Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store
![Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "ANTAGONY Transformers Legacy Generations Selects Voyager 2023 New"](https://www.seibertron.com/images/ebay/legacy/evolution/voyager-class/antagony/t-DSC01360.jpg)
mirageandjazz1197 wrote:I pity the fools who believe that just because Bay might (not confirmed) be gone means that we will get a good movie.
There are many who are worse then Bay and we also still have the rest of the film crew including that turd who dares call himself a writer Kruger.
Plus Bay can do action and lets say the replacement can't make good action and also have a lack of focus on Transformers.
Rodimus Prime wrote:I refuse to believe this until I see a different director physically sitting in the chair calling "action!" on set.
Both Bay and Paramount have thrown curves at us before, I refuse to give them credit until I see it with my own eyes.
Burn wrote:Agamemnon wrote:Let's get back to talking about Burn's mammoth snout flopping...
Well I am Australian. It's kinda what we're known for.
It's not "blocked" per se. I just put it in spoiler tags to make it more of a surprise reveal.Cobotron wrote:Why Is Bird's name blocked out in those earlier posts?
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
Cobotron wrote:I'm still kinda new around here. I learned quickly, if I don't want to start a fight(which is not why I joined), to keep my Baypinion to myself. That being said, here I go...
Why Is Bird's name blocked out in those earlier posts? He'd be a good choice, but he'd never take the job. Plus he's a bigger pain in the #$@ then Bay. Master at what he does though.
I don't care who directs, this is what I'd like to see different.
1. New writers. Those guys have slaughtered enough Sci/Fi Fantasy franchises to fill a cargo freighter, and that's taking up precious cargo space that could be filled with more Masterpiece figures.
2. New art direction. Hollywood has this bad habit of shooting steroids straight into the testicles of some of our most beloved heroes. There is already 30 plus years of awesome character design for the Transformers. Japanese robot design is an art form in itself. Let's see that in a movie.
3. PUT THE CAMERA DOWN.
Why is the answer to the question about, can't we have a movie that's more robot less human, there's no budget for that. How much money did AOE make? $389,998,735,200.32?
one more tiny thing. I don't think Optimus yells "I'll kill you", at people. he wouldn't even yell that at Megs.
Sabrblade wrote:It's not "blocked" per se. I just put it in spoiler tags to make it more of a surprise reveal.Cobotron wrote:Why Is Bird's name blocked out in those earlier posts?
Burn wrote:Agamemnon wrote:Let's get back to talking about Burn's mammoth snout flopping...
Well I am Australian. It's kinda what we're known for.
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
dreadwing95 wrote:well stated my friend. but optimus did state whenever he found who was responsible for the deaths of his autobots they would die and they were humans
Burn wrote:Agamemnon wrote:Let's get back to talking about Burn's mammoth snout flopping...
Well I am Australian. It's kinda what we're known for.
Prime shot Attinger dead.Cobotron wrote:dreadwing95 wrote:well stated my friend. but optimus did state whenever he found who was responsible for the deaths of his autobots they would die and they were humans
I like to think he just puts everybody in jail. Like Batman.
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
Cobotron wrote:I'm still kinda new around here. I learned quickly, if I don't want to start a fight(which is not why I joined), to keep my Baypinion to myself. That being said, here I go...
Why Is Bird's name blocked out in those earlier posts? He'd be a good choice, but he'd never take the job. Plus he's a bigger pain in the #$@ then Bay. Master at what he does though.
I don't care who directs, this is what I'd like to see different.
1. New writers. Those guys have slaughtered enough Sci/Fi Fantasy franchises to fill a cargo freighter, and that's taking up precious cargo space that could be filled with more Masterpiece figures.
2. New art direction. Hollywood has this bad habit of shooting steroids straight into the testicles of some of our most beloved heroes. There is already 30 plus years of awesome character design for the Transformers. Japanese robot design is an art form in itself. Let's see that in a movie.
3. PUT THE CAMERA DOWN.
Why is the answer to the question about, can't we have a movie that's more robot less human, there's no budget for that. How much money did AOE make? $389,998,735,200.32?
one more tiny thing. I don't think Optimus yells "I'll kill you", at people. he wouldn't even yell that at Megs.
"Murderous" is not a quality to be admired. It's the exact opposite of admirable.SlyTF1 wrote:If Optimus wasn't so murderous, I doubt I'd like these movies nearly as much as I do.
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
Burn wrote:Agamemnon wrote:Let's get back to talking about Burn's mammoth snout flopping...
Well I am Australian. It's kinda what we're known for.
Sabrblade wrote:"Murderous" is not a quality to be admired. It's the exact opposite of admirable.SlyTF1 wrote:If Optimus wasn't so murderous, I doubt I'd like these movies nearly as much as I do.
