Seibertron.com Energon Pub Forums

by **Nemesis Maximo** » Tue Aug 25, 2015 8:50 am

Rodimus Prime wrote:
Nemesis Maximo wrote:And also glass. Glass cutting boards, while popular in the late 80s, are probably worse than metal in their knife-ruining abilities, plus they have a tendency to shatter. Glass is not tasty.
Seriously? People actually used glass cutting boards? Then again, it was the 80s...but still, I never saw a glass cutting board. What a stupid idea.

I think it was something that was just supposed to be a decorative thing, because you can actually still BUY them. But some people *Cough* my mother and grandmother *cough* took it literally.

News Credits: 5 · by **Mr O** » Tue Aug 25, 2015 3:40 pm

I'm actually, properly, not allowed to tell you.

News Credits: 19 · by **Stuartmaximus** » Wed Aug 26, 2015 4:25 am

Mr O wrote:I'm actually, properly, not allowed to tell you.

Official Secrets Act?

Or

Maybe your involved in working on Transformers 5?

Or

Maybe your a TF toy designer & not allowed to talk about up n coming projects beyond what we already know

News Credits: 22 · by **Rodimus Prime** » Wed Aug 26, 2015 4:55 am

Stuartmaximus wrote:
Mr O wrote:I'm actually, properly, not allowed to tell you.

Official Secrets Act?

Or

Maybe your involved in working on Transformers 5?

Or

Maybe your a TF toy designer & not allowed to talk about up n coming projects beyond what we already know

So you took the time to capitalize the title of a document but can't tell the difference between "your" and "you're?"

News Credits: 19 · by **Stuartmaximus** » Wed Aug 26, 2015 12:31 pm

Rodimus Prime wrote:So you took the time to capitalize the title of a document

What the hell are you blabbering on about? what document?

& since when did you become Mr O?

Because I'm sure the person I quoted can speak for himself without you having to do that for him! or do you have a habit of speaking for other people?

+ do you always highlight other people's faults & mistakes? because in this instance it looks as if you are coming across as the grammar police.

by **Nemesis Maximo** » Wed Aug 26, 2015 1:32 pm

Stuartmaximus wrote:
Rodimus Prime wrote:So you took the time to capitalize the title of a document

What the hell are you blabbering on about? what document?

& since when did you become Mr O?

Because I'm sure the person I quoted can speak for himself without you having to do that for him! or do you have a habit of speaking for other people?

+ do you always highlight other people's faults & mistakes? because in this instance it looks as if you are coming across as the grammar police.

In a this instance, it looks as if you're coming across as the fun police. Or do you have a habit of either completely missing the point of some things or taking them waaaay to seriously?

News Credits: 19 · by **Stuartmaximus** » Wed Aug 26, 2015 1:55 pm

Nemesis Maximo wrote:
Stuartmaximus wrote:
Rodimus Prime wrote:So you took the time to capitalize the title of a document

What the hell are you blabbering on about? what document?

& since when did you become Mr O?

Because I'm sure the person I quoted can speak for himself without you having to do that for him! or do you have a habit of speaking for other people?

+ do you always highlight other people's faults & mistakes? because in this instance it looks as if you are coming across as the grammar police.

In a this instance, it looks as if you're coming across as the fun police. Or do you have a habit of either completely missing the point of some things or taking them waaaay to seriously?

The only habit i'm seeing on here is people speaking for other people! I'm sure that Rodimus could've answered himself, without a representative speaking for him.

+ the last time I checked....it's not against the law to take things seriously or not! & if you have issues with that....then clearly that's a fault of your own.

News Credits: 226 · by **Burn** » Wed Aug 26, 2015 3:06 pm

Knock it off all of you. >:oP

News Credits: 5 · by **Mr O** » Thu Aug 27, 2015 9:27 am

Burn wrote:Knock it off all of you.

Really. I can't take my eye off this place for a second without the authorities having to get involved! It's like 2005 all over again...

:michaelbay:

News Credits: 226 · by **Burn** » Thu Aug 27, 2015 2:40 pm

Mr O wrote:
Burn wrote:Knock it off all of you.

Really. I can't take my eye off this place for a second without the authorities having to get involved! It's like 2005 all over again...

If it was 2005 all those people would have been banned and nothing said publicly.

News Credits: 19 · by **Stuartmaximus** » Fri Aug 28, 2015 2:26 am

Burn wrote:If it was 2005 all those people would have been banned and nothing said publicly.

