
Night Striker wrote:
Jetfire's mode is Cybertronian, as I don't think he scanned anything. I'd really have liked to see more about their relationship. Starscream must have felt very seriously betrayed when Jetfire chose to be an Autobot. I think in someway Starscream wanted to look like an hero in Jetfire's optics, probably becuase Jetfire was one of the few that took him seriously and knew that he was actually intellegent.
Tangent wrote:Auto Bot wrote:Autobot Vanquish wrote:I fantasize about holding on to Starscreams big shiny wing, and him and I flying in the night sky with the moon so bright. He looks at me with his twinkling red eyes and says... AUTOBOT TRASH!! GET OFF!!
But really though. I freekin' love the seekers. Is there an Autobot equivilant?
Jetfire and Starscream used to be best friends.
They share similar alt modes.
From what i can deduce, Jetfire is an F-14 Tomcat, Starscream is an F-15 Eagle. Quite similar profile.
I just don't know why Jetfire is a giant compared to Starscream. In realistic scale, they should be about equal. With Jetfire slightly shorter, due to the way it transform.
Anyway, there's your Autobot by the moonlight!
Isnt Jetfire still in cybertronian form? Either way I love Jetfire too, because he's so tall
Night Striker wrote:Arial bots would be the next best bet. The reason why there's not a squadren of them is due to the fact that the Autobots were desginated by the second season to stay on the ground. That's why the Con's built the Stunticons and the Bots built the Arialbots. It was all so they could deal with their weaknesses against the other side.
Jetfire's mode is Cybertronian, as I don't think he scanned anything. I'd really have liked to see more about their relationship. Starscream must have felt very seriously betrayed when Jetfire chose to be an Autobot. I think in someway Starscream wanted to look like an hero in Jetfire's optics, probably becuase Jetfire was one of the few that took him seriously and knew that he was actually intellegent.
Auto Bot wrote:Night Striker wrote:Arial bots would be the next best bet. The reason why there's not a squadren of them is due to the fact that the Autobots were desginated by the second season to stay on the ground. That's why the Con's built the Stunticons and the Bots built the Arialbots. It was all so they could deal with their weaknesses against the other side.
Jetfire's mode is Cybertronian, as I don't think he scanned anything. I'd really have liked to see more about their relationship. Starscream must have felt very seriously betrayed when Jetfire chose to be an Autobot. I think in someway Starscream wanted to look like an hero in Jetfire's optics, probably becuase Jetfire was one of the few that took him seriously and knew that he was actually intellegent.
The white and red Jetfire? Isn't that F-14 Tomcat?
Zombie Starscream wrote:Did Charlie Addler voice Starscream in the new movie or the old?
Thats an interesting point, I think he might not of joined the cons you know, I mean sure he's an arrogant jerk, but we know that he is also smart and reasonable rational. If they where still friends perhaps Jet/Skyfire would have been able to talk him out of it, like, talk some sence into him maybe?
Goribus wrote:Auto Bot wrote:Night Striker wrote:Arial bots would be the next best bet. The reason why there's not a squadren of them is due to the fact that the Autobots were desginated by the second season to stay on the ground. That's why the Con's built the Stunticons and the Bots built the Arialbots. It was all so they could deal with their weaknesses against the other side.
Jetfire's mode is Cybertronian, as I don't think he scanned anything. I'd really have liked to see more about their relationship. Starscream must have felt very seriously betrayed when Jetfire chose to be an Autobot. I think in someway Starscream wanted to look like an hero in Jetfire's optics, probably becuase Jetfire was one of the few that took him seriously and knew that he was actually intellegent.
The white and red Jetfire? Isn't that F-14 Tomcat?
You must be thinking of the Arielbot Fireflight. He had the same color scheme as Jetfire. However Jetfire's alternate mode isn't an Earth vehicle, and it's only a Cybertronian alt in the canon fiction. His toy mold was a Macross Valkyrie fighter jet, Takara having acquired it from a toy company that went out of business.
Goribus wrote:Auto Bot wrote:Night Striker wrote:Arial bots would be the next best bet. The reason why there's not a squadren of them is due to the fact that the Autobots were desginated by the second season to stay on the ground. That's why the Con's built the Stunticons and the Bots built the Arialbots. It was all so they could deal with their weaknesses against the other side.
Jetfire's mode is Cybertronian, as I don't think he scanned anything. I'd really have liked to see more about their relationship. Starscream must have felt very seriously betrayed when Jetfire chose to be an Autobot. I think in someway Starscream wanted to look like an hero in Jetfire's optics, probably becuase Jetfire was one of the few that took him seriously and knew that he was actually intellegent.
The white and red Jetfire? Isn't that F-14 Tomcat?
You must be thinking of the Arielbot Fireflight. He had the same color scheme as Jetfire. However Jetfire's alternate mode isn't an Earth vehicle, and it's only a Cybertronian alt in the canon fiction. His toy mold was a Macross Valkyrie fighter jet, Takara having acquired it from a toy company that went out of business.
Tramp wrote:Actually, Auto Bot, while the Valkyrie is based upon the F-14, it isn't an F-14. There are a number of key differences including the lack of rear horizontal stablizers on the Valyrie, and the vectored thrusters. The verticle stablizers are also set too closely on the Valkyrie compared to the Tomcat.
No, it's more than that. the Seekers are pretty accurate to the F-15 with very little variation for transformation. and that is really only with the toys. The Valkyrie has major differences that separate it from the F-14, most of which I have already mentioned. Those are radical differences. Thus, while the F-14 was the inspiration for the Valkyrie, there are enough major differences for it to be classified as a completely separate aircraft.Auto Bot wrote:Tramp wrote:Actually, Auto Bot, while the Valkyrie is based upon the F-14, it isn't an F-14. There are a number of key differences including the lack of rear horizontal stablizers on the Valyrie, and the vectored thrusters. The verticle stablizers are also set too closely on the Valkyrie compared to the Tomcat.
I guess they have to modify a real F-14 to be able to accommodate transformation into a robot Battroid.
Just like practically every TF jets and vehicles.
Starscream's F-15 jet can't be exactly the real F-15. It's got portions stretched or shortened. Not to mention the chest and other robot parts under the fuselage.
Tramp wrote:No, it's more than that. the Seekers are pretty accurate to the F-15 with very little variation for transformation. and that is really only with the toys. The Valkyrie has major differences that separate it from the F-14, most of which I have already mentioned. Those are radical differences. Thus, while the F-14 was the inspiration for the Valkyrie, there are enough major differences for it to be classified as a completely separate aircraft.Auto Bot wrote:Tramp wrote:Actually, Auto Bot, while the Valkyrie is based upon the F-14, it isn't an F-14. There are a number of key differences including the lack of rear horizontal stablizers on the Valyrie, and the vectored thrusters. The verticle stablizers are also set too closely on the Valkyrie compared to the Tomcat.
I guess they have to modify a real F-14 to be able to accommodate transformation into a robot Battroid.
Just like practically every TF jets and vehicles.
Starscream's F-15 jet can't be exactly the real F-15. It's got portions stretched or shortened. Not to mention the chest and other robot parts under the fuselage.
Auto Bot wrote:Tramp wrote:No, it's more than that. the Seekers are pretty accurate to the F-15 with very little variation for transformation. and that is really only with the toys. The Valkyrie has major differences that separate it from the F-14, most of which I have already mentioned. Those are radical differences. Thus, while the F-14 was the inspiration for the Valkyrie, there are enough major differences for it to be classified as a completely separate aircraft.Auto Bot wrote:Tramp wrote:Actually, Auto Bot, while the Valkyrie is based upon the F-14, it isn't an F-14. There are a number of key differences including the lack of rear horizontal stablizers on the Valyrie, and the vectored thrusters. The verticle stablizers are also set too closely on the Valkyrie compared to the Tomcat.
I guess they have to modify a real F-14 to be able to accommodate transformation into a robot Battroid.
Just like practically every TF jets and vehicles.
Starscream's F-15 jet can't be exactly the real F-15. It's got portions stretched or shortened. Not to mention the chest and other robot parts under the fuselage.
What jetfighter should its design be closer to?
Damolisher wrote:All it is is a throwaway animation model like all of the offcoloured seekers, Reflectors and Rumbles. Nothing more, nothing less.
Return to Transformers General Discussion
Registered users: Bing [Bot], botomb, Fires_Of_Inferno, Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, Lunatyk, MSN [Bot], Omegatron., Riot Riverman, Ultra Magnus, Ziusundra