Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store
![Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "UNCANNY X-MEN #280 Marvel Comics 1991 (CA) Lee + Willams (W) Nicieza 240427A"](https://www.seibertron.com/images/ebay/comic-books/marvel/x-men/uncanny-x-men/volume-1/280-240427A/t-DSC05178.jpg)
![Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "UNCANNY X-MEN #226 Marvel Comics 1988 (A/CA) Silvestri (W) Claremont 240407A"](https://www.seibertron.com/images/ebay/comic-books/marvel/x-men/uncanny-x-men/volume-1/226-240407A/t-DSC04638.jpg)
![Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "X-MEN 97 #1 var Marvel Comics 2024 JAN240643 (CA) Dauterman (W) Foxe 240607B"](https://www.seibertron.com/images/ebay/comic-books/marvel/x-men/x-men-97/01-var-dauterman-240607B/t-DSC07212.jpg)
![Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "FCBD BLOOD HUNT UNCANNY X-MEN #1 Marvel Comics 2024 DEC230008 (CA) Ngu"](https://www.seibertron.com/images/ebay/comic-books/fcbd/2024/blood-hunt+uncanny-x-men/t-DSC05833.jpg)
![Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "GIANT-SIZE X-MEN #1 var 1:25 Marvel Comics 2024 MAR240630 (CA) Noto 240524A"](https://www.seibertron.com/images/ebay/comic-books/marvel/x-men/giant-size-x-men/2024/01-var-25-copy-240524A/t-DSC06683.jpg)
william-james88 wrote:BATTLEMASTER IIC wrote:I just noticed that the "REFRAKTOR" label on the front of it's camera mode has a design error in its typeface. The "R" at the beginning of "REFRAKTOR" is slanted correctly, but the "R" at the end of the word is not slanted at all. A reprolabel would fix that!
Not a design error, thats 100% G1 accurate.
Wireless_Phantom wrote:william-james88 wrote:BATTLEMASTER IIC wrote:I just noticed that the "REFRAKTOR" label on the front of it's camera mode has a design error in its typeface. The "R" at the beginning of "REFRAKTOR" is slanted correctly, but the "R" at the end of the word is not slanted at all. A reprolabel would fix that!
Not a design error, thats 100% G1 accurate.
A G1 accurate design error!
william-james88 wrote:If ever Sabrblade decides to go on vacation, I am glad to know we can rely on you.
Wireless_Phantom wrote:A G1 accurate design error!
o.supreme wrote:Normally I'm all about animated series accuracy over anything else. Jetfire is my one exception, because I love the original Macross Valkyrie model so much. However... all that being said, I think Siege Jetfire is brilliant! I never thought we'd see an animation accurate Skyfire, yet here we are. This toy is amazing, and I am so glad to have it.
Burn wrote:Agamemnon wrote:Let's get back to talking about Burn's mammoth snout flopping...
Well I am Australian. It's kinda what we're known for.
emlit wrote:So what’s the consensus on Siege Jetfire? He looks like an awesome figure with exceptional detail and articulation, although I don’t care for the scale in proportion to my other Siege figures and I don’t know if I’m OK with the $ investment. I actually like the Generations alt mode design better - should I pick that one up instead? Thoughts?
vs.
blackeyedprime wrote:I rate the cyber battalion jetfire
Planning to pick the siege version up and I want the original G1 toy but that will have to be put away in a dark place and never see any kind of light ever. It is cheaper to have an arcadia or bandai VF on display (which I have a Roy Fokker version but that's the wrong colors and armored up, macross toy prices make my brain hurt).
Leonardo wrote:Take your lips off my pipe!
Ironhidensh wrote:Stay classy target.....
sol magnus wrote:And to be clear - I've had three 1985 Jetfires. I'm not in any way knocking on the classic. However, having seen Macross around the same time as Transformers debuted, I knew already that he was a Valkyrie, and therefore found it odd having known the origin of the toy.
Return to Transformers Toys Discussion
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Blastback, Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, MSN [Bot], Sabrblade, william-james88, Yahoo [Bot], ZeroWolf