>
shop.seibertron.com amazon.seibertron.com Facebook Twitter X YouTube Pinterest Instagram Myspace LinkedIn Patreon Podcast RSS
This page runs on affiliate links — your clicks may earn us a few Shanix. Want the full transmission? Roll out to our Affiliate Disclosure.

Transformers for girls

Discuss anything about the Transformers cartoons and comics! You can discuss anything from G1 to Cybertron as well as the comics from Marvel, Dreamwave, IDW and more!

Postby Damolisher » Sun Aug 19, 2007 11:29 pm

God you're pathetic, Tramp. You keep going on about life this, life that, newsflash, fool, it's not REAL LIFE!
Damolisher
Brainmaster
Posts: 1323
News Credits: 3
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 1:29 am

Postby Tramp » Sun Aug 19, 2007 11:39 pm

Damolisher wrote:God you're pathetic, Tramp. You keep going on about life this, life that, newsflash, fool, it's not REAL LIFE!


Damolisher, if you can't be civil, leave. We all know this is fiction. so what! There are those among us who like to discuss the theoretcial and the deeper meanings wihtin a piece of fiction. We get more enjoyment out of it that way. If you don't, that's fine, but don't try and stop those of us who do, and don't belittle us either. your posts are getting closer and closer to flaming. Knock it off.
Tramp

Postby Damolisher » Mon Aug 20, 2007 1:37 am

Oh, wah. Cry me a freakin' river. Your posts are getting close to "I'm a mental patient, I think robots can have sexual intercourse." I also love the way you haven't answered any of my prior posts. Also, it's not a discussion of theoretical things, it's a debate over reality, and the fact you're trying to drum your fantasies into everyone with a brain.
Damolisher
Brainmaster
Posts: 1323
News Credits: 3
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 1:29 am

Postby Nemesis Cyberplex » Mon Aug 20, 2007 7:16 am

Tramp wrote:They don't have to The implication is as clear as day. The sole purpose for courtship is to bring males and females together for reproduction. The purpose of marriage evolved over the millenia is for the raising of offspring by both parents because it provides the best chance for the successful raising and protection of said offspring especially given the length of time it takes for human children to reach adulthood. Genders, courtship, marriage (taking on a life-mate) serves only one purpose in a species for its survival, and that is reproduction. It serves no other evolutionary or biological purpose.
But in the original run of TFs, they had no genetic need for families...therefore there must be some other reason for why they had them. Fail.

Yes, so was I. Yes, all TransFormers were born of the Allspark, but not directly. Their sparks came from the Allspark through the planet, through the growth of life. They were not brought in front of the Allspark as lifeless husks and "imbued" with a spark directly. As Robert Orci said, that creates mindless monsters. Not just from Earth Tech, but from anything. The Allspark is not meant to be used directly on any machine. It is menat to bring life to the planet itself so that the planet can bring forth life and sustain it.
once again, the only important thing to bring out of that is the fact that Prime says they are all TFs are born from it. That means they don't come from sex.


Fiction or reality, it does not matter Life cannot survive, much less thrive, without these criteria. This is especially true of autopoietic reproduction. without that, a species cannot continue. It will die out. a lfie form's only immortality is through its offspring by passing on its genes to the next generation. That canot be accomplished through creating copies in a factory. That requires autopoietic means. That requires procreation.
Actually yes, it matters quite a bit. & I'm still not going to argue this, as you clearly think fiction has to also follow the rules of reality, even though we're talking about advanced ancient giant alien robots from outer space.

How do you know that? You don't. We can't see any more than what they show because to do so would be innappropriate for children. The very fact that there is romantic affection, courtship, romantic rivalry. That is evidence of sexual reproduction. You don't need to see them in action. Arcee was the first female TransFormers seen in thousands of millenia if not longer. Yes, this is evidence of sexual reproduction and that genders are real among TransFormers.
No, it is evident that they show affection, any purpose beyond that is simply implied.

The are there. You simply choose to ignore them because you can't look past them being robotic. There is not other conclusion to be drawn.
No, robotic or no, I'm not looking past them being fiction, children's fiction at that.


I never said women are solely for reproduction. I said genders are solely for sexual reproduction. IF we were asexual beings, we would not have genders at all, much less gender idenmtities. We would not have males or females. The only reason why we do have males and females is sexual reproduction. That is why we are divided into two genders, why we engage in courtship and marry. To further the species. That is the only purpose for genders, courtship, etc.
once again, human hubris to think all complex life, alien, robotic, or otherwise, must have sex to be considered life.

And I am referring to in universe. Life forms cannot choose their sex. Yes, it was the preferense of the writers, more accurately Hasbro. It was a marketing ploy, and it worked. However, once that decision was made, ther has to be an internal[b] reason for it. And the only [b]logical reason, given that TransFormers are living beings, is reproductive. Genders serve no other purpose in a life form or its survival.
*sigh*
"You're wrong, because my reasoning on this matter is better than yours.
"you're not even arguing what I was talking about"
"it dosen't matter, I'm right anyway"

....That's all I'm saying about this part.

