The Energon Pub

by **Decatron** » Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:12 pm

I would also like to see Wheeljack in the sequel. He could build some weapons and enhance the Autobot aresenal.

News Credits: 2 · by **Moonbase2** » Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:20 pm

To be honest with you, they can bring in any autobot they want (with the exception of Wheelie or Blurr). I'm just very happy they didn't kill Starscream. I am so tired of fool always getting killed! Stop killing Starscream!!!

by **Golgo13:Professional** » Sun Jul 15, 2007 8:20 am

Omega Supreme.

News Credits: 20 · by **Neko** » Sun Jul 15, 2007 8:48 am

My idea for the sequal is to bring in the Twins and Battlechargers.

What fun it would be to see two sets of twins beating each other sensless.

by **Low Convoy** » Sun Jul 15, 2007 10:33 am

Prowl definately, with Jazz gone he'll make a great replacement as 2nd in command. If they could actually get their hands on lambos/ferraris then sideswipe and sunstreaker would be great, other than that Hot Rod would also be good filling in the mandatory sports car role.

by **Sentinel Pax** » Sun Jul 15, 2007 11:56 am

I think Sky/Jetfire would be awesome to give the 'bots some air power, and play off of his former friendship with Starscream. Grimlock, just to be a badass, and Roadbuster, because every picture of him ever, he has no less than three guns on his person. There you go. Firepower.

Like Prowl76 on Facebook · by **Prowl76** » Sun Jul 15, 2007 11:59 am

Autobots need Prowl, Sunstreaker and Sideswipe.

by **Auto Bot** » Sun Jul 15, 2007 1:06 pm

Hotrod wrote:
Blackout wrote:Wheelie.

Yes Wheelie needs to be in the movie. The cons will be running scared

Wheelie's rhymes will short circuit the audio receptors of the Decepticons.

by **Auto Bot** » Sun Jul 15, 2007 1:12 pm

If only one Autobot is allowed to come in to tip the power balance, it should be Jetfire.
Autobots desperately needs air power. Not to mention air mobility.

All the Decepticons need to do is summon a few flying bots (Megs, Screamer, Chopper guy), and stay in the air all the time to defeat the Autobots. That is, if they were wise enough. They should be given Bush's flavor of Shock & Awe Lesson 101.

Megs' positronic brain must still be frozen when they attacked the Autobots. Geezzzzz! Zero points on military strategy. Dumb dumb dumb.

by **Auto Bot** » Sun Jul 15, 2007 1:19 pm

FutureFamous wrote:I want to say Ultra Magnus, but I wouldn't like it so much if he was just a white clone of Optimus.
Trailbreaker as a Chevy Avalanche (as most the Autobots will likely still be GMC's)
Mirage.

I heard rumors that Toyota is positioning to take on Movie #2.
Ironhide will reported scan and reformat to a 2009 Tundra concept.
Bumblebee will temporarily switched to a yellow Supra. Before coming back to his Camaro form.
Sideswipe is reportedly coming in as 2009 Celica concept.
Prime, Ratchet remains the same.

Are we seeing Takara version toys soon??? :shock:

Cool it. I'm just messing around. Hehehe

by **Auto Bot** » Sun Jul 15, 2007 1:22 pm

FutureFamous wrote:Wow. I can fill the love.
Alright, it's time for everybody to come together, come on now, GROUP HUG!!!

Hey, Grimlock, you're not part of the group hug. We don't want to hear bones crunching.

Hehehe :-P

by **Auto Bot** » Sun Jul 15, 2007 1:30 pm

Golgo13:Professional wrote:Omega Supreme.

With Bay's style of in-your-face close up camera shots?

I guess the most you'd see of Omega Supreme is the BOLT on his left metal butt plate. And probably fast moving shaky shots at that. Whew!

The only way you'll only see the full Omega image is thru hand-out concept art. :sad:

by **LicoriceSnoCone** » Sun Jul 15, 2007 6:02 pm

I'd love to see Mirage or Blurr, but I think that would be more for the cgi more than anything. Grimlock or Omega would be nice too. Or maybe Warpath because it would balance out the mostly military/noncivilian Decepticons and the civilian ordinary Autobots.

by **MercilessOne** » Sun Jul 15, 2007 6:05 pm

Sideswipe a Celica?

...

by **DUDEATRICE** » Sun Jul 15, 2007 6:42 pm

Spark Light wrote:
Brakethrough wrote:
Renne wrote:
Spark Light wrote:Dinobots would be awesome in the movie. **** the people who want to enforce a bad sense of "Realism" on this,

SIGH.

Agreed.

What do you mean "Agreed"? There wasn't even an argument there, just a lump of patronising, pessimistic, fan-hating, know-it-all bullshit compressed into a single word. SIGH isn't a good enough reason to count out a huge and much loved part of the TF Mythos.

