Open discussion about balancing tactic costs
Re: Open discussion about balancing tactic costs
Posted by Name_Violation Wed Mar 10, 2010 9:45 pm

Fun Toy Banned Because Of Three Stupid Dead Kids
People wrote:zombybunnie: N_V scares me...I no longer wish that my pants transformed
Burn:Anyone notice how much of a boring party pooper N_V is? He doesn't join in the fun, he's spent the last few years with dodgy builds feeding XP to the Autobots, and he sure as heck doesn't spam.
disruptor96: I forgot how insane you were.
-

Name_Violation - Matrix Keeper
- Posts: 9401
- News Credits: 3
- Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 8:48 pm
- Location: Location, Location
- Intelligence: ???
- Skill: ???
Re: Open discussion about balancing tactic costs
Posted by Waylander Wed Mar 10, 2010 9:51 pm
Redimus GTS wrote:Waylander wrote:Sharkticon
have seen the Allicon,and Sharkticon in the Help/Tactics page for some time now. now i see it is being tested, nice to see some things moving forward.
[color=#FF0000]That's an entirely unrelated thing. If you check the official rules of my tournie, you'll notice the Sharkticon is one of the two prizes for the winning faction. Mkall needed to check that Bite (Ram, with a different name) still worked first
well to me it is very much a part of this issue with tactic cost, if ya can have Bite instead of ram for say the predator class and such, that would be a big change for the game, and if they are going to change one, then changing the other should be done at the same time to limit the work load, planning , and grouping of all the alts. also if they got one, more may be in the planing,only time will tell,i do not know, i am just wishing. i for one can care less if it is a copycat tactic, having my t-rex bite, instead of ram, would be fracking sweet after all these years.
and yes i know about your tournies details, i like to read, and would have joined but i cannot say how things will go for me 2 weeks ahead, i am not in good health,ya do not get payed 100% service connected disability by the Veterans Affairs and not have some major medical issues.and mainly i was wishing /waiting till we would have one with that old X-mas tournie mission code, so i could be lazy ,have more lvl bracketed missions ,and just kill stuff in my bracket. i was #2 in the lvl 0-2 bracket in that one. did not get a damn thing, lol.
so i got to ask the big question for the MODs
will there/or could there be new tactics -even if they are renames- added to the game in the future? time /code and work permitting of course?
-

Waylander - Combiner
- Posts: 472
- Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2004 11:32 pm
- Location: Yakima Washington USA
- Strength: 10
- Speed: 8
- Endurance: 6
- Rank: 6
- Courage: 8
Re: Open discussion about balancing tactic costs
Posted by Redimus Thu Mar 11, 2010 6:11 am
As for the tournie, had that hardware failure just before it started not happened, we would have used the xmas tournie code, but unfortunetly, Mkall lost his access to the back end of the game, and Ryan was no where to be seen to re-grant the access (and to be honest I would not be happy with starting the tournie using one system, then switching to another mid event).

Duly Appointed Representative in Chief of the Decpeticon Coprophage Accord.
Second class scavenger.
Better RED than DEAD!
Better still RDD!
-

Redimus - Guardian Of Seibertron
- Posts: 5729
- News Credits: 1
- Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 6:44 am
- Location: Neo Kaon, planing the domination of HMW:GD.
- Strength: 6
- Intelligence: 10
- Speed: 6
- Endurance: 7
- Rank: 7
- Courage: 8
- Firepower: 6
- Skill: 10
Re: Open discussion about balancing tactic costs
Posted by Redimus Thu Mar 11, 2010 6:22 am
Old man Ryan, stop farting about with my little pony and twiglet, and sort out this site first...

Duly Appointed Representative in Chief of the Decpeticon Coprophage Accord.
Second class scavenger.
Better RED than DEAD!
Better still RDD!
-

Redimus - Guardian Of Seibertron
- Posts: 5729
- News Credits: 1
- Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 6:44 am
- Location: Neo Kaon, planing the domination of HMW:GD.
- Strength: 6
- Intelligence: 10
- Speed: 6
- Endurance: 7
- Rank: 7
- Courage: 8
- Firepower: 6
- Skill: 10
Re: Open discussion about balancing tactic costs
Posted by Burn Thu Mar 11, 2010 6:34 am
Be thankful he actually priorities getting HMW up and running before other parts of the site for once.
- Burn
- Forum Admin
- Posts: 28770
- News Credits: 226
- Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2003 3:37 am
Re: Open discussion about balancing tactic costs
Posted by Psychout Thu Mar 11, 2010 7:38 am
Waylander wrote:so i got to ask the big question for the MODs
will there/or could there be new tactics -even if they are renames- added to the game in the future? time /code and work permitting of course?
*Shrug* once Mkall gets access we'll see what we can do. We have a few ideas knocking around, mostly based on trying to narrow down the number of alt classes and remove all the single-tactic alts.
New/duplicate/renamed tactics are a job for later. The Bite ones may appear a bit sooner, but as Red said, they are a hangover from the OS days. We certainly have enough alts that would qualify for it though...
- Psychout
- HMW Moderator
- Posts: 9740
- News Credits: 42
- Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 8:04 am
- Location: Vatican City
- Alt Mode: Cassette. The 80s ROCKED
- Strength: 1
- Intelligence: 1
- Speed: 1
- Endurance: 1
- Rank: 10
- Courage: 1
- Firepower: 1
- Skill: 10
Re: Open discussion about balancing tactic costs
Posted by Absolute Zero Thu Mar 11, 2010 10:47 am
Psychout wrote:Waylander wrote:so i got to ask the big question for the MODs
will there/or could there be new tactics -even if they are renames- added to the game in the future? time /code and work permitting of course?
*Shrug* once Mkall gets access we'll see what we can do. We have a few ideas knocking around, mostly based on trying to narrow down the number of alt classes and remove all the single-tactic alts.
New/duplicate/renamed tactics are a job for later. The Bite ones may appear a bit sooner, but as Red said, they are a hangover from the OS days. We certainly have enough alts that would qualify for it though...
So does that mean you'll put this alt
into a more useful class than noble land animal? I can't speak for everyone, but I like some of the single tactic alts, I just wish they weren't quite so useless, and I'd like for them to get moved into new catagories instead of removed.
Sig by BunBun
Dead in One-XBLive
Shinobiusagi-PSN
-

Absolute Zero - Faction Commander
- Posts: 4574
- News Credits: 1
- Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 10:47 pm
- Location: On the corner earning money for a crippling plastic addiction
- Alt Mode: Meloncholy Savior of Fascist Autobots
- Strength: 2
- Intelligence: 4
- Endurance: Infinity
- Rank: 2
- Courage: 10
- Firepower: 5
- Skill: 6
Re: Open discussion about balancing tactic costs
Posted by Name_Violation Thu Mar 11, 2010 4:12 pm

Fun Toy Banned Because Of Three Stupid Dead Kids
People wrote:zombybunnie: N_V scares me...I no longer wish that my pants transformed
Burn:Anyone notice how much of a boring party pooper N_V is? He doesn't join in the fun, he's spent the last few years with dodgy builds feeding XP to the Autobots, and he sure as heck doesn't spam.
disruptor96: I forgot how insane you were.
-

Name_Violation - Matrix Keeper
- Posts: 9401
- News Credits: 3
- Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 8:48 pm
- Location: Location, Location
- Intelligence: ???
- Skill: ???
Re: Open discussion about balancing tactic costs
Posted by Redimus Thu Mar 11, 2010 5:23 pm

Duly Appointed Representative in Chief of the Decpeticon Coprophage Accord.
Second class scavenger.
Better RED than DEAD!
Better still RDD!
-

Redimus - Guardian Of Seibertron
- Posts: 5729
- News Credits: 1
- Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 6:44 am
- Location: Neo Kaon, planing the domination of HMW:GD.
- Strength: 6
- Intelligence: 10
- Speed: 6
- Endurance: 7
- Rank: 7
- Courage: 8
- Firepower: 6
- Skill: 10
Re: Open discussion about balancing tactic costs
Posted by -Soundwave- Thu Mar 11, 2010 6:51 pm
-

-Soundwave- - Gestalt
- Posts: 2822
- News Credits: 2
- Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 9:33 pm
- Location: Daraknus Decepticon Outpost.
- Alt Mode: Cassette Deck
- Strength: 8
- Intelligence: 9
- Speed: 2
- Endurance: 6
- Rank: 8
- Courage: 5
- Firepower: 6
- Skill: 10
Re: Open discussion about balancing tactic costs
Posted by Editor Thu Mar 11, 2010 10:34 pm
Once I ran an Anime festival with over 6,000 attendees. Now... not so much.
-

