Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store
![Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "DESTRO #1 Cvr E 1:50 Image Comics 2024 1E GI JOE 0424IM194 (CA) Fornes"](https://www.seibertron.com/images/ebay/comic-books/image/gijoe/destro/01E/t-DSC07521.jpg)
![Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "TRANSFORMERS #9 Cvr A Image Comics 2024 Skybound 0424IM340 9A (CA) Johnson"](https://www.seibertron.com/images/ebay/comic-books/image/transformers/09A/t-DSC07284.jpg)
![Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "GI JOE Saturday Morning Adv #3 RI 1:10 IDW Comics 2022 FEB220414 3RI Meugniot"](https://www.seibertron.com/images/ebay/comic-books/idw/gijoe/saturday-morning-adventures/03RI/t-DSC08594.jpg)
Tronus_Rex wrote:njb902 wrote:Oh goody more words in my mouth.
No, I said your responses "boil down to", how about, "distill", or "demonstrate".
You have been dismissive, hostile, combative, rude. Part of this is in reaction to my own intensity and obvious anger. I was justified, you were never my friend, kind, nor fair. I've tried apologizing.
Now I'm calling you on your superior & childish attitude.
Yes, you've had an attitude. Stop denying it njb'. You've bristled my fur enough, now you get eat some humble pie.![]()
I'm focusing on the topic. You won't yank my chain again, kid.
Tronus_Rex wrote:njb902 wrote:It's not my fault you don't know what the word means, or that it isn't necessarily a negative. Also the man admits to being a terrorist. I don't get your objection to the label.
Context of your statement. Implying why anyone should take him seriously.
Use proper grammar and English and stop taking your own crap out of context.
Tronus_Rex wrote:The pearls of facts, wisdom, history, and logic I’ve just presented on this thread, is not for the three burrows. It’s for anyone who is willing to think, be fair, and hear why you shouldn't give in to fear.
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Tronus_Rex wrote:Blast Cannon wrote:Tronus_Rex wrote:Rupert Murdoch is a Saudi prince?
Did I say Rupert Murdoch? No, I'm not talking about Murdoch. He founded Fox News but he's no longer in charge. Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, however is. Talal owns a media conglomerate that controls Fox News.
The "go fact yourself" is meant to be a little mean but not a full F you. It's a wordplay meant to grab your attention. Don't take it as a full...er, rude, comment.![]()
Just so you know, "fact yourself" is used by many people in a positive way, but is also used like I just did-haha! Don't take it the wrong way.
Remember also, I'm trying to be positive, but hearing dismissals of "crazy", or "made-up/BS" incenses me. It smacks of apathy, and a few other things. My ability to care, doesn't come from fear nor delusion, but because I'm aware. An educated consumer is what I am, at the very least.
Sorry but you're a complete loon.![]()
The best part is that you post from a deluded 'enlightened' perspective that is entirely presumptious. You think that everybody else must be ignorant or stupid for not giving a flying yellow monkey **** about what you're jabbering on about, when in reality I just don't care because not one part of what you and your conspiracy theorist buddies are claiming will take place.
You're barking up the wrong tree. Take to the streets.
I don't know weather to scoff, mock, laugh, or just roll my eyes. You say no one cares about my "flying yellow monkey ****". That's funny-seriously!-I cracked up when I read that.I'm going to use that image in a meme, also as a way to poke fun at myself.
Thank you, very much!
Anyway, clearly many people do and are very impassioned about this such as myself. You can see it on YouTube comment sections, comment sections in general, the countless news articles showing people who DO care.
You say I'm crazy, but you're the one ignoring how visually measurable people really care. They very obviously care. Why does it bother you so much that they, and myself to?
Also crying "no one cares", (especially when you, yourself obviously care), is not how you debate. I do wish you'd actually bother to debate me. Until you do I'll have to ignore your obvious trolling. Hopefully I'm wrong, but I would do better to reason with my smart phone then you...sigh*
Tronus_Rex wrote:I've taken a break to actually work and get away from the little brats on this thread. Anyway, I'm not surprised that credited journalists, news sites, business and legal analysts, lawyers, academics, and documented history, all cited on this thread, including a specialist who worked for the US military in a tech. position, are considered to be "YoutTube comments"by what a friend and colleague from England (working in Japan A.T.M.), called a chav".
The word; "chav", is not nice, but I don't care at the moment, I was very polite, reasonable and civil, but was repaid for respect with pig slop. My anger was valid, and this rude remark is also justified.
Tronus_Rex wrote:The internet, the web, must be classified as a "common carrier", or we will have irresponsible corporations acting in selfish interest, and against the public interest.
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Shadowman wrote:Tronus_Rex wrote:I've taken a break to actually work and get away from the little brats on this thread. Anyway, I'm not surprised that credited journalists, news sites, business and legal analysts, lawyers, academics, and documented history, all cited on this thread, including a specialist who worked for the US military in a tech. position, are considered to be "YoutTube comments"by what a friend and colleague from England (working in Japan A.T.M.), called a chav".
The word; "chav", is not nice, but I don't care at the moment, I was very polite, reasonable and civil, but was repaid for respect with pig slop. My anger was valid, and this rude remark is also justified.
And all of that? That's going to make us take you seriously.
It's probably just a grammar issue, but you're talking about the Internet and Web as if they're the same thing.
Tronus_Rex wrote:The "chav" remark, as well as my being offended by brats who "troll", and think they know everything, my anger was and still is justified. So are my rude remarks.
Burn wrote:Tronus_Rex wrote:The "chav" remark, as well as my being offended by brats who "troll", and think they know everything, my anger was and still is justified. So are my rude remarks.
No, they're not.
You are, in no way, shape, or fashion, above the rules of these forums.
I've let this thread go for a while just to see how things would progress. Suffice to say, I'm actually incredibly disappointed.
If you wish for this thread to remain open, then I suggest you try to have a civilised discussion without feeling the need to resort to petty childish insults.
That goes for everyone else involved. All parties are guilty in some small way.
If you wish to discuss this with me, feel free to PM me. Otherwise, you can get the thread back onto topic with those who wish to discuss it in a mature manner.
Tronus_Rex wrote:The **** up thing is I had a friend named Justin, (I will not reveal his full name), an internet personality, who was tired of the BS, part of which came from the effect of trolls, who shot himself over a week ago on a Thursday.
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Shadowman wrote:Tronus_Rex wrote:The **** up thing is I had a friend named Justin, (I will not reveal his full name), an internet personality, who was tired of the BS, part of which came from the effect of trolls, who shot himself over a week ago on a Thursday.
Justin "JewWario" Carmical. And you're trying to use his suicide against me. You should be ashamed of yourself.
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Shadowman wrote:If he was really your friend, you wouldn't be using his death to try and guilt-trip people. I am being real with you right now: You should be ashamed and embarrassed with yourself for having brought that up the way you did.
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
1. No flaming, trolling, harassing, or baiting other guests.
Flaming should be self evident, trolling means to make posts or threads for the intended purpose of starting an argument, while baiting is any post intended to make another user resort to flaming. Harassment means following a user or group of users around through multiple threads to flame them, bait them, or otherwise cause them to want to avoid the boards because of a user's actions towards them. If there is a discussion and there ends up some sort of disagreement on someones personal opinion, simply try and respect each others opinions without forcing them on others.
11. Mod's the Word
If a moderator/administrator has to step in and hand out warnings/bans or other disciplines adhere to their wishes. Do not treat the warning as grounds for a personal vendetta. Warnings are carefully thought out, and flaming, bating, threatening or harassing a staff member because of it will only lead to a harsher reprimand.
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], MSN [Bot], MSNbot Media, Yahoo [Bot]