Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store














Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.
-Kanrabat- wrote:If they remake Energon Optimus, thw WILL remake Wingsaber. Because he's the preferred way to combine Optimus.
As for combining Optimus with Sentinel, am I wrong to say that common consensus find that combination horrendous?
That's no guarantee. I'm sorry, but it's not. Because that would be spending a Leader slot on a non-G1/BW character that wasn't an Optimus (or a Megatron or Starscream), and that they couldn't lazily repaint into or from somebody else.-Kanrabat- wrote:If they remake Energon Optimus, thw WILL remake Wingsaber. Because he's the preferred way to combine Optimus.
ZeldaTheSwordsman wrote:Not saying it wouldn't be nice, I'm just saying you're giving "fans like that better" an awful lot of weight vs. the juggernaut that is Hasbro's lack of energy when it comes to non-G1/BW stuff in CHUG.
Evil Eye wrote:Here's something that will never happen- a thread where someone disagrees with ZeldaTheSwordsman where he doesn't get needlessly hostile and aggressive over nothing.
Nemesis Primal wrote:-Sunstorm from either WFC Seeker mold, because he's "too obscure to be marketable" (but Redwing and A LITERAL ZOMBIE THEY MADE UP aren't?)
ZeldaTheSwordsman wrote:Blue Bacchus specifically to go with TR Sky Shadow isn't happening because TR Sky Shadow owes his existence to being an Overlord pretool, whereas who would a comparable Blue Bacchus be a pretool or retool of?
Given that Crossblades wouldn't have really worked as TR basebot material, I'm assuming you're being facetiouso.supreme wrote:ZeldaTheSwordsman wrote:Blue Bacchus specifically to go with TR Sky Shadow isn't happening because TR Sky Shadow owes his existence to being an Overlord pretool, whereas who would a comparable Blue Bacchus be a pretool or retool of?
Crossblades
ZeldaTheSwordsman wrote:Given that Crossblades wouldn't have really worked as TR basebot material, I'm assuming you're being facetiouso.supreme wrote:ZeldaTheSwordsman wrote:Blue Bacchus specifically to go with TR Sky Shadow isn't happening because TR Sky Shadow owes his existence to being an Overlord pretool, whereas who would a comparable Blue Bacchus be a pretool or retool of?
Crossblades
Counterpoint: Acid Storm has the exact same amount of figures now (unless you count Sunstorm's Masterpiece twice because of deco changes between Hasbro & Takara releases), but half of Sunstorm's figures were made without Hasbro's involvement, and there hasn't been a new Sunstorm for 8 years whereas Acid Storm got a new one in 5.ZeldaTheSwordsman wrote:That info reeks of bs to me. Especially the Sunstorm part, because Sunstorm has had multiple toys already. IMO if there's any hesitation to him, it would more realistically be belief he'd been done too much.
Never had the set, cannot confirm. It is odd that they haven't done a single boat-former since then, though, and I assume there may be more strict safety stuff they would have to adhere to when comparing an online retailer exclusive to one of the biggest headliner retail figures in a line (which would be the slot Tidal Wave would take). Or maybe some safety thing or internal guideline changed, I dunno. This whole thing to me feels juuust stupid enough to be real, honestly, and I don't get what the benefit would be in someone making it up.ZeldaTheSwordsman wrote:Also, does anyone recall seeing "Does not float" on the SIEGE on Cybertron box or instructions? Anyone? No?
When would have been a better time to do a new Lockdown than the line where one of the main marketing/plot points is that it has an ENTIRE FACTION OF BOUNTY HUNTERS? We know the design team wasn't against doing G1 versions of non-G1 guys at that point, they just did Barricade and were about to do him again, Lockdown really feels like he should have been a no-brainer...unless the person who made the decision of No Lockdown was someone who didn't know the character and/or didn't have faith in him selling, like a corporate higher-up.ZeldaTheSwordsman wrote:ER Lockdown, I would tend to think "nobody's been arsed to G1-ify him yet" more likely than an actual ban, especially since it would involve deciding whether to base him on Animated or on AoE.
To be fair, the rumor never specified a TR Blue Bacchus, it just said Blue Bacchus. They released Flywheels and half the deluxe Female Autobots in the line after they did the first 2 and Battletrap (and Battletrap had more gimmickry/functionality than Flywheels despite them going together), and then the same thing happened again with Apeface and Snapdragon, there's no guarantee they wouldn't have done that again.ZeldaTheSwordsman wrote:Given that Crossblades wouldn't have really worked as TR basebot material, I'm assuming you're being facetiouso.supreme wrote:ZeldaTheSwordsman wrote:Blue Bacchus specifically to go with TR Sky Shadow isn't happening because TR Sky Shadow owes his existence to being an Overlord pretool, whereas who would a comparable Blue Bacchus be a pretool or retool of?
Crossblades
Right?Emerje wrote:To say nothing of his far less popular and memorable release mate Hauler getting a figure this year.
Hopefully it could look less like a man lying down though?-Kanrabat- wrote:Speaking of him, I don't think any remakes could recreate the GLORIOUSNESS of the original:
Nemesis Primal wrote:Hopefully it could look less like a man lying down though?-Kanrabat- wrote:Speaking of him, I don't think any remakes could recreate the GLORIOUSNESS of the original:
G1 Sunstorm may only have an equal number of figures to Acid Storm... But the Sunstorm name and color scheme have been much more of a go-to for redecoes in general than Acid Storm.Nemesis Primal wrote:Counterpoint: Acid Storm has the exact same amount of figures now (unless you count Sunstorm's Masterpiece twice because of deco changes between Hasbro & Takara releases), but half of Sunstorm's figures were made without Hasbro's involvement, and there hasn't been a new Sunstorm for 8 years whereas Acid Storm got a new one in 5.ZeldaTheSwordsman wrote:That info reeks of bs to me. Especially the Sunstorm part, because Sunstorm has had multiple toys already. IMO if there's any hesitation to him, it would more realistically be belief he'd been done too much.
