You disagree that the 2012-summer 2016 IDW run is arguably the best long-form, cohesive story run of Transformers comics ever? Does that mean you agree that it is? Or that it is not and this is inarguable? The words of my sentence in the review express that this is one opinion some have that others do not, and those that prefer another run over this one would have valid points to argue, hence use of the word "arguably".Rodimus Prime wrote:I liked your review very much, but with this opinion I disagree wholeheartedly.ScottyP wrote:The Death of Optimus Prime, which ushered in what has arguably been the best long-form run of Transformers comics in history
I re-worded that sentence about 8 times last Tuesday night. Guess it still missed the mark.
We're on the same heading here. Here's my insane, not-rooted-in-evidence-and-more-speculation-than-anything theory about all of that: the planets that Skids saw in issue 21 are the Knights of Cybertron, bound into planetoid forms. They were trying to express to Skids what was going on and how to help, but he ended up having to go back to the other side of the portal to help a certain bot from being destroyed...MrBlack wrote:On a different note:
The Necrobot's planet. Apparently the die from which Cybertron was cast (Optimus Primal: "It's a lost art").
That raises a lot of questions in terms of Cybertron's creation. Was it really Primus? Or is Roberts taking some cues from his own fan novel and trying to bridge the gap between the cartoon and comic creation myths?
Were the planets Skids saw on the other side of Tyrest's portal exact copies of Cybertron?
All we really know is that something apparently quite bad would happen:Sagitta wrote:As for Nightbeat he's been "dead" already so--. But Rung??? How can the universe go on without the historical constant???