New Gray Prototype Images of HasLab Unicron

Couldn't afford the space for him... wouldn’t mind if they release just the head on a stand and the little accessories...

really scared that i have to transform it. wish it came in bot mode.

Yeah, I'm not sure where I can put him. I hope the artwork on the box he's in has the G1 look.

skywarp408 wrote:I hope the artwork on the box he's in has the G1 look.

This is the packaging:



Anything prettier would have only added to the already-expensive $600 price.

City Mode is interesting at least.

AllNewSuperRobot wrote:City Mode is interesting at least.

If I remember correctly, City mode only got as far as that image and the finished toy can't do it. I'm sure we reported on this aspect before.

ZeroWolf wrote:

AllNewSuperRobot wrote:City Mode is interesting at least.

If I remember correctly, City mode only got as far as that T image abd the finished toy can't do it. I'm sure we reported on this aspect before.

Correct on both accounts.

Well that's disappointing. For the price tag, they should be adding as much extra value and functionality as possible. I wonder if someone will find it is still possible to actually achieve in the final product. Much like the alternate leg placement for Fort Max in City Mode.

AllNewSuperRobot wrote:Well that's disappointing. For the price tag, they should be adding as much extra value and functionality as possible.

The abundance of features and extras they're already poured into this thing isn't enough?

They tried to put in the city mode and couldn't make it work without further compromising the rest of the figure.

Sabrblade wrote:

AllNewSuperRobot wrote:Well that's disappointing. For the price tag, they should be adding as much extra value and functionality as possible.

The abundance of features and extras they're already poured into this thing isn't enough?

They tried to put in the city mode and couldn't make it work without further compromising the rest of the figure.

The sad thing about the lack of City mode in this case, It actually looks like the best city mode we've seen designed for a large scale transformer.

The feature I wish they would have included was a quintasan ship that could be placed in one of his eyes like it was flying out like in the animated movie.

Why does Unicron need a city mode in the first place? Did he have one in any continuity? I would rather he be just a robot and a planet and cost $100 less.

The city mode was shown before. Still don't miss it. I'm not buying Unicron to be a city I'll never, ever use.

Gauntlet101010 wrote:The city mode was shown before. Still don't miss it. I'm not buying Unicron to be a city I'll never, ever use.

Exactly.

Rodimus Prime wrote:Why does Unicron need a city mode in the first place? Did he have one in any continuity? I would rather he be just a robot and a planet and cost $100 less.

At best, one could pretend that it represents some kind of hellish landscape found inside of his planet mode, but otherwise, yeah, he's not a citybot.

The idea was just to give his giant toy some more play value as a playset in addition to its already being a giant action figure (much like the case with all of the Titan class Citybots being both giant action figures and playsets).

If anything, I'm betting this mode was conceived as a way to further appeal to potential retailers so that they would be more inclined to carry this gigantic Transformers product since the figure on its own wouldn't have been enough in the eyes of the retailers since its planet mode alone wouldn't be marketable enough to most retailers due to its just being a giant ball on a stick that couldn't be played with like how a normal ball could be played with.

But, as we know, the city mode didn't happen and retailers didn't pick it up, so it instead went to HasLab as a crowdfunding product, where it wouldn't have to worry about the needs of mass market appeal to get made.

He still looks really impressive, I am excited to see him, that planet mode is huge!

Sabrblade wrote:

Rodimus Prime wrote:Why does Unicron need a city mode in the first place? Did he have one in any continuity? I would rather he be just a robot and a planet and cost $100 less.

At best, one could pretend that it represents some kind of hellish landscape found inside of his planet mode, but otherwise, yeah, he's not a citybot.

The idea was just to give his giant toy some more play value as a playset in addition to its already being a giant action figure (much like the case with all of the Titan class Citybots being both giant action figures and playsets).

If anything, I'm betting this mode was conceived as a way to further appeal to potential retailers so that they would be more inclined to carry this gigantic Transformers product since the figure on its own wouldn't have been enough in the eyes of the retailers since its planet mode alone wouldn't be marketable enough to most retailers due to its just being a giant ball on a stick that couldn't be played with like how a normal ball could be played with.

But, as we know, the city mode didn't happen and retailers didn't pick it up, so it instead went to HasLab as a crowdfunding product, where it wouldn't have to worry about the needs of mass market appeal to get made.

I have nothing against the concept of him having a city mode, and I understand the reasoning. My problem is that his featured modes (planet and robot) would suffer because if it. If they could have pulled it off without messing with those, then fine. By the looks of it, seems like they were trying to do the same thing they did to Cybertron Primus, except on a larger scale. Just because he's a large figure and has a big price tag, doesn't mean he has to have excessive and unnecessary features, especially ones that have no basis in his origins. If you want a city mode, buy a city bot. There are plenty. Unicron is Unicron.

Rodimus Prime wrote:

Sabrblade wrote:

Rodimus Prime wrote:Why does Unicron need a city mode in the first place? Did he have one in any continuity? I would rather he be just a robot and a planet and cost $100 less.

At best, one could pretend that it represents some kind of hellish landscape found inside of his planet mode, but otherwise, yeah, he's not a citybot.

The idea was just to give his giant toy some more play value as a playset in addition to its already being a giant action figure (much like the case with all of the Titan class Citybots being both giant action figures and playsets).

If anything, I'm betting this mode was conceived as a way to further appeal to potential retailers so that they would be more inclined to carry this gigantic Transformers product since the figure on its own wouldn't have been enough in the eyes of the retailers since its planet mode alone wouldn't be marketable enough to most retailers due to its just being a giant ball on a stick that couldn't be played with like how a normal ball could be played with.

But, as we know, the city mode didn't happen and retailers didn't pick it up, so it instead went to HasLab as a crowdfunding product, where it wouldn't have to worry about the needs of mass market appeal to get made.

I have nothing against the concept of him having a city mode, and I understand the reasoning. My problem is that his featured modes (planet and robot) would suffer because if it. If they could have pulled it off without messing with those, then fine. By the looks of it, seems like they were trying to do the same thing they did to Cybertron Primus, except on a larger scale. Just because he's a large figure and has a big price tag, doesn't mean he has to have excessive and unnecessary features, especially ones that have no basis in his origins. If you want a city mode, buy a city bot. There are plenty. Unicron is Unicron.

Prezactly.

Sabrblade wrote:At best, one could pretend that it represents some kind of hellish landscape found inside of his planet mode, but otherwise, yeah, he's not a citybot.

This was my interpretation as well, more of an inside Unicron play set than a city. The monitor cluster is even there in the back.

I really don't understand the articulated eyes that you can't actually see through the eye lenses.

Also...



Still can't unsee it.

Emerje

Unicron is only looking better and better. I so wish I had haved or have the cash to afford him. So fecking awesome. If they can add a half-assed base mode it will be cool but not necessary. Congrats to all who backed this, I was so, so close but couldnt come up with the money even though I knew it was super sweet. He is looking so good with every update that comes out.

Emerje wrote:

Sabrblade wrote:At best, one could pretend that it represents some kind of hellish landscape found inside of his planet mode, but otherwise, yeah, he's not a citybot.

This was my interpretation as well, more of an inside Unicron play set than a city. The monitor cluster is even there in the back.

The planet mode maw pointed upward in the center is also reminiscent of The Pit that was inside Unicron in the 3H Universe comics.

Considering he is just laying down (variation on the theme shared by all city bots) in the concept art, I doubt it would have compromised any other mode. That's just another excuse. What they could have done, since some think only four cities should exist within Transformers figures, was (as mentioned above) show off the acid vat, tentacle tunnel and monitor cluster. Make his "third mode" a Unicron playset. That would have made sense over pointlessly moving but hidden eyes and mismatched tiny figures.

AllNewSuperRobot wrote:Considering he is just laying down (variation on the theme shared by all city bots) in the concept art, I doubt it would have compromised any other mode.

The structural integrity would have been compromised based on how much the torso and legs would have had to open up and break apart as they appear to do in that artwork. The figure needed to be solid enough to support its own weight when not using its display stand.

I'm glad they put the effort of giving him a forked beard and a detachable head over working in a third mode we've never seen before. From the original pitch we were given those weren't features Unicron had. And those things are what this figure really needed. Not a third mode just for the sake of having a third mode. It really looks like Unicron is just lying down half transformed. It's decent enough, I'll give it that. But it's not why I'm buying this.

If we're just tossing random things in a grab bag I'd rather have more tiny space ships.

Considering the lower leg is hollow and the pics so far have all indicated both forms will need a stand regardless, they seemed too busy boasting about how much it weighs (like it was a bonus feature) over the logistics of making it so heavy.

Wanted to come here to say something i find very interesting.

The Haslab Sentinel for Marvel Legends was revealed today and put up for pre-order, and in less than 12 hours, they have passed 2/3 of their goal of 6000, and have also already passed what was the unicron number halfway point. It's incredible to see how quickly the numbers have rose.

Also cool, and something Unicron should have done, is that they have bonus tiers, so if they get above 7000, they get something extra, same with 8000 and 9000. And the Sentinel comes with a bonus Marvel Legends figure too.

I think they are doing a better job with this crowdfund project compared to Unicron, and apparently Marvel fans are reacting a lot more positively too.

PS: I am backing the Sentinel too

That does sound better-handled.

I'm pretty sure that what we saw with the Unicron funding campaign was panicked flailing after the rug got pulled out from under them by the Bayverse Unicron movie getting shelved.

It also didn't help that they had the Cookie Monster campaign running at the exact same time.

I think Unicron is going to be a great toy. I couldn't afford it at the time, and I have no regrets, but I'm glad for those who got one. If it had come with a base mode ( and compatible with the current airlock system) I would have regrets. But as it is now, I can be content admiring it from afar.

As for the Sentinel.

1. It's almost half the price and a smaller much less complex figure
2. As much as we don't like to admit. Transformers fans are a much smaller group than Marvel fans in general.
3. It requires fewer backers, "increased bonus tiers" aside



It makes sense such a project would be backed much faster. Also just for grins, I had to do a double take when I got the email yesterday I thought it said Haslab Sentinel Prime ....

Unicron is bar far the Grandest product from Haslab so far much moreso than the sailbarge or this Sentinel. A far more complex and expensive endeavor offered to a fan base much smaller than Star Wars or Marvel. We should really consider it a small miracle it actually got funded.


In fact I think they had to go with something *safe* as their next project with the almost failure of Unicron to get funded, and the aforementioned poor Cookie Monster who never had a chance.

Just wait until people find out the Sentinel is completely hollow.

Sabrblade wrote:It also didn't help that they had the Cookie Monster campaign running at the exact same time.

They should give us a Cookie Monster costume for Unicron for doing that.

Seriously though, I was thinking their next HasLab should be a big 24" Dino Megazord. Considering what people pay for all those Bandai Japan versions I think it would be an easy sell at $400 with lots of chrome. This one is $300 and only 10" tall and been reissued at least twice. Hasbro obviously wouldn't add die cast, but the size would more than make up for it.

Emerje

Emerje wrote:

Sabrblade wrote:It also didn't help that they had the Cookie Monster campaign running at the exact same time.

They should give us a Cookie Monster costume for Unicron for doing that.

Seriously though, I was thinking their next HasLab should be a big 24" Dino Megazord. Considering what people pay for all those Bandai Japan versions I think it would be an easy sell at $400 with lots of chrome. This one is $300 and only 10" tall and been reissued at least twice. Hasbro obviously wouldn't add die cast, but the size would more than make up for it.

Emerje

I disagree with you on that hard. The size would be awful. 24" is grossly oversize for a Megazord toy. At 10 1/4", the Soul of Chogokin one is well within the usual range of 10-12" (although shorter than the original version's 11 1/2"). The Soul of Chogokin version is popular because not only does it have die-cast, it remains in the proper size range for a Megazord while also being fully articulated and having fully-articulated components (as opposed to the normal retail fare of being at the same articulation level as G1 combiner limbs, when they have articulation at all).

A 24" Dino Megazord would be grossly oversize, except possibly in comparison to the combining movie Megazord (sad mess that that is). And then there's the fact that the Megazord is only 5 Zords out of the full set of 7. Can you imagine the extra funding needed to produce a Dragonzord and Titanus to go with it?

I think if Hasbro does a big lab project for Power Rangers it should be something like a Legacy Tor to complete the Legacy Thunderzords set. And/or a Legacy Megazord that rivals the SoC one, instead of being the 2010 Dino Megazod but with gratuitous die-cast. Or a 12" articulated monster line. Or maybe better toys of the 2017 movie Zords.

Also, too much chrome would be out of place on the Megazord. Especially on the sword.

Yeah, no way would I want a giant Dino Megazord that towers over all of my other megazords. I'd want a Dino Megazord that's properly in scale with all my other megazords so that they could all team up together in a big megazord bonanza.

Like these:

You know, seeing as how Sentinel passed 7000 and an alternate head was revealed for that tier, and they are nearly to the 8000 limit, it makes me think of this for Unicron:

What if at 9000 they had offered an IDW Unicron alternate head (the head come off afterall)

And at 10,000 they had offered a bonus minicon package with Dead End and maybe a could other generic ball minicons

And then 11/12000 (if they wanted) they could offer the 3 minicon weapon teams.

Things like that could have gone a long way

Thing to remember is that they've learned a lot from doing unicron and there's nothing to say they would have done it this way if it was launched tomorrow.

They made so many mistakes with Unicron, and by extent Cookie Monster too. Those reeked of overconfidence, and they both suffered. Sentinel shows how much better they are doing with this one. I actually wish unicron had waited a year or 2 to come out, I think they rushed that one, especially since he is the most expensive one.

Also, I have been talking to some main marvel collectors as well as some marvel collectors who also collect transformers, and there were some interesting points brought up about the 2 fandoms/brands.

the general consensus from those conversations is marvel handles it's brand far better than Hasbro with TFs, and that TFs rely too heavily on nostalgia. TFs constantly go back to the same source, while marvel balances it all out, something for everyone out and available at wider retail at all times. And as a result, they have both a larger fan base and a more active one since fans of every generation have something to look forward to, almost the opposite of what TFs are doing.

Couple a wider, happier, marvel fandom with a large potential troop builder, sole focus on 1 project, tiers for bonus parts, and a more palatable price, it shows just how much more cohesive, happy, and excited the marvel fandom is compared to tfs.

If they had simplified engineering and made Unicron $100 cheaper, I don't think that alone would have made a difference.

I wish the brand wasn't so stuck to Nostalgia, but it's giving the company short term gains so that's where their focus is.

Well, CHUG has always been nostalgia-based. What annoys me is crap like Bungledbee where the non-nostalgia franchise gets hijacked.

Given the amount of people who wanted it, it was bound to happen

D-Maximal_Primal wrote:They made so many mistakes with Unicron, and by extent Cookie Monster too. Those reeked of overconfidence, and they both suffered. Sentinel shows how much better they are doing with this one. I actually wish unicron had waited a year or 2 to come out, I think they rushed that one, especially since he is the most expensive one.

Also, I have been talking to some main marvel collectors as well as some marvel collectors who also collect transformers, and there were some interesting points brought up about the 2 fandoms/brands.

the general consensus from those conversations is marvel handles it's brand far better than Hasbro with TFs, and that TFs rely too heavily on nostalgia. TFs constantly go back to the same source, while marvel balances it all out, something for everyone out and available at wider retail at all times. And as a result, they have both a larger fan base and a more active one since fans of every generation have something to look forward to, almost the opposite of what TFs are doing.

Couple a wider, happier, marvel fandom with a large potential troop builder, sole focus on 1 project, tiers for bonus parts, and a more palatable price, it shows just how much more cohesive, happy, and excited the marvel fandom is compared to tfs.

If they had simplified engineering and made Unicron $100 cheaper, I don't think that alone would have made a difference.

In all fairness, Marvel's been around much longer and kno whow to manage their stuff, and while they've done plenty of reboots and resets over the years, the core timeline is still relatively intact.

They're also more geared towards selling comic books and movie tickets whereas Hasbro is all about toys, and that doesn't give them much in the way of flexibility as kids these days only care about a set group of characters ... plus there's holding onto trademarks.

ZeldaTheSwordsman wrote:Well, CHUG has always been nostalgia-based. What annoys me is crap like Bungledbee where the non-nostalgia franchise gets hijacked.

Ah yes because the people who wanted a G1-styled live action film getting 1 after 5 Bayverse films is so darn unreasonable.

Like come on, the Bay films practically ended besides the Unicron stuff, it was over, finished.

Let those who waited get their turn.

Sabrblade wrote:Yeah, no way would I want a giant Dino Megazord that towers over all of my other megazords. I'd want a Dino Megazord that's properly in scale with all my other megazords so that they could all team up together in a big megazord bonanza.

I guess I just think differently. I don't care about scale when it comes to one-off figures. I don't play with my toys so I just like nice shelf pieces, be it 4" or 24". I have that big 23" Mattel Voltron, I think it's great aside from being twice the price it should have been (it's much more toy than collectible, the Netflix Voltron line is better made), I don't need it to be the same size as the other Voltrons in my collection (which are all different sizes anyway. For that matter all of my Megazords are pretty different sizes as well. Bandai even did a line of Jumbo Megazords in the 2000s.



Maybe it's just me.

The Sentinel page is now doing the same thing the Unicron page did, the counter just says 6,000+ instead of a live count like before. They've noted that they're over 8,500+ orders, but I'm guessing they're trying to prevent people from asking for more stretch goals after is sails past 9,000 by hiding the actual count. It's the opposite problem Unicron had. If they hid Unicron's count so they could pad disappointing numbers then they're hiding the Sentinel's numbers because they're selling too many too quickly.

If anyone cares the first stretch goal was for a Master Mold head while the second was a battle damaged head. In a way we did get some stretch goals for Unicron as they added a few things to the package after launch

Emerje

Emerje wrote:

Sabrblade wrote:Yeah, no way would I want a giant Dino Megazord that towers over all of my other megazords. I'd want a Dino Megazord that's properly in scale with all my other megazords so that they could all team up together in a big megazord bonanza.

I guess I just think differently. I don't care about scale when it comes to one-off figures. I don't play with my toys so I just like nice shelf pieces, be it 4" or 24". I have that big 23" Mattel Voltron, I think it's great aside from being twice the price it should have been (it's much more toy than collectible, the Netflix Voltron line is better made), I don't need it to be the same size as the other Voltrons in my collection (which are all different sizes anyway. For that matter all of my Megazords are pretty different sizes as well. Bandai even did a line of Jumbo Megazords in the 2000s.



Maybe it's just me.

Plus, Imaginext already made a gigantic 27.5-inch Megazord that looks nice as it is and is even bigger than the giant Movie Megazord, so the concept has already been done, size-wise.

It is incredible, the sentinel crossed its final tier within 3 days of going up.

I hope that if there is another Transformers haslab project, they can take lessons learned and apply it the way they did for Sentinel. There is a clear difference in project success stories

Hopefully. Although someone did point out that the Sentinel is a smaller figure that had a lower primary threshold to cross.

ZeldaTheSwordsman wrote:Hopefully. Although someone did point out that the Sentinel is a smaller figure that had a lower primary threshold to cross.

Oh Sentinel was certainly properly proportioned price wise. 2 inches shorter, but a lot less engineering needed. But they used new cues and items that certainly helped the excitement factor. Unlike unicron, there was near universal excitement and joy here. And a bunch of cool stuff to help encourage people to spend the money.

I hope that when TFs do get another Haslab, that things work better

Hopefully.
I'll say it before and I'll say again: The performance with Unicron really does smack of them relying on the Unicron-focused 6th Bayformer movie to generate hype, and frantically fumbling about when that rug got pulled out from under their feet.

