Tyrese Gibson wrote:3 guns - Not here o play any games with anybody /. ?#TBT? I have some good news to share soon.......... Just know this.... I've seen everything you guys have posted about Epps..... I love you back!
Man, even the hype for this movie can't escape product placement.CommanderShadowmus wrote:Nice Ford in the background!
Sabrblade wrote:No, it's how he was played. He was given an exaggerated accent (Ken Watanabe does not sound in real life quite like how Drift sounded), he used Japanese terms that Americans know but only used them out of their proper meaning because of how pop culture has constantly used those terms incorrectly, he presented himself as a well-behaved bot of honor yet kept doing lot of disrespectful and dishonorable things throughout the movie, he spoke proverbs for no reason other than his having a Japanese motif as said proverbs never fit the context of the situations in which he spoke them and which only incited ill reactions from his teammates (particularly Crosshairs)... Drift is a far cry from a respective representation of a Japanese Samurai character. Beast Wars Dinobot, or even the character-less Swordbot Samurai Team members from Transformers Go!, were far more accurate expressions of how an actual Samurai would be like.SlyTF1 wrote:So, because he's a samurai played by a Japanese guy, he's obviously a stereotype. Right.
A point not even hinted at by the movie, as no one would know about it if not for the toy bio saying so.conbot3 wrote:To be fair Drift was a Decepticon before joiming the Autobots
Sabrblade wrote:A point not even hinted at by the movie, as no one would know about it if not for the toy bio saying so.
A game whose story had jack all to do with the movie it was meant to tie in with (thanks to Bay forbidding any licensees from seeing the movie's script prior to the film's release).Deadput wrote:Sabrblade wrote:A point not even hinted at by the movie, as no one would know about it if not for the toy bio saying so.
Rise of the dark spark states he was a former con as well it's one of those all but confirmed things.
None of those other Drifts matter to the content of the AOE movie.Deadput wrote:Plus every other Drift ever has been a former con and I'm pretty sure it's intentional I mean remember brains he is also a former con according to the prequel comics yet it's not stated in the film itself.
(Yes Rid Drift is a former con too just not stated in the show it's in a book)
conbot3 wrote:Sabrblade wrote:No, it's how he was played. He was given an exaggerated accent (Ken Watanabe does not sound in real life quite like how Drift sounded), he used Japanese terms that Americans know but only used them out of their proper meaning because of how pop culture has constantly used those terms incorrectly, he presented himself as a well-behaved bot of honor yet kept doing lot of disrespectful and dishonorable things throughout the movie, he spoke proverbs for no reason other than his having a Japanese motif as said proverbs never fit the context of the situations in which he spoke them and which only incited ill reactions from his teammates (particularly Crosshairs)... Drift is a far cry from a respective representation of a Japanese Samurai character. Beast Wars Dinobot, or even the character-less Swordbot Samurai Team members from Transformers Go!, were far more accurate expressions of how an actual Samurai would be like.SlyTF1 wrote:So, because he's a samurai played by a Japanese guy, he's obviously a stereotype. Right.
To be fair Drift was a Decepticon before joiming the Autobots so perhaps he hasn't had time to worry about the true meaning of honour!
conbot3 wrote:Sabrblade wrote:No, it's how he was played. He was given an exaggerated accent (Ken Watanabe does not sound in real life quite like how Drift sounded), he used Japanese terms that Americans know but only used them out of their proper meaning because of how pop culture has constantly used those terms incorrectly, he presented himself as a well-behaved bot of honor yet kept doing lot of disrespectful and dishonorable things throughout the movie, he spoke proverbs for no reason other than his having a Japanese motif as said proverbs never fit the context of the situations in which he spoke them and which only incited ill reactions from his teammates (particularly Crosshairs)... Drift is a far cry from a respective representation of a Japanese Samurai character. Beast Wars Dinobot, or even the character-less <a target="_blank" href="http://rover.ebay.com/rover/1/711-53200-19255-0/1?toolid=10001&customid=&icep_ff3=9&icep_uq=transformers%20swordbot&ipn=psmain&icep_vectorid=229466&kwid=902099&mtid=824&kw=lg&mkcid=1&mkrid=711-53200-19255-0&siteid=0&mkevt=1 class="epn-link" target="_blank" id="epn8">Swordbot</a> Samurai Team members from <a target="_blank" href="http://rover.ebay.com/rover/1/711-53200-19255-0/1?toolid=10001&customid=&icep_ff3=9&icep_uq=transformers%20go&ipn=psmain&icep_vectorid=229466&kwid=902099&mtid=824&kw=lg&mkcid=1&mkrid=711-53200-19255-0&siteid=0&mkevt=1 class="epn-link" target="_blank" id="epn7">Transformers Go</a>!, were far more accurate expressions of how an actual Samurai would be like.SlyTF1 wrote:So, because he's a samurai played by a Japanese guy, he's obviously a stereotype. Right.
So was wheelie and jetfire
To be fair Drift was a Decepticon before joiming the Autobots so perhaps he hasn't had time to worry about the true meaning of honour!
Kurona wrote:Well yes, but the point is that it's a point not addressed in the movie itself - hence most viewers will not know of it. You have to dig into extra material to know this particular character trait.
Deadput wrote:Unicron is the worst thing they could do especially since he is a one dimension character from the start
SlyTF1 wrote:Kurona wrote:Well yes, but the point is that it's a point not addressed in the movie itself - hence most viewers will not know of it. You have to dig into extra material to know this particular character trait.
That's what I like about the movies. You have to work for answers.
Precisely!JazZeke wrote:SlyTF1 wrote:Kurona wrote:Well yes, but the point is that it's a point not addressed in the movie itself - hence most viewers will not know of it. You have to dig into extra material to know this particular character trait.
That's what I like about the movies. You have to work for answers.
And I consider that the essence of bad storytelling. A movie should provide all the relevant information to the audience within itself; audiences should not be expected to do homework or buy tie-in material to understand what is going on. When I buy a movie ticket, I expect to be paying for a whole story, not just part of a story.
Especially if said tie-in material isn't even written by the screenwriters, but left to other writers to clear up. That is the very definition of laziness.
JazZeke wrote:SlyTF1 wrote:Kurona wrote:Well yes, but the point is that it's a point not addressed in the movie itself - hence most viewers will not know of it. You have to dig into extra material to know this particular character trait.
That's what I like about the movies. You have to work for answers.
And I consider that the essence of bad storytelling. A movie should provide all the relevant information to the audience within itself; audiences should not be expected to do homework or buy tie-in material to understand what is going on. When I buy a movie ticket, I expect to be paying for a whole story, not just part of a story.
Especially if said tie-in material isn't even written by the screenwriters, but left to other writers to clear up. That is the very definition of laziness.
Hellscream9999 wrote:JazZeke wrote:SlyTF1 wrote:Kurona wrote:Well yes, but the point is that it's a point not addressed in the movie itself - hence most viewers will not know of it. You have to dig into extra material to know this particular character trait.
That's what I like about the movies. You have to work for answers.
And I consider that the essence of bad storytelling. A movie should provide all the relevant information to the audience within itself; audiences should not be expected to do homework or buy tie-in material to understand what is going on. When I buy a movie ticket, I expect to be paying for a whole story, not just part of a story.
Especially if said tie-in material isn't even written by the screenwriters, but left to other writers to clear up. That is the very definition of laziness.
That's because it is the essence of bad storytelling - at least a major part of it
JazZeke wrote:Hellscream9999 wrote:JazZeke wrote:SlyTF1 wrote:Kurona wrote:Well yes, but the point is that it's a point not addressed in the movie itself - hence most viewers will not know of it. You have to dig into extra material to know this particular character trait.
That's what I like about the movies. You have to work for answers.
And I consider that the essence of bad storytelling. A movie should provide all the relevant information to the audience within itself; audiences should not be expected to do homework or buy tie-in material to understand what is going on. When I buy a movie ticket, I expect to be paying for a whole story, not just part of a story.
Especially if said tie-in material isn't even written by the screenwriters, but left to other writers to clear up. That is the very definition of laziness.
That's because it is the essence of bad storytelling - at least a major part of it
You know that, and I know that. But Sly has his head burried so deep in his a- I mean, the sand, that he doesn't know that.
Yup! Forget this guy's not having a backstory in the movie, dude doesn't even get a name despite being a roughly major player in the flick.Hellscream9999 wrote:I remember someone saying that they never even mentioned Drift's name, I won't waste my time re-watching that movie, but if that's true, then that would explain why they don't bother explaining his backstory
Hellscream9999 wrote:JazZeke wrote:Hellscream9999 wrote:JazZeke wrote:SlyTF1 wrote:Kurona wrote:Well yes, but the point is that it's a point not addressed in the movie itself - hence most viewers will not know of it. You have to dig into extra material to know this particular character trait.
That's what I like about the movies. You have to work for answers.
And I consider that the essence of bad storytelling. A movie should provide all the relevant information to the audience within itself; audiences should not be expected to do homework or buy tie-in material to understand what is going on. When I buy a movie ticket, I expect to be paying for a whole story, not just part of a story.
Especially if said tie-in material isn't even written by the screenwriters, but left to other writers to clear up. That is the very definition of laziness.
That's because it is the essence of bad storytelling - at least a major part of it
You know that, and I know that. But Sly has his head burried so deep in his a- I mean, the sand, that he doesn't know that.
Mr. Plinkett for life yo
And to be fair, I don't mind having to dig for easter eggs, it's nice fan service; a main characters name shouldn't be treated that way
I remember someone saying that they never even mentioned Drift's name, I won't waste my time re-watching that movie, but if that's true, then that would explain why they don't bother explaining his backstory