1. I have looked at pictures of the box and scans of the instructions - no such disclaimer. Ditto for Broadside and Alpha Trion, who was general retail. 2a. Boatformers aren't exactly common lol 2b. We haven't had any outright boat-formers, but we've still had some boats via Cyberverse. And SS86 Scourge would easily be mistaken for a boat. 3. I personally doubt it though. As for why/how it would be made up... Wild guessing/conspiracy theory/troll bs circle-pumped into being "common knowledge"? It's happened before.Nemesis Primal wrote:Never had the set, cannot confirm. It is odd that they haven't done a single boat-former since then, though, and I assume there may be more strict safety stuff they would have to adhere to when comparing an online retailer exclusive to one of the biggest headliner retail figures in a line (which would be the slot Tidal Wave would take). Or maybe some safety thing or internal guideline changed, I dunno. This whole thing to me feels juuust stupid enough to be real, honestly, and I don't get what the benefit would be in someone making it up.ZeldaTheSwordsman wrote:Also, does anyone recall seeing "Does not float" on the SIEGE on Cybertron box or instructions? Anyone? No?
Just because an obvious thing to do, was not done? Does not automatically mean somebody prohibited. Laziness is also a possibility, as is the team having a brain fart, and I personally find both of those far more likely than "U no can use him!"Nemesis Primal wrote:When would have been a better time to do a new Lockdown than the line where one of the main marketing/plot points is that it has an ENTIRE FACTION OF BOUNTY HUNTERS?ZeldaTheSwordsman wrote:ER Lockdown, I would tend to think "nobody's been arsed to G1-ify him yet" more likely than an actual ban, especially since it would involve deciding whether to base him on Animated or on AoE.
Ooor nobody thought to do it or felt bothered to do it. This is the same company that failed to do a "Masquerade" homage during Combiner Wars even though that was also a no-brainer.Nemesis Primal wrote:We know the design team wasn't against doing G1 versions of non-G1 guys at that point, they just did Barricade and were about to do him again, Lockdown really feels like he should have been a no-brainer...unless the person who made the decision of No Lockdown was someone who didn't know the character and/or didn't have faith in him selling, like a corporate higher-up.
My main point is, TR Sky Shadow's existence is a fluke of them wanting to milk more money out of the Overlord mold - they weren't trying to go for updating the set at the time, they just did Black/Sky Shadow because Overlord needed a moldmate and he conveniently worked well enough. A similar opening of convenience did not exist for Blue Bacchus.Nemesis Primal wrote:To be fair, the rumor never specified a TR Blue Bacchus, it just said Blue Bacchus. They released Flywheels and half the deluxe Female Autobots in the line after they did the first 2 and Battletrap (and Battletrap had more gimmickry/functionality than Flywheels despite them going together), and then the same thing happened again with Apeface and Snapdragon, there's no guarantee they wouldn't have done that again.ZeldaTheSwordsman wrote:Given that Crossblades wouldn't have really worked as TR basebot material, I'm assuming you're being facetiouso.supreme wrote:ZeldaTheSwordsman wrote:Blue Bacchus specifically to go with TR Sky Shadow isn't happening because TR Sky Shadow owes his existence to being an Overlord pretool, whereas who would a comparable Blue Bacchus be a pretool or retool of?
Crossblades
Did Hasbro previously release any large toys or sets (perhaps with G.I.Joe or Marvel) that may have set a precedent for this?alekese wrote:In regards to the Tidal wave 'does not float' speculation, it could be that there's some obscure consumer safety regulation that either only came into effect recently or only kicks in above a certain size. "All toy boats either greater than 6in in length or 12oz of weight must provide a disclaimer stating they do not float if product is incapable of floating" or something stupidly specific like that.
TulioDude wrote:I have no idea how HasTak would do this,but it would be cool if they made an updated version of Menasor,that combines while members are still in vehicle mode,then would rise up like the Turbo Megazord.
ZeldaTheSwordsman wrote:ER Lockdown, I would tend to think "nobody's been arsed to G1-ify him yet" more likely than an actual ban, especially since it would involve deciding whether to base him on Animated or on AoE. And The Fallen... Has kinda fallen from prominence, it feels like. As have the 13 in general, between the 2005 IDW continuity doing in the wizard when it came to them and the PotP machinima failing to hype them.
-Kanrabat- wrote:Because of the HASLAB, Titan Unicron will never happen. As far as it'S the G1 character.
But what about the planned but never made Beast Wars Neo?
They could finally greenlight it's production. And if the design is imperfect or even too small for Titan, modify it to fit the class and improve it.
1. RotF Lockdown is just a Bayformerizing of the Animated design, so I wasn't counting him separately. 2. That's not a real G1-ification. That was "Let's use him because he fits with the half-Bayformerized aesthetic IDW art shifted to".MaximalNui wrote:...what about the RoTF Lockdown? You, know, the design they actually used to G1-ify him for the IDW1 comics?
Return to Transformers Toys Discussion
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Bumblevivisector, Drop Bear, Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, MSN [Bot], Sabrblade, Silver Wind, sprockitz, Thundertron, Yahoo [Bot]