Yes, there is a logical reason why they should be capable of it. First, they are life forms. Second, they are life forms divided into two distinct sexes—male and female. Why do life forms have sexes? Reproduction. That is why they have genders, and gneders evolved for reproduction. That is the only purpose for a life form to be male or female. It is so that it can come together with a member of the opposite gender and make babies. Courtship is meant to draw a male and female together so they can mate and make babies. Marriage evolved so that the male and female cuould better raise those children. IF you think logically from the standpoint of TransFormers being life forms instead of "just" robots, particularly life forms divided by gender, it makes perfect sense that they would be sexual beings capable of reproduction through sexual means. IF TransFormers were truely asexual, they would not have either male or female appearances. They would not refer to themselves or others of theoir kind as "he" or "she". They would have absolutely no concept of gender. The very fact that they do have a concept of gender, clearly evident in their gender-based bias towards Arcee, is proof enough of this. They are sexual beings, but some time in their past, all of the females were taken by the Quintessans forcing them into an essentially genderless existence until Arcee, and later, other lost Femmes, came back to Cybertron. The fact that they are mechanical in composition has no bearing. It is irrelevant. They are living beings divided by sex. Sexes only serve a reproductive purpose in life. That is what is relevant.
NO, the point here is you want them to be sexual beings. Your entire argument was debunked several pages ago, & now all you can do towards any point of argument is: "uh-huh, it is so, because I say it is, so your wrong." I'm done arguing.
Image
Nemesis Cyberplex
Headmaster
Posts: 1017
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2003 7:20 am

Postby City Commander » Mon Aug 20, 2007 7:37 am

Weapon: Air Rifle
And as the dust settled at half time, I came running in to ask


'Have you lot finished yet?'














:P
Image
Electron wrote:sledge your comments are like a fat chick raping a hot dog, its unpleasent to watch but in the end its gonna happen

Mr O wrote:I'm part Irish, part Scottish, very Welsh, mostly drunk, somewhat Transformers nerd and all bastard.
User avatar
City Commander
Guardian Of Seibertron
Posts: 7177
News Credits: 6
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 1:47 pm
Location: AWC Headquarters (under the sofa)
Buy from City Commander on eBay
Strength: 6
Intelligence: 9
Speed: 6
Endurance: 7
Rank: Infinity
Courage: 8
Firepower: 7
Skill: 9

Postby Nemesis Cyberplex » Mon Aug 20, 2007 8:19 am

The Master Blaster wrote:And as the dust settled at half time, I came running in to ask


'Have you lot finished yet?'
Heh....I am. I don't know about Robosex, but I'm done.
Image
Nemesis Cyberplex
Headmaster
Posts: 1017
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2003 7:20 am

Postby Doctor Paragon » Mon Aug 20, 2007 9:55 am

I already covered the canonical facts about where
"Female" cybertronians came from. Here, I'll restate it.

Doctor Paragon wrote:Transformers reproduce through "artificial" means because
they are machines. Living machines, but machines none the
less. There is pretty credible imagery implying the Lithones
could reproduce "naturally" but it was never stated as canon.

Also Cybertronians rely on the (Creation Matrix, Matrix,
Pit, Oracle, Vector Sigma, Allspark, and/or Primus)
to give them their Sentience.
They could in theory produce a dynamic growing body for a
new transformer from their own substance especially as of
Beast Wars and the new movie since both show signs of
"Nano-machine" level technology. It is for the gift of
self awareness that they must rely on these techno-Spiritual
Macguffins for.

Two other issues I have with your arguments Tramp:

1: Primus and Unicron are Gods.
In scale only. Neither created the universe, nor can they
defy natural/quantum laws of the universe in which they
both reside.

2: Any reference to post Headmasters animation as canon.
Please. I love my Victory Saber as much as the next
Transfan who has one, but that stuff was absolutely
ridiculous. It was as if DBZ (which I truly enjoyed on
it's own crazy merits) had chewed up Transformers and
then vomited out those poor excuses for sequels.

As for the age old issue of why there are female Autobots
and also why there were no female Decepticons originally
is covered in season 3 of the cartoon. The Autobots were
a consumer robot line made primarily for humanoid organics
to use for luxury and labor. The Decepticons were produced
as a combat model. The Quintessons decided to make two
genders for the Autobots to broaden the market appeal.
The Decepticons were fine as is with one nuetral/male
design. The different genders in Autobots was for esthetics
not reproductive function nothing more, nothing less.


The rest is conjecture, period.
I'm the last thing you'll ever see...
Doctor Paragon
Micromaster
Posts: 65
News Credits: 1
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 2:46 pm

Postby City Commander » Mon Aug 20, 2007 10:00 am

Weapon: Air Rifle
I don't know how people can argue so much about alien machines having sex.

It's kinda freaky, but it ain't impossible.


Just out of curiosity, what actually was the topic before fur flew?

Cos I'd like to say let's get back on it :P
Image
Electron wrote:sledge your comments are like a fat chick raping a hot dog, its unpleasent to watch but in the end its gonna happen

Mr O wrote:I'm part Irish, part Scottish, very Welsh, mostly drunk, somewhat Transformers nerd and all bastard.
User avatar
City Commander
Guardian Of Seibertron
Posts: 7177
News Credits: 6
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 1:47 pm
Location: AWC Headquarters (under the sofa)
Buy from City Commander on eBay
Strength: 6
Intelligence: 9
Speed: 6
Endurance: 7
Rank: Infinity
Courage: 8
Firepower: 7
Skill: 9

Postby ThunderThruster » Mon Aug 20, 2007 10:24 am

Weapon: Twin Shoulder-Mounted Rocket Launchers
The Master Blaster wrote:I don't know how people can argue so much about alien machines having sex.

It's kinda freaky, but it ain't impossible.


Just out of curiosity, what actually was the topic before fur flew?

Cos I'd like to say let's get back on it :P


something about a TF series aimed at girls or something along those lines!
Tekka wrote:What she doesn't realize is that Springer actually loves Rodimus.
User avatar
ThunderThruster
Gestalt
Posts: 2939
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 8:56 am
Location: Nottingham

Postby Nemesis Cyberplex » Mon Aug 20, 2007 10:58 am

ThunderThruster wrote:
The Master Blaster wrote:I don't know how people can argue so much about alien machines having sex.

