Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store














Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.
Sonray wrote:Skowl wrote:Mattamus Prime wrote:
It's hard to play with a toy that doesn't exist... unless you have a vivid imagination...
..and a penis.
Gojira Prime wrote:
Oh, and ^ is taking this waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too seriously. If we want fem TF's let us have them.
Dark Zarak wrote:Meanwhile, the characters I listed, even while being made tokens of themselves, are way better than a pink motorcycle.
darkqueen01 wrote:Dark Zarak wrote:darkqueen01 wrote::BOT:"Yes and no. If there are no distinct genders then, yes, in transformers lore there are no females but then that also means that there are no males in Transformers culture. Due to this lack of distinction then that means that individual transformers can look and act in distinctive manners without being labeled as a male or female because this concept does not exist in transformers culture.
Yes, except that every "male" TF is referred to as He, and it is accepted and not only considered normal, but expected. Prime, Megatron, Bumblebee, Starscream, they're all guys. They act like guys without even trying. They downloaded guy personalities from the world wide web. They actually are dudes.
Actually, I would argue this point. You identify them as males because you are still trying to compare them to humans, which in this case doesn't work because we have two separate concepts: a species with two genders vs. a species with no distinct gender.
I get that this is a hard idea to grasp so allow me to try and break it down a bit. Let me stress that these are just my random ideas and not necessary any sort of truth about transformers lore.
A-hem.
In our world, gender is reflected in EVERYTHING because [almost] all biological species on this planet have two genders: humans, animals, even plants. These distinctions are reflected in our culture and, most importantly, in our language.
For us, since there is a BIG NEED to differentiate between males and females we try to identify everything as being male and female. In english: he/she, him/her. This is also seen in other languages, such as spanish: chico/chica, nino/nina.
We even do this with people that have both male and female reproductive organs. In once sense they are a genderless being at birth, at which point you would call on a DNA test to prove genetically if that baby is male or female. Then again you get men who think they are women and vice versa. (That quite frankly is an issue I wish to avoid at this point. This is complicated enough.) In any even you have people that are choosing to be either male or female because that is how our culture operates. You must be one or the other in some shape or form.
With transformers there is no such thing because you need one group to counter another group. With Transformers, if you accept this idea, there is one group, which is a genderless group. As humans we have no concept of this and nothing to go by. Instead we try to make comparisons so that we can understand a concept that we don't understand. (Example: The eye is like the lens of a camera)
With transformers, since our language reflects that we have no concept of a one gender/lack of gender species, we then attempt to make comparisons. We want to label these characters as male characters because we are comparing them to our own culture. Basically, what most people do is think: This transformer has a deep voice and is very strong, he must be a guy.
However, with transformers, if you buy the one gender idea, they do not distinguish themselves into two gender because they don't have two genders. Hell, there isn't even one gender! To them, they are all just cybertronians. More to the point, there is NO WORD for it in their language because,again, in their culture they would have no concept of this idea. Since they would not differentiate themselves as being male or female then their language would also represent this.
In other words, in the cybertronian language they would not say "He said this," or "She did that." They might just use their names: "Arcee said this" or "Bonecrusher did that". Or maybe they would replace he and she with what we would consider to be gender neutral terms. It would be like how we humans called a group of guys and girls just "guys" because, with most human languages, we tend to make everything masculine because that goes back into history where women were seen as inferior to men, etc, etc.
All I am trying to say is that there can be no A group if a B group isn't present. They would all just be C, because there is no way to distinguish them.
That's all I got. I HAVE to get to bed now. I look forward to more posts or even flammers, tho I will probably just talk them down to nothingness, as is my way of things.
And besides, IT'S JUST A CARTOON!! *L*
Tazirai wrote:Most of the people opposed to female transformers
1) See nothing wrong with male transformers (hypocrites)
2) Feel threatened by the idea of Female robots.
3) Don't realize the first robot EVER filmed was female.
4) Dont realize the second robot ever filmed was female.![]()
5) Have Gender ID issues.
