The Energon Pub

News Credits: 22 · by **Rodimus Prime** » Thu Aug 06, 2009 2:49 am

Damn, The Baroness looks *hot* in the new Joe flick. I still think Angelina Jolie was perfect for the role and would have been even hotter, but I have no problem with Ms. Miller. I saw her on Conan O'Brien tonight, and she looks much better with black hair than blonde. Then again, I'm a sucker for long dark hair.

And she's so much more attractive than Megan Fox was in RoTF. I'll be seeing Joe on friday, and I can't wait to see her on the big screen. I will probably even buy a poster if it's sold somewhere.

by **tom_p1980** » Fri Aug 07, 2009 11:18 am

Absolutely!

SM FTW. B-)

Megan Fox is hot but Sienna is "hawt!"

Did anyone see her on Top Gear a few weeks back? :grin:

by **Zombie Starscream** » Fri Aug 07, 2009 1:23 pm

Wow, she does appear a lot nicer looking then Megan, doesn't she? At least this dark-haired woman doesn't have to slither all over a motercycle to turn mens' heads

News Credits: 22 · by **Rodimus Prime** » Fri Aug 07, 2009 2:46 pm

Well, I just saw G.I.Joe, and it is confirmed. Sienna Miller as the Baroness is the *hottest* thing this summer. Including the sun and my George Foreman grill on full blast.

She looked like she barely needed makeup to make her look like that. She did say on Conan that putting the Baroness suit on was a pain in the ass. I'm not surprised, that thing is ti-i-i-ight! (Her suit!) :twisted:

by **Prime Riblet** » Fri Aug 07, 2009 2:55 pm

Sienna is prettier, but Megan has that trash factor going for her........yes, that is a good thing.

News Credits: 4 · by **tom brokaw** » Fri Aug 07, 2009 8:58 pm

id pick sienna miller over megan fox any day.... even the actress that played scarlett was hotter than megan fox

by **Tyrannotaur** » Fri Aug 07, 2009 9:35 pm

tom brokaw wrote:id pick sienna miller over megan fox any day.... even the actress that played scarlett was hotter than megan fox

Rachael Nichols. :mrgreen:

She is very hot yes.

Rodimus Prime wrote:Damn, The Baroness looks *hot* in the new Joe flick. I still think Angelina Jolie was perfect for the role and would have been even hotter, but I have no problem with Ms. Miller. I saw her on Conan O'Brien tonight, and she looks much better with black hair than blonde. Then again, I'm a sucker for long dark hair.

And she's so much more attractive than Megan Fox was in RoTF. I'll be seeing Joe on friday, and I can't wait to see her on the big screen. I will probably even buy a poster if it's sold somewhere.

I think Megan Fox was hotter in Transformers. I dunno why. They seemed to have overdone it in ROTF. I still find her attractive, she's just starting to become overrated. She also shouldn't talk to the mass media. She needs to be more like Jessica Alba and just do her job and go home and not interact with the paparazzi or say anything that could offend someone. That's why I like Ms. Alba so much.. Well one reason. She doesn't feed the beast that is the tabloids.

Isabel Lucas is really hot too.. Although I will forever be grossed out by that long mechanical tongue with a small fleshy human one at the end.. nasty..

News Credits: 22 · by **Rodimus Prime** » Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:01 am

Yeah, megan was fine in Transformers. Though Rachael Taylor was still hotter. But in RoTF, she was just so..fake. From her lips to her acting. Ugh.

Yes...Jessica Alba. Dark Angel. :twisted:

I have a huge poster of her from Sin City, in her cow-girl getup and on the pole. Yeeeeeesss...

I want to find a good poster of Sienna Miller in her Baroness gear as well. So hot. =P~

News Credits: 4 · by **tom brokaw** » Sat Aug 08, 2009 5:54 am

Tyrannotaur wrote:
tom brokaw wrote:id pick sienna miller over megan fox any day.... even the actress that played scarlett was hotter than megan fox

Rachael Nichols. She is very hot yes.

haha. though to be honest, i REALLY have thing for redheads :oops:

by **Tyrannotaur** » Sat Aug 08, 2009 12:53 pm

Rodimus Prime wrote:Yeah, megan was fine in Transformers. Though Rachael Taylor was still hotter. But in RoTF, she was just so..fake. From her lips to her acting. Ugh.

Yes...Jessica Alba. Dark Angel. I have a huge poster of her from Sin City, in her cow-girl getup and on the pole. Yeeeeeesss...

I want to find a good poster of Sienna Miller in her Baroness gear as well. So hot.

Yeah. The 20 million slow mo shots of Megan running didn't help either. I still like her, but I think they need to cut down on those..

I'm a huge fan of Ms. Alba I have like 3 posters of her framed on my wall and then a few not framed on my closet wall. I loved her in Sin City.... :mind wanders:.. uh yeah. I also bought some of those giant Fantastic four banners they hung in theaters from Ebay. I have no room to hang them up so they are in my attic. I'm a tad obsessed..but not crazy crazy obsessed.

