Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store
Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.
Elita One wrote:I thought Bay wanted a rest before starting TF 3 hence the 2012 release, he must be a glutton for pushing himself to the limit or something. Oh well as long Welker is back in TF 3 as Soundwave I don't care.
vectorA3 wrote:Oh my gooooood. WTF are they doing??! Slow it down and wait 3 yrs. I'm willing to wait an extra year for 'quality' (should i even say that for a Bay movie?). Not that TF is on par with them, but SW had 3 year gaps, and the Matrix had a 4 yr. gap in between the 1st two films. Paramount is mainly doing this for A) $ and B) they have nothing in the pipeline b/c a lot of productions got killed off during the writers' strike.
He's got some pretty far-out powers to go along with them, too, including teleportation, the projection of trippy telepathic visions and illusions, and the ability to groove on the language of 98% of all known species. To uses his powers to the fullest, though, he's gotta be feelin' good vibrations; bad karma can seriously harsh his mellow, y'know?
SlyTF1 wrote:I dont understand why the hell anyone would see a movie for the story, if you want a story, go read a f*ckin book.
Rodimus Prime wrote:And there will be Mini-Cons.
He's got some pretty far-out powers to go along with them, too, including teleportation, the projection of trippy telepathic visions and illusions, and the ability to groove on the language of 98% of all known species. To uses his powers to the fullest, though, he's gotta be feelin' good vibrations; bad karma can seriously harsh his mellow, y'know?
Hard Hacker wrote:Rated X wrote:This is great news but lets hope somewhere along the line Michael bay and his radical ideas are given the boot for a more G1 friendly production team. Please no more wheels for feet !!!
Yeah, because G1 is the only Transformers story to exist ever. Let's just forget that Beast Wars, Beast Machines, RiD and the Unicron Trilogy, et all ever happened. Sarcasm for the uniniated.
I really hope he tries with this. Less of the crude humour would work wonders. The lad has enthusiasm, which could help. Clearly he cares about telling a movie story, he should, but strays aside from the main point.
But at least he gives it a go.
Blurrz wrote:Wow, so many ridiculous bay haters. First of all, Michael Bay doesn't care what anyone thinks, it is all about the money, and he'll do whatever he wants to do. Most of the stuff that happens on the scene is directed by him. The rest; The script, the designs, they're approved by Bay, but they're made by generically everyone else. If you're hating on Bay, you're hating on every Transformer fan that's worked to design the 2007 Movie as well as Revenge of the Fallen.
I'm tired of hearing this disenchanted crap. If all you are doing is complaining, then just don't bother showing up here. It isn't going to change and being hopeful for a 'better' movie in 2011 is nonsense, because it's directed by the same person, it will be in the same dimensions!
Put G1 in? "How about this. G1's dead." It died a good 20 years ago. Bringing it back into the live film is like redoing Star Wars. This is what it is, a Transformers Universe on it's own. If you think Bay's giving Transformers a bad name, then you clearly have a short sense of time and memory. Transformers has existed for over 25 years, we've had good series, some bad series, yet all in all it brings fans, new and old, together to celebrate something that they enjoy.
Bay doesn't acknowledge Transformers lore? What? There's rules now? Like honestly, when the hell did that happen? If there were to be any rules in Transformers, Bay has acknowledged them all. Transformers transform. They interact with humans. They come from Cybertron. There are Autobots and Decepticons and they fight each other. Bay's representation of Transformers is as genuine as Animated's representation of the characters or Energon's representation of the characters. It is what it is, T-R-A-N-S-F-O-R-M-E-R-S.
Hate isn't going to get anywhere here. Michael Bay is still making Transformers 3, he'll make hundreds of millons, and Transformers will continue on in series after series. The best that can be done for you haters is not seeing the movie, and leaving news like this for people who enjoy Bay's work.
I for one, look forward to Transformers 3. Every bit of the universe that revolves around the Live Movies is an exciting change compared to the 2D characters we've seen for the past decades.
Autobot032 wrote:vectorA3 wrote:Oh my gooooood. WTF are they doing??! Slow it down and wait 3 yrs. I'm willing to wait an extra year for 'quality' (should i even say that for a Bay movie?). Not that TF is on par with them, but SW had 3 year gaps, and the Matrix had a 4 yr. gap in between the 1st two films. Paramount is mainly doing this for A) $ and B) they have nothing in the pipeline b/c a lot of productions got killed off during the writers' strike.
