Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store










Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.
ZeroWolf wrote:RodimusPrimeUkraine1 wrote:william-james88 wrote:blackeyedprime wrote:Does seem weird that the voyagers don't have ikkle guys with them like the netflix line. Hasbro overcharging for deluxes aint anything new, theyve done it before and been praised for it so dont see any difference for Override.
I don't want those little guys, they only ever made the previous voyager figures even more expensive.
What they did with Stud Ser Hot Rod and Earthrise Prime is fine I guess, but for things like Override it is just plain stupid and unfair.
Not much else they could do if she went over budget for Deluxe.
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
Emerje wrote:ZeroWolf wrote:RodimusPrimeUkraine1 wrote:william-james88 wrote:blackeyedprime wrote:Does seem weird that the voyagers don't have ikkle guys with them like the netflix line. Hasbro overcharging for deluxes aint anything new, theyve done it before and been praised for it so dont see any difference for Override.
I don't want those little guys, they only ever made the previous voyager figures even more expensive.
What they did with Stud Ser Hot Rod and Earthrise Prime is fine I guess, but for things like Override it is just plain stupid and unfair.
Not much else they could do if she went over budget for Deluxe.
Nothing they can do about the figure itself, but there's stuff they can do about the price point by adding a bunch of extra stuff to make it feel worth the higher price. Or, you know, more paint since it's missing a lot of apps from the original figure.
To me this feels more like Hasbro knew they were probably only going to use this mold once (I doubt it'll get a GTS repaint) and being a store exclusive they needed to maximize their profit from its exclusive use.
Emerje
ZeldaTheSwordsman wrote:She's got noticeably more meat on her than Hot Rod (who trade size for engineering).
sol magnus wrote:ZeldaTheSwordsman wrote:She's got noticeably more meat on her than Hot Rod (who trade size for engineering).
He traded size for scale, not 'engineering.'
AcademyofDrX wrote:sol magnus wrote:ZeldaTheSwordsman wrote:She's got noticeably more meat on her than Hot Rod (who trade size for engineering).
He traded size for scale, not 'engineering.'
Trading size for scale doesn't explain why he's a Voyager, the engineering does. In the case of Override, the question is why she's being sold as a Voyager when the engineering and part count don't match Hot Rod. Emerje's theory of limited mold reuse on a retailer exclusive is a good one.
People are finally accepting now, more or less, that size class doesn't directly relate to the size of the toy. We're all still struggling with the right now conceptual model. Profit margins, product variation, and shelf space considerations are manufacturer and retailer considerations, rather than consumer-centric, so even if they're true, they're harder to know and validate.
Is it worth the money? That's always the question regardless of class, everyone has to figure that out for themselves.
AcademyofDrX wrote:sol magnus wrote:ZeldaTheSwordsman wrote:She's got noticeably more meat on her than Hot Rod (who trade size for engineering).
He traded size for scale, not 'engineering.'
Trading size for scale doesn't explain why he's a Voyager, the engineering does. In the case of Override, the question is why she's being sold as a Voyager when the engineering and part count don't match Hot Rod. Emerje's theory of limited mold reuse on a retailer exclusive is a good one.
People are finally accepting now, more or less, that size class doesn't directly relate to the size of the toy. We're all still struggling with the right now conceptual model. Profit margins, product variation, and shelf space considerations are manufacturer and retailer considerations, rather than consumer-centric, so even if they're true, they're harder to know and validate.
Is it worth the money? That's always the question regardless of class, everyone has to figure that out for themselves.
sol magnus wrote:AcademyofDrX wrote:sol magnus wrote:ZeldaTheSwordsman wrote:She's got noticeably more meat on her than Hot Rod (who trade size for engineering).
He traded size for scale, not 'engineering.'
Trading size for scale doesn't explain why he's a Voyager, the engineering does. In the case of Override, the question is why she's being sold as a Voyager when the engineering and part count don't match Hot Rod. Emerje's theory of limited mold reuse on a retailer exclusive is a good one.