Editor - City Commander
- Posts: 3572
- News Credits: 9
- Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 2:18 am
- Location: Vancouver, Cascadia
- Strength: 6
- Intelligence: 8
- Speed: 7
- Endurance: 8
- Rank: ???
- Courage: 7
- Firepower: 4
- Skill: 6
Re: Open discussion about balancing tactic costs
Posted by Psychout Fri Mar 12, 2010 4:19 am
If I get my way, nothing will be classed by its vehicle/species type anymore. 60 alt classes per faction? There is such a thing as too much choice, I want it below 20 if possible.Absolute Zero wrote:So does that mean you'll put this altinto a more useful class than noble land animal?
Absolute Zero wrote:I can't speak for everyone, but I like some of the single tactic alts, I just wish they weren't quite so useless, and I'd like for them to get moved into new catagories instead of removed.
Name_Violation wrote:I was hopin the same thing as AZ. I like alot of the 1 tactic alts looks, but they suck to pick. making them useful would be awesome. like the vampire bats. let them be predators.
Yeah, my bad, I meant remove the single-tactic classes not alts. All the single-tactic alts will stay in the game - after all, both the Optimus Prime and Megatron alts are currently single tactic, the plan is that they wont be single-tactic anymore.
After all, how does it make sense that the 2 most powerful characters in G1 cant even get to L11??
That is awesome, Tammuz ruled.Sustain wrote:meh, call it boredom or spam whatever I just thought it was funny.
Spammer!
- Psychout
- HMW Moderator
- Posts: 9740
- News Credits: 42
- Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 8:04 am
- Location: Vatican City
- Alt Mode: Cassette. The 80s ROCKED
- Strength: 1
- Intelligence: 1
- Speed: 1
- Endurance: 1
- Rank: 10
- Courage: 1
- Firepower: 1
- Skill: 10
Re: Open discussion about balancing tactic costs
Posted by Absolute Zero Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:19 pm
Psychout wrote:If I get my way, nothing will be classed by its vehicle/species type anymore. 60 alt classes per faction? There is such a thing as too much choice, I want it below 20 if possible.Absolute Zero wrote:So does that mean you'll put this altinto a more useful class than noble land animal?
Absolute Zero wrote:I can't speak for everyone, but I like some of the single tactic alts, I just wish they weren't quite so useless, and I'd like for them to get moved into new catagories instead of removed.Name_Violation wrote:I was hopin the same thing as AZ. I like alot of the 1 tactic alts looks, but they suck to pick. making them useful would be awesome. like the vampire bats. let them be predators.
Yeah, my bad, I meant remove the single-tactic classes not alts. All the single-tactic alts will stay in the game - after all, both the Optimus Prime and Megatron alts are currently single tactic, the plan is that they wont be single-tactic anymore.
After all, how does it make sense that the 2 most powerful characters in G1 cant even get to L11??
Gen 1 wasn't epic enough to go to 11, their knobs only went to 10.
That was kinda what I figured about the alts, but better to get clarification than to assume.
Sig by BunBun
Dead in One-XBLive
Shinobiusagi-PSN
-

Absolute Zero - Faction Commander
- Posts: 4574
- News Credits: 1
- Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 10:47 pm
- Location: On the corner earning money for a crippling plastic addiction
- Alt Mode: Meloncholy Savior of Fascist Autobots
- Strength: 2
- Intelligence: 4
- Endurance: Infinity
- Rank: 2
- Courage: 10
- Firepower: 5
- Skill: 6
Re: Open discussion about balancing tactic costs
Posted by The Legend Sat Mar 13, 2010 4:17 am
Off topic but what's this **** with google ads in the middle of threads?
- The Legend
- Headmaster Jr
- Posts: 503
- Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 2:53 pm
Re: Open discussion about balancing tactic costs
Posted by Redimus Sat Mar 13, 2010 7:57 am
The Legend wrote:I only skimmed the thread so I appologise if I'm repeating something but why not start with the tactics costing the same amount so you can choose your own primary tactic, the other will increase in cost by X as the skill points do to become your secondary tactic?
In an ideal world, I think that would certainly be well worth consideration. Unfortunately, it requires more changes than is easily achievable right now. Changes to the database can be made with relative ease (ie changes in any numerical values and the creation of new items like alts and weapons), but anything that requires changes to the mechanics of the game is pretty much not possible. I don't know what the plan (if any) is for the HMW programmer, at the moment Mogwai Prime is nowhere to be seen (I don't know the reason), and Mkall's doing the best he can, but he's not really a programmer. It's also worth mentioning that the general rule of thumb for the past Programmers (Mogwai and OS) is that rather than make small alterations like this to the current game, they would devote their time to building the new one.
The Legend wrote:Off topic but what's this **** with google ads in the middle of threads?
Rampant commercialism. It's been an ever increasing problem for this site...

Duly Appointed Representative in Chief of the Decpeticon Coprophage Accord.
Second class scavenger.
Better RED than DEAD!
Better still RDD!
-

Redimus - Guardian Of Seibertron
- Posts: 5729
- News Credits: 1
- Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 6:44 am
- Location: Neo Kaon, planing the domination of HMW:GD.
- Strength: 6
- Intelligence: 10
- Speed: 6
- Endurance: 7
- Rank: 7
- Courage: 8
- Firepower: 6
- Skill: 10
Who is online
Registered users: Apple [Bot], Bing [Bot], ChatGPT [Bot], DuckDuckGo [Bot], Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, MSN [Bot], OpenAI [Bot], Primal Prime, Yahoo [Bot], Yandex [Bot]
