Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store
Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.
Damolisher wrote:God you're pathetic, Tramp. You keep going on about life this, life that, newsflash, fool, it's not REAL LIFE!
But in the original run of TFs, they had no genetic need for families...therefore there must be some other reason for why they had them. Fail.Tramp wrote:They don't have to The implication is as clear as day. The sole purpose for courtship is to bring males and females together for reproduction. The purpose of marriage evolved over the millenia is for the raising of offspring by both parents because it provides the best chance for the successful raising and protection of said offspring especially given the length of time it takes for human children to reach adulthood. Genders, courtship, marriage (taking on a life-mate) serves only one purpose in a species for its survival, and that is reproduction. It serves no other evolutionary or biological purpose.
once again, the only important thing to bring out of that is the fact that Prime says they are all TFs are born from it. That means they don't come from sex.Yes, so was I. Yes, all TransFormers were born of the Allspark, but not directly. Their sparks came from the Allspark through the planet, through the growth of life. They were not brought in front of the Allspark as lifeless husks and "imbued" with a spark directly. As Robert Orci said, that creates mindless monsters. Not just from Earth Tech, but from anything. The Allspark is not meant to be used directly on any machine. It is menat to bring life to the planet itself so that the planet can bring forth life and sustain it.
Actually yes, it matters quite a bit. & I'm still not going to argue this, as you clearly think fiction has to also follow the rules of reality, even though we're talking about advanced ancient giant alien robots from outer space.Fiction or reality, it does not matter Life cannot survive, much less thrive, without these criteria. This is especially true of autopoietic reproduction. without that, a species cannot continue. It will die out. a lfie form's only immortality is through its offspring by passing on its genes to the next generation. That canot be accomplished through creating copies in a factory. That requires autopoietic means. That requires procreation.
No, it is evident that they show affection, any purpose beyond that is simply implied.How do you know that? You don't. We can't see any more than what they show because to do so would be innappropriate for children. The very fact that there is romantic affection, courtship, romantic rivalry. That is evidence of sexual reproduction. You don't need to see them in action. Arcee was the first female TransFormers seen in thousands of millenia if not longer. Yes, this is evidence of sexual reproduction and that genders are real among TransFormers.
No, robotic or no, I'm not looking past them being fiction, children's fiction at that.The are there. You simply choose to ignore them because you can't look past them being robotic. There is not other conclusion to be drawn.
once again, human hubris to think all complex life, alien, robotic, or otherwise, must have sex to be considered life.I never said women are solely for reproduction. I said genders are solely for sexual reproduction. IF we were asexual beings, we would not have genders at all, much less gender idenmtities. We would not have males or females. The only reason why we do have males and females is sexual reproduction. That is why we are divided into two genders, why we engage in courtship and marry. To further the species. That is the only purpose for genders, courtship, etc.
*sigh*And I am referring to in universe. Life forms cannot choose their sex. Yes, it was the preferense of the writers, more accurately Hasbro. It was a marketing ploy, and it worked. However, once that decision was made, ther has to be an internal[b] reason for it. And the only [b]logical reason, given that TransFormers are living beings, is reproductive. Genders serve no other purpose in a life form or its survival.
NO, the point here is you want them to be sexual beings. Your entire argument was debunked several pages ago, & now all you can do towards any point of argument is: "uh-huh, it is so, because I say it is, so your wrong." I'm done arguing.Yes, there is a logical reason why they should be capable of it. First, they are life forms. Second, they are life forms divided into two distinct sexes—male and female. Why do life forms have sexes? Reproduction. That is why they have genders, and gneders evolved for reproduction. That is the only purpose for a life form to be male or female. It is so that it can come together with a member of the opposite gender and make babies. Courtship is meant to draw a male and female together so they can mate and make babies. Marriage evolved so that the male and female cuould better raise those children. IF you think logically from the standpoint of TransFormers being life forms instead of "just" robots, particularly life forms divided by gender, it makes perfect sense that they would be sexual beings capable of reproduction through sexual means. IF TransFormers were truely asexual, they would not have either male or female appearances. They would not refer to themselves or others of theoir kind as "he" or "she". They would have absolutely no concept of gender. The very fact that they do have a concept of gender, clearly evident in their gender-based bias towards Arcee, is proof enough of this. They are sexual beings, but some time in their past, all of the females were taken by the Quintessans forcing them into an essentially genderless existence until Arcee, and later, other lost Femmes, came back to Cybertron. The fact that they are mechanical in composition has no bearing. It is irrelevant. They are living beings divided by sex. Sexes only serve a reproductive purpose in life. That is what is relevant.