People are finally accepting now, more or less, that size class doesn't directly relate to the size of the toy. We're all still struggling with the right now conceptual model. Profit margins, product variation, and shelf space considerations are manufacturer and retailer considerations, rather than consumer-centric, so even if they're true, they're harder to know and validate.
Is it worth the money? That's always the question regardless of class, everyone has to figure that out for themselves.
I agree, but the direct engineering for size 'trade' isn't accurate. They could have made him the same size as the PotP Hot Rod, but he would have been out of scale. It's not correct to say they shrunk him for the sake of engineering when they're doing these figures in 'scale.'
ZeldaTheSwordsman wrote:My only complaint with her is the front half of her car mode ending up so much wider than the rear. I blame the waist swivel.
Tuned Agent wrote:ZeldaTheSwordsman wrote:My only complaint with her is the front half of her car mode ending up so much wider than the rear. I blame the waist swivel.
What would the waist swivel have to do with that? I think the car proportions are more a product of trying to give her bot mode more accurate proportions.
Sabrblade wrote:Now we just need a new Gravedigger and all eight Constructicons will have been updated.
D-Maximal_Primal wrote:The Velocitron packaging looks really sharp. I am looking forward to seeing the car modes in the box for the first time in a long time
TF-fan kev777 wrote:D-Maximal_Primal wrote:The Velocitron packaging looks really sharp. I am looking forward to seeing the car modes in the box for the first time in a long time
^^^^100% This. I love getting a figure in alt mode and having to transform it first before getting to see the bot mode.
sol magnus wrote:TF-fan kev777 wrote:D-Maximal_Primal wrote:The Velocitron packaging looks really sharp. I am looking forward to seeing the car modes in the box for the first time in a long time
^^^^100% This. I love getting a figure in alt mode and having to transform it first before getting to see the bot mode.
I'll never understand why they changed that practice in the first place.
Till-all-R1 wrote:Yeah it was a fun thing to do back then as kid, not when I open them I usually just leave in bot mode and immediate set on shelf. I've only ever transformed a few into alt mode first before reverting back to put on display. So I can't exactly say I'd be keen on them coming in alt mode but I do acknowledge the nostalgia of it.
Perhaps they went with bot mode due to so many people displaying them MIB and having the appeal of "action figures" actually looking like a figure?
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
Sabrblade wrote:I feel like the decision to package the toys in robot mode came down to at least four things.
First off, it makes it more immediately apparent that these are robot toys, first and foremost. The average unassuming parent or grandparent need only look at them to see that they're robot toys and not just toy cars/trucks/jets/etc.
Secondly, for characters that have multiple altmodes, packaging them in robot mode eliminates the question of which altmode to package the figure in.
Thirdly, for characters like Soundwave, Blaster, Reflector, Shockwave, etc. who all turn into non-vehicle/non-beast altmodes, a humanoid robot creates a more striking visual than a compacted rectangle or a non-descript sci-fi thingamajig, and helps to make it very clear what they are.
And finally, one of the biggest excuses given back in the days of Aaron Archer & Friends for why they wouldn't give us new toys of certain characters like all five of the G1 Dinobots was that they, apparently, looked too similar to each other in altmode (like, a gray dinosaur is a gray dinosaur is a gray dinosaur). This, allegedly, created such a redundancy that parents would look at the toy and go, "But you already have the gray dinosaur, you don't need another one." In robot mode, there is more color diversity (and visual diversity) in such cases that we finally got all five Dinobots from John Warden & Friends back in Power of the Primes, and are getting them all again in Studio Series 86 (and maybe Legacy?) by having them all packaged in robot mode.
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
Return to Transformers Toys Discussion
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Bumblevivisector, Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, Jelze Bunnycat, MSN [Bot], o.supreme, Yahoo [Bot]