Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store








Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.
amtm wrote:Josh, thanks for the updates. This is terrible. I hope the secondary quake prediction turns out to be wrong.
The land occupancy thing, if true, is a horrible idea. Why encourage people to put themselves at risk?
I can only hope they manage to contain the nuclear mess. After all the devastation that's occurred from the natural disaster it would be a tragic irony for what could be the worst of it to come from something man-made.
Burn wrote:So on top of a cyclone and floods, we apparently just had a 4.0 earthquake off the coast of north east Australia.
http://www.smh.com.au/environment/small-earthquake-shakes-north-queensland-20110315-1bvsw.html
Evolution Prime wrote:Being in the nuclear industry, I prefer to get my new about the situation with the reactors here. I currently work at Cooper Nuclear Station in Nebraska. The plant I work at is basically the exact same as the ones that are in trouble over in Japan. Its a slightly different core, but same containment structure, with probably a bit more upgrades to it. I prefer the NEI site since the mainstream media tends to sensationalize the situation.
gailanne wrote:Natural disaster affecting a community. Dual earthquakes hit the rural region of Myanmar on Thurs morning. Though officially the Union of Myanmar, it is also often known as Burma. I found this here: Double earthquakes hit Union of Myanmar, aka Burma The 2 earthquakes were 6.8 and 4.8 on the Richter scale. The middle of the earthquake was near the border of Thailand and China. Tsunamis aren't very likely, but major damage is. The earthquakes were very shallow, and therefore were felt very strongly on the surface.
Registered users: Bing [Bot], blokefish, Delta Supreme, Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], MSN [Bot], Yahoo [Bot]