It's kinda freaky, but it ain't impossible.


Just out of curiosity, what actually was the topic before fur flew?

Cos I'd like to say let's get back on it :P


something about a TF series aimed at girls or something along those lines!


babylon queen wrote:TRansformers are mostly boy toys but since they do have fembots .Shouldn't HAsbro have transformers for girls? They can have a line with only female transformers. Have actually a boy or two in the line even though they are really needed. The fembots don't need to compete or impress them to reproduce only to impress or companionship. They should have female leaders as well.
IIRC, the part that got the fur flying was the "The fembots don't need to compete or impress them to reproduce only to impress or companionship" part....well, that & Damolisher doing his "OMG THEY'RE ROBOTS!!" post(no offense, man).
Image
Nemesis Cyberplex
Headmaster
Posts: 1017
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2003 7:20 am

Postby Tramp » Mon Aug 20, 2007 2:46 pm

Nemesis Cyberplex wrote:
Tramp wrote:They don't have to The implication is as clear as day. The sole purpose for courtship is to bring males and females together for reproduction. The purpose of marriage evolved over the millenia is for the raising of offspring by both parents because it provides the best chance for the successful raising and protection of said offspring especially given the length of time it takes for human children to reach adulthood. Genders, courtship, marriage (taking on a life-mate) serves only one purpose in a species for its survival, and that is reproduction. It serves no other evolutionary or biological purpose.
But in the original run of TFs, they had no genetic need for families...therefore there must be some other reason for why they had them. Fail.


In the first season, we didn't have any females. It was in the second season that they were intorduced, and the implication was clear, that they aren't much different than us. Yet still there were only a small handful of femmes. Acree was the only recurring fem. As the Ultimate Guide put it, her appearance goes all the way back to ancient times—a time when Cybertronains of both genders were common. A time when ther were two genders; a time before all the females were taken away creating, in essence a single-gender socieity.

Yes, so was I. Yes, all TransFormers were born of the Allspark, but not directly. Their sparks came from the Allspark through the planet, through the growth of life. They were not brought in front of the Allspark as lifeless husks and "imbued" with a spark directly. As Robert Orci said, that creates mindless monsters. Not just from Earth Tech, but from anything. The Allspark is not meant to be used directly on any machine. It is menat to bring life to the planet itself so that the planet can bring forth life and sustain it.
once again, the only important thing to bring out of that is the fact that Prime says they are all TFs are born from it. That means they don't come from sex.

Not quite. Prime's statement is like us saying we are all born from God, which, is also true depending upon your religious beliefs. He was not sayng that the Allspark was directly responsible for bringing each individual TF to life. Robert Orci's statment clarifies this perfectly. The Allspark created life on Cybertron, allowing life to flourish. Once the life was created in the first place, it evolved and flourished on its own with the power of the Allspark maintaining the planet's own ability to sustain life.

Fiction or reality, it does not matter Life cannot survive, much less thrive, without these criteria. This is especially true of autopoietic reproduction. without that, a species cannot continue. It will die out. a lfie form's only immortality is through its offspring by passing on its genes to the next generation. That canot be accomplished through creating copies in a factory. That requires autopoietic means. That requires procreation.
Actually yes, it matters quite a bit. & I'm still not going to argue this, as you clearly think fiction has to also follow the rules of reality, even though we're talking about advanced ancient giant alien robots from outer space.

Advanced alien robotic life forms. That is the key difference. The very fact that you think because they are robotic limits your views to the belife that reproduction is only limited to organic life, and this is simply not true. It is a logical fallacy. Many of the articles I went through specifically say that these criteria work because they can be applied to all life, not just, life in forms that we know, but theoretical forms such as silicon based life, mechanical life, etc as well.

Imagine nanomichines capable of self-replication, self-maintainence (homeostasis), self-organization, metabolism, sensing and responding to environmental stimuli, growth, that would be mechanical life. Now, imagine those nanites evolving, orgianizing into larger, more complex systems, Creating a multi-cellular organism. To increase diversity, and thus its chances of long-term survival, it evolves genders—sexual rerpoduction—to mix the genetic data, and continues to evolve eventually becoming sentient. That is robotic life.

How do you know that? You don't. We can't see any more than what they show because to do so would be innappropriate for children. The very fact that there is romantic affection, courtship, romantic rivalry. That is evidence of sexual reproduction. You don't need to see them in action. Arcee was the first female TransFormers seen in thousands of millenia if not longer. Yes, this is evidence of sexual reproduction and that genders are real among TransFormers.
No, it is evident that they show affection, any purpose beyond that is simply implied.


They show romantic affection. Romance only serves one purpose in the survival of a species; and that purpose is reproductive. Romance is sexual attraction. It is courtship. Courtship serves to bring a male and female together for mating. That is what romance is. It all comes down to sexual reproduction. That is not implied, that is fact. When animals engage in courtship, they are trying to find a suitable mate and pass on their genes to a new generation. The same is true of Humans. We meet someone we are sexually attracted to, and court them, hoping to find a suitable sexual partner with whom to rais a family with. It all comes down to sexual reproduction. This is true of all life. This is true of TransFormers. They engage in romance—in courtship. Courtship is part of the sexual reproductive process, and is unique to sexually reproducing life.

The are there. You simply choose to ignore them because you can't look past them being robotic. There is not other conclusion to be drawn.
No, robotic or no, I'm not looking past them being fiction, children's fiction at that.


Fiction has to have a basis in fact. Otherwise, readers cannot relate to it and accept it's internal reality. Even the most far-out fantasy literature cannot throw reality completely out the window. It still has to be grounded in certain scientificand physical principles even if they don't overtly explain them.

