Seibertron.com Energon Pub Forums

Autobot Genocide wrote:

I could go for this if it's deluxe scale. Wouldn't have any interest if it dwarves earlier gobot homages Ive collected. For that ill stick with Fracture (Mirage repaint)

Need Alt Mode, Please. (Fortunately there are fewer Go-Bots to collect "Classics" homages of, right? RIGHT??!?!! (My poor wallet...)

Agamemnon wrote:Need Alt Mode, Please. (Fortunately there are fewer Go-Bots to collect "Classics" homages of, right? RIGHT??!?!! (My poor wallet...)

Well, fewer 'popular' ones, IIRC.

Guessing Crasher is a Voyager. Speculating that UT DX9 might want all of their Gobots homage toys. to be the same 6.3 inch robot scale like Salmoore is.

Makes sense.

Did I miss a figure this is a repaint of or is this the first w this mold? I do like Mirage and this might be a nice place holder until Tak gets around to it.

If they make the obvious repaint, I'm likely to have this mold serve as Mirage and the Hasbro Mirage repaint continue to serve as Crasher.

The important question is... Can they make Crasher's face appear in car mode?

Agamemnon wrote:The important question is... Can they make Crasher's face appear in car mode?

Haha, Scourge style! That would be awesome .

I'm all about the 'Generations' Go-Bots, so keep em' comin' UT and I'll keep buying em' (and you too, X-Transbots).

crasher looks awsome xcept for clour scheme unless they are doing varaints would be cool if they gave herva voice chip for het laugh

I will most likely buy this since it's a new mold and not a Mirage repaint . I sold my Fracture as part of a lot not so long ago , sort of regretting it now .

I still like my Fracture as Crasher, but I'll see what comes of this.

Appears the DX9-UT trend is release the Gobot version first. Then later release the Transformers version. Easily guessing there going to do a Mirage and DragStrip repaints and retools using this sculpt.

Tsutsukakushi wrote:Appears the DX9-UT trend is release the Gobot version first. Then later release the Transformers version. Easily guessing there going to do a Mirage and DragStrip repaints and retools using this sculpt.

I skipped X-Transbots' not-Wheelie and got Turbo. I skipped X-Transbots' not-Pipes and not-Huffer and got Road Ranger. I'm skipping UT's not-Wreck-Gar and I'm getting their not-Cy-Kill and of course I'm getting not-Crasher here and will most likely skip any subsequent G1 repaints/retools as I'm fairly satisfied with my Henkei Mirage (and I've got the one from the recent Asia Exclusive 3 pack sitting in my PoL as we speak). Unless it looks absolutely amazing, I'm not buying any of UT's G1 stuff. It's just not working for me, either because I don't like some of their design choices, or because I'm satisfied with the version(s) of the characters I've already got so doing these not-Gobots was a good idea on their part in my opinion to make some extra scratch off the collectors like me who aren't getting their G1 stuff.

Over at TFW, DX9 Confirms this toy is Voyager scale. their will be a Mirage recolor, Retool using this sculpt. http://www.tfw2005.com/boards/transform ... irage.html

Tsutsukakushi wrote:Over at TFW, DX9 Confirms this toy is Voyager scale. their will be a Mirage recolor, Retool using this sculpt. http://www.tfw2005.com/boards/transform ... irage.html

Um, no they did not confirm Voyager scale.

Scaleface on TFW2005 wrote:Just confirmed from DX9 in a PM he sent me. He will be doing a Mirage version of the Crasher we saw teased at TFcon 2014. Will probably be a Voyager size, so possibly a good MP stand-in?

Will "probably" be Voyager is not a confirmation that it is a voyager. There is a distinction there, and something that bugs me about your "facts," Tsutsukakushi. The only confirmation here is DX9 is planning on doing a Mirage repaint.

(Sorry, I'm a college instructor and sourcing material is important to me. It's important to be accurate, and distinguish between speculation and known facts.)

It will suck if Crasher is voyager scale. If so Ill just stick with Fracture. I donttneed a huge car. At least with Cykill (Salmore) he can get away with being taller because he is their supreme leader.

Agamemnon wrote:

Tsutsukakushi wrote:Over at TFW, DX9 Confirms this toy is Voyager scale. their will be a Mirage recolor, Retool using this sculpt. http://www.tfw2005.com/boards/transform ... irage.html

Um, no they did not confirm Voyager scale.

Scaleface on TFW2005 wrote:Just confirmed from DX9 in a PM he sent me. He will be doing a Mirage version of the Crasher we saw teased at TFcon 2014. Will probably be a Voyager size, so possibly a good MP stand-in?

