The Energon Pub

News Credits: 1 · by **vegetacron** » Sun Apr 28, 2013 9:38 am

http://io9.com/theres-an-autobot-hidden ... -483792095

Check it out. I thought it was neat.

by **frogbat** » Sat May 04, 2013 5:23 am

i like it.. wish there were official ones - i'm more of a trek fan than a star wars fans and the star wars cross overs always annoyed me because they transformed into sw chracters rather than tf characters

the federation doesn't offer much variety in ship design.. however the ship designs from the various factions would make it interesting

maybe a triple crossover/changer a robot that turns into a borg cube and a rubiks cube... and an allspark cube....

News Credits: 100 · by **-Kanrabat-** » Sat May 04, 2013 8:19 pm

This should have been posted in the CUSTOMISATION FORUM.
Kinda neat, but half of the ship being used as the shield is a waste.

News Credits: 1452 · by **Blurrz** » Sat May 04, 2013 8:29 pm

-Kanrabat- wrote:This should have been posted in the CUSTOMISATION FORUM.
Kinda neat, but half of the ship being used as the shield is a waste.

No it shouldn't, it's not his custom.

News Credits: 9 · by **Mykltron** » Sun May 05, 2013 6:01 am

Wow, kibbly.

by **Bowspearer** » Sun May 05, 2013 7:45 am

Anyone else find the saucer section becoming the shield a little black and on the anti-Autobot side of things?

News Credits: 100 · by **-Kanrabat-** » Sun May 05, 2013 1:00 pm

Blurrz wrote:
-Kanrabat- wrote:This should have been posted in the CUSTOMISATION FORUM.
Kinda neat, but half of the ship being used as the shield is a waste.

No it shouldn't, it's not his custom.

It's still A custom. So why the exception?

News Credits: 402 · by **Mkall** » Sun May 05, 2013 1:32 pm

-Kanrabat- wrote:
Blurrz wrote:
-Kanrabat- wrote:This should have been posted in the CUSTOMISATION FORUM.
Kinda neat, but half of the ship being used as the shield is a waste.

No it shouldn't, it's not his custom.

It's still A custom. So why the exception?

I think the customizing forums are more for showing off your own creativity.