I never said women are solely for reproduction. I said genders are solely for sexual reproduction. IF we were asexual beings, we would not have genders at all, much less gender idenmtities. We would not have males or females. The only reason why we do have males and females is sexual reproduction. That is why we are divided into two genders, why we engage in courtship and marry. To further the species. That is the only purpose for genders, courtship, etc.
once again, human hubris to think all complex life, alien, robotic, or otherwise, must have sex to be considered life.

No. It isn't hubris at all. It is scientific fact. Secondly, sexual reproduction does not necessarily mean sex as we do it. It is just the most likely scenerio in this case given their design. Plants engage in sexual reproduction through pollenation. Most fish never even come in physical contact with each other when they mate. The female lays her eggs, and the male comes along and fertilizes them. All sexual reproduction is, is reproduction through the combination of gametes. That can be done internally, as we do, or externally. Hubris is saying because they are mechanical, they can't reproduce sexually. That they have to be built in factories. That is hubris. That is being unimaginative. The combined evidence shows that TFs had at one time two distinct genders, and every member of one gender—the females—was taken, which forced the use of factory-built protoforms to become the standard method of creating new Cybertronians. When the females were re-introduced, we see courtship, marriage, and families again. We see children being raised again. Something that hadn't happened in millions of years. I consider that pretty strong evidence of sexual reproduction. IF the TransFormers were organic, we wouldn't be having this debate.

Here is the applicable definitions of courtship and courting, from the Oxford dictionary—courtship

• noun 1 a period of courting. 2 the courting behaviour of male birds and other animals. 3 the action of courting.

Court

• verb 1 dated be involved with romantically, especially with a view to marriage. 5 (of a male bird or other animal) try to attract (a mate).

It all comes down to mating. It all comes down to reproduction.

And I am referring to in universe. Life forms cannot choose their sex. Yes, it was the preferense of the writers, more accurately Hasbro. It was a marketing ploy, and it worked. However, once that decision was made, ther has to be an internal[b] reason for it. And the only [b]logical reason, given that TransFormers are living beings, is reproductive. Genders serve no other purpose in a life form or its survival.
*sigh*
"You're wrong, because my reasoning on this matter is better than yours.
"you're not even arguing what I was talking about"
"it dosen't matter, I'm right anyway"

....That's all I'm saying about this part.

No, your reasoning isn't. You have not once provided a reason for any species to have genders or engage in courtship that doesn't revolve around reproduction. And that is because there is not other purpose. A life form being male or female, and engaging in courtship, serves only a reproductive purpose. There is no other purpose for it, and you have yet to provide one. Therefore, no, you have not provided a better argument.

Yes, there is a logical reason why they should be capable of it. First, they are life forms. Second, they are life forms divided into two distinct sexes—male and female. Why do life forms have sexes? Reproduction. That is why they have genders, and gneders evolved for reproduction. That is the only purpose for a life form to be male or female. It is so that it can come together with a member of the opposite gender and make babies. Courtship is meant to draw a male and female together so they can mate and make babies. Marriage evolved so that the male and female cuould better raise those children. IF you think logically from the standpoint of TransFormers being life forms instead of "just" robots, particularly life forms divided by gender, it makes perfect sense that they would be sexual beings capable of reproduction through sexual means. IF TransFormers were truely asexual, they would not have either male or female appearances. They would not refer to themselves or others of theoir kind as "he" or "she". They would have absolutely no concept of gender. The very fact that they do have a concept of gender, clearly evident in their gender-based bias towards Arcee, is proof enough of this. They are sexual beings, but some time in their past, all of the females were taken by the Quintessans forcing them into an essentially genderless existence until Arcee, and later, other lost Femmes, came back to Cybertron. The fact that they are mechanical in composition has no bearing. It is irrelevant. They are living beings divided by sex. Sexes only serve a reproductive purpose in life. That is what is relevant.
NO, the point here is you want them to be sexual beings. Your entire argument was debunked several pages ago, & now all you can do towards any point of argument is: "uh-huh, it is so, because I say it is, so your wrong." I'm done arguing.

No, It isn't because "I want them" to be that way., The evidence say that they are that way. You have yet to give a single solid reason why they would have males and females, and engage in courtship, and everything else which serves a reproductive functiuon in life, that they posess, If it isn't for reproduction. There is no other purpose for them to have genders or engage in these activies. They only serve a reproductive purpose. And, unless you can give a logical reason why a life form would have genders and engage in these activities that in no way serves a reproductive function, then your argument has no leg to stand on. And don't give me the "gay marriage" bit, because even that has to do with sex.
Tramp

Postby Tramp » Mon Aug 20, 2007 3:18 pm

Doctor Paragon wrote:I already covered the canonical facts about where
"Female" cybertronians came from. Here, I'll restate it.

Doctor Paragon wrote:Transformers reproduce through "artificial" means because
they are machines. Living machines, but machines none the
less. There is pretty credible imagery implying the Lithones
could reproduce "naturally" but it was never stated as canon.

Also Cybertronians rely on the (Creation Matrix, Matrix,
Pit, Oracle, Vector Sigma, Allspark, and/or Primus)
to give them their Sentience.
They could in theory produce a dynamic growing body for a
new transformer from their own substance especially as of
Beast Wars and the new movie since both show signs of
"Nano-machine" level technology. It is for the gift of
self awareness that they must rely on these techno-Spiritual
Macguffins for.

Two other issues I have with your arguments Tramp:

1: Primus and Unicron are Gods.
In scale only. Neither created the universe, nor can they
defy natural/quantum laws of the universe in which they
both reside.

