Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store

Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.
They went with a model of cement truck that would be of appropriate size with Long Haul's gigantic mining dump truck altmode.william-james88 wrote:You know, the more I think about it, I dont get why Mixmaster couldnt be the conventional cement truck he was in G1. Both ends could easily be interchanged if designed a little different.
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
william-james88 wrote:You know, the more I think about it, I dont get why Mixmaster couldnt be the conventional cement truck he was in G1. Both ends could easily be interchanged if designed a little different.
Sabrblade wrote:They went with a model of cement truck that would be of appropriate size with Long Haul's gigantic mining dump truck altmode.william-james88 wrote:You know, the more I think about it, I dont get why Mixmaster couldnt be the conventional cement truck he was in G1. Both ends could easily be interchanged if designed a little different.
JelZe GoldRabbit wrote:
Like Scrapper's missing elbows it's probably for stability. The cab of the original toy was rather big and still had the wheels in leg mode, while CW Mixmaster has a smaller foot, more room to wiggle and above all, no wheels.
Between group teammates in this line, it is. Hence the reduction of Groove to a Legends.william-james88 wrote:Sabrblade wrote:They went with a model of cement truck that would be of appropriate size with Long Haul's gigantic mining dump truck altmode.william-james88 wrote:You know, the more I think about it, I dont get why Mixmaster couldnt be the conventional cement truck he was in G1. Both ends could easily be interchanged if designed a little different.
Ah, but as we all kind of agreed on, alt mode scale is not something any of us really expect from the brand
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
Sabrblade wrote:Between group teammates in this line, it is. Hence the reduction of Groove to a Legends.william-james88 wrote:Sabrblade wrote:They went with a model of cement truck that would be of appropriate size with Long Haul's gigantic mining dump truck altmode.william-james88 wrote:You know, the more I think about it, I dont get why Mixmaster couldnt be the conventional cement truck he was in G1. Both ends could easily be interchanged if designed a little different.
Ah, but as we all kind of agreed on, alt mode scale is not something any of us really expect from the brand
They wanted the Constructicons to all be giant mining vehicles, so the model of cement truck they went with for Mixmaster is the kind that is that big. And they wanted to modernize him.
Sabrblade wrote:Between group teammates in this line, it is. Hence the reduction of Groove to a Legends.william-james88 wrote:Sabrblade wrote:They went with a model of cement truck that would be of appropriate size with Long Haul's gigantic mining dump truck altmode.william-james88 wrote:You know, the more I think about it, I dont get why Mixmaster couldnt be the conventional cement truck he was in G1. Both ends could easily be interchanged if designed a little different.
Ah, but as we all kind of agreed on, alt mode scale is not something any of us really expect from the brand
They wanted the Constructicons to all be giant mining vehicles, so the model of cement truck they went with for Mixmaster is the kind that is that big. And they wanted to modernize him.
MrBlack wrote:It's worth noting that there seem to be enough details on both ends of the truck that Mixmaster can pass as a more traditional cement mixer if that's what you want him to be.
SillySpringer wrote:MrBlack wrote:1) Prowl took Hook's place as Devastator's upper torso, with Hook becoming Devastator's right leg (replacing Scrapper). Thus, an accurate Prowlastator would require two new figures: Prowl as the upper torso, and a new Hook to form the right leg. In addition, building a Prowl who would be his usual black and white in robot and car mode and green in combined mode would tax even the most brilliant engineer at Takara.
1) Prowl is green in both modes as a constructicon, so it wouldn't be as hard as you are making it out to be.
That Bot wrote:
That picture you posted of Prowl in green and purple is fanart.
william-james88 wrote:Hey guys. now that we have a better look at the remolded head for the SDCC version, which one do you preffer? I actually like the normal one but I preffer the paint apps on SDCC. And for only 30$ more, it sounds fair. But since I dont want to end up with 2 devastators (I dont even have space for 1 but I will figure something out), I think I will stick to the normal version dur to its head sculpt.
Burn wrote:Agamemnon wrote:Let's get back to talking about Burn's mammoth snout flopping...
Well I am Australian. It's kinda what we're known for.
Cobotron wrote:Just so we can see them side by side.
itscramtastic wrote:I agree with you Megatronus, I haven't run in to any paint issues with TT, jay. Usually the case is that the TT paint ends up being more accurate to the original item (either animation or toy model) I thought?megatronus wrote:What do you mean? Takara-Tomy normally has AWESOME paint apps.jay5 wrote:Ah, I guess if most of it is actually color-infused plastic and not painted plastic or painted metal, the poor quality of paint application we've seen on TT products won't be as much of an issue.
william-james88 wrote:Hey guys. now that we have a better look at the remolded head for the SDCC version, which one do you preffer? I actually like the normal one but I preffer the paint apps on SDCC. And for only 30$ more, it sounds fair. But since I dont want to end up with 2 devastators (I dont even have space for 1 but I will figure something out), I think I will stick to the normal version dur to its head sculpt.
carytheone wrote:I would imagine the heads are swappable, but some of the purple may go with it.
I actually like the black forehead better. I just want some cool guy shades on my Devy.
dittowilliam-james88 wrote:carytheone wrote:I would imagine the heads are swappable, but some of the purple may go with it.
I actually like the black forehead better. I just want some cool guy shades on my Devy.
The shades really make all the difference for me.
Burn wrote:Agamemnon wrote:Let's get back to talking about Burn's mammoth snout flopping...
Well I am Australian. It's kinda what we're known for.
jay5 wrote:william-james88 wrote:Hey guys. now that we have a better look at the remolded head for the SDCC version, which one do you preffer? I actually like the normal one but I preffer the paint apps on SDCC. And for only 30$ more, it sounds fair. But since I dont want to end up with 2 devastators (I dont even have space for 1 but I will figure something out), I think I will stick to the normal version dur to its head sculpt.
Unless Hasbro has a store page where you can order the SDCC version, or you are able to attend the convention yourself, which very few people overall are able to do, it's more like 100% more, not $30 more. Look at eBay - all of the listings are around $300 for an SDCC version Devy.
Retail Price: $179.99/Available through HasbroToyShop.com
jay5 wrote:Paint looks good on the SDCC
The non-rotating mixer barrel, non-extending crane arm, and the likely non-jointed excavator arm irk me, though.itscramtastic wrote:I agree with you Megatronus, I haven't run in to any paint issues with TT, jay. Usually the case is that the TT paint ends up being more accurate to the original item (either animation or toy model) I thought?megatronus wrote:What do you mean? Takara-Tomy normally has AWESOME paint apps.jay5 wrote:Ah, I guess if most of it is actually color-infused plastic and not painted plastic or painted metal, the poor quality of paint application we've seen on TT products won't be as much of an issue.
The reviews of some of the car Autobots have shown pretty poor paint quality control issues. Same with Soundwave and the cassette Decepticons. For Masterpiece-level models, they seem to have inferior paint to this TG combiner Devastator.
Cobotron wrote:Hey! You seemed to have attracted a wild Megatronus. They're hard to find, but boy are they fun when you catch one!
jay5 wrote:william-james88 wrote:Hey guys. now that we have a better look at the remolded head for the SDCC version, which one do you preffer? I actually like the normal one but I preffer the paint apps on SDCC. And for only 30$ more, it sounds fair. But since I dont want to end up with 2 devastators (I dont even have space for 1 but I will figure something out), I think I will stick to the normal version dur to its head sculpt.
Unless Hasbro has a store page where you can order the SDCC version, or you are able to attend the convention yourself, which very few people overall are able to do, it's more like 100% more, not $30 more. Look at eBay - all of the listings are around $300 for an SDCC version Devy.
Delta Magnus wrote:This is because you are a hamhanded idiot.
megatronus wrote:jay5 wrote:Paint looks good on the SDCC
The non-rotating mixer barrel, non-extending crane arm, and the likely non-jointed excavator arm irk me, though.itscramtastic wrote:I agree with you Megatronus, I haven't run in to any paint issues with TT, jay. Usually the case is that the TT paint ends up being more accurate to the original item (either animation or toy model) I thought?megatronus wrote:What do you mean? Takara-Tomy normally has AWESOME paint apps.jay5 wrote:Ah, I guess if most of it is actually color-infused plastic and not painted plastic or painted metal, the poor quality of paint application we've seen on TT products won't be as much of an issue.
The reviews of some of the car Autobots have shown pretty poor paint quality control issues. Same with Soundwave and the cassette Decepticons. For Masterpiece-level models, they seem to have inferior paint to this TG combiner Devastator.
First of all, you shouldn't conflate Masterpiece and Generations; even when both fall under Takara, they're different animals.
Second, the only MP figure I know of that saw widespread paint QC issues was Sideswipe, and that was several years ago. I haven't heard anything negative about the cassettes or Soundwave in that department, so if you could provide links or source those claims, I would appreciate it. I've had no such issues with mine.
Cobotron wrote:dittowilliam-james88 wrote:carytheone wrote:I just want some cool guy shades on my Devy.
The shades really make all the difference for me.
Return to Transformers Toys Discussion
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, Lunatyk, MSN [Bot], Yahoo [Bot], Ziusundra