Sledge wrote:Who are you agreeing with? You're the first person to say it's better than G1.
massmachine wrote:just looking for opinions on the mattter.Next time you start a thread ill be the first one to say something smartass
Skowl wrote:- Octane (I refuse to call him Tankor. Not only is it NOT his name, but it's one of the stupidest names in all the TF Universe - might as well call him "Trucktor"!)
0ctane wrote:Woah easy on the newbies Sledge, outward hostility doesn't make for a good discussion.
as I do find your comments amusing most of the time i think that belittling someone as you did in that first and subsequent post on this topic was uncalled for.
.
Skowl wrote:- Octane (I refuse to call him Tankor. Not only is it NOT his name, but it's one of the stupidest names in all the TF Universe - might as well call him "Trucktor"!)
I've dipped in and out of the TV show, and found it almost enjoyable when they were able to keep the bloody kids off screen for more than thirty seconds. Sadly, this didn't happen that often.No Death for Prowl wrote:I have never seen an episode of the Cybertron TV show, but my opinion on the toy line after purchasing 6 of the figures and looking at the pictures of most is:
It is a pretty solid line with seemingly few figures that are terrible, but there are also few "must haves" in this line. The different planet angle of the storyline(which I confess, I don't completely understand) seemed interesting, but the "planet keys" concept comes across as a cheap gimmick just for the sake of having a gimmick.
I think the strength of the line is in the larger classes, such as Primus and Galaxy Force Prime, but the real meat and potatoes of any line is in the voyager and deluxe classes, and I think Cybertron comes up short in this department. Again, I don't want to make definitive statements on figures I don't own, but the fact that I haven't been compelled to buy many of them even when presented with the opportunity tells me something.
I also found the alt modes of many figures to be too ambitious in futuristic designs to the point where many alt modes don't seem to reseble much at all. The transformations on the figures that I do have seem to range from boring(Nemisis Breaker, Skywarp) to needlessly difficult without really being all that complex(Smokescreen's arms).
All in all, not a bad line, but not one that I really regret missing out on for the most part.
Sledge wrote:I've dipped in and out of the TV show, and found it almost enjoyable when they were able to keep the bloody kids off screen for more than thirty seconds. Sadly, this didn't happen that often.No Death for Prowl wrote:I have never seen an episode of the Cybertron TV show, but my opinion on the toy line after purchasing 6 of the figures and looking at the pictures of most is:
It is a pretty solid line with seemingly few figures that are terrible, but there are also few "must haves" in this line. The different planet angle of the storyline(which I confess, I don't completely understand) seemed interesting, but the "planet keys" concept comes across as a cheap gimmick just for the sake of having a gimmick.
I think the strength of the line is in the larger classes, such as Primus and Galaxy Force Prime, but the real meat and potatoes of any line is in the voyager and deluxe classes, and I think Cybertron comes up short in this department. Again, I don't want to make definitive statements on figures I don't own, but the fact that I haven't been compelled to buy many of them even when presented with the opportunity tells me something.
I also found the alt modes of many figures to be too ambitious in futuristic designs to the point where many alt modes don't seem to reseble much at all. The transformations on the figures that I do have seem to range from boring(Nemisis Breaker, Skywarp) to needlessly difficult without really being all that complex(Smokescreen's arms).
All in all, not a bad line, but not one that I really regret missing out on for the most part.
As for the toys, I found the smaller toys were better. The Voyagers and above were, for me, often ruined by needless light and sound gimmicks that took up large amounts of space. As a result, the toys were often too simple for their size. Whilst the smaller toys didn't have this issue, the need to fit a Cyber Key gimmick to everything did create it's own problems. Downshit would have been better if his chest could have folded away more. As it is, his gimmick means his arms barely reach bast his chest. Ransack GTS, Hard Top and Swindle, whilst good figures, were saddled with stupidly oversized guns because their guns housed a gimmick that really wasn't worth the payoff.
Octane: I don't want to be rude, but if you don't want to get involved in something, don't post about it. Ok, so I tried to make a funny and it didn't go down well. I'm sorry. On the other hand, I've not actually seen anyone yet who does think that Cybertron is the best series since G1. If I'm wrong, fair enough. But based on my experience (which is all any of us can go on), I'm not wrong.
massmachine wrote:just looking for opinions on the mattter.Next time you start a thread ill be the first one to say something smartass
Sledge wrote:Guys, we've settled the issue, no blood was spilt, apologies were exchanged, etc. We were both dicks. Can we drop it and move on?![]()
Best toyline since G1? Has to be Classics. Great updates of old characters, without the convoluted transformations of the Alternators line. Cybertron didn't have enough "wow! Gotta have it!" figures for me.
Return to Transformers Toys Discussion
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Gauntlet101010, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, Lunatyk, Maikeruu, MSN [Bot], Yahoo [Bot]