2: Any reference to post Headmasters animation as canon.
Please. I love my Victory Saber as much as the next
Transfan who has one, but that stuff was absolutely
ridiculous. It was as if DBZ (which I truly enjoyed on
it's own crazy merits) had chewed up Transformers and
then vomited out those poor excuses for sequels.

As for the age old issue of why there are female Autobots
and also why there were no female Decepticons originally
is covered in season 3 of the cartoon. The Autobots were
a consumer robot line made primarily for humanoid organics
to use for luxury and labor. The Decepticons were produced
as a combat model. The Quintessons decided to make two
genders for the Autobots to broaden the market appeal.
The Decepticons were fine as is with one nuetral/male
design. The different genders in Autobots was for esthetics
not reproductive function nothing more, nothing less.


The rest is conjecture, period.


Much of your agrument, especially regaarding the Matrix and Vector Sigma, as well as Primus and Unicron have been dealt with already. Primus and Unicron are gods according to canon. They are primordial dieties, one of order and one of chaos. They are indeed gods. Secondly, the Matrix and Vector Sigma are only needed to bring life to protoforms. and, as the Ultimate Guide said, the Matrix is not limitless. Third, als according the the Ultimate Guide, the Quintessans did not creatye the TransFormers, though they did have a very powerful effect on their early development. The way transFormers are now is a direct rewsult of their influece. Before the Quintessans, TransFormers were already male and Female. It was aftewr[b] the Quintessans that the TransFomrers ended up with a single-gender society. Gender was not aesthetic it was an integral part of the TransFormers from the beginning. Acree's bio in the Ultimate Guide points to this fact when it says her appearance and attitude are a result of something [b]from their timelost past. The quotes from the pasegans on the Well of the Allsparks, and the Quintessans suppoorts this. As for the Lithones, yes, the evidence is clear that they are sexually reproducing. You have men, women and children. The conclusion is clear. It doesn't need to be spelled out. Te same is true with the romantic relationships in G1, Beast Wars and later series, as well as the families in Victory. It doesn't have to be spelled out to show that they are capable of sexual reproduction. We don't have to see them actually engaged in the physical act to draw the conclusion that they are capable of it. IF you do need to see the act of mating, or have it spelled out for you, then something is very wrong.
Tramp

Postby Tramp » Mon Aug 20, 2007 3:19 pm

Damolisher wrote:Oh, wah. Cry me a freakin' river. Your posts are getting close to "I'm a mental patient, I think robots can have sexual intercourse." I also love the way you haven't answered any of my prior posts. Also, it's not a discussion of theoretical things, it's a debate over reality, and the fact you're trying to drum your fantasies into everyone with a brain.

Actually Damolisher, I have. Too many times to count.
Tramp

Postby Damolisher » Mon Aug 20, 2007 4:03 pm

No, I'm referring to my most recent posts. Here's the thing: People like you ruin Transformers for everyone else. You expect a kids' show to meet your expectations, and you seem to feel that writers must meet your criteria of what is and what isn't physically possible. It's a cartoon, and is a franchise generally aimed t a younger audience, but people like YOU want to hijack it,. and make everything "Feasible" so you can understand it. Understand this: Machines can't breed, Transformers are built, and you never hear any Transformer say anything about being born. A Transformer's parent is whoever builds them, Kup and Wheelie's aging is to do with their components, and when they were built, you're a misogynist, and your comics are not evidence as to your ridiculous and downright impossible claims of Transformers being born.

You talk down to people, and you expect everyone to bow down to "Science" when we're dealing with a cartoon/comic in which if you had to look at what's physically possible, you wouldn't have a Transformers franchise at all. However, you and your only 4 points of defence have constantly been debunked and you have been informed by other people your so-called comics are not canon, and yet you both continue to attempt to pass them off as canon, a term which you CONSTANTLY misuse.

You seem to feel you know more than me because you're older, you seem to love attempting to talk down to me and try to tell me how to conduct myself despite the fact I've been here 4 years longer than you, and I think I might know how things run just a liiiiiiittle bit more than you do. You think you have all the answers, when all you have is hearsay, theory, and your so-called laws of life, which I don't think a lot of people will have heard of. I never learned about these "laws" in science, and you never ever see any references to birth in Transformers, only building, and asexual reproduction, in the instance of G2.

Paragon, Glyph, Myself, and others, have given you mountains of evidence AGAINST what you say, and yet you never present anything new. If more evidence weighs more heavily against one argument, it's clear that the argument with more evidence wins.
Damolisher
Brainmaster
Posts: 1323
News Credits: 3
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 1:29 am

Postby slycherrychunks » Mon Aug 20, 2007 4:14 pm

Tramp wrote:Many of the articles I went through specifically say that these criteria work because they can be applied to all life, not just, life in forms that we know, but theoretical forms such as silicon based life, mechanical life, etc as well.
Theoretical life is exactly that.

Fictional life is exactly that.

Also, what articles? It sounds like you've reading through some online bumf and just interpreting it in a way that supports your silly little fantasy.

And as the only purpose of courtship and romance is reproduction, please explain to me:

Powerglide and Astoria, Seaspray and Alana, Tracks and Roaul (G1 cartoon)

Jazz and Marrissa Faireborn (Dreamwave G1)

Starscream and Alexis (Armada)

Convoy and Marrissa, Hot Rod and Syaosyao, Kremzeek and Atari's panties (Kiss Players)

My foot and your ass (this thread)
slycherrychunks
Minibot
Posts: 104
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 4:56 pm

Postby Tramp » Mon Aug 20, 2007 4:15 pm

Damolisher wrote:No, I'm referring to my most recent posts. Here's the thing: People like you ruin Transformers for everyone else. You expect a kids' show to meet your expectations, and you seem to feel that writers must meet your criteria of what is and what isn't physically possible. It's a cartoon, and is a franchise generally aimed t a younger audience, but people like YOU want to hijack it,. and make everything "Feasible" so you can understand it. Understand this: Machines can't breed, Transformers are built, and you never hear any Transformer say anything about being born. A Transformer's parent is whoever builds them, Kup and Wheelie's aging is to do with their components, and when they were built, you're a misogynist, and your comics are not evidence as to your ridiculous and downright impossible claims of Transformers being born.

