The Energon Pub

News Credits: 22 · by **Johndoe4880** » Sun May 11, 2008 11:30 pm

Caught up with "Transformers" and "Shutter" star Rachael Taylor today, here in Melbourne, and she spoke a little about why she won't be appearing in the "Transformers" sequel.

"I wasn't contracted for a sequel anyway, but I also think it would be pretty ridiculous for my character just to show up and say 'We've got some more computers to play with!'.

More importantly, I don't think I'd wanna do it to be honest, and not for any particular reason other than the fact that I've done it. I'm just drawn to doing different things. It was the same when I went to the U.S, I didn't want to do TV, because I'd done it. I want to be able to mix it up all the time."

Taylor has returned to Australia to shoot the new Australian film "The Cedar Boys" with Les Chantery ("Righteous Kill") and Martin Henderson ("Torque").

"I love it that I'm now back to do a $1.4 million dollar picture in Australia – I'll be changing out the back of my car somewhere in Sydney. It'll be really back to basics."

Look for the full interview with Ms Taylor later in the week

sourcehttp://www.moviehole.net/news/20080512_taylor_talks_transformers_2.html

News Credits: 38 · by **TheMuffin** » Mon May 12, 2008 11:37 am

Makes more sense than I'm used to hearing from female celebrities. Or celebrities in general.

by **Primus C-00** » Mon May 12, 2008 12:12 pm

She would've made an excellent Circuit Breaker...

:-B

News Credits: 23 · by **1337W422102** » Mon May 12, 2008 12:32 pm

I'd like to play with her computers if you know what I mean.

News Credits: 4 · by **capellamusic** » Mon May 12, 2008 12:38 pm

Yeah, if they need another computer wiz they'll call Chip chase

"No one is really disabled as long as they have courage".

News Credits: 23 · by **1337W422102** » Mon May 12, 2008 12:55 pm

capellamusic wrote:Yeah, if they need another computer wiz they'll call Chip chase "No one is really disabled as long as they have courage".

80s cheese FTW. Can't be that courageous when your wang doesn't work.

by **imotron** » Mon May 12, 2008 1:17 pm

OH!.. she's cute... what a shame, but makes sense :grin:

News Credits: 5 · by **--B--** » Mon May 12, 2008 2:56 pm

Primus C-00 wrote:She would've made an excellent Circuit Breaker...

Would have been an easy write too, there she is trying to locate the 'con signal when they send a feedback loop that fries her, and she blames all of the bots for the injuries.

Can I copyright that idea

News Credits: 23 · by **1337W422102** » Mon May 12, 2008 3:16 pm

--B-- wrote:
Primus C-00 wrote:She would've made an excellent Circuit Breaker...

Would have been an easy write too, there she is trying to locate the 'con signal when they send a feedback loop that fries her, and she blames all of the bots for the injuries.

Can I copyright that idea

Circuit Breaker's a Marvel character, so even if they wanted to use her, they'd have to get the rights first. That being said, I'd shank a baby to see her in that costume.

News Credits: 1 · by **Mechabreaker** » Mon May 12, 2008 4:12 pm

1337W422102 wrote:
--B-- wrote:
Primus C-00 wrote:She would've made an excellent Circuit Breaker...

Would have been an easy write too, there she is trying to locate the 'con signal when they send a feedback loop that fries her, and she blames all of the bots for the injuries.

Can I copyright that idea

Circuit Breaker's a Marvel character, so even if they wanted to use her, they'd have to get the rights first. That being said, I'd shank a baby to see her in that costume.

Circuit Breaker= HOTNESS!!! =P~

News Credits: 8 · by **Liege Evilmus** » Mon May 12, 2008 5:10 pm

To bad, I liked her.

News Credits: 3 · by **Autobot Jazz** » Mon May 12, 2008 9:06 pm

imotron wrote:OH!.. she's cute... what a shame, but makes sense

QFT, we're really just trading in one hot Austrailian Blonde for another.

News Credits: 1 · by **T-Macksimus** » Tue May 13, 2008 3:09 am

Well, no shortage of unchecked hormones on this sight. Come on guys,
you're not exactly making the best impression on the female members who may happen across this thread.

And before any of you wise guys says anything, I'm straight, I'm not blind, I just happen to exhibit a fair amount of decorum and self control... o.k. the drool kept shorting out my keyboard, I confess. :grin:

News Credits: 23 · by **1337W422102** » Tue May 13, 2008 5:49 am

T-Macksimus wrote:Well, no shortage of unchecked hormones on this site. Come on guys,
you're not exactly making the best impression on the female members who may happen across this thread.

There are no girls on the internets.