I'd check Walmart for a Baroness poster. Either there or one of those stores in malls like Spencers. But yeah she is hot. I am going to see G.I. Joe today, looking forward to it. :grin:

by **Prime Riblet** » Sat Aug 08, 2009 1:21 pm

Let's all just be completely honest about the situation. There isn't one lady mentioned on this thread that I would consider "unsatifactory". :grin:

News Credits: 22 · by **Rodimus Prime** » Sat Aug 08, 2009 2:43 pm

That's true...but why settle for bronze (Megan) when you can have the gold (Sienna.) Guess what that makes Jessica?

And you won't be disappointed in the movie. Best movie of the summer. Unless Rob Zombie really outdoes the first Halloween.

by **Prime Riblet** » Sat Aug 08, 2009 4:38 pm

That's good news. I'm looking forward to seeing it quite a lot. It looks like it should be a ton of fun. I will agree that Megan is the bronze medalist, haha.

by **Rodimus_light** » Sat Aug 08, 2009 6:31 pm

Movie was Baaaaaad. Baroness turning good was lame and predictable from the first five minutes. Why can't she just be a bad girl?

News Credits: 1 · by **cybercat** » Sat Aug 08, 2009 9:49 pm

[quote="Rodimus_light"]Movie was Baaaaaad. Baroness turning good was lame and predictable from the first five minutes. Why can't she just be a bad girl?[/quote]

Dude, seriously. You're entitled to your opinion and all, but SOME OF US HAVEN"T SEEN THE MOVIE YET and you just blew the whole plot. Thanks.

It's common netiquette to at least HINT that your post might have a spoiler. At least over the opening weekend.

Sheesh.

HK, well, on the plus side, you just saved me $10.

News Credits: 1452 · by **Blurrz** » Sun Aug 09, 2009 5:13 am

Yeah, I digg. However I think Sarah Palin would make a damn fine Baroness. Oh well.

And seriously kitty, not seeing a movie from one opinion?

News Credits: 1 · by **cybercat** » Sun Aug 09, 2009 10:24 am

Blurrz wrote:
And seriously kitty, not seeing a movie from one opinion? [/color]

Look more closely at the post, Blurrz. HE GIVES AWAY A MAJOR PLOT POINT. Which is not the same as voicing a negative opinion.

Like the time I started watching _Bridge on the River Kwai_ and my mom walks in and says, oh yeah, they blow up the bridge. Thanks for ruining whole story, mom. There goes any sense of suspense for me.

HK, seriously, people, don't blow the endings of movies.

News Credits: 22 · by **Rodimus Prime** » Mon Aug 10, 2009 1:31 am

Blurrz wrote: However I think Sarah Palin would make a damn fine Baroness. Oh well.[/color]

OK, so I am not the only weirdo thinking that.

And kitty, that was not the main plot of the movie. You should still see the movie, if for nothing than the action. Best movie of the summer.

News Credits: 1452 · by **Blurrz** » Mon Aug 10, 2009 2:01 am

Rodimus Prime wrote:
OK, so I am not the only weirdo thinking that.

Weirdo? I'm no wierdo...

And c'mon... the likeness is just uncanny.

News Credits: 22 · by **Rodimus Prime** » Mon Aug 10, 2009 2:21 am

Blurrz wrote:
Rodimus Prime wrote:
OK, so I am not the only weirdo thinking that.

Weirdo? I'm no wierdo...

I am.

And c'mon... the likeness is just uncanny.

Why do you do that to me??? I was just getting over the shakes...

But yeah, she does look like Palin.

News Credits: 1 · by **vectorA3** » Mon Aug 10, 2009 4:09 am

Sienna and Rachel smoke Megan Fox. & Rodimus I agree with you on Rachel Taylor, I liked her better in TF1. I was like -u guys can have Megan, I'll take Rachel anyday! Fox is too wild, unpredictable (like women aren't anyway -but hey?)

News Credits: 1 · by **cybercat** » Mon Aug 10, 2009 7:44 am

Actually, gentlemen and pervs, if all you're looking for in a woman is long dark hair, glasses, comfort around high-caliber weaponry, a little crazy, and the ability to fill out a catsuit (and walk in high heels without looking like a lumbering idiot)....

Y'all actually want *me*. (HORROR!!!!)

No, I'm not soliciting. Just suggesting that y'all be just a bit more selective and judicious in your criteria.

HK, No, I will not cut my hair that short just so I can play the Baroness.

News Credits: 5 · by **5150 Cruiser** » Mon Aug 10, 2009 7:35 pm

Rachel Nichols was the hottie of the film. With Sienna Miller coming in at a close second.

Man its sad that we have to stoop so low to the "Hot chick factor" as one of the reasons we like the movie. And yes, i'll admit it. It was a big factor. And yes i'll admit it...
I'm a perve. B-)

But yes, others are correct that the whole.. -Spoiler:.......

Baroness becoming good thing

End of spolier:... Is only one part of the plot and really isn't anything major. Frankly, they could have left that part out and it really wouldn't have affected anything.

News Credits: 22 · by **Rodimus Prime** » Tue Aug 11, 2009 3:47 am

hellkitty wrote:Actually, gentlemen and pervs, if all you're looking for in a woman is long dark hair, glasses, comfort around high-caliber weaponry, a little crazy, and the ability to fill out a catsuit (and walk in high heels without looking like a lumbering idiot)....

Y'all actually want *me*.

Do you have a black trench coat that you actually wear casually, not just for Halloween?