Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store






Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.
Wireless_Phantom wrote:Skritz wrote:AcademyofDrX wrote:Tommy T. wrote:I'm with ya, I prefer all the datsun boys being the same mold also. Love the fact they bringing barricade in. I'll definitely grab him. But I also don't see them using the same mold 4 times. Even though I would love it if they did the original seekers then did the rainmakers!!!
Titans Return Blurr would like a word.
UM, ACKSHUALLY! *Mouth breathe*![]()
Blurr's retool were NOT mass retail figures, as Brainstorm was a Walgreen exclusive, Nautica was a boxset exclusive and Arcee was a stand-alone online and TRU exclusive. Meaning the Blurr mold only showed up once at mass retail during Titans Return.
However, Combiner Wars Deadend would like a word with you![]()
Skritz wrote:AcademyofDrX wrote:Tommy T. wrote:I'm with ya, I prefer all the datsun boys being the same mold also. Love the fact they bringing barricade in. I'll definitely grab him. But I also don't see them using the same mold 4 times. Even though I would love it if they did the original seekers then did the rainmakers!!!
Titans Return Blurr would like a word.
UM, ACKSHUALLY! *Mouth breathe*![]()
Blurr's retool were NOT mass retail figures, as Brainstorm was a Walgreen exclusive, Nautica was a boxset exclusive and Arcee was a stand-alone online and TRU exclusive. Meaning the Blurr mold only showed up once at mass retail during Titans Return.
AcademyofDrX wrote:The line has an emphasis on G1 figures, it's rumored (and almost certain) that we'll see a Ratchet and at least one additional seeker, and Bluestreak and Smokescreen will work as redecoes only. We still don't know anything about the later WFC lines, which could reuse molds a la CW/PotP. I think they'd be nuts not to release all the Datsun boys; that's just leaving money on the table.
And I never qualified restriction to mass retail only, it would be perfectly reasonable to see Bluestreak as an exclusive, for example.
If Barricade is in fact a G1 version of the movie character, I hope we see more line hoppers. I would love a RiD Strongarm retooled from someone like Hound, or a Cybertronian Slipstream. That said, I want a complete 1985 CHUG lineup, so I'm more interested in all of the Autobot cars in WfC first.
Skritz wrote:Also, theory: if the line is called 'War for Cybertron' but the first one in the trilogy supposedly depict the final days of the war, perhaps the implied 'story' of the line is to be taken has starting in-media res. Which is to say, it start right in the middle of the ending and then the other two lines 'flashback' to the start and middle of the war.
Because otherwise it make no sense to market the entire trilogy as War for Cybertron if the war is already over.
Sentinel_Primal wrote:Skritz wrote:Also, theory: if the line is called 'War for Cybertron' but the first one in the trilogy supposedly depict the final days of the war, perhaps the implied 'story' of the line is to be taken has starting in-media res. Which is to say, it start right in the middle of the ending and then the other two lines 'flashback' to the start and middle of the war.
Because otherwise it make no sense to market the entire trilogy as War for Cybertron if the war is already over.
I had two thoughts on how this could be handled. One was that the trilogy would be similar to the games where the first one still has hope of being able to stay on Cybertron, the second part would be them desperate to win so they look for more powerful options (like Powermasters or maybe Brainmasters), and then the third part sees them attempting to flee like Fall of Cybertron. My other thought was that it could be the three Cybertron settings where we know conflict occurs. The last days before the war moved to Earth, the second part being post Rebirth, and the final part being the Pax Cybertronia where we see the Maximals and Predacons with Cybertronian vehicle modes and no beast modes. Though, your theory definitely sounds more likely
Skritz wrote:-That leave Hound who I'm unsure he would get retooled as, given he had no mainline retool in G1, with only the E-Hobby exclusive Detritus. My theory is its either Ironfist or Roadbuster.
-Theory: Barricade, if he does indeed turn into a police car, is a retool of an unseen mold. Either a Sunstreaker or the Mirage that is supposed to be in a wave 'opposed' to Ironfist.
Skritz wrote:We just had Optimal Optimus: to Warden, that's 'enough Beast Wars for a life time'.
Warden: "They are cool, aren't they? I hear Takara's doing some pretty neat Beast stuff in their Masterpiece line. You should check that out. Oh, and speaking of Masterpiece, we're gonna bring over Takara's G1 cartoon-colored Prowl. Everyone loves G1. Here, check out our Siege line with all its G1 goodness. We really wanted to do right by G1, making everyone look really faithful to G1 in robot mode, especially these G1 characters, from G1, who look really G1, in this G1 line, based on G1..."Nemesis Primal wrote:Also, more Beast Wars anyways please, Warden, surprise us.
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
ZeldaTheSwordsman wrote:I like Beast Wars a fair bit. A great show with great toys. I haven't seen any of RiD (2001) other than snippets I managed to catch on TV when it was on the air (I didn't actively follow), but I own some of the toys and I've seen the others. They're cool.
However, I'm not too sad about the dearth of Beast Wars or RiD 2001 figures in the Generations line. For a simple reason:
THEY DON'T NEED UPDATES ANYWHERE NEAR AS BADLY!!!
Beast Wars and RiD (2001) set the standards for articulation that later lines are judged by, and the original toys are for the most part already more or less in line with modern scaling. And in some cases (particularly Leader-class figures), we'd probably get a smaller and somewhat dumbed-down remake of a toy that was just fine as-is.
G1, on the other hand? The scale of the original toys was all over the place, and the Diaclone molds are dwarfed by most modern TFs that turn into cars of the same relative size. There's also the fact that a lot of them are bricks. The G1 characters are the ones most in need of being brought up to modern standards and size, and continue to get made as a trial-and-error process, of coming up with more polished modern versions of their toys and of back-and-forth over what design direction to take. And also covering characters who hadn't been done before, of course.
ZeldaTheSwordsman wrote:I like Beast Wars a fair bit. A great show with great toys. I haven't seen any of RiD (2001) other than snippets I managed to catch on TV when it was on the air (I didn't actively follow), but I own some of the toys and I've seen the others. They're cool.
However, I'm not too sad about the dearth of Beast Wars or RiD 2001 figures in the Generations line. For a simple reason:
THEY DON'T NEED UPDATES ANYWHERE NEAR AS BADLY!!!
Beast Wars and RiD (2001) set the standards for articulation that later lines are judged by, and the original toys are for the most part already more or less in line with modern scaling. And in some cases (particularly Leader-class figures), we'd probably get a smaller and somewhat dumbed-down remake of a toy that was just fine as-is.
G1, on the other hand? The scale of the original toys was all over the place, and the Diaclone molds are dwarfed by most modern TFs that turn into cars of the same relative size. There's also the fact that a lot of them are bricks. The G1 characters are the ones most in need of being brought up to modern standards and size, and continue to get made as a trial-and-error process, of coming up with more polished modern versions of their toys and of back-and-forth over what design direction to take. And also covering characters who hadn't been done before, of course.
Nemesis Primal wrote:Skritz wrote:We just had Optimal Optimus: to Warden, that's 'enough Beast Wars for a life time'.
OpOp still hasn't shown up at retail everywhere yet, so I'd argue we haven't actually had him yet.![]()
Also, more Beast Wars anyways please, Warden, surprise us.
Sabrblade wrote:Warden: "They are cool, aren't they? I hear Takara's doing some pretty neat Beast stuff in their Masterpiece line. You should check that out. Oh, and speaking of Masterpiece, we're gonna bring over Takara's G1 cartoon-colored Prowl. Everyone loves G1. Here, check out our Siege line with all its G1 goodness. We really wanted to do right by G1, making everyone look really faithful to G1 in robot mode, especially these G1 characters, from G1, who look really G1, in this G1 line, based on G1..."Nemesis Primal wrote:Also, more Beast Wars anyways please, Warden, surprise us.
ZeldaTheSwordsman wrote:I like Beast Wars a fair bit. A great show with great toys. I haven't seen any of RiD (2001) other than snippets I managed to catch on TV when it was on the air (I didn't actively follow), but I own some of the toys and I've seen the others. They're cool.
However, I'm not too sad about the dearth of Beast Wars or RiD 2001 figures in the Generations line. For a simple reason:
THEY DON'T NEED UPDATES ANYWHERE NEAR AS BADLY!!!
Beast Wars and RiD (2001) set the standards for articulation that later lines are judged by, and the original toys are for the most part already more or less in line with modern scaling. And in some cases (particularly Leader-class figures), we'd probably get a smaller and somewhat dumbed-down remake of a toy that was just fine as-is.
G1, on the other hand? The scale of the original toys was all over the place, and the Diaclone molds are dwarfed by most modern TFs that turn into cars of the same relative size. There's also the fact that a lot of them are bricks. The G1 characters are the ones most in need of being brought up to modern standards and size, and continue to get made as a trial-and-error process, of coming up with more polished modern versions of their toys and of back-and-forth over what design direction to take. And also covering characters who hadn't been done before, of course.
Skritz wrote:Nemesis Primal wrote:Skritz wrote:We just had Optimal Optimus: to Warden, that's 'enough Beast Wars for a life time'.
OpOp still hasn't shown up at retail everywhere yet, so I'd argue we haven't actually had him yet.![]()
Also, more Beast Wars anyways please, Warden, surprise us.
Wut? I got him right next to me on my computer desk!
Skritz wrote:Warden is just a product of the current 'pop culture exploitation' business: Transformers became a hit again in 2007, with the movies, bringing back into the fold many older fans who by then were in their thirties and forties with a lot more disposable income. At the same time, Transformers got a whole new wave of happy consumer consisting of little kids and parents buying them Transformers merch. Also around that time (or rather, a little before on 2005) IDW rose up with the Transformers comics. While this has led to many great things (Animated, the WFC games, Prime and the current Generations lines) I worry about the brand in the long run. And what is my worry, you ask?
Stagnation.
While for a time this whole idea of using G1 nostalgia, marketable characters and reinventing big names was good for most of this decade I worry that in the long run the brand and, by extension, the media surrounding (be it cartoon, comics and toylines) will increasingly stagnate if it remain under the leadership of the current Hasbro crop. There is only so many times they can purely rehash Generation 1 before the brand gets too stale. What we need is something back like in the days of the Unicron trilogy: enough recognizable brand characters but new ideas and new character or new design for older characters, like what Animated did.
To me there is a fine balancing act between nostalgia-grab and boring stagnation, which the Prime Wars trilogy IMO walked quite well. However, if after Siege we just get yet another Generations line with nothing but '84 to '86 bots (but with earth modes....again!) then there will be a problem. Right now this isn't quite the stagnation and going into circles because we still got enough interesting updates but what I'm trying to say is: after such a nostalgia-pandering line they'll have to shake things or end up boring the older fans. I like what Siege does from production and engineering standpoint but anyone familiar with my posts will know that my 'buy list' only include day one G1 characters who simply did not have a decent/up to my taste.
I can tolerate Siege because there's still good stuff left to milk off GEEWUN. But after that line? They need to really shake things up.
Edit: For the record I am 100% aware that I am willingly participating in said pop culture milking. My point is that if they start doing the same characters over and over they will lose collectors like me (or older) if they release an Optimus/Megatron/Starscream/Bumblebee/Ironhide every single line after Siege. There is no point for collectors to constantly buy the same character barring, maybe, the new one being such a massive improvement.
ZeroWolf wrote:This. So much this. Good post Skritz, you said it better than I could ever have
ZeroWolf wrote:This. So much this. Good post Skritz, you said it better than I could ever have
Return to Transformers Toys Discussion
Registered users: 1984forever, Bing [Bot], blokefish, figureguy, FracturedKoi, Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Jackatron, MSN [Bot], sprockitz, SupersonicShockwave, TF-fan kev777, vintron, W3C [Validator], Yahoo [Bot]