The Energon Pub

News Credits: 174 · by **Hellscream9999** » Sat Aug 22, 2015 1:08 am

Shuttershock wrote:
D-Maximus_Prime wrote:
Hellscream9999 wrote:
D-Maximus_Prime wrote:
Hellscream9999 wrote:
D-Maximus_Prime wrote:I know a lot of people are sick of the mold, But I still like AB. He is part of my Superion and shall remain so, and He does have a good bio. Shows us all kinds of stuff that he really hasn't gotten in fiction yet

I'm sick of him not being remolded, especially as all of the parts in question are obtusely easy to remold as they play no integral part of the figures alt mode, and are not complicated parts in the slightest (the lower arms, tail, rotors, and cockpit shells)

True yes, and something I am glad they are doing with Victorion, but I still really like him

Yeah, I love him too (insofar as his combiner port will let me), I'm just sick of a/b clones (especially since he's an exact clone of vortex )

Yeah, Vortex is a bummer since they are straight repaints, I'll give you that

On the flip side, while Vortex is the same moldwise, I love the color scheme they're going with for him. I was concerned they wouldn't have it in them to make a mostly grey and turquoise bot and just do what they did with the FOC one.

Yeah, but having experienced the same damn thing twice, it won't be that great when I get it. And that to me is the entire problem of this line.

News Credits: 226 · by **Burn** » Sat Aug 22, 2015 1:47 am

Hellscream9999 wrote:
Burn wrote:
Hellscream9999 wrote:Yeah, I love him too (insofar as his combiner port will let me),

Yeah, for some reason, all the a/b clones I (and many others that I've seen) have the detent gear miss molded, so the port (when used as a joint) is ~.5 degrees off from all the others that I have. So when used as a knee, he will always be unbalanced (he cannot even stand properly because of this) so it's hard for me to like him, when him, blades, and vortex suffer from this problem (mine, many reviewers', and even the galleries here have shown this)

Yeah ... get technical all you want, but we really know how you "love" your toys now. :-P

News Credits: 174 · by **Hellscream9999** » Sat Aug 22, 2015 2:06 am

Burn wrote:
Hellscream9999 wrote:
Burn wrote:
Hellscream9999 wrote:Yeah, I love him too (insofar as his combiner port will let me),

Yeah, for some reason, all the a/b clones I (and many others that I've seen) have the detent gear miss molded, so the port (when used as a joint) is ~.5 degrees off from all the others that I have. So when used as a knee, he will always be unbalanced (he cannot even stand properly because of this) so it's hard for me to like him, when him, blades, and vortex suffer from this problem (mine, many reviewers', and even the galleries here have shown this)

Yeah ... get technical all you want, but we really know how you "love" your toys now.

Wouldn't be here if I didn't, now would I :-P

News Credits: 6188 · by **Va'al** » Sat Aug 22, 2015 2:06 am

ALPHA BRAVO BE PRAISED

(This news post is approved by Thew.)

News Credits: 174 · by **Hellscream9999** » Sat Aug 22, 2015 2:09 am

Va'al wrote:ALPHA BRAVO BE PRAISED

(This news post is approved by Thew.)

Praise be to Lord Thew - official reviewer of seibertron.com

(and a/b, I guess)

News Credits: 1642 · by **D-Maximal_Primal** » Sat Aug 22, 2015 11:29 am

Shuttershock wrote:
D-Maximus_Prime wrote:
Hellscream9999 wrote:
D-Maximus_Prime wrote:
Hellscream9999 wrote:
D-Maximus_Prime wrote:I know a lot of people are sick of the mold, But I still like AB. He is part of my Superion and shall remain so, and He does have a good bio. Shows us all kinds of stuff that he really hasn't gotten in fiction yet

I'm sick of him not being remolded, especially as all of the parts in question are obtusely easy to remold as they play no integral part of the figures alt mode, and are not complicated parts in the slightest (the lower arms, tail, rotors, and cockpit shells)

True yes, and something I am glad they are doing with Victorion, but I still really like him

Yeah, I love him too (insofar as his combiner port will let me), I'm just sick of a/b clones (especially since he's an exact clone of vortex )

Yeah, Vortex is a bummer since they are straight repaints, I'll give you that

On the flip side, while Vortex is the same moldwise, I love the color scheme they're going with for him. I was concerned they wouldn't have it in them to make a mostly grey and turquoise bot and just do what they did with the FOC one.

also true, The radically different color schemes make these guys quite different

News Credits: 1642 · by **D-Maximal_Primal** » Sat Aug 22, 2015 11:30 am

Va'al wrote:ALPHA BRAVO BE PRAISED

(This news post is approved by Thew.)

This is quality right here

News Credits: 1642 · by **D-Maximal_Primal** » Sat Aug 22, 2015 11:31 am

Hellscream9999 wrote:
Yeah, but having experienced the same damn thing twice, it won't be that great when I get it. And that to me is the entire problem of this line.

Mold fatigue, yes, but considering I have these guys combined so much, and considering that the helicoptor limb has been 3 different limb locations, I can deal with it.

by **Optimum Supreme** » Sat Aug 22, 2015 2:54 pm

You know who has VTOL AND can keep up with his teammates?

SLINGSHOT, the greatest of all Aerialbots, that's who.

News Credits: 4835 · by **william-james88** » Sat Aug 22, 2015 2:56 pm

Optimum Supreme wrote:You know who has VTOL AND can keep up with his teammates?

SLINGSHOT, the greatest of all Aerialbots, that's who.

Hoe does that toy have VTOL?

News Credits: 1642 · by **D-Maximal_Primal** » Sat Aug 22, 2015 3:07 pm

william-james88 wrote:
Optimum Supreme wrote:You know who has VTOL AND can keep up with his teammates?

SLINGSHOT, the greatest of all Aerialbots, that's who.

Hoe does that toy have VTOL?

It does not. Unless you count taking off in robot mode with jets in the feet and transforming midair. But Alpha Bravo still is the only Vehicle mode aerialbot capable of VTOL

by **Shuttershock** » Sat Aug 22, 2015 3:14 pm

D-Maximus_Prime wrote:
william-james88 wrote:
Optimum Supreme wrote:You know who has VTOL AND can keep up with his teammates?

SLINGSHOT, the greatest of all Aerialbots, that's who.

Hoe does that toy have VTOL?

It does not. Unless you count taking off in robot mode with jets in the feet and transforming midair. But Alpha Bravo still is the only Vehicle mode aerialbot capable of VTOL

Again, not being vindictive, but Harriers ARE VTOL capable. They just don't use obvious fans or propellers to do it.

News Credits: 4835 · by **william-james88** » Sat Aug 22, 2015 3:18 pm

Shuttershock wrote:
Again, not being vindictive, but Harriers ARE VTOL capable. They just don't use obvious fans or propellers to do it.

That's pretty amazing.

News Credits: 10 · by **Agamemnon** » Sat Aug 22, 2015 3:21 pm

william-james88 wrote:
Shuttershock wrote:
Again, not being vindictive, but Harriers ARE VTOL capable. They just don't use obvious fans or propellers to do it.

That's pretty amazing.

Indeed...

(There was also a scene in True Lies of a Harrier taking off. This, along with the A10 Warthog (Thunderbolt II) are among my favorite military aircraft.)

Though, not to run afoul of Va'al, AB is still superior. :-s

News Credits: 1642 · by **D-Maximal_Primal** » Sat Aug 22, 2015 4:06 pm

william-james88 wrote:
Shuttershock wrote:
Again, not being vindictive, but Harriers ARE VTOL capable. They just don't use obvious fans or propellers to do it.

That's pretty amazing.

Forgot he was based on a Harrier, my bad!

News Credits: 174 · by **Hellscream9999** » Sat Aug 22, 2015 4:43 pm

D-Maximus_Prime wrote:
william-james88 wrote:
Shuttershock wrote:
Again, not being vindictive, but Harriers ARE VTOL capable. They just don't use obvious fans or propellers to do it.

That's pretty amazing.

Forgot he was based on a Harrier, my bad!

Yeah, I believe they use a single pivoting thruster that can aim straight down, or straight behind them, and then, smaller thrusters below the body to aid take off.

