Megatron shot down Sentinel's ship? (Yes that that is a long shot giving the size of Sentinel's ship). Or maybe he came out of space bridge jump and landed up on the moon?

Gyrotron wrote: First off there are no flying Autobots,

Umm... Say's who?

Gyrotron wrote:so Silverbolt would not be an Autobot, he would be a seeker, like Jetfire said that there were more "seekers" out there.

It's very plausable he is a seeker. Especially if he turns out to be the Space shuttle like many are speculating.

Gyrotron wrote:Finally, I seriously doubt that. If he awakens in 1969 I believe he would be on Earth already, considering that look of his Fire Truck mode it looks like something from the 70s.

But we'll see 7/1/2011...

70's"? Really? His fire truck mode is that of a brand new Ronsenbauer airport fire truck. his design is not hat of an average fire truck because its designed to work on air fields. They are all wheel drive, (4x4, 6x6, or 8x8), designed to move and manuvure at high speeds, and have good front visablitiy.

5150 Cruiser wrote:

Gyrotron wrote: First off there are no flying Autobots,

Umm... Say's who?

Gyrotron wrote:so Silverbolt would not be an Autobot, he would be a seeker, like Jetfire said that there were more "seekers" out there.

It's very plausable he is a seeker. Especially if he turns out to be the Space shuttle like many are speculating.

Gyrotron wrote:Finally, I seriously doubt that. If he awakens in 1969 I believe he would be on Earth already, considering that look of his Fire Truck mode it looks like something from the 70s.

But we'll see 7/1/2011...

70's"? Really? His fire truck mode is that of a brand new Ronsenbauer airport fire truck. his design is not hat of an average fire truck because its designed to work on air fields. They are all wheel drive, (4x4, 6x6, or 8x8), designed to move and manuvure at high speeds, and have good front visablitiy.

BeastWarsFTW wrote:It is a good theory but I also doubt that it is true. I think if Silverbolt was in the movie we would have heard about it.

We have heard about it. It was confirmed earlier last year that James Avery would be voicing Silverbolt. Its not surpising that we haven't heard much more info concidering shots of an aircraft are going to be much more limited than that of a vehicle. At this point the only "aircfraft' that we've seen has been the Space shuttle. This is why many are speculating the space shuttle to be Silverbolt.

5150 Cruiser wrote:

Gyrotron wrote: First off there are no flying Autobots,

Umm... Say's who?

Gyrotron wrote:so Silverbolt would not be an Autobot, he would be a seeker, like Jetfire said that there were more "seekers" out there.

It's very plausable he is a seeker. Especially if he turns out to be the Space shuttle like many are speculating.

Gyrotron wrote:Finally, I seriously doubt that. If he awakens in 1969 I believe he would be on Earth already, considering that look of his Fire Truck mode it looks like something from the 70s.

But we'll see 7/1/2011...

70's"? Really? His fire truck mode is that of a brand new Ronsenbauer airport fire truck. his design is not hat of an average fire truck because its designed to work on air fields. They are all wheel drive, (4x4, 6x6, or 8x8), designed to move and manuvure at high speeds, and have good front visablitiy.

Quote #1: Says the Bayverse movies.
Quote #2: No, Silverbolt is NOT the fricken ARK if that's what you're talking about
Quote #3: Excuse me if I don't look up vehicles like an extreme automobile nerd. And seriously, too much information on freakin' crappy Fire Truck

Gyrotron wrote: Quote #1: Says the Bayverse movies.

Has this been quoted anywhere? And if thats true then how do you explain Jet Fire? (Yes, i realize that he switched sides, but he was an Autobot.)

Gyrotron wrote:Quote #2: No, Silverbolt is NOT the fricken ARK if that's what you're talking about

Where did I ever say anything about the Ark? They filmed at Kennedy Space Center and the Space Shuttle was filmed.

Gyrotron wrote:Quote #3: Excuse me if I don't look up vehicles like an extreme automobile nerd. And seriously, too much information on freakin' crappy Fire Truck

1.- I know the information concerning the fire engine because I work on them for a living. So if that qualifies me as "An extreme automobile nerd" then fine. I'm doing what i love and have been making a decent living out of it.

2.-Dude,.. your on a forum dedicated to children's toys based on transforming robots, and your trying to belittle someone who knows/has more information than you on a given subject by calling them an "nerd". Really? Where all nerds to some extent here. Let me guess, your 15, maybe 16? Just cause you were corrected on your info, and you failed to read someones post correctly doesn't warrant that type of response. Relax and go play some Black Ops.

5150 Cruiser wrote:

Gyrotron wrote: Quote #1: Says the Bayverse movies.

Has this been quoted anywhere? And if thats true then how do you explain Jet Fire? (Yes, i realize that he switched sides, but he was an Autobot.)

Gyrotron wrote:Quote #2: No, Silverbolt is NOT the fricken ARK if that's what you're talking about

Where did I ever say anything about the Ark? They filmed at Kennedy Space Center and the Space Shuttle was filmed.

Gyrotron wrote:Quote #3: Excuse me if I don't look up vehicles like an extreme automobile nerd. And seriously, too much information on freakin' crappy Fire Truck

1.- I know the information concerning the fire engine because I work on them for a living. So if that qualifies me as "An extreme automobile nerd" then fine. I'm doing what i love and have been making a decent living out of it.

2.-Dude,.. your on a forum dedicated to children's toys based on transforming robots, and your trying to belittle someone who knows/has more information than you on a given subject by calling them an "nerd". Really? Where all nerds to some extent here. Let me guess, your 15, maybe 16? Just cause you were corrected on your info, and you failed to read someones post correctly doesn't warrant that type of response. Relax and go play some Black Ops.

Quote #1: So is Silverbolt but Jetfire was originally be a decepticon, therefore making him a Decepticon in his origin. I have this same idea put together with Silverbolt.

Quote #2: Then be more specific when you say shuttle because currently many are saying the Ark is a shuttle because it is.

Quote #3 part 1: Ok, so?

Quote #3 part 2: 14, close. And don't start a flame war or you can READ MAH SIGGEH. Allow me to copy for you: (Not in same color) "I see you, posting your threads, and think: What a loser. Why do I think so? Because you make absolutely no sense" ~Gyrotron's message to flamers and spammers.

5150 Cruiser wrote:

Gyrotron wrote: Quote #1: Says the Bayverse movies.

Has this been quoted anywhere? And if thats true then how do you explain Jet Fire? (Yes, i realize that he switched sides, but he was an Autobot.)

Gyrotron wrote:Quote #2: No, Silverbolt is NOT the fricken ARK if that's what you're talking about

Where did I ever say anything about the Ark? They filmed at Kennedy Space Center and the Space Shuttle was filmed.

Gyrotron wrote:Quote #3: Excuse me if I don't look up vehicles like an extreme automobile nerd. And seriously, too much information on freakin' crappy Fire Truck

1.- I know the information concerning the fire engine because I work on them for a living. So if that qualifies me as "An extreme automobile nerd" then fine. I'm doing what i love and have been making a decent living out of it.

2.-Dude,.. your on a forum dedicated to children's toys based on transforming robots, and your trying to belittle someone who knows/has more information than you on a given subject by calling them an "nerd". Really? Where all nerds to some extent here. Let me guess, your 15, maybe 16? Just cause you were corrected on your info, and you failed to read someones post correctly doesn't warrant that type of response. Relax and go play some Black Ops.

1. im afraid jetfire was never an autobot, he fought on their side alright, but the clue is on his insignia

2. Again do you have to be patronising to everyone who argues with you. So what if he is 15 or 16, surely that means you can be bigger more mature man and let it pass

3. Again you feel it necessary to insult people. You need to have a word with yourself because its becoming a common occurance

shamone wrote: 1. im afraid jetfire was never an autobot, he fought on their side alright, but the clue is on his insignia

2. Again do you have to be patronising to everyone who argues with you. So what if he is 15 or 16, surely that means you can be bigger more mature man and let it pass

3. Again you feel it necessary to insult people. You need to have a word with yourself because its becoming a common occurance

I'll have to disagree with.....nothing, you are absolutely right with everything.