Electron wrote:sledge your comments are like a fat chick raping a hot dog, its unpleasent to watch but in the end its gonna happen
Mr O wrote:I'm part Irish, part Scottish, very Welsh, mostly drunk, somewhat Transformers nerd and all bastard.
Heh....I am. I don't know about Robosex, but I'm done.The Master Blaster wrote:And as the dust settled at half time, I came running in to ask
'Have you lot finished yet?'
Doctor Paragon wrote:Transformers reproduce through "artificial" means because
they are machines. Living machines, but machines none the
less. There is pretty credible imagery implying the Lithones
could reproduce "naturally" but it was never stated as canon.
Also Cybertronians rely on the (Creation Matrix, Matrix,
Pit, Oracle, Vector Sigma, Allspark, and/or Primus)
to give them their Sentience.
They could in theory produce a dynamic growing body for a
new transformer from their own substance especially as of
Beast Wars and the new movie since both show signs of
"Nano-machine" level technology. It is for the gift of
self awareness that they must rely on these techno-Spiritual
Macguffins for.
Two other issues I have with your arguments Tramp:
1: Primus and Unicron are Gods.
In scale only. Neither created the universe, nor can they
defy natural/quantum laws of the universe in which they
both reside.
2: Any reference to post Headmasters animation as canon.
Please. I love my Victory Saber as much as the next
Transfan who has one, but that stuff was absolutely
ridiculous. It was as if DBZ (which I truly enjoyed on
it's own crazy merits) had chewed up Transformers and
then vomited out those poor excuses for sequels.
As for the age old issue of why there are female Autobots
and also why there were no female Decepticons originally
is covered in season 3 of the cartoon. The Autobots were
a consumer robot line made primarily for humanoid organics
to use for luxury and labor. The Decepticons were produced
as a combat model. The Quintessons decided to make two
genders for the Autobots to broaden the market appeal.
The Decepticons were fine as is with one nuetral/male
design. The different genders in Autobots was for esthetics
not reproductive function nothing more, nothing less.
Electron wrote:sledge your comments are like a fat chick raping a hot dog, its unpleasent to watch but in the end its gonna happen
Mr O wrote:I'm part Irish, part Scottish, very Welsh, mostly drunk, somewhat Transformers nerd and all bastard.
The Master Blaster wrote:I don't know how people can argue so much about alien machines having sex.
It's kinda freaky, but it ain't impossible.
Just out of curiosity, what actually was the topic before fur flew?
Cos I'd like to say let's get back on it
Tekka wrote:What she doesn't realize is that Springer actually loves Rodimus.
ThunderThruster wrote:The Master Blaster wrote:I don't know how people can argue so much about alien machines having sex.
It's kinda freaky, but it ain't impossible.
Just out of curiosity, what actually was the topic before fur flew?
Cos I'd like to say let's get back on it
something about a TF series aimed at girls or something along those lines!
IIRC, the part that got the fur flying was the "The fembots don't need to compete or impress them to reproduce only to impress or companionship" part....well, that & Damolisher doing his "OMG THEY'RE ROBOTS!!" post(no offense, man).babylon queen wrote:TRansformers are mostly boy toys but since they do have fembots .Shouldn't HAsbro have transformers for girls? They can have a line with only female transformers. Have actually a boy or two in the line even though they are really needed. The fembots don't need to compete or impress them to reproduce only to impress or companionship. They should have female leaders as well.
Nemesis Cyberplex wrote:But in the original run of TFs, they had no genetic need for families...therefore there must be some other reason for why they had them. Fail.Tramp wrote:They don't have to The implication is as clear as day. The sole purpose for courtship is to bring males and females together for reproduction. The purpose of marriage evolved over the millenia is for the raising of offspring by both parents because it provides the best chance for the successful raising and protection of said offspring especially given the length of time it takes for human children to reach adulthood. Genders, courtship, marriage (taking on a life-mate) serves only one purpose in a species for its survival, and that is reproduction. It serves no other evolutionary or biological purpose.
once again, the only important thing to bring out of that is the fact that Prime says they are all TFs are born from it. That means they don't come from sex.Yes, so was I. Yes, all TransFormers were born of the Allspark, but not directly. Their sparks came from the Allspark through the planet, through the growth of life. They were not brought in front of the Allspark as lifeless husks and "imbued" with a spark directly. As Robert Orci said, that creates mindless monsters. Not just from Earth Tech, but from anything. The Allspark is not meant to be used directly on any machine. It is menat to bring life to the planet itself so that the planet can bring forth life and sustain it.
Actually yes, it matters quite a bit. & I'm still not going to argue this, as you clearly think fiction has to also follow the rules of reality, even though we're talking about advanced ancient giant alien robots from outer space.Fiction or reality, it does not matter Life cannot survive, much less thrive, without these criteria. This is especially true of autopoietic reproduction. without that, a species cannot continue. It will die out. a lfie form's only immortality is through its offspring by passing on its genes to the next generation. That canot be accomplished through creating copies in a factory. That requires autopoietic means. That requires procreation.
No, it is evident that they show affection, any purpose beyond that is simply implied.How do you know that? You don't. We can't see any more than what they show because to do so would be innappropriate for children. The very fact that there is romantic affection, courtship, romantic rivalry. That is evidence of sexual reproduction. You don't need to see them in action. Arcee was the first female TransFormers seen in thousands of millenia if not longer. Yes, this is evidence of sexual reproduction and that genders are real among TransFormers.
No, robotic or no, I'm not looking past them being fiction, children's fiction at that.The are there. You simply choose to ignore them because you can't look past them being robotic. There is not other conclusion to be drawn.
once again, human hubris to think all complex life, alien, robotic, or otherwise, must have sex to be considered life.I never said women are solely for reproduction. I said genders are solely for sexual reproduction. IF we were asexual beings, we would not have genders at all, much less gender idenmtities. We would not have males or females. The only reason why we do have males and females is sexual reproduction. That is why we are divided into two genders, why we engage in courtship and marry. To further the species. That is the only purpose for genders, courtship, etc.
*sigh*And I am referring to in universe. Life forms cannot choose their sex. Yes, it was the preferense of the writers, more accurately Hasbro. It was a marketing ploy, and it worked. However, once that decision was made, ther has to be an internal[b] reason for it. And the only [b]logical reason, given that TransFormers are living beings, is reproductive. Genders serve no other purpose in a life form or its survival.
"You're wrong, because my reasoning on this matter is better than yours.
"you're not even arguing what I was talking about"
"it dosen't matter, I'm right anyway"
....That's all I'm saying about this part.
NO, the point here is you want them to be sexual beings. Your entire argument was debunked several pages ago, & now all you can do towards any point of argument is: "uh-huh, it is so, because I say it is, so your wrong." I'm done arguing.Yes, there is a logical reason why they should be capable of it. First, they are life forms. Second, they are life forms divided into two distinct sexes—male and female. Why do life forms have sexes? Reproduction. That is why they have genders, and gneders evolved for reproduction. That is the only purpose for a life form to be male or female. It is so that it can come together with a member of the opposite gender and make babies. Courtship is meant to draw a male and female together so they can mate and make babies. Marriage evolved so that the male and female cuould better raise those children. IF you think logically from the standpoint of TransFormers being life forms instead of "just" robots, particularly life forms divided by gender, it makes perfect sense that they would be sexual beings capable of reproduction through sexual means. IF TransFormers were truely asexual, they would not have either male or female appearances. They would not refer to themselves or others of theoir kind as "he" or "she". They would have absolutely no concept of gender. The very fact that they do have a concept of gender, clearly evident in their gender-based bias towards Arcee, is proof enough of this. They are sexual beings, but some time in their past, all of the females were taken by the Quintessans forcing them into an essentially genderless existence until Arcee, and later, other lost Femmes, came back to Cybertron. The fact that they are mechanical in composition has no bearing. It is irrelevant. They are living beings divided by sex. Sexes only serve a reproductive purpose in life. That is what is relevant.