News Credits: 10 · by **Agamemnon** » Sat Aug 22, 2015 4:44 pm

D-Maximus_Prime wrote:
william-james88 wrote:
Shuttershock wrote:
Again, not being vindictive, but Harriers ARE VTOL capable. They just don't use obvious fans or propellers to do it.

That's pretty amazing.

Forgot he was based on a Harrier, my bad!

I don't think you're the only one. The official bio seems to forget that Slingshot was based off of a Harrier. And since Firefly is now sharing a mold with Slingshot, and both look sort of like a Harrier...yeah, I don't think anyone could be blamed for forgetting this bit. Well, maybe Hasbro since we love to hammer them. And maybe they didn't count Slingshot as he was the bot AB was replacing....

Yeah, my head hurts now. :HEADHURTS:

Interesting fact, if anyone cares. G1 Slingshot had venting on the back of his hands that were supposed to emulate the vents on the side of the Harrier. :-B

News Credits: 10 · by **Agamemnon** » Sat Aug 22, 2015 4:46 pm

Hellscream9999 wrote:
D-Maximus_Prime wrote:
william-james88 wrote:
Shuttershock wrote:
Again, not being vindictive, but Harriers ARE VTOL capable. They just don't use obvious fans or propellers to do it.

That's pretty amazing.

Forgot he was based on a Harrier, my bad!

Yeah, I believe they use a single pivoting thruster that can aim straight down, or straight behind them, and then, smaller thrusters below the body to aid take off.

Sorry for the double post, you posted as I was posting. Are you talking about the Harrier? There are two pivoting exhaust ports on either side of the jet. There is no single thruster along the center. Check out the video a couple posts up.

(Wow, I love talking fighter jets! 8-)

)

News Credits: 174 · by **Hellscream9999** » Sat Aug 22, 2015 4:49 pm

Agamemnon wrote:
Hellscream9999 wrote:
D-Maximus_Prime wrote:
william-james88 wrote:
Shuttershock wrote:
Again, not being vindictive, but Harriers ARE VTOL capable. They just don't use obvious fans or propellers to do it.

That's pretty amazing.

Forgot he was based on a Harrier, my bad!

Yeah, I believe they use a single pivoting thruster that can aim straight down, or straight behind them, and then, smaller thrusters below the body to aid take off.

Sorry for the double post, you posted as I was posting. Are you talking about the Harrier? There are two pivoting exhaust ports on either side of the jet. There is no single thruster along the center. Check out the video a couple posts up.

(Wow, I love talking fighter jets! )

Well, I knew one kind does use that; but yeah, they could've easily molded some vents onto the side of slingshot/fireflys arms >:oP

News Credits: 4835 · by **william-james88** » Sat Aug 22, 2015 4:52 pm

Agamemnon wrote:
(Wow, I love talking fighter jets! )

Well then I am glad to have you around since I have a question. Is it wrong to see the F-117 Nighthawk as a jet as well? I am talking about categorizing generally.

News Credits: 174 · by **Hellscream9999** » Sat Aug 22, 2015 4:54 pm

william-james88 wrote:
Agamemnon wrote:
(Wow, I love talking fighter jets! )

Well then I am glad to have you around since I have a question. Is it wrong to see the F-117 Nighthawk as a jet as well? I am talking about categorizing generally.

Yes, I believe it is classified as awesome 8-)

News Credits: 10 · by **Agamemnon** » Sat Aug 22, 2015 5:07 pm

Hellscream9999 wrote:
william-james88 wrote:
Agamemnon wrote:
(Wow, I love talking fighter jets! )

Well then I am glad to have you around since I have a question. Is it wrong to see the F-117 Nighthawk as a jet as well? I am talking about categorizing generally.

Yes, I believe it is classified as awesome

I think the F-117 should have been classified as a Bomber, or B-117, instead as a Fighter. Is that what you are asking, WJ? It does fly with a jet engine, but there are so many things weird about its flight abilities that we could spend an afternoon just talking about that. The stealth nature is what makes the flight surfaces all flat. The jet exhaust is run through some surfaces and mesh to help eliminate the heat signature and foil heat seeking missiles. I've heard the thing would be impossible to fly if it were not for the micro-corrections made by the flight computers. (This was made possible by equipment that allowed the forward swept wing prototype X-29 fly without crashing.)