Will "probably" be Voyager is not a confirmation that it is a voyager. There is a distinction there, and something that bugs me about your "facts," Tsutsukakushi. The only confirmation here is DX9 is planning on doing a Mirage repaint.

(Sorry, I'm a college instructor and sourcing material is important to me. It's important to be accurate, and distinguish between speculation and known facts.)

Are you serious, Guy?

Reads like your just trying to overly nitpick and antagonize.

Scaleface is a 3rd party liason with serious connections, So his maybe's and probably's carry more weight as coming true than a non-liason regular fan does.

Tsutsukakushi wrote:

Agamemnon wrote:

Tsutsukakushi wrote:Over at TFW, DX9 Confirms this toy is Voyager scale. their will be a Mirage recolor, Retool using this sculpt. http://www.tfw2005.com/boards/transform ... irage.html

Um, no they did not confirm Voyager scale.

Scaleface on TFW2005 wrote:Just confirmed from DX9 in a PM he sent me. He will be doing a Mirage version of the Crasher we saw teased at TFcon 2014. Will probably be a Voyager size, so possibly a good MP stand-in?

Will "probably" be Voyager is not a confirmation that it is a voyager. There is a distinction there, and something that bugs me about your "facts," Tsutsukakushi. The only confirmation here is DX9 is planning on doing a Mirage repaint.

(Sorry, I'm a college instructor and sourcing material is important to me. It's important to be accurate, and distinguish between speculation and known facts.)

Are you serious, Guy?

Reads like your just trying to overly nitpick and antagonize.

Scaleface is a 3rd party liason with serious connections, So his maybe's and probably's carry more weight as coming true than a non-liason regular fan does.

Has nothing to do with coming true or nitpicking. Indeed, I trust Scaleface's speculation more than some people's facts. (Thank you Doctor McCoy, ST IV the Voyage Home.) This has to do with your tendency to state things as fact that are not fact. Could this be Voyager? Sure. But it has yet to be confirmed as such, so it could be deluxe, right?

And I believe this is the issue behind your "factual" assertion that the Hasbro non-combining Protectobots are a store exclusive. When I asked for a source, you replied that you read it on another forum. Was this another example of speculation being relayed as fact by you? I don't know. And given your history, there is no reason to believe your facts until you back them up with sources. (I'm still waiting on that Protectobot claim in that thread, by the way.)

You are being dismissive about my complaints claiming that I am antagonizing. I don't believe my comments to be either nitpicky or antagonizing. I am asking for accuracy, especially when such comments affect people's interest in products. I am with Rated X in this thread. If DX9 D03 is confirmed to be voyager, I may end up passing as she will be too oversized for my collection. However, if she is deluxe, or even somewhere between deluxe and voyager, I may still be interested.

This would maybe be a nitpick if it wasn't a recurring theme with your posts. Too many times you have passed off speculation as the opinion of the masses or as given fact. This is asking for clarity in your posts, especially if you are attempting to "break some news." I don't think that is unreasonable.

Agamemnon wrote:

Tsutsukakushi wrote:

Agamemnon wrote:

Tsutsukakushi wrote:Over at TFW, DX9 Confirms this toy is Voyager scale. their will be a Mirage recolor, Retool using this sculpt. http://www.tfw2005.com/boards/transform ... irage.html

Um, no they did not confirm Voyager scale.

Scaleface on TFW2005 wrote:Just confirmed from DX9 in a PM he sent me. He will be doing a Mirage version of the Crasher we saw teased at TFcon 2014. Will probably be a Voyager size, so possibly a good MP stand-in?

Will "probably" be Voyager is not a confirmation that it is a voyager. There is a distinction there, and something that bugs me about your "facts," Tsutsukakushi. The only confirmation here is DX9 is planning on doing a Mirage repaint.

(Sorry, I'm a college instructor and sourcing material is important to me. It's important to be accurate, and distinguish between speculation and known facts.)

Are you serious, Guy?

Reads like your just trying to overly nitpick and antagonize.

Scaleface is a 3rd party liason with serious connections, So his maybe's and probably's carry more weight as coming true than a non-liason regular fan does.

Has nothing to do with coming true or nitpicking. Indeed, I trust Scaleface's speculation more than some people's facts. (Thank you Doctor McCoy, ST IV the Voyage Home.) This has to do with your tendency to state things as fact that are not fact. Could this be Voyager? Sure. But it has yet to be confirmed as such, so it could be deluxe, right?