Again, **** realism. Realism should be how you do things, how you present them, not what you're doing or presenting.
Heroes is ridiculously unrealistic - it succeeds not by appealing on a scientific or even well developed fantasy basis, but by appealing to our sense that deep down, we feel that some of these things MUST be possible.

Dinobots obviously appeal to something rather different - but the idea is the same - as long as it's a captivating and amazing enough idea that's well executed, and presented in a way that flows with the world it's inserted into, it will work.

Scorponok was cool and so would Grimlock be. There's no difference between the two, except that giant dinosaurs make more sense than giant scorpions. The same goes for mass-shifting - you shouldn't leave it out just because it's "Unrealistic", you should just do it in a way that makes sense within the context of the universe. I despise the people that want to strip all the elements of what gave TFs their identity over other Transforming robots. A giant robot turning into a tape deck worked because it was cool It wouldn't be as cool nowadays, but it'd still be pretty cool since 95% of people still know what a tape deck is(like the IDW comics, have him crash in the 80s, IMO, TFs may have been better set in that era to begin with). It appeals of a sense of fear that everyday items could suddenly become monstrous things.

You're all talking **** - none of you have seen or made a Mass-shifting live action Transformer, or a Dinobot produced to the same level of detail as the movie Transformers. How is Grimlock any less ridiculous than Godzilla, or more appropriately, Mecha Godzilla?

You can't prove or provide real hard evidence for ANY of what you're saying, same deal with the movie designs not being more like TFs used to look like(change isn't always good).

There is just so much "Mundane" bullshit, I can't stand it any more. I want Dinobots. I want Mass-shifting. Maybe you think you don't, but I know that if you saw it done in a way that was cool and made sense, you would.

(SIGH)

by **DUDEATRICE** » Sun Jul 15, 2007 6:45 pm

who was the Autobot that kinda resembled the Red A-10 Warthog...THAT would be a good 'bot to bring in. That is the epithome of air firepower.

by **Sentinel Pax** » Sun Jul 15, 2007 9:14 pm

DUDEATRICE wrote:who was the Autobot that kinda resembled the Red A-10 Warthog...THAT would be a good 'bot to bring in. That is the epithome of air firepower.

Powergilde! Hahaha...it would be so weird to see him in-scale with Prime, though. He was the smallest Warthog ever!

by **Auto Bot** » Sun Jul 15, 2007 10:20 pm

An oversized Autobot will be good.

But with Megs, Bonecrusher, Blackout gone... that would seriously decimate the Decepticons.

Unless Starscream came back with some big hulking new Decepticons.

Constructicon will do the trick.

I'm so gonna buy the Movie Constructicon when it comes out! Unless it's made so small out of scale.

by **Auto Bot** » Mon Jul 16, 2007 5:49 am

Why not make Wheelie a Decepticon in Movie #2?

Just a thought.

News Credits: 2 · by **Moonbase2** » Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:13 am

Blackout wrote:
Auto Bot wrote:
Hotrod wrote:
Blackout wrote:Wheelie.

Yes Wheelie needs to be in the movie. The cons will be running scared

Wheelie's rhymes will short circuit the audio receptors of the Decepticons.

If Wheelie is in it, they have got to use Dr Smoov's video.

Wheelie: Wheelie's my name. Want to play a game?

Optimus Prime: Who the f*ck is that Autobot?!

We use him as a decoy!

Prime: He can stay and guard the base! Of all the autobots to survive...f*ck me.

by **Necessary Evil** » Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:23 am

ganymede2010 wrote:
burrdrinka wrote:Wheelie...was already in the 2007 movie... ..oh wait, it was Frenzy. I think Hollywood has given me my fill of irritating weaka$$ characters.

I guess I'm one of the few who really likes frenzy:(

I thought Frenzy was awesome. He was quite a character.

The 'Bots need Smokescreen, Prowl and Sideswipe. Hell, I'll even say the Aerialbots. The Aerialbots would be fantastic!

by **Auto Bot** » Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:25 am

You gotta bring in Constructicon first before you bring in Aerobots.

by **Necessary Evil** » Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:29 am

Auto Bot wrote:You gotta bring in Constructicon first before you bring in Aerobots.

I'd rather see the Stunticons or the Combaticons, to tell you the truth. And if the Constructicons were going to be in the next movie, how do they work without Bonecrusher?

by **Auto Bot** » Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:43 am

Bonecrusher is revived and reformatted into one of the Constructicons.

Just like the Combaticons need Barricade(Onslaught), Brawl, and Blackout(Vortex).

You didn't know half of the Movie Decepticons were taken from the Combaticons?

You CAN'T have Vortex and Blackout representing 2 different characters in one storyline, because Vortex and Blackout are 2 names of a single character. Same with Barricade/Onslaught.

The Energon Pub

Which Autobots Do you Think Should Be Called In to Tip the Balance of Power?

Who is online