Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store
Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.
shamone wrote:im sorry but this thread has been bewilderng.
I cant honestly beleive that slytf and capt failure are actually arguing that movie lovers are oppressed, attacked and
I have tried to debate the merits of the movies on a rational, reasonable, logical level, without resorting to personalised insults or wide ranging stereotyping
in return they have responded as follows:
- called me a troll (because i disagreed with their opinion)
- Called me a liar
- Ranted angrily about a point i never even made
- Called me a bullsh1ter and a spoofer
- misquoted and misintepreted points i made to fit their argument
- refuted my argument by saying, essentially, because i said so.
So when they come on here and say that the majority of movie dislikers are reactionary and offensive, i take it with a pinch of salt and believe they should look at their houses.
As for being scared that a movie wont be as good as the previous two, no i nownt be , because i am an adult with a life, and it will pass off me like water off a ducks back.
NewFoundStarscreamLuv wrote:me and my friends combine all the time. Sometimes I even combine by myself if no one is around.
Burn wrote:It's Monday morning. Leave me alone.
SlyTF1 wrote:In a way though, I'm still kind of scared. This is supposed to be the last one directed by Bay. I'm gonna miss this series. Then what if the next director just totally ruins Transformers? Not that "ruined forever" crap, but what if they get EVERYTHING wrong?
HoundimusPrime wrote:SlyTF1 wrote:In a way though, I'm still kind of scared. This is supposed to be the last one directed by Bay. I'm gonna miss this series. Then what if the next director just totally ruins Transformers? Not that "ruined forever" crap, but what if they get EVERYTHING wrong?
Unless Uwe Boll directs the rest, I think we're safe.
Plus Steven Spielberg is producer of the films, when Bay leaves maybe he'll move up to the director chair, and Spielberg said he is fan of the comics and toys, so YAY (hopefully).
Evil_the_Nub wrote:You are a troll, I've seen you make several posts with the sole intention of subtly insulting Capt. Failure and Sly. Like this one.
SlyTF1 wrote:I sure as hell am. I had another dream; a few days before I had a dream about DOTM where I was being hunted down and killed because I liked the movies. I know it sounds stupid, but that's what my dream was about.
Starscream GaGa wrote:Evil_the_Nub wrote:You are a troll, I've seen you make several posts with the sole intention of subtly insulting Capt. Failure and Sly. Like this one.
That's not what being a troll means. What he's saying is true, Capt Failure and Sly are MUCH louder than any other fans should someone dare insult the movieverse.
Burn wrote:Starscream GaGa wrote:Evil_the_Nub wrote:You are a troll, I've seen you make several posts with the sole intention of subtly insulting Capt. Failure and Sly. Like this one.
That's not what being a troll means. What he's saying is true, Capt Failure and Sly are MUCH louder than any other fans should someone dare insult the movieverse.
By whose standards?
Starscream GaGa wrote:Has anyone else on this forum been so loud about they're opinion of the movies? Go check out any thread in which the movies are criticized and one or all three will be there going crazy.
Starscream GaGa wrote:Burn wrote:Starscream GaGa wrote:Evil_the_Nub wrote:You are a troll, I've seen you make several posts with the sole intention of subtly insulting Capt. Failure and Sly. Like this one.
That's not what being a troll means. What he's saying is true, Capt Failure and Sly are MUCH louder than any other fans should someone dare insult the movieverse.
By whose standards?
Mine? Has anyone else on this forum been so loud about they're opinion of the movies? Go check out any thread in which the movies are criticized and one or all three will be there going crazy.
This thread is about Sly claiming they had a nightmare in which the movie was not to his "standard", like ROTF apparently was. They then go into a rage when people point out obvious flaws, think of reasons that are not supported but unfalsifiable and insult those that don't believe their arguments and declare people who disagree with them trolls. Evil_the_Nub, nor Capt. Failure, nor Sly can declare someone a troll for not immediately sitting back and loving their opinions. This forum seems to have actually loss the meaning of troll and instead thinks it means "person who does not sit back and accept untrue statements made by a single person in multiple threads".
Evidence is right there.
Besides, like I said, I've actually discovered that arguing with them is horribly useless. They're arguments ARE all unfalsifiable and therefore impossible to debate by nature. You can't prove or disprove anything they say.
Tekka wrote:I think we can all be friends though!
Burn wrote:Bad news guys, I just got back from the hardware store and they're all outta pitchforks.
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Shadowman wrote:
-Plot Hole, TF Wiki has a few, but here's a new one I just read about: near the end, Simmons contacts the USS John C. Stennis Aircraft Carrier. The problem? That was the Carrier the Decepticons had destroyed when they came to Earth earlier in the movie.
SlyTF1 wrote:Shadowman wrote:
-Plot Hole, TF Wiki has a few, but here's a new one I just read about: near the end, Simmons contacts the USS John C. Stennis Aircraft Carrier. The problem? That was the Carrier the Decepticons had destroyed when they came to Earth earlier in the movie.
I thought it was supposed to be an irony thing...because they paused and the music stopped after he said what ship it was.
Shadowman wrote:-Plot Hole, TF Wiki has a few, but here's a new one I just read about: near the end, Simmons contacts the USS John C. Stennis Aircraft Carrier. The problem? That was the Carrier the Decepticons had destroyed when they came to Earth earlier in the movie.
Most of the NEST and American soldiers are seen using small-caliber arms such as assault rifles, machine guns and sniper rifles against the Decepticons, despite the previous film establishing that "high-heat" sabot rounds were the only means of penetrating Decepticon armour. Even if they somehow figured out how to make small caliber ammunition achieve the "high heat" required to damage Decepticon armour, it is extremely unlikely that such low-powered weapons would do any meaningful damage that warrants such widespread usage. After all, in real life, you can't kill a tank with a machine gun, well, unless you're in G.I. Joe.
The notion that a big metal box (containing a complex electronic mechanism shouting to be released) would ever make it through airport luggage screening is a bit on the implausible side. The novelization of the film attributes this to Mikaela's Epic Hotness distracting the guard into just letting her through; she also claims that the box contains expensive mechanic's tools which might look strange in an x-ray. Neither explanation is present in the film itself, however.
When Alice attacks Sam and his friends, the box Wheelie is imprisoned within is taken along, but the box is not seen when Mikela and Leo escape from the foundry in Bumblebee (the box should still be inside the wreckage of the car Mikaela hotwired at the college).
Given the Autobots are part of NEST and are dependent on the US Air Force for transportation around the world, it is not clear why Major Lennox had to be alerted to the fact the Autobots were on the east coast of the United States. Do the Autobot normally go on unexplained joyrides?
Tasers do not cause those tased to go into convulsions.
Where does Mikaela get the padding and gauze to bandage up Sam's hand?
When Jetfire teleports to Egypt, Wheelie is seen landing by him, but disappears until the group reaches the border guards. After they arrive at the pyramids, Wheelie is seen rolling in with the quartet of humans, but is never seen again.
There's no rational reason for Simmons to climb the pyramid after Devastator. It looks like he's enabling the Navy ship to "fire on his position", which is useful when the firer can't see the target. However, as we find out just before the railgun is fired, the ship can see the pyramid. (And railguns are line-of-sight weapons, anyway.) So, Simmons didn't need to climb; he could have stayed someplace safe, called the ship, and told them, "Take a look at the pyramid, and shoot the giant robot tearing it up." It's also hard to believe he wasn't crushed by the flood of pyramid stones, which at one point are raining down on all four sides of the structure.
When the U.S.S. Theodore Roosevelt is sunk by Decepticon transition forms, its hull number of 71 can be seen on the bridge island. However, when it sinks, a hull number of 74 can clearly be seen on the bow of the landing deck. CVN-74 belongs to the U.S.S. John C. Stennis, a carrier that shows up later in the film and was also the carrier used for filming.
Capt.Failure wrote:Sorry to double post but I figure I'd point this out. Quoting the article.When the U.S.S. Theodore Roosevelt is sunk by Decepticon transition forms, its hull number of 71 can be seen on the bridge island. However, when it sinks, a hull number of 74 can clearly be seen on the bow of the landing deck. CVN-74 belongs to the U.S.S. John C. Stennis, a carrier that shows up later in the film and was also the carrier used for filming.
That's not a plot hole either, that is exactly what I said it was. The same ship filling the role of multiple sets on the film. Again, aircraft carriers aren't cheap to rent out for a film.
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Return to Transformers Live Action Film Forum
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Emerje, Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], MSN [Bot], Yahoo [Bot]