You talk down to people, and you expect everyone to bow down to "Science" when we're dealing with a cartoon/comic in which if you had to look at what's physically possible, you wouldn't have a Transformers franchise at all. However, you and your only 4 points of defence have constantly been debunked and you have been informed by other people your so-called comics are not canon, and yet you both continue to attempt to pass them off as canon, a term which you CONSTANTLY misuse.

You seem to feel you know more than me because you're older, you seem to love attempting to talk down to me and try to tell me how to conduct myself despite the fact I've been here 4 years longer than you, and I think I might know how things run just a liiiiiiittle bit more than you do. You think you have all the answers, when all you have is hearsay, theory, and your so-called laws of life, which I don't think a lot of people will have heard of. I never learned about these "laws" in science, and you never ever see any references to birth in Transformers, only building, and asexual reproduction, in the instance of G2.

Paragon, Glyph, Myself, and others, have given you mountains of evidence AGAINST what you say, and yet you never present anything new. If more evidence weighs more heavily against one argument, it's clear that the argument with more evidence wins.


Damolisher, the only person talking down to people is you. Secondly, your entire argument is that they are robots. You can't get it through your head that the TransFormers are more than just machines. They are living beings, and that is the key difference. With our current technology, we cannot create machines that can self-replicate, but it is theoretically possible. There are a number of articles on the subject. Self-reproducing machines are possible. Even canon states that the use of factory produced protofoms is not the only option. Yet, you insist on repeating that it is the only option. That is what kills your whole argument. You have yourself locked up into this tiny little box of "they are machines; they are robots", that you can't see any other possibilities, and when those possibilities are presented to you, with cumulative supporting evidence, you reject them out of hand. Then you go and insult those who propose those possibilities. It's called being a "nay-sayer". It is not impossible for TransFomers to breed. Evidence shows that it is possible for them to do so. Comnbined evidence from multiple sources show that it was once quite common, but was lost with the removal of females from the population by the Quintessans, and regained with their return.
Tramp

Postby Tramp » Mon Aug 20, 2007 4:51 pm

slycherrychunks wrote:
Tramp wrote:Many of the articles I went through specifically say that these criteria work because they can be applied to all life, not just, life in forms that we know, but theoretical forms such as silicon based life, mechanical life, etc as well.
Theoretical life is exactly that.

Fictional life is exactly that.

Also, what articles? It sounds like you've reading through some online bumf and just interpreting it in a way that supports your silly little fantasy.

And as the only purpose of courtship and romance is reproduction, please explain to me:

Powerglide and Astoria, Seaspray and Alana, Tracks and Roaul (G1 cartoon)

Jazz and Marrissa Faireborn (Dreamwave G1)

Starscream and Alexis (Armada)

Convoy and Marrissa, Hot Rod and Syaosyao, Kremzeek and Atari's panties (Kiss Players)

My foot and your ass (this thread)


Astoria took a sexual interest in Powerglide. Why? he was malke for starters, and their personalities matched up. She saw him as a "man" not an alien. Whether or not they were physically capable of reproducing, wasn't in question, her reactions were still the result of emotions which developed for the purpose of finding a mate. Her mind saw that in Powerglide.
The same is true of the other G1 cartoon examples you gave. On top of that, what I am referring to is the evolutionary reason for theior development in the first place. Sure we can find individual instances where romantic affections happen between sentient individuals who look past their physical bodies, but that is not the norm, nor it is the purpose for what these were first developed for. You don't see Lions trying to court a sheep. OR a crocodile trying to court a bird. Why? Because it serves no purpose in the continuation of life. The examples of the Kiss Players is also an example of sexual deviancy; in particular fetishism. It still revolves around sex, and the real purpose of sex is reproductive. Thus, you still haven't provided any actiual purpose for these phenomena that isn't sexually related.
As for Marrissa Fairborn and Jazz in issue #8 of the DW comics, there is nothing romantic. IT's playful banter between two comerads in arms. She was making a jibe at him to break the tension. I just went through it.

And Alexis and Starscream weren't romantic either.

As for theoreticla and fictional life. They are often one and the same. Another name for Scinece fiction is theoretical fiction. Most of what we see in science fiction has a basis in scientific theory. Much of it is theoretically possible. Science fiction challenges up to look into what is possible in the future. It asks the questions we all have. "are we alone in the universe". "Can we do this?" "Is this possible?" "Can we go to the stars?" "What is out there?" These are the questions that everyone has deep down, and these are what science fiction addresses, and inspires. Often times, such fiction eventually becomes reality. Therefore, theoretical life is fictional life until such time as it is discovered to be reality. TransFormers fall under the catagory of theoretical life. Theoretically, they are possible. Theoretically, mechanical life forms similar to the TransFormers is possible. And how would we know that they are life forms if we were to meet them some time in the future? Because they would meet the criteria for life forms.
Last edited by Tramp on Mon Aug 20, 2007 5:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Tramp

Postby Damolisher » Mon Aug 20, 2007 4:57 pm

Now far be it from me, but that post seems familiar. Could it be because YOU'VE SAID IT REPEATEDLY?! Machines do not have sex. Any sane person will tell you machines, regardless of how "Alive" they may be can't have sex. Why would you build a robot with genitals? What, somehow, Wheeljack and Ratchet have to attach a vibrator to Grimlock or someone else they're BUILT because you say the "laws of life" say they have to? Hell no! Newsflash, buddy: Scientific laws are writers playthings. IF anyone doesn't want to stick with something that doesn't make sense, they don't have to. Simon Furman doesn't, and he's the main man when it comes to Transformers. The only writer who seems to give a crap about these seldom heard of laws is the idiot who wrote your lame manga. And he's nobody. What's he done since he wrote the manga? Nothing Transformers related, I bet. You are not Simon Furman. You are not someone who writes for Transformers, and if people don't want to stick with these laws, they don't have to.

