Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store






Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.
John Warden once said in a TCC magazine interview that they deliberately avoided doing the beast-based combiners on purpose.Cyberpath wrote:Kurona wrote:Cyberpath wrote:Speaking about new releases, what about the animal combiners?HasTak has totally skipped those.
It's not so much 'skipped' as 'don't have the molds to do'.
Maybe it's time for some new molds.
TCC: What Combiner were you personally eager to make, but just could not get it into the final product line? Predaking, Piranhacon(sic), Abominus are seemingly absent from Combiner Wars. Were the animal Combiners just not feasible for the line or was it a priority issue, wanting to focus on the more classic vehicle Combiners?
JW: You took the words right out of my mouth: Predaking. I loved Predaking as a kid, and I loved the other Monster/Beast Combiner teams as well. I'd even love to bring to life the idea of a Dinobot Combiner team in toy form.
Every figure we create needs to be able to be incorporated into the greater whole of the Combiner Wars line. To create a Beast Combiner, we would have had to dedicate a full wave of product to play off the aesthetics of the original characters and Combiners that fans love.
Secondly, we wanted to focus the line on "terrestrial" forms (such as helicopters, jets, cars) that we knew would be easily identified by the new fans (kids) and would give a point of difference from the Transformers: Robots in Disguise toyline, which has a lot of Beast/Monster Alt Forms.
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
Cyberpath wrote:Neither of these reasons completely makes sense to me. I think Kurona nailed it.
Well, yeah, they don't have the molds to make those combiners out of because they didn't make the necessary molds to do so, and they didn't make said molds for the reasons given in that interview.Cyberpath wrote:Neither of these reasons completely makes sense to me. I think Kurona nailed it.
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
Sabrblade wrote:Well, yeah, they don't have the molds to make those combiners out of because they didn't make the necessary molds to do so, and they didn't make said molds for the reasons given in that interview.Cyberpath wrote:Neither of these reasons completely makes sense to me. I think Kurona nailed it.
Though, things have since changed what with Titans Return featuring animal-based Decepticons, which at the time this interview was published were only in RID and not in Generations.JelZe GoldRabbit wrote:Sabrblade wrote:Well, yeah, they don't have the molds to make those combiners out of because they didn't make the necessary molds to do so, and they didn't make said molds for the reasons given in that interview.Cyberpath wrote:Neither of these reasons completely makes sense to me. I think Kurona nailed it.
Look at it this way: Hasbro wants to keep RiD 2015 and Generations separate with each its own gimmicks to avoid toy line confusion (remember, not everyone is as savvy as we are). The last thing they want is for the two lines to "blend" thematically, for instance by flooding one line with what would be other line's main gimmick, rendering the point of having two lines at all moot.
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
Sabrblade wrote:Things has since changed what with Titans Return featuring animal-based Decepticons, which at the time this interview was published were only in RID and not in Generations.JelZe GoldRabbit wrote:Sabrblade wrote:Well, yeah, they don't have the molds to make those combiners out of because they didn't make the necessary molds to do so, and they didn't make said molds for the reasons given in that interview.Cyberpath wrote:Neither of these reasons completely makes sense to me. I think Kurona nailed it.
Look at it this way: Hasbro wants to keep RiD 2015 and Generations separate with each its own gimmicks to avoid toy line confusion (remember, not everyone is as savvy as we are). The last thing they want is for the two lines to "blend" thematically, for instance by flooding one line with what would be other line's main gimmick, rendering the point of having two lines at all moot.
william-james88 wrote:SillySpringer wrote:
I can dig some curvy femme though. I am not PC.
Obviously, you look nothing like him:
RAR wrote:To me it would make perfect sense to revisit Combiner Wars thematically in 2018-2019 with Beasts for a number of reasons.
They will be a nice Amuse Bouche for Movie toys - as there is only going to be a few Animals in The Last Knights - a few Dinobots and a Dragon in particular.
So for a mostly vehicle based toy line some more Animals would be nice counter to that. also if people liked The Headmaster Beast then a short pause and a slight twist from Headmaster Animals to other kinds makes sense to me.
If they give the combiner a pause they can come back to them fresh with an Animal focus. (as well as get around to G2 Devastator & Defensor if they still have not by then).
----
Also the mould family they make can be used for all sorts the new Combiner Characters that debued in the Kreo-O line for example on top of Abominus and The Seacons.
Starsaber468 wrote: Love the fact this is unlikely to happen guys beast combiners is still the same as the combiner gimmick which i doubt they will be doing unless its a boxset, and also beast alt modes is not a gimmick.... seriously i bet you its either gonna be pretenders 2018-2019 or something else doubt it would be actionmasters unless it was like something for legends class cause hasbro has likely learned from their mistakes
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
william-james88 wrote:Wouldnt it be up to women to decide if its sexist or not? Kurona, Jelze, do you have any opinion?
I find it a bit degrading that we have a comic with fun female villains taking the lead and being awesome, and the first thing men say is "sexist". Its like putting down something that could instead be hailed as more fiction involving females within a very (coinsciously made) male centric hobby. To me, thats where the real sexism is, in the people seeing an isue that might not be there, its speak to their bias. I support any fiction involving new female characters, especially some who kick ass as much as these and show the men how its really done!
Kurona wrote:I'd rather not give an opinion since I'm a little tired of this particular combiner mold making people triggerhappy for either their "SEXIST" or "YOU'RE A FEMINIST SJW" buzzwords that do more harm than good, don't contribute towards any actual conversation beyond inflating your own ego and agenda and really have no place on a Transformers forum. I'd rather the comic and toys themselves be discussed, as is the point of the thread.
Return to Transformers Toys Discussion
Registered users: Bing [Bot], blokefish, Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, MSN [Bot]