Gyrotron wrote: Quote #1: So is Silverbolt but Jetfire was originally be a decepticon, therefore making him a Decepticon in his origin. I have this same idea put together with Silverbolt.

I said that. You obviously can't read.

Gyrotron wrote: Quote #2: Then be more specific when you say shuttle because currently many are saying the Ark is a shuttle because it is. .

If i meant Ark then i would have said that. Instead i said Space shuttle. And its rumored that Omega Supreme could possible be the Ark. Not Silverbolt

Gyrotron wrote:Quote #3 part 1: OK, so?

So? Thats why i know what i know about the given subject of the Fire truck.

Gyrotron wrote:Quote #3 part 2: 14, close. And don't start a flame war or you can READ MAH SIGGEH. Allow me to copy for you: (Not in same color) "I see you, posting your threads, and think: What a loser. Why do I think so? Because you make absolutely no sense" ~Gyrotron's message to flamers and spammers

Wow... You throw insults because you don't have your facts straight, then can't even give a decent response and accuse me of starting a flame war? You got problems kid. But thats fine. Continue to make yourself look how your acting. Stupid.

5150 Cruiser wrote:

Gyrotron wrote: Quote #1: So is Silverbolt but Jetfire was originally be a decepticon, therefore making him a Decepticon in his origin. I have this same idea put together with Silverbolt.

I said that. You obviously can't read.

Gyrotron wrote: Quote #2: Then be more specific when you say shuttle because currently many are saying the Ark is a shuttle because it is. .

If i meant Ark then i would have said that. Instead i said Space shuttle. And its rumored that Omega Supreme could possible be the Ark. Not Silverbolt

Gyrotron wrote:Quote #3 part 1: OK, so?

So? Thats why i know what i know about the given subject of the Fire truck.

Gyrotron wrote:Quote #3 part 2: 14, close. And don't start a flame war or you can READ MAH SIGGEH. Allow me to copy for you: (Not in same color) "I see you, posting your threads, and think: What a loser. Why do I think so? Because you make absolutely no sense" ~Gyrotron's message to flamers and spammers

Wow... You throw insults because you don't have your facts straight, then can't even give a decent response and accuse me of starting a flame war? You got problems kid. But thats fine. Continue to make yourself look how your acting. Stupid.

You're the one making a fool of yourself, just because someone doesn't agree with you, you have the nerve to call them stupid. Hehe, YOU have problems. I think Skids put it second best when he said in ROTF: Why dont you get a haircut with yo b***h a**. Who said it best? Shamone when he said to you:

shamone wrote:3. Again you feel it necessary to insult people. You need to have a word with yourself because its becoming a common occurance

So, in the words of your signature, Com in get yo ice cream!.... And then get yo a** whop'in!!

BTW WRONG QUOTE. It's supposed to be "Com and get yo ice cream!...Any bad robots out there better get ready for an a** whoopin'"

I have my own personal opinion on you, 5150 Cruiser, and it's that you need to calm down, take a break from the computer, go OUTSIDE, eat a sandwhich, and then come back and think of some better insults, retart.

Darkday wrote:I have my own personal opinion on you, 5150 Cruiser, and it's that you need to calm down, take a break from the computer, go OUTSIDE, eat a sandwhich, and then come back and think of some better insults, retart.

What if he doesn't like to go outside!? I sure as hell don't!

SlyTF1 wrote:

Darkday wrote:I have my own personal opinion on you, 5150 Cruiser, and it's that you need to calm down, take a break from the computer, go OUTSIDE, eat a sandwhich, and then come back and think of some better insults, retart.

What if he doesn't like to go outside!? I sure as hell don't!

I'm so sorry to hear that. Wait a minute, YOUR JOKING

SlyTF1 wrote:

Darkday wrote:I have my own personal opinion on you, 5150 Cruiser, and it's that you need to calm down, take a break from the computer, go OUTSIDE, eat a sandwhich, and then come back and think of some better insults, retart.

What if he doesn't like to go outside!? I sure as hell don't!

Then he lost the game

Oh P.S: Gyrotron, can I do that little sprite thing that you do? I just want to ask because I don't want to be a copier.

Darkday wrote:

SlyTF1 wrote:

Darkday wrote:I have my own personal opinion on you, 5150 Cruiser, and it's that you need to calm down, take a break from the computer, go OUTSIDE, eat a sandwhich, and then come back and think of some better insults, retart.

What if he doesn't like to go outside!? I sure as hell don't!

Then he lost the game

Oh P.S: Gyrotron, can I do that little sprite thing that you do? I just want to ask because I don't want to be a copier.

Whatever, dude, go ahead...Stay on topic now.

I will say this once, Gyrotron; I want to see YOU settle down. 5150 Cruiser wrote nothing in his posts to warrant the statements that have been made by yourself toward him. If you have a difference of opinion with anyone at this site, you can state your case in a civil manner. It would also be a good idea to back some of your opinions up with information rather than insults toward members of this site.

Actually, how about we do this?

I will send you a warning which you will receive in your inbox. Baiting is against the rules. Calling another user insulting names is also against the rules. Both are low-class. Consider yourself warned.

Prime Riblet wrote:I will say this once, Gyrotron; I want to see YOU settle down. 5150 Cruiser wrote nothing in his posts to warrant the statements that have been made by yourself toward him. If you have a difference of opinion with anyone at this site, you can state your case in a civil manner. It would also be a good idea to back some of your opinions up with information rather than insults toward members of this site.

you going to send same message to 5150 too.

he may have been called a nerd, but he attacked back equally vitrolically and not for the first time as he talked down to people or insulted them, most of the time when unprovoked jsut because someone denigrated the bay verse movies

Prime Riblet wrote:Actually, how about we do this?

I will send you a warning which you will receive in your inbox. Baiting is against the rules. Calling another user insulting names is also against the rules. Both are low-class. Consider yourself warned.

Ok how about 5150? Like shamone said, I may have called him a nerd, which I didn't I said "Like an automobile nerd", but he did attack back. What about Darkday (sorry dude, we're all at fault here), he called him "retarted", does he get a warning? And isn't the point of Private Messaging to be PRIVATE? Why are you going to strut in the forums that "this guy's getting a warning", and embarrass a user. See all these things make no sense.

I smell a point being made.

dirk2243 wrote:I smell a point being made.

Hmm? What point is that?

Gyrotron wrote:

Prime Riblet wrote:Actually, how about we do this?

I will send you a warning which you will receive in your inbox. Baiting is against the rules. Calling another user insulting names is also against the rules. Both are low-class. Consider yourself warned.

Ok how about 5150? Like shamone said, I may have called him a nerd, which I didn't I said "Like an automobile nerd", but he did attack back. What about Darkday (sorry dude, we're all at fault here), he called him "retarted", does he get a warning? And isn't the point of Private Messaging to be PRIVATE? Why are you going to strut in the forums that "this guy's getting a warning", and embarrass a user. See all these things make no sense.

Life makes no sense.

SlyTF1 wrote:

Gyrotron wrote:

Prime Riblet wrote:Actually, how about we do this?

I will send you a warning which you will receive in your inbox. Baiting is against the rules. Calling another user insulting names is also against the rules. Both are low-class. Consider yourself warned.

Ok how about 5150? Like shamone said, I may have called him a nerd, which I didn't I said "Like an automobile nerd", but he did attack back. What about Darkday (sorry dude, we're all at fault here), he called him "retarted", does he get a warning? And isn't the point of Private Messaging to be PRIVATE? Why are you going to strut in the forums that "this guy's getting a warning", and embarrass a user. See all these things make no sense.

Life makes no sense.

No but this should have some sense to it. All we hear is I'M getting the warning yet nobody else who did the same exact thing as me in THIS THREAD is getting one, nevertheless, nobody's getting a warning and being told that in public.