I mean, I don't know why you argue your point. If Transformers were born, they would've come straight out and said it. Theres no debate over the fact they can be built, since we've seen it, and it's been stated repeatedly that they are. No Transformer has ever made reference to birth. (Outside of some Japanese Manga that you seem to be the only one to have read.) Personally, I feel they would've come straight out and said it, rather than have left "Room for debate."

(Which, prior to this, I thought there would've been none of, but it turns out people think machines have genetic XY chromosome make-ups, semen, and a bunch of other conveniently AWOL baby-making parts. Funny that. Even in the ultimate guide, and even at Botcons, which are for adult Transformers collectors, we've never seen anything regarding genitals.)
Damolisher
Brainmaster
Posts: 1323
News Credits: 3
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 1:29 am

Postby slycherrychunks » Mon Aug 20, 2007 4:58 pm

Tramp wrote:As for Marrissa Fairborn and Jazz in issue #8 of the DW comics, there is nothing romantic. IT's playful banter between two comerads in arms. She was making a jibe at him to break the tension. I just went through it.
If we apply your own logic to this - it is clear evidence of a full blown sexual relationship
slycherrychunks
Minibot
Posts: 104
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 4:56 pm

Postby Damolisher » Mon Aug 20, 2007 5:01 pm

slycherrychunks wrote:
Tramp wrote:As for Marrissa Fairborn and Jazz in issue #8 of the DW comics, there is nothing romantic. IT's playful banter between two comerads in arms. She was making a jibe at him to break the tension. I just went through it.
If we apply your own logic to this - it is clear evidence of a full blown sexual relationship


Agreed. If Inferno and Firestar, Ironhide and Chromia, and Powerglide and Moonracer are a "Sexual relationship" so are Jazz and Fairborne. Careful., though, sly. he's older than you are, you need to respect him. *Cough*
Damolisher
Brainmaster
Posts: 1323
News Credits: 3
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 1:29 am

Postby Damolisher » Mon Aug 20, 2007 5:04 pm

slycherrychunks wrote:
Tramp wrote:As for Marrissa Fairborn and Jazz in issue #8 of the DW comics, there is nothing romantic. IT's playful banter between two comerads in arms. She was making a jibe at him to break the tension. I just went through it.
If we apply your own logic to this - it is clear evidence of a full blown sexual relationship


Agreed. If Inferno and Firestar, Ironhide and Chromia, and Powerglide and Moonracer are a "Sexual relationship" so are Jazz and Fairborne. Careful., though, sly. he's older than you are, you need to respect him. *Cough*

P.S. There's the Misogyny at work AGAIN. She was in love, not "Looking for a mate." It was a schoolgirl crush, not a fullblown sexual relationship. Christ Almighty, women are more than just baby-carrying sex objects. They're people who can choose to live their lives how they want. They don't want kids, they don't have to have kids. Our purpose in life is whatever we want it to be, otherwise, it'd be pretty pointless.
Damolisher
Brainmaster
Posts: 1323
News Credits: 3
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 1:29 am

Postby Tramp » Mon Aug 20, 2007 5:12 pm

Damolisher wrote:Now far be it from me, but that post seems familiar. Could it be because YOU'VE SAID IT REPEATEDLY?! Machines do not have sex. Any sane person will tell you machines, regardless of how "Alive" they may be can't have sex. Why would you build a robot with genitals? What, somehow, Wheeljack and Ratchet have to attach a vibrator to Grimlock or someone else they're BUILT because you say the "laws of life" say they have to? Hell no! Newsflash, buddy: Scientific laws are writers playthings. IF anyone doesn't want to stick with something that doesn't make sense, they don't have to. Simon Furman doesn't, and he's the main man when it comes to Transformers. The only writer who seems to give a crap about these seldom heard of laws is the idiot who wrote your lame manga. And he's nobody. What's he done since he wrote the manga? Nothing Transformers related, I bet. You are not Simon Furman. You are not someone who writes for Transformers, and if people don't want to stick with these laws, they don't have to.

I mean, I don't know why you argue your point. If Transformers were born, they would've come straight out and said it. Theres no debate over the fact they can be built, since we've seen it, and it's been stated repeatedly that they are. No Transformer has ever made reference to birth. (Outside of some Japanese Manga that you seem to be the only one to have read.) Personally, I feel they would've come straight out and said it, rather than have left "Room for debate."

(Which, prior to this, I thought there would've been none of, but it turns out people think machines have genetic XY chromosome make-ups, semen, and a bunch of other conveniently AWOL baby-making parts. Funny that. Even in the ultimate guide, and even at Botcons, which are for adult Transformers collectors, we've never seen anything regarding genitals.)


Wrong Damolisher. Being machines has nothing to do with it. The question is not why would I build a machine with reproductive capability, but why would a mechanical life form evolve that way. And to say that any "sane" person would agree with you that no machine os capable of sexual reproduction is a fallacy. The writers of [i]Batteries Not Included[/b] certainly don't agree with you on that regard. They had little alien robots mate and the female get pregnant and have babies. A mated pair, male and female The female gave birth to baby robots. There goes your argument that any sane person would agree tha no machine can have sex and reproduce. Your entire argument is a fallacy. And, no, it isn't always better to spell out something happening. In fact, in a lot of cases, it is better to leave it up t the imagination. This is especially true of anything dealing with sex. Young children do not need to know where babies come from. All they need to know is that they have a mommy and a daddy. They know what a family is. They know what a mother is and a father is. Older people know more intimate details that children don't need to know. The stories do imply these issues. The cumulative evidence supports it as well. You simply can't accept it because they are mechanical.
Tramp

Postby slycherrychunks » Mon Aug 20, 2007 5:13 pm

Damolisher wrote:Careful., though, sly. he's older than you are, you need to respect him. *Cough*
My Dad's bigger than his though.

I actually think the misogony makes even the implied relationships seem souless. So, theres no other reason to love other than a biological urge to multiply and spread like bacteria. How depressing. Tramp you have officially ruined love.

Now let's all go hang ourselves.
slycherrychunks
Minibot
Posts: 104
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 4:56 pm

Postby Damolisher » Mon Aug 20, 2007 5:19 pm

No, Tramp, I deny it because as I said, we've never heard a Transformer mention being born, we've seen Transformers being built, and there's no argument when it comes to being built. Find me an internal diagram from any source which shows a Transformer with the parts to make a baby, and I'll leave. Until then, here's what Doctor Cox thinks of your stupid argument:

Doctor Cox wrote: Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong!
Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong!
You're wrong! You're Wrong! You're Wrooong!
Damolisher
Brainmaster
Posts: 1323
News Credits: 3
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 1:29 am

Postby slycherrychunks » Mon Aug 20, 2007 5:19 pm

Tramp wrote:[i]Batteries Not Included[/b]
You know in that film, the Daddy robot cut up tin cans and put them into the Mummy robot. There was no exchange of genetic material. The Mummy Robot was essentially a mobile factory unit.
slycherrychunks
Minibot
Posts: 104
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 4:56 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Transformers Cartoons and Comics Forum


[ Incoming message. Source unknown. ] No Signal - Please Stand By [ Click to attempt signal recovery... ]


Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store

Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "LASER OPTIMUS PRIME Transformers Legacy United Leader G2 Universe 2024 New"
LASER OPTIMUS PRIM ...
Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "Transformers Buzzworthy Bumblebee Legacy Silverstreak Deluxe Class 2022 New"
Transformers Buzzw ...
Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "ARMADA GALVATRON Transformers Legacy United Leader Class Hasbro 2024 New"
ARMADA GALVATRON T ...
Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "Go-Bot Guardians Transformers Generations Selects Legacy United 3-Pack New"
Go-Bot Guardians T ...
Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "Transformers Legacy United Cybertron Vector Prime Voyager Hasbro 2024 New"
Transformers Legac ...
Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "JHIAXUS Transformers Legacy Voyager Class G2 Universe Hasbro 2022 New"
JHIAXUS Transforme ...
Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "WFC-K7 PALEOTREX Transformers War Cybertron Kingdom Deluxe Hasbro 2020 New"
WFC-K7 PALEOTREX T ...
Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "Transformers Legacy United Origin Bumblebee Deluxe Class Hasbro 2025 New"
Transformers Legac ...
Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "Transformers Legacy United Optimus Prime Deluxe Class G1 Hasbro 2024 New"
Transformers Legac ...
Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "Transformers Legacy United Animated Bumblebee Deluxe Class Hasbro 2024 New"
Transformers Legac ...
Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "CYCLONUS + NIGHTSTICK Transformers Legacy Generations Selects Voyager 2022 New"
CYCLONUS + NIGHTST ...
Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "Transformers Legacy Blitzwing Leader Class Hasbro 2022 New"
Transformers Legac ...
Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "NEMESIS LEO PRIME Transformers Legacy Evolution Voyager Lio Convoy 2023 New"
NEMESIS LEO PRIME ...
Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "Transformers Legacy Evolution SHADOW STRIKER Deluxe Class Cyberverse Hasbro 2023"
Transformers Legac ...
These are affiliate links. We may earn a commission.
Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.

Featured Products on Amazon.com

Buy "Transformers: Generations Power of The Primes Legends Class Battleslash" on AMAZON
Buy "Transformers: Bumblebee Movie Toys, Power Charge Bumblebee Action Figure - Spinning Core, Lights and Sounds - Toys for Kids 6 and Up, 10.5-inch" on AMAZON
Buy "Transformers Generations Power of The Primes Deluxe Terrorcon Rippersnapper" on AMAZON
Buy "Transformers Power of the Primes Punch-Counterpunch and Prima Prime" on AMAZON
Buy "Transformers Studio Series 12 Voyager Class Movie 1 Decepticon Brawl" on AMAZON
Buy "Transformers: Generations Power of the Primes Voyager Class Starscream" on AMAZON
Buy "Transformers: Generations Power of The Primes Leader Evolution Optimus Prime" on AMAZON
Buy "Masterpiece MPM-7 Bumblebee" on AMAZON
Buy "Transformers Generations Legends Class Insecticon Bombshell Figure" on AMAZON
Buy "Transformers Generations Titans Return Deluxe Slugslinger and Caliburst" on AMAZON
Buy "Playskool Heroes Transformers Rescue Bots Optimus Prime" on AMAZON
Buy "Transformers Generations Titans Return Decepticon Octone and Murk" on AMAZON
These are affiliate links. We may earn a commission.
Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.