6) Can't or wont understand that female is a mental thing.
7) Need to grow up and stop thinking a female bot "HAS" to look female.
Need to read this page. And yes Wiki is valid.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gynoid
with that said, I don't mind female transformers, as long as they arent the cliched bad ass or weakling. Just give me a well written gynoid, with good dialogue and a modicrum of development.
but I realize trying to be rational with some people doesnt work.
PS: Being an Ex-soldier I do know that females make better combat pilots than guys. But we rock in melee situations.. if we can fight at all that is. ^^
Gojira Prime wrote:Amen, and DarkQueen, shut up, I'm sick of your longwinded pop psycobabble
Gojira Prime wrote:Deny me my freedom of speach will you? You say this, but I'm truthfully getting irritated with seeing these extremly long posts with one repetitive point
Gojira Prime wrote:Deny me my freedom of speach will you? You say this, but I'm truthfully getting irritated with seeing these extremly long posts with one repetitive point
Gojira Prime wrote:Deny me my freedom of speach will you? You say this, but I'm truthfully getting irritated with seeing these extremly long posts with one repetitive point
Neko wrote:Swerve wrote:Electron wrote:Cybertron must of been a Sausage fest lol
Muffler fest.
...ew...
Swerve wrote:Neko wrote:Swerve wrote:Electron wrote:Cybertron must of been a Sausage fest lol
Muffler fest.
...ew...
Well, "sausage" fest just doesn't fit in with Transformers per say... unless it was like a Transformer that was a meat delivery truck or something and... oh, why do I keep talking, I'm making it worse!?!
Tangent wrote:I dont think any bike-bot would be too hard to do for the movie. It would still be bigger then Frenzy after all, and it could just use a hologram for a rider, like what Barricade and Blackout did. Easy!
iopele wrote:Tangent wrote:I dont think any bike-bot would be too hard to do for the movie. It would still be bigger then Frenzy after all, and it could just use a hologram for a rider, like what Barricade and Blackout did. Easy!
I guess I just don't think a hologram would hold up to close scrutiny. You notice Blackout's hologram pilot losing coherence a bit when he lands. That'd be extremely noticeable on a bike. Also, I'm certainly no hologram expert, but I believe creating an image inside a less-bright environment (like a car/truck/aircraft interior) would make the hologram clearer than having one exposed to full, direct sunlight. Going down a freeway during the day, wouldn't the holo fade out and look ghostly?
I honestly don't know. Holos aren't anything I'm super-informed about. Just picturing it kind of like an old movie projector--there's a reason the teacher turns the lights out before firing one of those up. I'm all for reasonable suspension of disbelief in movies, but that would be enough of a reach to bug me.
Thanks for posting that larger pic of Arcee, Skowl. I can finally make out her features! The face is good, but the top of her head bugs me. Is that the motorcycle seat on top? It looks like she's wearing a super-clunky bicycle helmet.
(edited for spelling boo-boos)
Astrotrain87 wrote:your thinking about human holograms,I'm sure autobots have better ones
iopele wrote:Astrotrain87 wrote:your thinking about human holograms,I'm sure autobots have better ones
Yes, but light is still light. If you shine a flashlight at night, you see it because it's got very little competition from the environment. Shine it during the day and it's invisible. When the environment is bright, I don't think you can create an effect that's also made of light and have it look nice and solid.
I don't have anything against Arcee in particular, I just don't think they picked a very good vehicle transform for her by using the motorcycle. Unless, that is, they intend her to have a human buddy all the time to pose as the rider. Mikeala did lose her Vespa, after all. Maybe that's what they're aiming for?
Skowl wrote:I think you're over-analysing the whole hologram thing. The general public isn't going to question a hologram in broad daylight no more than they'll question the myriad of scientific and continuity mistakes already in the first film.
To the general public, myself included, holograms in movies work regardless of lighting, exterior, weather, decor or anything else... they're just holograms.
Return to Transformers Live Action Film Forum
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, MSN [Bot], Yahoo [Bot]