I think you've just described the UK Government! lol

News Credits: 22 · by **Rodimus Prime** » Fri Aug 28, 2015 8:10 am

Stuartmaximus wrote:
Rodimus Prime wrote:So you took the time to capitalize the title of a document

What the hell are you blabbering about? What document?

Official Secrets Act.

Because I'm sure the person I quoted can speak for himself without you having to do that for him! or do you have a habit of speaking for other people?

I'm not speaking for anyone else. I am pointing out that you did not use the correct word when attempting to make someone the subject of your previous sentence, yet you capitalized the 1st letter of each word in an official document. What I was trying to find out was if you were unaware of the difference between the definitions of your and you're, or if you were just simply too lazy to include the apostrophe and the "e" on the end of the correct word to be used in that particular sentence.

do you always highlight other people's faults & mistakes? because in this instance it looks as if you are coming across as the grammar police.

Not always. Just "in this instance," as you put it.

+ what do you mean "coming across as the grammar police?" I am the grammar police.

News Credits: 5 · by **Mr O** » Fri Aug 28, 2015 8:36 am

A.C.A.B.

News Credits: 6188 · by **Va'al** » Fri Aug 28, 2015 8:37 am

Hi everyone. Let's move on, shall we? Good.

Have a picture of Va'al looking disgruntled behind a mic.

News Credits: 5 · by **Mr O** » Fri Aug 28, 2015 8:52 am

Va'al wrote:Hi everyone. Let's move on, shall we? Good.

Have a picture of Va'al looking disgruntled behind a mic.

I did see you at AA! Curse my shyness.

News Credits: 22 · by **Rodimus Prime** » Fri Aug 28, 2015 1:33 pm

Mr O wrote:
Va'al wrote:Hi everyone. Let's move on, shall we? Good.

Have a picture of Va'al looking disgruntled behind a mic.

I did see you at AA! Curse my shyness.

He doesn't look like an alcoholic...but it's good to know he's doing something about it anyway.

News Credits: 5 · by **Mr O** » Fri Aug 28, 2015 1:44 pm

Rodimus Prime wrote:He doesn't look like an alcoholic...but it's good to know he's doing something about it anyway.

Maybe not on this clearly photoshopped image, but I was there. There's a power greater than any of us, we find strength in our unity. >:oP

News Credits: 19 · by **Stuartmaximus** » Fri Aug 28, 2015 9:26 pm

I see my government quip went right over everyone else's heads!

OMG! Is that really a pic of Va'al?

News Credits: 6188 · by **Va'al** » Sat Aug 29, 2015 4:36 am

Mr O wrote:
Rodimus Prime wrote:He doesn't look like an alcoholic...but it's good to know he's doing something about it anyway.

Maybe not on this clearly photoshopped image, but I was there. There's a power greater than any of us, we find strength in our unity.

Or you know, masks to maintain the anonymity.

News Credits: 226 · by **Burn** » Sat Aug 29, 2015 5:16 am

At least we can't see the eyebrow ring. >:oP

News Credits: 19 · by **Stuartmaximus** » Sat Aug 29, 2015 5:56 am

Burn wrote:At least we can't see the eyebrow ring.

I'm glad you said eyebrow

News Credits: 22 · by **Rodimus Prime** » Sat Aug 29, 2015 7:46 am

Stuartmaximus wrote:
Burn wrote:At least we can't see the eyebrow ring.

I'm glad you said eyebrow

Do you know something about Va'al that we don't...?

News Credits: 6188 · by **Va'al** » Sat Aug 29, 2015 9:09 am

Rodimus Prime wrote:
Stuartmaximus wrote:
Burn wrote:At least we can't see the eyebrow ring.

I'm glad you said eyebrow

Do you know something about Va'al that we don't...?

I'm curious too now.. :-?

News Credits: 22 · by **Rodimus Prime** » Sat Aug 29, 2015 10:48 am

Va'al wrote:
Rodimus Prime wrote:
Stuartmaximus wrote:
Burn wrote:At least we can't see the eyebrow ring.

I'm glad you said eyebrow

Do you know something about Va'al that we don't...?

I'm curious too now..

Those old university photos might just come back to haunt you now...but hey, you needed the money, right?

News Credits: 226 · by **Burn** » Sat Aug 29, 2015 3:27 pm

Rodimus Prime wrote:
Va'al wrote:
Rodimus Prime wrote:
Stuartmaximus wrote:
Burn wrote:At least we can't see the eyebrow ring.

I'm glad you said eyebrow

Do you know something about Va'al that we don't...?

I'm curious too now..
Those old university photos might just come back to haunt you now...but hey, you needed the money, right?