Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store

Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.
Screamfleet wrote:Noideaforaname wrote:One thing I hate about G1 is how it's become the "main" generation in terms of homages. It's to be expected, I guess, since it's the original one, but it's disappointing how Black Shadow getting a new toy or Bulkhead appearing in Prime or even Waspinator and Dinobot winning HoF spots are "unheard of."
It certainly doesn't help that I have little connection with any of the G1 guys.
My hope is that Transformers will grow as brand and hasbro will broaden it a bit too. Right now, hasbro wants to have one continuity, which is fine. I just hope maybe in the future, we can see two series within this continuity. Suppose Transformers Prime goes on for another few years, why not a beast wars series along side it?
It seems like a never happen situation. Especially with how hasbro repeatedly says no plans for any beast wars related merchandise. I hope though, like how marvel has multiple characters and shows, that transformers can be the same way. You know, there's the Avengers and The x-men, and why not the autobots and the maximals?
"G1" is not one story, though. Not even in the 1980s. There were at least two different "G1" stories running at the time. The cartoon and the Marvel Comics (note that the comics actually came first, before the cartoon, and even outlived it by four years).RhA wrote:Keep in mind that Marvel is composed of several stories, most of which are not direclty connected and the merchandise was made after all of the stories where established. TF's started as 'just' G1,
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
Sabrblade wrote:"G1" is not one story, though. Not even in the 1980s. There were at least two different "G1" stories running at the time. The cartoon and the Marvel Comics (note that the comics actually came first, before the cartoon, and even outlived it by four years).RhA wrote:Keep in mind that Marvel is composed of several stories, most of which are not direclty connected and the merchandise was made after all of the stories where established. TF's started as 'just' G1,
Jeep! wrote:Why do I imagine Dead Metal sounding exactly like Arnie?
Intah-wib-buls?
Blurrz wrote:10/10
Leave it to Dead Metal to have the word 'Pronz' in his signature.
Haven't heard that before. Got a link?Dead Metal wrote:Yes, but that was more due to bad communication between the two teams, the cartoon was supposed to expand upon the comic and be set in the same universe.
Blaster sure wasn't the same in both. In the cartoon, he was a jive-talking radio DJ dude. In the comic, he was Robot Wolverine.Dead Metal wrote:Also, the differences where mostly superficial, since technically it was still the same series and the same characters.
Don't forget the new Rescue Bots cartoon coming soon.Dead Metal wrote:But what RhA wants is to have multiple different continuities/series with different characters going at the same time, kinda like Prime and then Beast Wars and Armada.
Which is kinda happening, we've got Prime, we've got idw G1 comics and we've got Movie and toy line fiction for Generations etc.
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
Dead Metal wrote:Yes, but that was more due to bad communication between the two teams, the cartoon was supposed to expand upon the comic and be set in the same universe.
Also, the differences where mostly superficial, since technically it was still the same series and the same characters. But what RhA wants is to have multiple different continuities/series with different characters going at the same time, kinda like Prime and then Beast Wars and Armada.
Which is kinda happening, we've got Prime, we've got idw G1 comics and we've got Movie and toy line fiction for Generations etc.
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
Sabrblade wrote:We now return to the main topic.
Sounds like you've had personal experience with anti-G1 fans. Care to elaborate?SlyTF1 wrote:Of damn course there are people who don't like G1 who are still TF fans. People like my age. People who like Transformers but don't feel like sitting through old 80's cartoons where the animation is stiff, there's horrible diologue and the person either has ADHD or think they're too old to watch cartoons from the 80s. I like G1, but I can see why someone my age would hate G1, but love TF Prime, the movies, etc.
Sabrblade wrote:Haven't heard that before. Got a link?Dead Metal wrote:Yes, but that was more due to bad communication between the two teams, the cartoon was supposed to expand upon the comic and be set in the same universe.![]()
Blaster sure wasn't the same in both. In the cartoon, he was a jive-talking radio DJ dude. In the comic, he was Robot Wolverine.Dead Metal wrote:Also, the differences where mostly superficial, since technically it was still the same series and the same characters.
And Shockwave was Mr. Loyalty in the toon. Comic Shockwave was Evil Spock and a more competent leader than Megatron ever was.
And Grimlock was literally a dimwit (not meant as an insult, but a statement) in the show, while he only has a speech impediment in the comic. And the other Dinobots weren't dumb either in the comics.
And any animal bot spoke with normal intellect in the comic, while only making animal noises (barring a few excepted cases) or speaking in "Dinobot-speak" in the cartoon.
Don't forget the new Rescue Bots cartoon coming soon.Dead Metal wrote:But what RhA wants is to have multiple different continuities/series with different characters going at the same time, kinda like Prime and then Beast Wars and Armada.
Which is kinda happening, we've got Prime, we've got idw G1 comics and we've got Movie and toy line fiction for Generations etc.![]()
Though, it kinda looks like the Movie fiction is done for now, since there have been no new comics or media material since the DOTM novel/comic adaptations.
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:Dead Metal wrote:Yes, but that was more due to bad communication between the two teams, the cartoon was supposed to expand upon the comic and be set in the same universe.
where did you get that info?
I've never seen anything that remotely suggest the plan was anything but 2 different stories.Same as above.Also, the differences where mostly superficial, since technically it was still the same series and the same characters. But what RhA wants is to have multiple different continuities/series with different characters going at the same time, kinda like Prime and then Beast Wars and Armada.
Which is kinda happening, we've got Prime, we've got idw G1 comics and we've got Movie and toy line fiction for Generations etc.
"superficial"............maybe in your opinion.
Jeep! wrote:Why do I imagine Dead Metal sounding exactly like Arnie?
Intah-wib-buls?
Blurrz wrote:10/10
Leave it to Dead Metal to have the word 'Pronz' in his signature.
Dead Metal wrote:Here you go.
And in your opinion blocky has to do with the amount of articulation something has instead of it's proper meaning, so you really have no right to call me out on that, seeing as you do the same.
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:Dead Metal wrote:Here you go.
thank youAnd in your opinion blocky has to do with the amount of articulation something has instead of it's proper meaning, so you really have no right to call me out on that, seeing as you do the same.
there is no such thing as a "proper meaning" for the term blocky, and I have the right to say anything I choose, as long as I'm civil![]()
and its not like I was saying your wrong, just saying that your idea of "superficial" differes from mines.
Jeep! wrote:Why do I imagine Dead Metal sounding exactly like Arnie?
Intah-wib-buls?
Blurrz wrote:10/10
Leave it to Dead Metal to have the word 'Pronz' in his signature.
Dead Metal wrote:http://www.thefreedictionary.com/blocky
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/superficial Note definition 4
I just didn't like the way you worded your original reply.
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
I see your point.
Keep in mind that Marvel is composed of several stories, most of which are not direclty connected and the merchandise was made after all of the stories where established. TF's started as 'just' G1, story there to support toystoystoys and evolved over the years, with Maximals as a byproduct of Autobots, not a seperate storyline.
IMO Marvel operates towards the older geek, a demographic which could buy comics with their allowance. Hasbro aims towards parents, because most kids would have to actually save up a period of time for a 'bot. Parents can put down the cash far more easily.
In order to not confuse the poor saps, their kids probably are going to have to be precise about what figure they want. Multiple stories running at once is just going to confuse the hell out of them.
I just thought of something that may be in line with this. There is that new Resuce Bots cartoon coming. So, what if it is also part of the Aligned continuity? I mean, the description for it states that the Rescue Bots are a team of four who have been assigned by Optimus Prime to combat lesser threats such as "floods, fires, and everything in between." That means that they are a secondary group operating under Optimus' authority, but not directly under him. So, if the Rescue Bots are a different branch from Team Prime stationed elsewhere, then that would make two consecutive series in the same continuity dealing with two different protagonist teams airing side by side each other.Screamfleet wrote:Noideaforaname wrote:One thing I hate about G1 is how it's become the "main" generation in terms of homages. It's to be expected, I guess, since it's the original one, but it's disappointing how Black Shadow getting a new toy or Bulkhead appearing in Prime or even Waspinator and Dinobot winning HoF spots are "unheard of."
It certainly doesn't help that I have little connection with any of the G1 guys.
My hope is that Transformers will grow as brand and hasbro will broaden it a bit too. Right now, hasbro wants to have one continuity, which is fine. I just hope maybe in the future, we can see two series within this continuity. Suppose Transformers Prime goes on for another few years, why not a beast wars series along side it?
It seems like a never happen situation. Especially with how hasbro repeatedly says no plans for any beast wars related merchandise. I hope though, like how marvel has multiple characters and shows, that transformers can be the same way. You know, there's the Avengers and The x-men, and why not the autobots and the maximals?
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
cagey wrote:G1:
1 Retro, simple look
2 Rubber tires abound
3 Simple transformations
4 Durable construction
5 Metal parts and chrome
6 Cool, catchy musical score
7 Interesting dialogue and plots
8 Not P.C.
9 Sophisticated fans
10 Come as you are
Modern:
1 Modern, detailed look
2 All plastic
3 20-minute transformations
4 Parts pop off and can be hard to stand up
5 Almost entirely plastic
6 Composers not paid enough
7 Touchy-feely
8 Not P.C.
9 A mix of fans
10 Tries too hard
ADVANTAGE: G1
Jeep! wrote:Why do I imagine Dead Metal sounding exactly like Arnie?
Intah-wib-buls?
Blurrz wrote:10/10
Leave it to Dead Metal to have the word 'Pronz' in his signature.
cagey wrote:I typo'd 8 on modern TFs - should read, "Really P.C."
Anyway, see, Sarblade? With only some neutral observations, even a noob touched a nerve and brought a possible G1 hater out into the light. We have proven that G1 haters exist. "Good, good, let the hate flow through you."
Jeep! wrote:Why do I imagine Dead Metal sounding exactly like Arnie?
Intah-wib-buls?
Blurrz wrote:10/10
Leave it to Dead Metal to have the word 'Pronz' in his signature.
Noideaforaname wrote:lines with a movie/cartoon/game follow said fiction, not the other way around
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
cagey wrote:Trolling? I would think that a member of such seniority here wouldn't need to throw barbs around like that (e.g. "too stupid", "racist".)All I learned from the first page is that you seem to thrive on having the last word about everything.
![]()
G1:
1 Retro, simple look
2 Rubber tires abound
3 Simple transformations
4 Durable construction
5 Metal parts and chrome
6 Cool, catchy musical score
7 Interesting dialogue and plots
8 Not P.C.
9 Sophisticated fans
10 Come as you are
Modern:
1 Modern, detailed look
2 All plastic
3 20-minute transformations
4 Parts pop off and can be hard to stand up
5 Almost entirely plastic
6 Composers not paid enough
7 Touchy-feely
8 Really P.C.
9 A mix of fans
10 Tries too hard
ADVANTAGE: G1
Jeep! wrote:Why do I imagine Dead Metal sounding exactly like Arnie?
Intah-wib-buls?
Blurrz wrote:10/10
Leave it to Dead Metal to have the word 'Pronz' in his signature.
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:umm, excuse me but this confused me..."movie/cartoon/game that follow said fiction"??
movie/cartoon and game ARE said fiction.............so how can the fiction follow itself?
also....."not the other way around"???
what exactly do you mean?The fiction has always followed the toyline.
Noideaforaname wrote:sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:umm, excuse me but this confused me..."movie/cartoon/game that follow said fiction"??
movie/cartoon and game ARE said fiction.............so how can the fiction follow itself?
also....."not the other way around"???
what exactly do you mean?The fiction has always followed the toyline.
The creators of modern fiction (War for Cybertron/Animated/Bay Movies/etc.) design the characters themselves as opposed to using pre-existing designs from Hasbro. G1 (at least at first) didn't design their characters but instead used pre-existing designs from Hasbro. Modern toys follow the fiction, G1 fiction followed the toys.
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:Noideaforaname wrote:sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:umm, excuse me but this confused me..."movie/cartoon/game that follow said fiction"??
movie/cartoon and game ARE said fiction.............so how can the fiction follow itself?
also....."not the other way around"???
what exactly do you mean?The fiction has always followed the toyline.
The creators of modern fiction (War for Cybertron/Animated/Bay Movies/etc.) design the characters themselves as opposed to using pre-existing designs from Hasbro. G1 (at least at first) didn't design their characters but instead used pre-existing designs from Hasbro. Modern toys follow the fiction, G1 fiction followed the toys.
ahh, I see what you mean now, but I think thats only partly true.
Sure, some of Don Figarolas [spelling?] designs were later made into toys, but its my understanding that with WFC,Animated & the Bay Movies, the character designes worked in junction with the toy designers.
So, it not really a case toys following the fiction.
cagey wrote:A mix of fans doesn't imply unsophisticated, c'mon man!! And please don't make me go through the entire thread and cite all the previous multiquotes, etc. either. I regret I may have angered you on a sensitive topic, but as a senior staff member, you should probably not be so bothered so much by things other people have to say, especially a poor noob.
Jeep! wrote:Why do I imagine Dead Metal sounding exactly like Arnie?
Intah-wib-buls?
Blurrz wrote:10/10
Leave it to Dead Metal to have the word 'Pronz' in his signature.
Return to Transformers General Discussion
Registered users: 1984forever, Bing [Bot], Freezie, Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, GotBot, Lunatyk, MSN [Bot], muddyjoe, sprockitz, UltOrange