I was really stoked when Soundwave was made into a F-117-esque plane. I think it would be awesome to see him in that configuration again, but as a limb in Combiner Wars. #ShamelessAttemptToStayOnTopic

[Edit] Oh, the reason I thought it should have been classified as a bomber had to do with its mission planning. It was never really meant to engage in air-to-air combat, though I would imagine it could carry long range air-to-air missiles, like the Phoenix. Otherwise, its mission profiles had it mostly dropping smart bombs. Maybe a cruse missile, though I really don't remember that actually happening outside of perhaps a movie reference.... Lots of stuff is still classified, so who knows.

And thanks again for letting me geek out on fighter jets. :DANCE:

News Credits: 174 · by **Hellscream9999** » Sat Aug 22, 2015 5:14 pm

Agamemnon wrote:
Hellscream9999 wrote:
william-james88 wrote:
Agamemnon wrote:
(Wow, I love talking fighter jets! )

Well then I am glad to have you around since I have a question. Is it wrong to see the F-117 Nighthawk as a jet as well? I am talking about categorizing generally.

Yes, I believe it is classified as awesome

I think the F-117 should have been classified as a Bomber, or B-117, instead as a Fighter. Is that what you are asking, WJ? It does fly with a jet engine, but there are so many things weird about its flight abilities that we could spend an afternoon just talking about that. The stealth nature is what makes the flight surfaces all flat. The jet exhaust is run through some surfaces and mesh to help eliminate the heat signature and foil heat seeking missiles. I've heard the thing would be impossible to fly if it were not for the micro-corrections made by the flight computers. (This was made possible by equipment that allowed the forward swept wing prototype X-29 fly without crashing.)

[Edit] Oh, the reason I thought it should have been classified as a bomber had to do with its mission planning. It was never really meant to engage in air-to-air combat, though I would imagine it could carry long range air-to-air missiles, like the Phoenix. Otherwise, its mission profiles had it mostly dropping smart bombs. Maybe a cruse missile, though I really don't remember that actually happening outside of perhaps a movie reference.... Lots of stuff is still classified, so who knows.

And thanks again for letting me geek out on fighter jets.

I still think mine was more accurate [-(

But yeah, I believe it was predominantly a bomber used to soften up enemy positions; so yes, it should have been classified as a bomber (does it even have the acrobatic capabilities of fighters

)

News Credits: 4835 · by **william-james88** » Sat Aug 22, 2015 5:38 pm

Interesting. I as because TF Wiki calls movie Mindwipe's alt mode the following:

Mindwipe transforms from a bat-like robot into a fighter plane similar to a F-117 Nighthawk stealth ground attack aircraft.

http://tfwiki.net/wiki/Mindwipe_(ROTF)

And they use "fighter", which I realize now is probably erroneous (OH, TF WIKI IS WROOOOONG!!!!!). However, I was wondering why they called it "fighter plane" and not "fighter jet". But now I know it is a bomber, which makes perfect sense. And now I know it has a jet engine, so it is still a jet as a larger categorical identifier but then is a bomber instead of a fighter. Let me know if that is correct.

News Credits: 174 · by **Hellscream9999** » Sat Aug 22, 2015 6:25 pm

william-james88 wrote: Interesting. I ask because TF Wiki calls movie Mindwipe's alt mode the following:

Mindwipe transforms from a bat-like robot into a fighter plane similar to a F-117 Nighthawk stealth ground attack aircraft.
http://tfwiki.net/wiki/Mindwipe_(ROTF)

And they use "fighter", which I realize now is probably erroneous (OH, TF WIKI IS WROOOOONG!!!!!). However, I was wondering why they called it "fighter plane" and not "fighter jet". But now I know it is a bomber, which makes perfect sense. And now I know it has a jet engine, so it is still a jet as a larger categorical identifier but then is a bomber instead of a fighter. Let me know if that is correct.

Well the f-117 is actually larger than fighter jets aren't they? And mindwipe is some sort of perverse uber bomber/jet hybrid (that is also alien) so I don't know if you can quantify it by earthly standards :-B