Doctor Paragon wrote:I already covered the canonical facts about where
"Female" cybertronians came from. Here, I'll restate it.Doctor Paragon wrote:Transformers reproduce through "artificial" means because
they are machines. Living machines, but machines none the
less. There is pretty credible imagery implying the Lithones
could reproduce "naturally" but it was never stated as canon.
Also Cybertronians rely on the (Creation Matrix, Matrix,
Pit, Oracle, Vector Sigma, Allspark, and/or Primus)
to give them their Sentience.
They could in theory produce a dynamic growing body for a
new transformer from their own substance especially as of
Beast Wars and the new movie since both show signs of
"Nano-machine" level technology. It is for the gift of
self awareness that they must rely on these techno-Spiritual
Macguffins for.
Two other issues I have with your arguments Tramp:
1: Primus and Unicron are Gods.
In scale only. Neither created the universe, nor can they
defy natural/quantum laws of the universe in which they
both reside.
2: Any reference to post Headmasters animation as canon.
Please. I love my Victory Saber as much as the next
Transfan who has one, but that stuff was absolutely
ridiculous. It was as if DBZ (which I truly enjoyed on
it's own crazy merits) had chewed up Transformers and
then vomited out those poor excuses for sequels.
As for the age old issue of why there are female Autobots
and also why there were no female Decepticons originally
is covered in season 3 of the cartoon. The Autobots were
a consumer robot line made primarily for humanoid organics
to use for luxury and labor. The Decepticons were produced
as a combat model. The Quintessons decided to make two
genders for the Autobots to broaden the market appeal.
The Decepticons were fine as is with one nuetral/male
design. The different genders in Autobots was for esthetics
not reproductive function nothing more, nothing less.
The rest is conjecture, period.
Damolisher wrote:Oh, wah. Cry me a freakin' river. Your posts are getting close to "I'm a mental patient, I think robots can have sexual intercourse." I also love the way you haven't answered any of my prior posts. Also, it's not a discussion of theoretical things, it's a debate over reality, and the fact you're trying to drum your fantasies into everyone with a brain.
Theoretical life is exactly that.Tramp wrote:Many of the articles I went through specifically say that these criteria work because they can be applied to all life, not just, life in forms that we know, but theoretical forms such as silicon based life, mechanical life, etc as well.
Damolisher wrote:No, I'm referring to my most recent posts. Here's the thing: People like you ruin Transformers for everyone else. You expect a kids' show to meet your expectations, and you seem to feel that writers must meet your criteria of what is and what isn't physically possible. It's a cartoon, and is a franchise generally aimed t a younger audience, but people like YOU want to hijack it,. and make everything "Feasible" so you can understand it. Understand this: Machines can't breed, Transformers are built, and you never hear any Transformer say anything about being born. A Transformer's parent is whoever builds them, Kup and Wheelie's aging is to do with their components, and when they were built, you're a misogynist, and your comics are not evidence as to your ridiculous and downright impossible claims of Transformers being born.
You talk down to people, and you expect everyone to bow down to "Science" when we're dealing with a cartoon/comic in which if you had to look at what's physically possible, you wouldn't have a Transformers franchise at all. However, you and your only 4 points of defence have constantly been debunked and you have been informed by other people your so-called comics are not canon, and yet you both continue to attempt to pass them off as canon, a term which you CONSTANTLY misuse.
You seem to feel you know more than me because you're older, you seem to love attempting to talk down to me and try to tell me how to conduct myself despite the fact I've been here 4 years longer than you, and I think I might know how things run just a liiiiiiittle bit more than you do. You think you have all the answers, when all you have is hearsay, theory, and your so-called laws of life, which I don't think a lot of people will have heard of. I never learned about these "laws" in science, and you never ever see any references to birth in Transformers, only building, and asexual reproduction, in the instance of G2.
