Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store

Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.
AllNewSuperRobot wrote:The original fanbase is approximately 30's to 40's. Hasbro have reiterated time and again, they predominantly sell to kids. It's simple maths/biology. The older the original fanbase gets, the less likely Hasbro is to know how to cater to them.
AllNewSuperRobot wrote:I come back to the Mattel example. They held steadfast to their original fanbase and even aimed a 2000's rebooted line directly at them. "Remember Us?" was the tagline of the figures. What happened? Cancellation. Because they weren't aiming the new show/toys at the new and more relevant generation of kids that their original fanbase were. Up until very recently (a new series has been announced), He-Man's once market dominance was relegated to a collectors line that wasn't sold or even marketed anywhere but through direct online vendors.
AllNewSuperRobot wrote:Back to X-Men, while most fans are aware of the Original Five from the 60's series, no one is asking for their toys, team or their series to be rebooted ad nauseum. Too many new and popular characters were created since. As it should be.
Sentinel_Primal wrote:Cyberverse I wouldn't actually call retro-G1. Personally, I haven't watched it yet, but from what I hear, it's actually doing something similar to Animated where it mixes things up but still keeps characters recognizable. Especially with Grimlock being inspired by Dr. Jekyll/Mr. Hyde in terms of robot mode and beast mode
Zeedust wrote:
Let me rephrase: The character design is retro-G1. Any one of these designs could be used for their G1 counterpart without anyone batting an eye. In fact, several have.
Va'al wrote:Deadput wrote:Actually I don't know my mother's name is Valerie so is Va'al actually my mother?
Yes. Now go to your room and don't play with yourself.
Wolfman Jake wrote:
Actually, Mattel's biggest issue with 200X Masters of the Universe was that they didn't understand they couldn't pack wave after wave with five He-Man with New Hat and one of another character. The shelves were littered with He-Man and Skeletor variants that no one wanted. They marketed a boy's action figure toyline like it was Barbie, just the same character with different outfits.
blackeyedprime wrote:Wolfman Jake wrote:
Actually, Mattel's biggest issue with 200X Masters of the Universe was that they didn't understand they couldn't pack wave after wave with five He-Man with New Hat and one of another character. The shelves were littered with He-Man and Skeletor variants that no one wanted. They marketed a boy's action figure toyline like it was Barbie, just the same character with different outfits.
Erm... Nope. Sometimes good things just don't last. Heman needs a Skeletor and he-man in every wave and that's what kept the original going and what Mattel knew. Compare that to the classics line where he-man and Skeletor were stupidly hard to get and £100 a figure from a line where they are the main characters. It's just as adults think X costume he-man sighs... Wow at certain costumes (eg the ice he man 200x and fire Skeletor 200x) that mainly get avoided as we are more selective. Sad thing was the new thundercars didn't last because Bandai wanted it to be as big as their ben10 which was never going to happen, good, bad or too many duplicates of characters is irrelevant. Example here being ben10 who ended up having endless numbers of 'costumes' and very little villains but still sold well.
Wolfman Jake wrote:AllNewSuperRobot wrote:The original fanbase is approximately 30's to 40's. Hasbro have reiterated time and again, they predominantly sell to kids. It's simple maths/biology. The older the original fanbase gets, the less likely Hasbro is to know how to cater to them.
Here's the problem with this argument, though. Siege has been selling like HOTCAKES. Hasbro squeezed in a fifth wave of additional product JUST because of how popular Siege has become and how much money it's making them. So, if kids are the predominant market that Hasbro is selling too, then kids do like this G1 stuff.
Wolfman Jake wrote:AllNewSuperRobot wrote:Back to X-Men, while most fans are aware of the Original Five from the 60's series, no one is asking for their toys, team or their series to be rebooted ad nauseum. Too many new and popular characters were created since. As it should be.