ZeldaTheSwordsman wrote:Hopefully.
I'll say it before and I'll say again: The performance with Unicron really does smack of them relying on the Unicron-focused 6th Bayformer movie to generate hype, and frantically fumbling about when that rug got pulled out from under their feet.

What about the other notion of 2021 (the year in which HasLab Unicron will be released) being the 35th anniversary of TFTM?

Sabrblade wrote:

ZeldaTheSwordsman wrote:Hopefully.
I'll say it before and I'll say again: The performance with Unicron really does smack of them relying on the Unicron-focused 6th Bayformer movie to generate hype, and frantically fumbling about when that rug got pulled out from under their feet.

What about the other notion of 2021 (the year in which HasLab Unicron will be released) being the 35th anniversary of TFTM?

I'd say that that's a fitting release timing. But I don't think they were expecting that anniversary to be their source of hype for the funding campaign. If they were, they certainly didn't act like it.

Although speaking of anniversaries of The Transformers: The Movie... Some people wondered why we got Hot Rod, Kup, Blurr, Galvatron, Scourge, Wheelie, and another Arcee (albeit as an exclusive retool based on "The Rebirth") during the Headmaster-oriented Titans Return. I wonder if they considered that that line was pulling double-duty as a 30th Anniversary line for the movie.

Connecting this Unicron to TLK's version is seeing patters where none exist. There's just nothing in common between the two of them.

I think Hasbro was relying on the "wow" factor too much. But that's about it.

As for an annaversary prompting Hasbro and Takara to make the movie guys Headmasters, I suppose it makes sense. But they were all Targetmasters too, so it's a lateral move in many ways. And then there's all the characters who weren't in the movie also in the line. So I think it's also kind of reaching.

Gauntlet101010 wrote:Connecting this Unicron to TLK's version is seeing patters where none exist. There's just nothing in common between the two of them.

I think Hasbro was relying on the "wow" factor too much. But that's about it.

You really think it's that illogical to see a connection-between:
* Unicron-centric movie was supposed to come out in Summer 2019, which - being a Unicron-centric movie and all - would have had everyone thinking about Unicron in general.
and
* Hasbro launches Unicron campaign in late Summer 2019, at about the point when the movie (had it come out) would have been out long enough for that to take effect
And people have pointed out that the pre-campaign development had to have been going on for a while, easily far enough back that TF6 could have still been on the slate when it started...

I don't think it's really fair to say "There's just nothing in common between the two of them". That's like saying there's nothing in common between G1, Armada, and Prime Unicron (the latter of whom Bayverse Unicron obviously draws from). Yes, all we saw in TLK itself was his protruding horns... but it's still made clear that he's got basically the same role in Transformers cosmology as other Unicrons, and no doubt he would have been fully awake and speaking and about to cause the end of the world in the next movie.

Gauntlet101010 wrote:I suppose them all being Headmasters on an anniversary makes sense. But they were all Targetmasters too, so it's a lateral move in many ways. And then there's all the characters who weren't in the movie also in the line.

I, um, don't think you quite got the point I'm making. Let me try to clarify...

ZeldaTheSwordsman wrote:Although speaking of anniversaries of The Transformers: The Movie...

Here's the first part, separated to make it clear what anniversary I'm talking about.

ZeldaTheSwordsman wrote:Some people wondered why we got Hot Rod, Kup, Blurr, Galvatron, Scourge, Wheelie, and another Arcee (albeit as an exclusive retool based on "The Rebirth") during the Headmaster-oriented Titans Return.

Here, I'm talking about two things:
1. that Titans Return was a Headmaster-oriented line; Headmasters 2.0 essentially.
2. That people questioned the presence of Hot Rod, Galvatron, et al (in other words, non-Headmaster characters) in a neo-Headmaster line

ZeldaTheSwordsman wrote:I wonder if they considered that that line was pulling double-duty as a 30th Anniversary line for the movie.

And here I'm saying that it's because said neo-Headmaster line was doubling as a TFTM 30th Anniversary line. Which, due to timing, it was - Titans Return launched in 2016, 30 years after the movie.

Hopefully that helps <.>