Even if they waited three years, the quality level wouldn't go up. Not one bit. The first movie lacked quality in many areas, just as ROTF did. It would merely be an extra year of waiting for more of the same. I mean, that's really what it is when you get down to it.
Star Wars had 3 year gaps because Lucas didn't have today's technology back then. Hell, when he brought us the prequel trilogy, the technology Bay's used, wasn't there. (Yes, I realize Lucas has revolutionized the industry, and some of those new visions of tech were used in TF, but Lucas isn't the only one making special equipment, etc.) If Lucas had all of the resources that he has now, back then, we'd have seen them rushed through as well. Doesn't mean the quality would've been lacking, but they'd have come along sooner.
As for the Matrix? Those four years ruined the franchise, really. Think about it for a second...the first movie was beyond anything we'd ever dreamed or imagined up until that point. It took them FOUR years to even come up with a sequel, and in the waiting period, we were all thinking "Wow, these are going to be so awesome!" and look at what we got: They turned out to be utter crap. They were nowhere near as good as the first film, and the third one was a rushed waste.
[quote="vectorA3"On the upside, Bay won't be trying to make this during a strike with a 30 page outline, like ROTF -& should have better writing/story organization. On the downside, they will still be rushing the crap out of this one and giving all the ILM and Digital Domain animators daily heart attacks for months on end till the release. Someone should really document a young animator going in working on ROTF or TF3, fresh-faced, normal hair --then fast forward to the end of his job - balding gray hair, face like he aged 20 yrs. Hopefully, for this 3rd installment they'll find a happy medium of action & story. That's the best we can hope for.
CybertronHotShot wrote:I agree with BlackSilverBot about characters that could be in the third movie,i like to see Prowl and a lot more G1 Autobots and Decepticons but i think the writers must create a good story to explain their presence on Earth,instead of just show then on the screen like Sideways and Demolishor or just falling from the sky in their protoforms.In other words,where is Nemesis and the Ark?
vectorA3 wrote:
You mentioned the strike twice, which leads me to this: ROTF was a better film, that's not just personal opinion, but the box office says it was. (If it truly was as bad as everyone claimed, it would've NEVER hit box office take that it has. Not even close.)
ClassyNX01 wrote:Interesting guess he didn't need as big of break for TF then originally suggested. Though it should be noted that he promised no harm to Megan during production from alien robots he made no such promise for her character however.![]()
I am going to keep my fingers crossed. Not ton of time has elapsed since the last film it makes me leery of the 'great' story they supposedly have.
Things I hope they do: (just my personal opinion take it or leave it)
1.You've proven concept the film will make a lot money. Push to have story that centers around Transformers and their interaction with humans, not the other way around. (After all it is called Transformers)
2.(As much as people want all their personal favorite characters involved..I still have to say this.) Limit the amount of new characters introduced, you are already drowning in them. Reduce the human character count and give that screen time to already introduced Transformer characters.
3.Megatron made some strides in this last film away from slobbering metal monster man who repeated his name way to much. Keep that up, and Keep him moving more toward the 'Lex luthrian' in style villain. Lex packing giant fusion cannons that is...
4. Keep the great effects but the fight scenes need better choreographing they to often lose the audience. While real combat is chaos. Chaos in filming general starts to put people off a movie if every fight scene is chaotic.
5. Please watch out for story continuity issues!
I'd consider it victory and much improved if any two of those above issues are addressed.
So while I am really dying for a new movie I am not sure this pushed up release date thrills me greatly.
Classy
D-340 wrote:vectorA3 wrote:
You mentioned the strike twice, which leads me to this: ROTF was a better film, that's not just personal opinion, but the box office says it was. (If it truly was as bad as everyone claimed, it would've NEVER hit box office take that it has. Not even close.)
Just because a movie is financially successful doesn't make it a better quality movie. I'm willing to bet that alot of ROTF box office came from the fact that Megan Fox was dressed 2 sizes to tight and running through the desert. I know it diverted my attention from ROTF's crappiness for a little while.
Return to Transformers Live Action Film Forum
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Bumblevivisector, chuckdawg1999, Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, MSN [Bot], Sabrblade, Silver Wind