The Energon Pub

News Credits: 2 · by **munkimus prime** » Tue Mar 04, 2008 4:09 pm

The decepticons did the autobots had 3-
superion
defensor
computron
decepticons had 5
devastator
bruticus
menasaur
predaking
abominus
I don't think i'm missing any.

News Credits: 1 · by **sto_vo_kor_2000** » Tue Mar 04, 2008 4:38 pm

Pottermus_Prime wrote:woot, i thought so but i had major doubts lol.

Right my question is:

Which side in G1 (cartoon) had the more combiner teams???
(amounts on each side and name give you brownie points lol)

Well that depends on a 2 things........

[1] What do you meen by combiners?????

I ask because Reflector and Skylinx use combiner tech.

[2] Are you including the Japanese TF toon serries combiners????

I ask because the number changes if your including the Japan toon combiners.

With out the Japan combiners the numbers are

Decepticons 5 combiners.

Devastator (Constructicons)
Menasor (Stunticons)
Bruticus (Combaticons)
Predaking (Predacons)
Abominus (Terrorcons)

Autobots 3 combiners

Superion (Aerialbots)
Defensor (Protectobots)
Computron (Technobots)

by **Pot Bot** » Tue Mar 04, 2008 4:41 pm

sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:
Pottermus_Prime wrote:woot, i thought so but i had major doubts lol.

Right my question is:

Which side in G1 (cartoon) had the more combiner teams???
(amounts on each side and name give you brownie points lol)

Well that depends on a 2 things........

[1] What do you meen by combiners?????

I ask because Reflector and Skylinx use combiner tech.

[2] Are you including the Japanese TF toon serries combiners????

I ask because the number changes if your including the Japan toon combiners.

With out the Japan combiners the numbers are

Decepticons 5 combiners.

Devastator (Constructicons)
Menasor (Stunticons)
Bruticus (Combaticons)
Predaking (Predacons)
Abominus (Terrorcons)

Autobots 3 combiners

Superion (Aerialbots)
Defensor (Protectobots)
Computron (Technobots)

you guessed what i was talking about, because if you include reflector and skylynx then really you have to include the headmaster's too.

News Credits: 1 · by **sto_vo_kor_2000** » Tue Mar 04, 2008 5:23 pm

Pottermus_Prime wrote:
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:
Pottermus_Prime wrote:woot, i thought so but i had major doubts lol.

Right my question is:

Which side in G1 (cartoon) had the more combiner teams???
(amounts on each side and name give you brownie points lol)

Well that depends on a 2 things........

[1] What do you meen by combiners?????

I ask because Reflector and Skylinx use combiner tech.

[2] Are you including the Japanese TF toon serries combiners????

I ask because the number changes if your including the Japan toon combiners.

With out the Japan combiners the numbers are

Decepticons 5 combiners.

Devastator (Constructicons)
Menasor (Stunticons)
Bruticus (Combaticons)
Predaking (Predacons)
Abominus (Terrorcons)

Autobots 3 combiners

Superion (Aerialbots)
Defensor (Protectobots)
Computron (Technobots)

you guessed what i was talking about, because if you include reflector and skylynx then really you have to include the headmaster's too.

I figured you were trying to trick me.And you know what else????If you count the Headmasters then an argument can be made to include the City formers like Trypticon and Metroplex that had smaller indavisial bots that in some cases combined with ether their robot modes or city/base modes.

Well since "munkimus prime" beat me to thepost the questioning is up to him.

by **Pot Bot** » Wed Mar 05, 2008 4:46 pm

sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:I figured you were trying to trick me.And you know what else????If you count the Headmasters then an argument can be made to include the City formers like Trypticon and Metroplex that had smaller indavisial bots that in some cases combined with ether their robot modes or city/base modes.

Well since "munkimus prime" beat me to thepost the questioning is up to him.

nah im not into all that crap, trying to make myself seem better by some dumb technicality, hell your knowledge is vastly superior to mine, ill find one you dont know one day though.

damn me for telling you grippers name lol

News Credits: 1 · by **sto_vo_kor_2000** » Wed Mar 05, 2008 11:24 pm

Pottermus_Prime wrote:
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:I figured you were trying to trick me.And you know what else????If you count the Headmasters then an argument can be made to include the City formers like Trypticon and Metroplex that had smaller indavisial bots that in some cases combined with ether their robot modes or city/base modes.

Well since "munkimus prime" beat me to thepost the questioning is up to him.

nah im not into all that crap, trying to make myself seem better by some dumb technicality, hell your knowledge is vastly superior to mine, ill find one you dont know one day though.

damn me for telling you grippers name lol

I wouldnt say superior.....I'm just full of useless info :grin:

by **Pot Bot** » Thu Mar 06, 2008 2:16 pm

i know loads of useless stuff, and when theres a general knowledge programme on tv i can usually answer 90% of the questions, but as for tf's, ive only been gathering info since the end of january so im sooooo un educated lol

News Credits: 1 · by **sto_vo_kor_2000** » Thu Mar 06, 2008 5:35 pm

Pottermus_Prime wrote:i know loads of useless stuff, and when theres a general knowledge programme on tv i can usually answer 90% of the questions, but as for tf's, ive only been gathering info since the end of january so im sooooo un educated lol

LOL

Looks like every one else has givven up on this thread.

by **Pot Bot** » Fri Mar 07, 2008 9:17 am

given up, or scared away????? :-?

News Credits: 1 · by **sto_vo_kor_2000** » Fri Mar 07, 2008 12:33 pm

Pottermus_Prime wrote:given up, or scared away?????

Ether way it seems the thread is dead. :sad:

by **Pot Bot** » Fri Mar 07, 2008 12:38 pm

sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:
Pottermus_Prime wrote:given up, or scared away?????

Ether way it seems the thread is dead.

they'll regret killing this thread, they have released my madness on the seibertron world mwahahahaha

News Credits: 1 · by **sto_vo_kor_2000** » Fri Mar 07, 2008 1:24 pm

Pottermus_Prime wrote:
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:
Pottermus_Prime wrote:given up, or scared away?????

Ether way it seems the thread is dead.

they'll regret killing this thread, they have released my madness on the seibertron world mwahahahaha

by **Defcon!** » Fri Mar 07, 2008 9:38 pm

Which Gen. 1 Tf had a brief appearence in the first episode, but never transformed or made a reappearence?

by **StarThunderWarp** » Fri Mar 07, 2008 10:08 pm

Hauler.........?

News Credits: 1 · by **sto_vo_kor_2000** » Fri Mar 07, 2008 11:17 pm

Defcon! wrote:Which Gen. 1 Tf had a brief appearence in the first episode, but never transformed or made a reappearence?

The only character that fit's your description is Haular.

And while we did not see him transform we did see him in robot mode.

by **NiteStar** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 3:19 am

In Transformers the Game 2007, in the Autobot Story in the the level "Inside Hooverdam", name one of the places where you find an Autobot Icon.

News Credits: 1 · by **sto_vo_kor_2000** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 6:25 am

NiteStar wrote:In Transformers the Game 2007, in the Autobot Story in the the level "Inside Hooverdam", name one of the places where you find an Autobot Icon.

You got me....I never picked up the game.

by **Pot Bot** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 12:48 pm

ooooo easy, i got all xbox achievments and 100% completion (which i be;ieve is an achievment lol) One is by the side of/behind megatron who is frozen

by **estrelliaes** » Thu Mar 13, 2008 5:43 am

What is Megatrons name in Galaxy Force (the japanese oridginal of Cybertron)?

News Credits: 1 · by **sto_vo_kor_2000** » Thu Mar 13, 2008 11:22 pm

estrelliaes wrote:What is Megatrons name in Galaxy Force (the japanese oridginal of Cybertron)?

Master Megatron was what he was called.

But I always felt that "Master" was a tital and not part of his name

by **estrelliaes** » Mon Mar 17, 2008 2:43 pm

If it was a title and it being japanese they would surely say Nee san or something.Or Yama like Yama Gii in Bleach.
Nee san like Kon calls Rukia or Rukia calls Bakarula(cant quite remeber his name cos i dont like him).

They call him Master Megatron sama.

Anyway next question

Where does G1 Soundwave keep Ravage and Lazorbeak when they arnt flying or running around?

News Credits: 1 · by **Heavy B** » Mon Mar 17, 2008 3:39 pm

in his chest cavaty as tapes.

heres a tough one. on the transformers the movie (1986) soundtrack, spectere general recorded two tracks. however spectre general wasn't there real name. WHAT WAS THERE NAME?

bonus points, why did the producers change there name for this album only

News Credits: 1 · by **sto_vo_kor_2000** » Tue Mar 18, 2008 3:17 am

estrelliaes wrote:If it was a title and it being japanese they would surely say Nee san or something.Or Yama like Yama Gii in Bleach.
Nee san like Kon calls Rukia or Rukia calls Bakarula(cant quite remeber his name cos i dont like him).

They call him Master Megatron sama.

Ohh I didnt know that about the Japanese way of speeking.Thanks

estrelliaes wrote:Anyway next question

Where does G1 Soundwave keep Ravage and Lazorbeak when they arnt flying or running around?

Your joking right????

Dr. Heavy B wrote:heres a tough one. on the transformers the movie (1986) soundtrack, spectere general recorded two tracks. however spectre general wasn't there real name. WHAT WAS THERE NAME?

bonus points, why did the producers change there name for this album only

Dude.....

Kick Ax was one of my favorite groups of the 80's.I wanted to ask this question a while back but I didnt tnink anyone would get it....I got a few complaints that my questions were too cerebral.

As for your bonus points:::

Theres no real way to get the answer to that question.

There are two sets or rumors about the name change both supported by different members of the band.

The first [and most likely] was that the producers of the soundtrack felt that the name "Kick Ax" was too simular to "Kick A$$" and would not be appropriate for a kids movie.

The other [which was stated by the producers and one former member of the band] was that the name "Kick Ax" was not [at the time] advisiable to be trademarked due to the sensership debates of the early and mid 80's.