The original run of X-Men was actually a very underwhelming book in its time. It got cancelled due to poor sales. It wasn't until it was revived in the latter part of the 70's with different team members that it really took off. Plus, even with all of the retcons, time traveling, magical reality bending, X-Men is still very much "G1," it's just been going on forever, with characters coming in and out of the spotlight on a constant rotation, older characters still being more popular than most new ones introduced. It's very few new characters now that strike a cord with fans and enjoy staying power in the franchise.
Sentinel_Primal wrote:Okay... I think we're starting to get off topic a bit everyone
AllNewSuperRobot wrote:^^ Quite right, blackeyedprime. A common fallacy a lot of companies fall into with various properties is trying to reclaim their former status exclusively through nostalgia. It simply doesn't work.Wolfman Jake wrote:AllNewSuperRobot wrote:The original fanbase is approximately 30's to 40's. Hasbro have reiterated time and again, they predominantly sell to kids. It's simple maths/biology. The older the original fanbase gets, the less likely Hasbro is to know how to cater to them.
Here's the problem with this argument, though. Siege has been selling like HOTCAKES. Hasbro squeezed in a fifth wave of additional product JUST because of how popular Siege has become and how much money it's making them. So, if kids are the predominant market that Hasbro is selling too, then kids do like this G1 stuff.
Two things.
1. I am talking about the future, not the present. So your comment on Siege is irrelevant to the point I was making.
2. Let's be clear here, you are making a bold assumption that "the kids" make the same association you do.
What is on the box of these toys: Transformers - War for Cybertron Trilogy: Siege/Earthrise. Much as it was "Transformers Animated, Beast Wars Transformers, Transformers Armada, Transformers Robots in Disguise" etc Nothing on the box even mentions G1.
At face value, most kids of 2019 won't make that association. I'd wager they mostly don't know or don't care about G1. Siege is selling so well because the figures are good and kids across the 35 year history of the series, still love transforming robot cars/jet/Submarines etc In fact, when the cartoon launches later on Netflix, that link will dissolve even further. As the toys, to the kids, will be judged as the precursor to a new cartoon. Not everyone who watches the newest Daniel Craig James Bond will have seen a Sean Connery film, after all.Wolfman Jake wrote:AllNewSuperRobot wrote:Back to X-Men, while most fans are aware of the Original Five from the 60's series, no one is asking for their toys, team or their series to be rebooted ad nauseum. Too many new and popular characters were created since. As it should be.
The original run of X-Men was actually a very underwhelming book in its time. It got cancelled due to poor sales. It wasn't until it was revived in the latter part of the 70's with different team members that it really took off. Plus, even with all of the retcons, time traveling, magical reality bending, X-Men is still very much "G1," it's just been going on forever, with characters coming in and out of the spotlight on a constant rotation, older characters still being more popular than most new ones introduced. It's very few new characters now that strike a cord with fans and enjoy staying power in the franchise.
Err.. No.
Let's pick this apart right away. New characters introduced that are still around and now fan favourites:
New Mutants
X-Force
X-Factor
Generation X
Excalibur
X-Treme X-Men
X-Statix
New X-Men [students]
Astonishing X-Men [students]
Wolverine and The X-Men [Students]
Bendis' Uncanny X-Men [students]
Barring about 10 individuals from the 10 books I've listed, the rest starting in the 80's to present day are all an established presence within the X-Men Universe. That's not even including the TV and live action characters like X23 that have been folded in. Those "fans" that don't acknowledge any of these new characters and their importance, probably haven't actually read a comic or bought a toy in a couple of decades. The recent movie fans, people like that. X-Men as a series has always put a lot of emphasis on the Next Generation, while keeping the most popular among them. The new reboot, for example, House of X and Powers of Ten, heavily featured most of those characters. With the Wolverines and Cyclops, often taking up less panel space and plot relevance. X-Men hasn't been reliant on "G1" alone in a Very, Very long time.
but what public consciousness comes back to time and again is the roots, the origins. In other words: G1.
AllNewSuperRobot wrote:I wasn't making a point on Siege. You were. I was talking about the future of the franchise in general. But..but what public consciousness comes back to time and again is the roots, the origins. In other words: G1.
