Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store
Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.
Tammuz wrote:mainly becuase they remade toys of alot of the original season characters to cash in on names; they made pretender starscream and he damn well died in the movie, and action master bumblebee? i swear he became goldbug, and actionmaster Megatron? he became galvatron during the movie no? and actionmaster shockwave? he was apparently another movie death. actionmaster Prowl? he died right?
killer wrote:Tammuz wrote:mainly becuase they remade toys of alot of the original season characters to cash in on names; they made pretender starscream and he damn well died in the movie, and action master bumblebee? i swear he became goldbug, and actionmaster Megatron? he became galvatron during the movie no? and actionmaster shockwave? he was apparently another movie death. actionmaster Prowl? he died right?
And Optimus Prime died many times as well returning in both animation and toys.
Scaleface wrote:Of course Wheeljack appeared in Victory, he was mentioned in the Timelines comics, and he had a post-movie toy (Action Master Wheeljack), so I see no reason you have to say he was dead if you don't want him to be. Heck, he recently had an Alternator and Spy Changer toy, but they have no supporting fiction.
Tekka wrote:What she doesn't realize is that Springer actually loves Rodimus.
Leonardo wrote:That's an interesting point. Of all the characters in G1 TF, why did Hasbro make an Action Master toy of one who was officially dead?
ThunderThruster wrote:the action master toyline is based of the comic storylines!
where the hell in the cartoon did you see an action master?!
Scaleface wrote:Leonardo wrote:That's an interesting point. Of all the characters in G1 TF, why did Hasbro make an Action Master toy of one who was officially dead?
Your mistake is assuming the TV show was official. It's just ONE fiction made for the toy line. There are comics, audio books, and other media (heck, they made Transformers viewmasters stories!). The TV show is based on the toys, not the other way around. If they do something on the TV show that Hasbro doesn't want to reflect in the toy line, that's Hasbro's choice.
First Gen wrote:Wheres Trailbreaker, Seaspray, Huffer, Mirage, the Aerialbots, Omega Supreme, the Stunticons and countless others?
I mean, c'mon, Kup says "Devastator" in the movie like all hope is lost, when the Aerialbots used to hand them their asses.
I think the one thing about the movie that shocked me the most was that fact that autobots died from getting shot. They got shot all the time in the series and it just bounced off.
Insurgent wrote:First Gen wrote:Wheres Trailbreaker, Seaspray, Huffer, Mirage, the Aerialbots, Omega Supreme, the Stunticons and countless others?
I mean, c'mon, Kup says "Devastator" in the movie like all hope is lost, when the Aerialbots used to hand them their asses.
I think the one thing about the movie that shocked me the most was that fact that autobots died from getting shot. They got shot all the time in the series and it just bounced off.
As there were no combiner teams (or the Dinobots)in Autobot City at that time, they were pretty much screwed when Devastator combined. And he did own non combiners (unless they ganged up on him).
As for the shots thing, my theory (and one believed by others who want an 'instory' expenation of the massacres) is because the cons had fully taken over Cybertron, the resources were no longer getting consumed by war. This meant the cons were able to supercharge their weapons before the initial attack on the shuttle, explaining why they could kill them so easily. In the series, they simply lacked the power to cause critical damage.
The movie was stated on many occasions as being a way to get rid of the existing lines and bring in the new bunch of people/toys.
But it still rocked.
Aurax wrote:the writers had planned a scene (not sure to what stage - pre-storyboard?) where the season 1 & 2 Autobots were slaughtered running a gauntlet, but left it out because of the massive trauma it would have caused all of us in the theaters.
First Gen wrote:I mean, c'mon, Kup says "Devastator" in the movie like all hope is lost, when the Aerialbots used to hand them their asses.
Neo Cyclonus wrote:
![]()
![]()
![]()
*ahem* I'd be interested in hearing the details of this particular scene.
The kind of interesting coda to the killing Optimus Prime story is the scene that never made it into the Transformers movie.
Next season, we're going to have all these new characters, [and] people are going to be wondering what happened to the old characters that they liked so much. And what we knew in a business sense was, "Well, they've been discontinued because they were the '84 line, but we've got to tie them off."
So we had this one scene where the Autobots basically had to run through a gauntlet of Decepticons, which basically wiped out the entire '84 product line in one massive Charge of the Light Brigade. So whoever wasn't discontinued stumbled to the end and yeah [Dille chuckles] that of course never made it into the movie. If you think kids were locking themselves in their rooms over Optimus Prime, basically in that scene they would have seen their entire toy collection wiped out.
Brakethrough wrote:First Gen wrote:I mean, c'mon, Kup says "Devastator" in the movie like all hope is lost, when the Aerialbots used to hand them their asses.
Well, see, the Aerialbots weren't there. More accurately they weren't THEN. See, after their first excellent time travelling adventure, they wound up going on a rather bogus journey at the same time the events of the movie took place. I'm not sure howw they all fit inside the phone booth in the first place, though.
Leonardo wrote:Scaleface wrote:Leonardo wrote:That's an interesting point. Of all the characters in G1 TF, why did Hasbro make an Action Master toy of one who was officially dead?
Your mistake is assuming the TV show was official. It's just ONE fiction made for the toy line. There are comics, audio books, and other media (heck, they made Transformers viewmasters stories!). The TV show is based on the toys, not the other way around. If they do something on the TV show that Hasbro doesn't want to reflect in the toy line, that's Hasbro's choice.
Yikes, no, I certainly don't think the TV show is official! I was saying this yesterday in some other thread. I asked the question because ThunderThruster had stated he was officially dead, when I didn't think he was.
Tekka wrote:What she doesn't realize is that Springer actually loves Rodimus.
ThunderThruster wrote:Leonardo wrote:Scaleface wrote:Leonardo wrote:That's an interesting point. Of all the characters in G1 TF, why did Hasbro make an Action Master toy of one who was officially dead?
Your mistake is assuming the TV show was official. It's just ONE fiction made for the toy line. There are comics, audio books, and other media (heck, they made Transformers viewmasters stories!). The TV show is based on the toys, not the other way around. If they do something on the TV show that Hasbro doesn't want to reflect in the toy line, that's Hasbro's choice.
Yikes, no, I certainly don't think the TV show is official! I was saying this yesterday in some other thread. I asked the question because ThunderThruster had stated he was officially dead, when I didn't think he was.
as far as i was aware this thread was about the movie and the animated continuity!
First Gen wrote:Insurgent wrote:First Gen wrote:Wheres Trailbreaker, Seaspray, Huffer, Mirage, the Aerialbots, Omega Supreme, the Stunticons and countless others?
I mean, c'mon, Kup says "Devastator" in the movie like all hope is lost, when the Aerialbots used to hand them their asses.
I think the one thing about the movie that shocked me the most was that fact that autobots died from getting shot. They got shot all the time in the series and it just bounced off.
As there were no combiner teams (or the Dinobots)in Autobot City at that time, they were pretty much screwed when Devastator combined. And he did own non combiners (unless they ganged up on him).
As for the shots thing, my theory (and one believed by others who want an 'instory' expenation of the massacres) is because the cons had fully taken over Cybertron, the resources were no longer getting consumed by war. This meant the cons were able to supercharge their weapons before the initial attack on the shuttle, explaining why they could kill them so easily. In the series, they simply lacked the power to cause critical damage.
The movie was stated on many occasions as being a way to get rid of the existing lines and bring in the new bunch of people/toys.
Now that is a very good theory that would explain very well as to the devastation underwent at Autobot City.
The movie just wasn't well written. It left too many "if" factors.
But it still rocked. lol.
and a curios thing. how many cons there were? cause there was enought artillery in Autbot city to destroy an army.
Let me put it this way then - Is there any proof that Wheeljack wasn't just injured in the movie? No one said he's dead, and we just see him laying there injured.
Return to Transformers Cartoons and Comics Forum
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Bumblevivisector, Emerje, Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, Hero Alpha, Kamijou Touma, Mewtwo Ex, MSN [Bot], Omegatron.