Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store









Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.
-Kanrabat- wrote:Sabrblade wrote:The reissue is missing its rubsign and its two middle bug legs, having only eight now instead of the original ten.
And its antennae are on backwards.
I can understand the missing rub sign, and the antennae can be swapped. But the missing middle legs are a huge WAT.
Emerje wrote:I wonder if they somehow lost that part of the mold or something? Seems strange to both choose to use an incomplete mold for reissue and to not simply mold new legs. Most likely for a figure like this the middle legs are on their own sprue and they just crank out a ton of them that go in a bin for assembly so it would be a new mold they'd get a lot of use out of even if it was just for this one run. They went to the trouble of remolding quite a bit of Rattrap, what's two little bug legs?
Emerje
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
Sabrblade wrote:I've actually had a theory about Retrax's missing legs for a while now. I'm pretty confident that the reason they left out those middle legs is because one of them ends up in the middle of his groin in robot mode. When transformed properly, the bug leg is hidden beneath the robot mode's chestplate. But one could instead choose to not hide it away and just let it stick out from the figure's waist all phallic-like. By removing it, Hasbro is basically eliminating that option from being a potential possibility for someone to do with the figure altogether.
You'd be surprised how close is considered "close enough" when it comes to (potentially) phallic imagery in children's media/products.Emerje wrote:Sabrblade wrote:I've actually had a theory about Retrax's missing legs for a while now. I'm pretty confident that the reason they left out those middle legs is because one of them ends up in the middle of his groin in robot mode. When transformed properly, the bug leg is hidden beneath the robot mode's chestplate. But one could instead choose to not hide it away and just let it stick out from the figure's waist all phallic-like. By removing it, Hasbro is basically eliminating that option from being a potential possibility for someone to do with the figure altogether.
This seems implausible, it would be sticking out of his belly, no where near his crotch. If Hasbro really did think this then they need a lesson in basic human anatomy.
Emerje
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
Rattrap is a super-popular show character.Emerje wrote:They went to the trouble of remolding quite a bit of Rattrap, what's two little bug legs?
Emerje
I have almost the same theory, but it regards the other middle bug leg.Sabrblade wrote:I've actually had a theory about Retrax's missing legs for a while now. I'm pretty confident that the reason they left out those middle legs is because one of them ends up in the middle of his groin in robot mode. When transformed properly, the bug leg is hidden beneath the robot mode's chestplate. But one could instead choose to not hide it away and just let it stick out from the figure's waist all phallic-like. By removing it, Hasbro is basically eliminating that option from being a potential possibility for someone to do with the figure altogether.
Also, see above. If I'm right about that, anyway. I don't own Retrax or Powerhug, so I can't check.Sabrblade wrote:You'd be surprised how close is considered "close enough" when it comes to (potentially) phallic imagery in children's media/products.Emerje wrote:This seems implausible, it would be sticking out of his belly, no where near his crotch. If Hasbro really did think this then they need a lesson in basic human anatomy.
Emerje
ZeldaTheSwordsman wrote:I think I'll write to Hasbro, see if I can get a definite answer from them.
Emerje wrote:ZeldaTheSwordsman wrote:I think I'll write to Hasbro, see if I can get a definite answer from them.
You'd probably have a better chance of getting a response if you email them saying you bought one and it's missing legs rather than just asking why they're missing.
Emerje
chuckdawg1999 wrote:Emerje wrote:ZeldaTheSwordsman wrote:I think I'll write to Hasbro, see if I can get a definite answer from them.
You'd probably have a better chance of getting a response if you email them saying you bought one and it's missing legs rather than just asking why they're missing.
Emerje
You'll have better luck pressing a piece of coal between your hands to make a diamond than getting a straight answer about anything from Hasbro.
Sculyblast wrote:chuckdawg1999 wrote:Emerje wrote:ZeldaTheSwordsman wrote:I think I'll write to Hasbro, see if I can get a definite answer from them.
You'd probably have a better chance of getting a response if you email them saying you bought one and it's missing legs rather than just asking why they're missing.
Emerje
You'll have better luck pressing a piece of coal between your hands to make a diamond than getting a straight answer about anything from Hasbro.
Isn't that just how big organisations work?
There are lucky employees who get to design toys.
There are unlucky employees who have to answer questions from annoyed customers.
If those unlucky employees cannot easily find the answer to the questions, they typically don't know who to ask. Therefore, the questions never reach those lucky, lucky employees. Who are probably drinking a cocktail on a beach filled with models in bikini's.
chuckdawg1999 wrote:Emerje wrote:ZeldaTheSwordsman wrote:I think I'll write to Hasbro, see if I can get a definite answer from them.
You'd probably have a better chance of getting a response if you email them saying you bought one and it's missing legs rather than just asking why they're missing.
Emerje
You'll have better luck pressing a piece of coal between your hands to make a diamond than getting a straight answer about anything from Hasbro.
Emerje wrote:I was thinking more along the lines of if you just email and ask they'll probably ignore you, but if you say you bought one they might at least give you an "it's not an error, it's a feature" response which would at least maybe confirm it was intentional.
Emerje
D-Maximal_Primal wrote:Retrax is good. He still has good springs. They don't hurt if they snap on you or anything, but they work and he has a good hugging action.
RodimusPrimeUkraine1 wrote:D-Maximal_Primal wrote:Retrax is good. He still has good springs. They don't hurt if they snap on you or anything, but they work and he has a good hugging action.
NICE, I want one
Sabrblade wrote:This is not the first time Hasbro has taken a preexisting design and made changes to it in order to eliminate any option for consumers to be naughty and make a figure's existing parts stick outward from the groin area. For Hasbro's three megazord toys for Power Rangers Dino Fury, they modified Bandai's original design for all three megazords' crotch pieces to render the once functional ports in their abdominal regions completely non-functional, enabling no attachable pieces to attach to said ports (save for one unique "loincloth" piece designed to specifically attach to the T-Rex Champion Zord's crotch port, which Hasbro apparently deemed an acceptable piece to attach there since it is a flat piece that doesn't stick outward, and its own port has likewise been rendered non-functional).
Whoever took those pics pulled that off by turning around the figure's head and feet, and by putting the arms on backwards, to make the back of the torso face forward in order to use functional port on the figure's tushie.william-james88 wrote:Sabrblade wrote:This is not the first time Hasbro has taken a preexisting design and made changes to it in order to eliminate any option for consumers to be naughty and make a figure's existing parts stick outward from the groin area. For Hasbro's three megazord toys for Power Rangers Dino Fury, they modified Bandai's original design for all three megazords' crotch pieces to render the once functional ports in their abdominal regions completely non-functional, enabling no attachable pieces to attach to said ports (save for one unique "loincloth" piece designed to specifically attach to the T-Rex Champion Zord's crotch port, which Hasbro apparently deemed an acceptable piece to attach there since it is a flat piece that doesn't stick outward, and its own port has likewise been rendered non-functional).
Dread it, run from it, crotch pics will happen all the same.
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
Sabrblade wrote:Whoever took those pics pulled that off by turning around the figure's head and feet, and by putting the arms on backwards, to make the back of the torso face forward in order to use functional port on the figure's tushie.william-james88 wrote:Sabrblade wrote:This is not the first time Hasbro has taken a preexisting design and made changes to it in order to eliminate any option for consumers to be naughty and make a figure's existing parts stick outward from the groin area. For Hasbro's three megazord toys for Power Rangers Dino Fury, they modified Bandai's original design for all three megazords' crotch pieces to render the once functional ports in their abdominal regions completely non-functional, enabling no attachable pieces to attach to said ports (save for one unique "loincloth" piece designed to specifically attach to the T-Rex Champion Zord's crotch port, which Hasbro apparently deemed an acceptable piece to attach there since it is a flat piece that doesn't stick outward, and its own port has likewise been rendered non-functional).
Dread it, run from it, crotch pics will happen all the same.
william-james88 wrote:Sabrblade wrote:This is not the first time Hasbro has taken a preexisting design and made changes to it in order to eliminate any option for consumers to be naughty and make a figure's existing parts stick outward from the groin area. For Hasbro's three megazord toys for Power Rangers Dino Fury, they modified Bandai's original design for all three megazords' crotch pieces to render the once functional ports in their abdominal regions completely non-functional, enabling no attachable pieces to attach to said ports (save for one unique "loincloth" piece designed to specifically attach to the T-Rex Champion Zord's crotch port, which Hasbro apparently deemed an acceptable piece to attach there since it is a flat piece that doesn't stick outward, and its own port has likewise been rendered non-functional).
Dread it, run from it, crotch pics will happen all the same.
Return to Transformers Toys Discussion
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Bumblevivisector, Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, MSN [Bot], Yahoo [Bot]