The Energon Pub

by **Omega_Supreme** » Wed Jul 25, 2007 9:39 pm

mmmmm Rachael Taylor.. *drools on self*

by **Roddy P** » Thu Jul 26, 2007 3:00 am

Who cares how her acting is. She was meant to be eyecandy. She served her purpose perfectly.

by **Nemesis_Apoc** » Fri Jul 27, 2007 7:55 pm

yeah.... no offense, conceptron, but you seriously need more cyanide in your diet.

by **T Honk** » Fri Jul 27, 2007 10:31 pm

How is it anyone keeps feeding this nonsence? This guys got like ten different threads all saying the same thing one way or another. His next thread will go like this... TITLE: Anyone see the Yankees play yesterday?
READ POST: When Derek Jeter was at bat I really felt it was much cooler than watching that piece of crap Bayformer movie which wasnt even a movie by any standard. How could anyone like it?
7 pages later people want it locked when they could have just done this......

by **Great Atlas** » Fri Jul 27, 2007 10:33 pm

lol!

by **sdefedder** » Sat Jul 28, 2007 6:25 am

Well she's doing better than you.. Least she's not on a message board whining.

by **Riotflea** » Sat Jul 28, 2007 6:39 am

Sadly, she was the only believable character in the movie.
Seemed fairly accurate as far as the "nothing going on upstairs" dealie usually going on with chicks I know who look like that.

I'm not sure why the topic creator is singling just HER out when complaining about the acting. She was hardly alone in this movie.

by **Altertron** » Sat Jul 28, 2007 9:30 am

oh yeah, she sure wasn't faking when i'm doing "it" with her if ya know what i mean. she's a real screamer too. :lol:

News Credits: 1 · by **Creature SH** » Sat Jul 28, 2007 9:37 am

Blazefrost wrote:main point: WHO GIVES A DANG? It's a MOVIE! you don't nitpick at little thing. You take in all of it at once-the CGI, the actors, the acting, the music, the sets, the plot- not get picky and start bashing one part.

Wait, are you seriously trying to apply "It's a movie" to defend bad acting ? That kind of reasoning can only be described as bizarre.

by **DorkimusPrime** » Sat Jul 28, 2007 9:38 am

Conceptron wrote:This is a completely honest question. Was she actually acting? Did she actually have more than one emotion?

I don't care, I just wanted to see more of her, wink wink, nudge nudge, say no more.

edit: born in 1986? I'm getting old. *sigh*

News Credits: 11 · by **Robinson** » Sat Jul 28, 2007 11:16 pm

Altertron wrote:oh yeah, she sure wasn't faking when i'm doing "it" with her if ya know what i mean. she's a real screamer too.

Thats all I have to say about that.

by **ScorpoMax** » Sat Jul 28, 2007 11:59 pm

Whatever you might say about her acting, I thought she had very pretty eyes.

News Credits: 4 · by **tom brokaw** » Sun Jul 29, 2007 2:38 am

ScorpoMax wrote:Whatever you might say about her acting, I thought she had very pretty eyes.

i agree^

News Credits: 1 · by **Creature SH** » Sun Jul 29, 2007 10:43 am

I think that the fact that most of the posts in this topic are along the lines of "Uh, she's purdy" says enough about her acting ability.

News Credits: 1 · by **softimus_prime** » Sun Jul 29, 2007 10:51 am

i think he doesnt like the movie same as we are here...

News Credits: 1 · by **softimus_prime** » Sun Jul 29, 2007 11:54 am

his next thread might say something like..

did the robots acted fine ? ? ? lol

by **Blazefrost** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 9:44 pm

Creature SH wrote:
Blazefrost wrote:main point: WHO GIVES A DANG? It's a MOVIE! you don't nitpick at little thing. You take in all of it at once-the CGI, the actors, the acting, the music, the sets, the plot- not get picky and start bashing one part.

Wait, are you seriously trying to apply "It's a movie" to defend bad acting ? That kind of reasoning can only be described as bizarre.

Uh, yep. that pretty much sums it up.

Oh, and by the way, I am a little bizarre. But hey, if it makes sense in my own little world, I'm fine with that. After all, what do you expect from a "retard"?

Sorry about that. I have aspergers syndrome, so I take things seriously. Some kid at my school called me a retard right in my face today, and I'm seriously hurt by that.

But, still, yeah, I do think that Megan Fox was actually acting. And I wasn't actually defending anything, simply because, in my opinion, there was nothing bad to defend.

News Credits: 1 · by **sto_vo_kor_2000** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:05 am

Blazefrost wrote:Sorry about that. I have aspergers syndrome,

Do you????I may also have it.

by **Nightracer GT** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 6:03 am

Her boobs didn't need to act.

by **Auto Bot** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 11:08 am

Megan was chosen for the body and the hotness. Nobody says she's there for the acting.

by **Galvatron628** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 6:44 am

The problem wasn't her acting, the problem was her character which wasn't her fault. I'll admit here character really had no place in the movie, and she was pretty much cast as nothing more than "eye Candy". But she acted fine if you ask me. You can't blame her shallow character on her, you can blame that on the writers and director. I've seen her in other movies before, nothing acadamy award winning obviously, but she is a good actress!

But I for one have no problem with her "eye candy" role. I enjoyed looking at her the whole movie! Honestly she might just be the Hottest Actress around right now.

by **Auto Bot** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 9:01 am

She did carry out an acceptable acting, in the cutesy parts.

But during the first encounter, when she saw Barricade for the first time, there was zero acting in that scene. She didn't even portray any bit of shock or fear or even amazement at the sight of an alien or a running robot.

Good acting should be able to visualize an imaginary CGI character. And react to it accordingly.

I would give a share of the failings to Bay too. A good director, or even just and average one, should be able to spot that, and make necessary changes.

by **Dran0n** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 7:26 pm

featofstrength wrote:better acting and better lookin than the oft-overrated Scarlet Johanssen

Amen.

by **Auto Bot** » Mon Jan 14, 2008 11:17 am

I like Scarlet Johannson. She's so sexy.

But i doubt she can do those heavy running and bouncing actions involved in TF movie.

She might literally bounce off the screen. :shock: