Trikeboy wrote:No split on the chest indicates it does not transform
Trikeboy wrote:No split on the chest indicates it does not transform
Shuttershock wrote:Trikeboy wrote:No split on the chest indicates it does not transform
Which is funny, considering the last two were so intricately detailed with the original engineering you'd swear they could transform.
Eh, what are you gonna do? Still pretty cool.
Trikeboy wrote:Shuttershock wrote:Trikeboy wrote:No split on the chest indicates it does not transform
Which is funny, considering the last two were so intricately detailed with the original engineering you'd swear they could transform.
Eh, what are you gonna do? Still pretty cool.
Why thank you for that sarcastic comment. Just indicating disappointment and I know the other two didn't either.
Shuttershock wrote:Trikeboy wrote:Shuttershock wrote:Trikeboy wrote:No split on the chest indicates it does not transform
Which is funny, considering the last two were so intricately detailed with the original engineering you'd swear they could transform.
Eh, what are you gonna do? Still pretty cool.
Why thank you for that sarcastic comment. Just indicating disappointment and I know the other two didn't either.
Sorry, no sarcasm meant. If anything I'm surprised there is no split, given how detailed this and the others have been.
kurthy wrote:I think I agree with Shajaki, this should be a tree topper with a crown. My son's would all love it, but my wife would probably move out.
Awww lookit all of us getting alongTrikeboy wrote:My apologies, I took it one way when you didn't intend it.Shuttershock wrote:Sorry, no sarcasm meant. If anything I'm surprised there is no split, given how detailed this and the others have been.Trikeboy wrote:Why thank you for that sarcastic comment. Just indicating disappointment and I know the other two didn't either.Shuttershock wrote:Which is funny, considering the last two were so intricately detailed with the original engineering you'd swear they could transform.Trikeboy wrote:No split on the chest indicates it does not transform
Eh, what are you gonna do? Still pretty cool.
kurthy wrote:I think I agree with Shajaki, this should be a tree topper with a crown. My son's would all love it, but my wife would probably move out.
Lucky Logician wrote:Grimlock, why you no in robot mode? Optimus and Megatron were. C-C-C-C-Combo breaker.
To those that might be looking for the G1 Grimlock Hallmark Keepsake Christmas Ornament, it was released this past weekend. July 9th-10th saw the release online and in stores. I got mine in Winston-Salem, NC for $15.95 plus tax. Start Christmas early…ha ha!
Bumblebee21 wrote:wow the description on the back isn't even about grimlock
Bumblebee21 wrote:wow the description on the back isn't even about grimlock
SillySpringer wrote:Does this thing actually transform??
Emerje wrote:Bumblebee21 wrote:wow the description on the back isn't even about grimlock
Right? It doesn't even mention Transformers at all outside of the logo (which chopped off the trademark). I'm also a little surprised that there's no mention of Hasbro licensing anywhere on the box when it's all over the website. Really strange, a little shocked Hasbro let them get away with that.
Emerje
Return to Transformers General Discussion
Registered users: Bing [Bot], EvasionModeBumblebee, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot]