Seibertron.com Energon Pub Forums

News Credits: 5 · by **Knightwave** » Wed Jun 15, 2011 11:55 pm

Clip from Transformers: Dark Of The Moon - Sam & Carly Opening Scene
From Late Show on June 15, 2011

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DPU7vvf5flg

News Credits: 37 · by **SlyTF1** » Wed Jun 15, 2011 11:59 pm

WTF!? Out of every "full" clip we've seen, not a single TF. Aw hell.

News Credits: 668 · by **Autobot032** » Thu Jun 16, 2011 12:05 am

Wow. She's only spoken in two scenes (this one and the one shown on Yahoo with Patrick Dempsey, some weeks back), and she's already a stellar actress compared to Megan Fox.

Amazing.

by **Capt.Failure** » Thu Jun 16, 2011 12:14 am

Autobot032 wrote:Wow. She's only spoken in two scenes (this one and the one shown on Yahoo with Patrick Dempsey, some weeks back), and she's already a stellar actress compared to Megan Fox.

Amazing.

Considering Microsoft Sam has a larger emotional range than Megan Fox, that's not saying much. Carly still wins for me however because of the "she was in G1" factor and cause I hate Megan Fox.

News Credits: 1 · by **SKYWARPED_128** » Thu Jun 16, 2011 12:27 am

I personally think Rosie has a certain Cameron Diaz demeanor to her, and she comes off as a more natural person than Megan Fox. Which is ironic since Fox actually has more "acting experience" than her, playing bit roles in sitcoms and such.

News Credits: 5749 · by **El Duque** » Thu Jun 16, 2011 12:57 am

Transformers DOTM's new leading lady Rosie Huntington-Whiteley made an appearance on last night's Late Show and naturally a Transformers DOTM clip has shown. Take a look at the embedded video below featuring Carly and Sam.

News Credits: 1 · by **Starscream GaGa** » Thu Jun 16, 2011 1:23 am

Glad to see that they're not using Carly purely to give thirteen year olds erections by making her on purposely move in compromising poses, while walking and talking sexy and instead show that they actually have hired her for her acting talents.

by **starwarrior1227** » Thu Jun 16, 2011 3:59 am

i still am wondering why hasbro allows michael to do these types of things(the porn posters in the college rooms, and partially naked women on screen) with their titles especially when hasbro is a CHILDRENS' toy company.

and then i remind myself this is the real world and partially naked women are now part of almost every movie.

by **Captziltoid** » Thu Jun 16, 2011 4:19 am

sam and carly sittin in a tree....bumblebee

shaddap i know it was dumb

by **Doubledealer93** » Thu Jun 16, 2011 4:43 am

yeah the short clips with no TFs in it is pissing me off. but i do think " Carly" is hotter than fox. and i never say an actress is hot. NEVER.

News Credits: 2 · by **Tekka** » Thu Jun 16, 2011 5:03 am

I hate this movie already. There I was thinking it was totally awesome seeing the city getting torn up in the other trailers and completely forgot how bull like this dominated the last one.

Thanks for bringing me back to reality and reminding me this is really what these movies are all about.

News Credits: 668 · by **Autobot032** » Thu Jun 16, 2011 5:29 am

Guys, seriously, don't get so upset over the human scenes.

If the movie is half as good as the novel, they'll be a lot of fun and bring levity to an otherwise REALLY dark film.

And there is plenty of TF scenery. Trust me.

News Credits: 2 · by **Tekka** » Thu Jun 16, 2011 6:02 am

I will do as I please.

by **jaws** » Thu Jun 16, 2011 7:22 am

She's f*&^ing beautiful, intelligent, and I want to apply to be her "loverboy toy"

News Credits: 37 · by **SlyTF1** » Thu Jun 16, 2011 7:30 am

Autobot032 wrote:Guys, seriously, don't get so upset over the human scenes.

If the movie is half as good as the novel, they'll be a lot of fun and bring levity to an otherwise REALLY dark film.

And there is plenty of TF scenery. Trust me.

I hope it's depressing...

News Credits: 1 · by **D-340** » Thu Jun 16, 2011 8:29 am

Ugh, what a waste of screen time. And Rosie Long Last Name, horrible. She makes Megan Fox look like an Oscar contender, and Fox had all the acting talent of a cardboard cut out. Every line in that scene made me cringe, neither Rosie, nor Shia the Beef, are selling this love story as believable at all.

News Credits: 15 · by **PrymeStriker** » Thu Jun 16, 2011 10:11 am

SlyTF1 wrote:WTF!? Out of every "full" clip we've seen, not a single TF. Aw hell.

Agreed. I want to see Bumblebee step in dog chocolate :SICK:

by **Capt.Failure** » Thu Jun 16, 2011 11:47 am

starwarrior1227 wrote:i still am wondering why hasbro allows michael to do these types of things(the **** posters in the college rooms, and partially naked women on screen) with their titles especially when hasbro is a CHILDRENS' toy company.

and then i remind myself this is the real world and partially naked women are now part of almost every movie.

I'd question the idea of Transformers toys being a children only thing when so many adults collect them. The only reason I don't is due to limited space in my apartment, and I'm almost 30. However it's just asinine to say that a form of media based off a toyline absolutely must be for children. If we kept the series focused on children alone, it would never be taken seriously.

D-340 wrote:Ugh, what a waste of screen time. And Rosie Long Last Name, horrible. She makes Megan Fox look like an Oscar contender, and Fox had all the acting talent of a cardboard cut out. Every line in that scene made me cringe, neither Rosie, nor Shia the Beef, are selling this love story as believable at all.

Gonna call BS here. The first thing I thought when I heard her act was "Wow, she actually sounds like a human being." Fox was more robotic than the damn Transformers, so if Rosie (still don't remember her last name) can keep this up through the whole film I consider her a welcome addition.

Also, am I the only one who saw them hanging a lampshade over how Sam always gets the hot girls when he really shouldn't? :-?

by **r3devi7** » Thu Jun 16, 2011 1:32 pm

I think I speak for everyone here, NO ONE CARES ABOUT THE HUMANS. lol

News Credits: 8 · by **LiKwid** » Thu Jun 16, 2011 1:41 pm

Wow..Im sorry but if you guys have a problem looking at Rosie.. #-o

That accent would make me forget what the movie was about

News Credits: 7 · by **Chaoslock** » Thu Jun 16, 2011 1:52 pm

starwarrior1227 wrote:i still am wondering why hasbro allows michael to do these types of things(the **** posters in the college rooms, and partially naked women on screen) with their titles especially when hasbro is a CHILDRENS' toy company.

and then i remind myself this is the real world and partially naked women are now part of almost every movie.

I miss the 80s... Back then, women weren't just partially naked in movies.

News Credits: 1 · by **Optimus1138** » Thu Jun 16, 2011 2:00 pm

I'm relieved (and rather surprised) that so far, it seems Rosie can act.

News Credits: 1 · by **Pontimax 01** » Thu Jun 16, 2011 2:47 pm

I'm more then happy to look at her fine legs straddling objects and/or people. But inevitably they will A)-show her face and B)-give her speaking lines. Between the weird lips and annoying accent, I would rather just not have a female lead in the movie at all. Nice legs though.

News Credits: 37 · by **SlyTF1** » Thu Jun 16, 2011 2:56 pm

Pontimax 01 wrote:I'm more then happy to look at her fine legs straddling objects and/or people. But inevitably they will A)-show her face and B)-give her speaking lines. Between the weird lips and annoying accent, I would rather just not have a female lead in the movie at all. Nice legs though.

This. There's no point. Just have Sam and the robots. And Lennox and Epps maybe. And a few random military guys in the background.