Paragon, Glyph, Myself, and others, have given you mountains of evidence AGAINST what you say, and yet you never present anything new. If more evidence weighs more heavily against one argument, it's clear that the argument with more evidence wins.
slycherrychunks wrote:Theoretical life is exactly that.Tramp wrote:Many of the articles I went through specifically say that these criteria work because they can be applied to all life, not just, life in forms that we know, but theoretical forms such as silicon based life, mechanical life, etc as well.
Fictional life is exactly that.
Also, what articles? It sounds like you've reading through some online bumf and just interpreting it in a way that supports your silly little fantasy.
And as the only purpose of courtship and romance is reproduction, please explain to me:
Powerglide and Astoria, Seaspray and Alana, Tracks and Roaul (G1 cartoon)
Jazz and Marrissa Faireborn (Dreamwave G1)
Starscream and Alexis (Armada)
Convoy and Marrissa, Hot Rod and Syaosyao, Kremzeek and Atari's panties (Kiss Players)
My foot and your ass (this thread)
If we apply your own logic to this - it is clear evidence of a full blown sexual relationshipTramp wrote:As for Marrissa Fairborn and Jazz in issue #8 of the DW comics, there is nothing romantic. IT's playful banter between two comerads in arms. She was making a jibe at him to break the tension. I just went through it.
slycherrychunks wrote:If we apply your own logic to this - it is clear evidence of a full blown sexual relationshipTramp wrote:As for Marrissa Fairborn and Jazz in issue #8 of the DW comics, there is nothing romantic. IT's playful banter between two comerads in arms. She was making a jibe at him to break the tension. I just went through it.
slycherrychunks wrote:If we apply your own logic to this - it is clear evidence of a full blown sexual relationshipTramp wrote:As for Marrissa Fairborn and Jazz in issue #8 of the DW comics, there is nothing romantic. IT's playful banter between two comerads in arms. She was making a jibe at him to break the tension. I just went through it.
Damolisher wrote:Now far be it from me, but that post seems familiar. Could it be because YOU'VE SAID IT REPEATEDLY?! Machines do not have sex. Any sane person will tell you machines, regardless of how "Alive" they may be can't have sex. Why would you build a robot with genitals? What, somehow, Wheeljack and Ratchet have to attach a vibrator to Grimlock or someone else they're BUILT because you say the "laws of life" say they have to? Hell no! Newsflash, buddy: Scientific laws are writers playthings. IF anyone doesn't want to stick with something that doesn't make sense, they don't have to. Simon Furman doesn't, and he's the main man when it comes to Transformers. The only writer who seems to give a crap about these seldom heard of laws is the idiot who wrote your lame manga. And he's nobody. What's he done since he wrote the manga? Nothing Transformers related, I bet. You are not Simon Furman. You are not someone who writes for Transformers, and if people don't want to stick with these laws, they don't have to.
I mean, I don't know why you argue your point. If Transformers were born, they would've come straight out and said it. Theres no debate over the fact they can be built, since we've seen it, and it's been stated repeatedly that they are. No Transformer has ever made reference to birth. (Outside of some Japanese Manga that you seem to be the only one to have read.) Personally, I feel they would've come straight out and said it, rather than have left "Room for debate."
(Which, prior to this, I thought there would've been none of, but it turns out people think machines have genetic XY chromosome make-ups, semen, and a bunch of other conveniently AWOL baby-making parts. Funny that. Even in the ultimate guide, and even at Botcons, which are for adult Transformers collectors, we've never seen anything regarding genitals.)
My Dad's bigger than his though.Damolisher wrote:Careful., though, sly. he's older than you are, you need to respect him. *Cough*
Doctor Cox wrote: Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong!
Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong!
You're wrong! You're Wrong! You're Wrooong!
You know in that film, the Daddy robot cut up tin cans and put them into the Mummy robot. There was no exchange of genetic material. The Mummy Robot was essentially a mobile factory unit.Tramp wrote:[i]Batteries Not Included[/b]
Return to Transformers Cartoons and Comics Forum
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Bumblevivisector, Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Jelze Bunnycat, Mkdlmr, MSN [Bot], Rtron, Yahoo [Bot]