And I believe this is the issue behind your "factual" assertion that the Hasbro non-combining Protectobots are a store exclusive. When I asked for a source, you replied that you read it on another forum. Was this another example of speculation being relayed as fact by you? I don't know. And given your history, there is no reason to believe your facts until you back them up with sources. (I'm still waiting on that Protectobot claim in that thread, by the way.)

You are being dismissive about my complaints claiming that I am antagonizing. I don't believe my comments to be either nitpicky or antagonizing. I am asking for accuracy, especially when such comments affect people's interest in products. I am with Rated X in this thread. If DX9 D03 is confirmed to be voyager, I may end up passing as she will be too oversized for my collection. However, if she is deluxe, or even somewhere between deluxe and voyager, I may still be interested.

This would maybe be a nitpick if it wasn't a recurring theme with your posts. Too many times you have passed off speculation as the opinion of the masses or as given fact. This is asking for clarity in your posts, especially if you are attempting to "break some news." I don't think that is unreasonable.

Tsutsukakushi wrote:And I could care less.

That's obvious. It's why I gave up trying to educate on the behavior until something hit closer to my interest. It's nice to know this so I can now ignore future posts.

And you want a nitpick, how about that the phrase is actually, "I couldn't care less."

Back to the regularly scheduled Crasher posts. (If you want to discuss further, Tsut, my PM is open. We don't need to clutter any more of this or other threads with such off topic discussions since we've moved this away from actually talking about Crasher. I tried to keep your comments about Crusher at the center of this discussion, but it appears that we may now be moving away from that.)

[Edit] And nice edit of your post to include some emoticons. Very troll like, indeed.

Agamemnon wrote:

Tsutsukakushi wrote:And I could care less.

That's obvious. It's why I gave up trying to educate on the behavior until something hit closer to my interest. It's nice to know this so I can now ignore future posts.

And you want a nitpick, how about that the phrase is actually, "I couldn't care less."

Back to the regularly scheduled Crasher posts. (If you want to discuss further, Tsut, my PM is open. We don't need to clutter any more of this or other threads with such off topic discussions since we've moved this away from actually talking about Crasher. I tried to keep your comments about Crusher at the center of this discussion, but it appears that we may now be moving away from that.)

[Edit] And nice edit of your post to include some emoticons. Very troll like, indeed.

Just for the record, You were not discussing the thread on topic with me. You were using it a excuse take it off topic by discussing my credibility as a source of info.

Related to the info on Crasher. Is it a Voyager? Probably. But it has not yet been confirmed to be a voyager. Or do you dispute this? You tried to use another person's non-confirmation (reliable though he is) as confirmation. I corrected you and asked that you try to be consistent. You laughed at me. Twice.

And again, this is straying off topic. Do you want to continue this public dialog, or do you wish to take it private, like I requested? I'd prefer to have a good, interesting, fun discussion about Crasher. How about you?

(And my apologies to the rest of the community. Any more comments I have to Tsut about this I will take to PM, even if he/she feels the need to get the last word in here.)

Back on topic: If this is voyager, and can be a decent stand-in for MP Mirage, I wonder if that is a good idea. Can Mirage be too far behind in the MP line? I was thinking about the lack of recolor options, but then we got Wheeljack, right?

Personally, I would hope UT will forgo trying to produce MP figures and keep Crasher more in line with the other GoBots that are coming out. However, if this looks really good as Crasher, I might still be in for a Voyager version.

I would be highly interested in not only this version, but a Mirage as well. Arguably my second favorite original cast member. I'll get either voyager or deluxe, although it would be nice if he scaled w MPs for my needs. I am optimistic for a Takara release eventually though. Mirage is one of a few guys I don't mind having several of if that turns out to be the case.

This guy has me rethinking my interest in Cykill if this is going to be a new trend. I can't decide if I like him in original colors or the black version. I did have both as a tike...leaning to black cause the odd foot coloring bugs me on the current version...

Tsutsukakushi wrote:Just for the record, You were not discussing the thread on topic with me. You were using it a excuse take it off topic by discussing my credibility as a source of info.

Just for the record:

Site. Your. Sources.

Agamemnon wrote:(And my apologies to the rest of the community. Any more comments I have to Tsut about this I will take to PM, even if he/she feels the need to get the last word in here.)

Please, don't apologize. You were doing the right thing.

Ah-ggie! Ah-ggie! Ah-ggie!

Bu duh ba-dum ba-dum! Chaaaaaarge!!!