Burn wrote:Agamemnon wrote:Let's get back to talking about Burn's mammoth snout flopping...
Well I am Australian. It's kinda what we're known for.
Sabrblade wrote:"Murderous" is not a quality to be admired. It's the exact opposite of admirable.SlyTF1 wrote:If Optimus wasn't so murderous, I doubt I'd like these movies nearly as much as I do.
SlyTF1 wrote:Seeing as though he can control his violent nature, I see it as a very admirable trait. I like exploring his mental and psychological state. He's about the only character in the existence of anything I feel I can actually do that with.
Burn wrote:Agamemnon wrote:Let's get back to talking about Burn's mammoth snout flopping...
Well I am Australian. It's kinda what we're known for.
Not anymore. Now he's voiced by Bud Luckey.Cobotron wrote:you guys know that Peter Cullen does the voice of Eyeore from Winnie the Pooh, right.
"Enjoying violence" for "murderous" purposes is not a quality to be admired.SlyTF1 wrote:Sabrblade wrote:"Murderous" is not a quality to be admired. It's the exact opposite of admirable.SlyTF1 wrote:If Optimus wasn't so murderous, I doubt I'd like these movies nearly as much as I do.
Seeing as though he can control his violent nature, I see it as a very admirable trait. I like exploring his mental and psychological state. He's about the only character in the existence of anything I feel I can actually do that with. I'm quite sure he wanted to murder Joshua during that KSI raid, you can see it in his eyes. But he didn't. Most characters are either blatantly evil, or extremely passive and anti-killing. Not Optimus. Given his record, I think I can say movie Optimus enjoys violence. But he only uses it in the heat of battle, or for the greater good of everyone around him.
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
Sabrblade wrote:Not anymore. Now he's voiced by Bud Luckey.Cobotron wrote:you guys know that Peter Cullen does the voice of Eyeore from Winnie the Pooh, right."Enjoying violence" for "murderous" purposes is not a quality to be admired.SlyTF1 wrote:Sabrblade wrote:"Murderous" is not a quality to be admired. It's the exact opposite of admirable.SlyTF1 wrote:If Optimus wasn't so murderous, I doubt I'd like these movies nearly as much as I do.
Seeing as though he can control his violent nature, I see it as a very admirable trait. I like exploring his mental and psychological state. He's about the only character in the existence of anything I feel I can actually do that with. I'm quite sure he wanted to murder Joshua during that KSI raid, you can see it in his eyes. But he didn't. Most characters are either blatantly evil, or extremely passive and anti-killing. Not Optimus. Given his record, I think I can say movie Optimus enjoys violence. But he only uses it in the heat of battle, or for the greater good of everyone around him.
All the more reason for these movie to desperately need to take a more righteous and virtuous path in the future.Burn wrote:Don't waste your time trying to reason with him. Sly has made it no secret that he's a psycho, he loves violence and I sure as hell hope he never owns a gun.
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
Burn wrote:Sabrblade wrote:Not anymore. Now he's voiced by Bud Luckey.Cobotron wrote:you guys know that Peter Cullen does the voice of Eyeore from Winnie the Pooh, right."Enjoying violence" for "murderous" purposes is not a quality to be admired.SlyTF1 wrote:Sabrblade wrote:"Murderous" is not a quality to be admired. It's the exact opposite of admirable.SlyTF1 wrote:If Optimus wasn't so murderous, I doubt I'd like these movies nearly as much as I do.
Seeing as though he can control his violent nature, I see it as a very admirable trait. I like exploring his mental and psychological state. He's about the only character in the existence of anything I feel I can actually do that with. I'm quite sure he wanted to murder Joshua during that KSI raid, you can see it in his eyes. But he didn't. Most characters are either blatantly evil, or extremely passive and anti-killing. Not Optimus. Given his record, I think I can say movie Optimus enjoys violence. But he only uses it in the heat of battle, or for the greater good of everyone around him.
Don't waste your time trying to reason with him. Sly has made it no secret that he's a psycho, he loves violence and I sure as hell hope he never owns a gun.
SlyTF1 wrote:I prefer swords.
Well, technically he is killing since 2009. Before RotF he was as some kind of nerdish emo underdog (Witch was fine, since it was the first time someone directly suggested, that Autobots are inferior). That is one of the main arguments against Michael Bay - he decide to change everything because no good reason and ruined a completly good plot.SlyTF1 wrote:I just like that the movie never comes out and says Optimus is a psychopath. But it can definitely be implied. Which adds realism to a character who's spent the last few thousand years of his life doing nothing but killing.
Return to Transformers Live Action Film Forum
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], MSN [Bot], Overcracker, Razorbeast88, Sabrblade, TF-fan kev777, Till-all-R1