Shadowman wrote:Obama Administration officially doesn't support SOPA/PIPA. Thank you and good night.
Psychout wrote:Shadowman wrote:Obama Administration officially doesn't support SOPA/PIPA. Thank you and good night.
Read my post a page or so before yours where I already list this, and the relevant omissions, then you are free to leave.
Psychout wrote:Shadowman wrote:Obama Administration officially doesn't support SOPA/PIPA. Thank you and good night.
Read my post a page or so before yours where I already list this, and the relevant omissions, then you are free to leave.
Ultra Markus wrote:looks like this obamanation of government
will end the world in 2012
or these reps or senators are trying to
save the world by destroying it
Ultra Markus wrote:looks like this obamanation of government
Ultra Markus wrote:will end the world in 2012
Ultra Markus wrote:or these reps or senators are trying to
save the world by destroying it
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Cyberstrike wrote:As much I support President Obama the sad truth is: that the Obama Administration has a long and sad history of saying their against or for something but always caves to GOP/Wall Street/Special Interests/Corprations at the end.
Twitchythe3rd wrote:Cyberstrike wrote:As much I support President Obama the sad truth is: that the Obama Administration has a long and sad history of saying their against or for something but always caves to GOP/Wall Street/Special Interests/Corprations at the end.
Even if Obama doesn't veto, the Supreme Court can still banish it back to the darkest pits of Hades where it came from for violating the First Amendment.
Twitchythe3rd wrote:Cyberstrike wrote:As much I support President Obama the sad truth is: that the Obama Administration has a long and sad history of saying their against or for something but always caves to GOP/Wall Street/Special Interests/Corprations at the end.
Even if Obama doesn't veto, the Supreme Court can still banish it back to the darkest pits of Hades where it came from for violating the First Amendment.
Shadowman wrote:Ultra Markus wrote:looks like this obamanation of government
will end the world in 2012
or these reps or senators are trying to
save the world by destroying it
There is so much wrong with this post, I don't think I could deal with it all in one sitting. I'd need a full team of analysts working around the clock, and we'd have a decent report in by next week. Here's my preliminary anyway.Ultra Markus wrote:looks like this obamanation of government
Obama hasn't gotten involved yet, and from what I'm hearing, when he does, it's going to involving vetoing the bill.Ultra Markus wrote:will end the world in 2012
The world isn't going to end in 2012. And how is a bill threatening to drastically change the internet going to cause the End of Days, anyway?Ultra Markus wrote:or these reps or senators are trying to
save the world by destroying it
Ultra Markus wrote:No they are going to hurt busness by trying to protect it thats why i said trying to
save the world by destroying it
Ultra Markus wrote:even if there is no involvement with the prez our government is so divided that these bills wouldnt get though
Ultra Markus wrote:anyway you sit there and over analyze my post without seeing the
sarcasm or humor some people cant get the joke
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
dedcat wrote:GOOD NEWS EVERYONE
White House rejects SOPA and PIPA
http://boingboing.net/2012/01/14/white- ... um=twitter
WASHINGTON — The Obama administration raised concerns today about efforts in Congress that it said would undermine "the dynamic, innovative global Internet," urging lawmakers to approve measures this year that balance the need to fight piracy and counterfeiting against an open Internet.
White House officials said in a blog post that it would not support pending legislation that "reduces freedom of expression, increases cybersecurity risk" or undermines the global Internet, cautioning the measure could discourage innovation and startup businesses.
"Any effort to combat online piracy must guard against the risk of online censorship of lawful activity and must not inhibit innovation by our dynamic businesses large and small," the White House said.
Registered users: AlexanderLuft, Bing [Bot], Gauntlet101010, Google [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, JazZeke, Jelze Bunnycat, Majestic-12 [Bot], TF-fan kev777