What is this based on?
Wolfman Jake wrote:AllNewSuperRobot wrote:I wasn't making a point on Siege. You were. I was talking about the future of the franchise in general. But..but what public consciousness comes back to time and again is the roots, the origins. In other words: G1.
What is this based on?
Reality.
AllNewSuperRobot wrote:Wolfman Jake wrote:AllNewSuperRobot wrote:I wasn't making a point on Siege. You were. I was talking about the future of the franchise in general. But..but what public consciousness comes back to time and again is the roots, the origins. In other words: G1.
What is this based on?
Reality.
No. Unless you have the ear of every single Transformers fan and consumer of the past 35 years, that just makes you sound like a Fanboy.
aronjlove wrote:The Earthrise figures look just as articulated, if not more so, than the Siege figures. How many individuals here "play" with their figures versus "collect"? What has me hooked is how posable these figures are. I'm either making little stop-motion animations or posing them and taking pics. I can't wait to animate Cliffjumper driving in and out of Optimus's trailer
Sentinel_Primal wrote:aronjlove wrote:The Earthrise figures look just as articulated, if not more so, than the Siege figures. How many individuals here "play" with their figures versus "collect"? What has me hooked is how posable these figures are. I'm either making little stop-motion animations or posing them and taking pics. I can't wait to animate Cliffjumper driving in and out of Optimus's trailer
Generally, I only buy ones I think will be fun to play with and use to tell a story. That said, I do still collect figures in the sense of I put them on shelves and have it organized when I'm not messing with them
Sentinel_Primal wrote:aronjlove wrote:The Earthrise figures look just as articulated, if not more so, than the Siege figures. How many individuals here "play" with their figures versus "collect"? What has me hooked is how posable these figures are. I'm either making little stop-motion animations or posing them and taking pics. I can't wait to animate Cliffjumper driving in and out of Optimus's trailer
Generally, I only buy ones I think will be fun to play with and use to tell a story. That said, I do still collect figures in the sense of I put them on shelves and have it organized when I'm not messing with them
ZeroWolf wrote:Sentinel_Primal wrote:aronjlove wrote:The Earthrise figures look just as articulated, if not more so, than the Siege figures. How many individuals here "play" with their figures versus "collect"? What has me hooked is how posable these figures are. I'm either making little stop-motion animations or posing them and taking pics. I can't wait to animate Cliffjumper driving in and out of Optimus's trailer
Generally, I only buy ones I think will be fun to play with and use to tell a story. That said, I do still collect figures in the sense of I put them on shelves and have it organized when I'm not messing with them
Nice to see I'm not the only one who does that
Wolfman Jake wrote:Why does this matter? Because Bumblebee and Barricade made much more recent influential imprints in their Transformers characterizations in the franchise as a whole. Many other characters did that years ago in G1, like Optimus Prime, Megatron, Soundwave, Starscream, the Dinobots, the Constructicons, etc. Hasbro struck a LOT of gold back in 1984 with the original line-up of Transformers, which is why those designs and characterizations still resonate today, even though the original cartoon, comic book, and toyline are all long done. Plenty of other characters since have done the same, like Optimus Primal, Cheetor, Blackarachnia, Hot Shot, Bulkhead, Lockdown, Drift, and Windblade, just to name a few, but the returns have been diminishing as the years have pushed on, with fewer new characters or new takes really taking a seat in the pantheon of Transformers public awareness and pop cultural relevance.
AllNewSuperRobot wrote:Bringing it back, what are the chances through the Earthrise Starscream mold we might finally get a stable version of these guys:
blackeyedprime wrote:200X he-man vs snakemen (when it failed) had hardly any he-man/skel variants (snake skel was super cool too) and the main character snake armor he-man wasn't even available in some countries which was insert expletives here.
Return to Transformers Toys Discussion
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, MSN [Bot], Nemesis Destron, sprockitz, TigrisEye, UltOrange, Yahoo [Bot]