Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store
Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.
Doctor McGrath wrote:Emerje wrote:Delta Magnus wrote:fenrir72 wrote:Delta Magnus wrote:Meh. They still look hollow as hell. The improvements are definitely nice but they can't make up for the fact that the molds just plain and simple suck.
Aaaaaaaaaaand you can do better? Just asking, you own the Hb version to be able to make a really unbiased opinion or is it based on just analyzing the images?
I watched Bobby Skullface's review of the Hasbro version, and quite frankly that was enough to put me off buying any version of these figures. Especially considering that far better alternatives exist- and ironically enough, far more readily available in this country.
Even if there was a rampant problem with the Hasbro version falling apart (which there isn't), there's no reason to believe Takara Tomy wouldn't fix that along with everything else they've improved. Have a little faith.
Emerje
Yeah, I don't understand that point either Delta. I let my 19 month old son play with Devastator & he never falls apart. The head pops up, sometimes the crane gets pulled off, & the gun always falls out of his hand but my son has never been able to detach a limb.
william-james88 wrote:If ever Sabrblade decides to go on vacation, I am glad to know we can rely on you.
Hellscream9999 wrote:
Alright, how about (purposely[?]) lackluster? I don't need tons of paint, but maybe pick out some vents in black and ladders in silver, maybe some hazard stripes or something, just enough to break up the absolute ocean of green... I can understand the desire to be 'show accurate' but that's not to say that there cannot be some middle ground where it isn't so plain.
The biggest problem I have with it is the same as UW defensor. It has all these molded details, and they go unnoticed because they aren't painted, because the reference material was a rushed and sloppy mess.
But to be fair, going for show accuracy would inevitably leave every figure as plain and boring as their unpainted defensor - and while that's okay to some, using it as a crutch to defend lackluster deco's is still wrong in my opinion, I dunno, I'm having trouble putting my frustration into words
Hey! Remember, there IS a Hasbro Asia premium deco coming. It has all that sweet battle damage, or work site soot, or both!william-james88 wrote:Hellscream9999 wrote:
Alright, how about (purposely[?]) lackluster? I don't need tons of paint, but maybe pick out some vents in black and ladders in silver, maybe some hazard stripes or something, just enough to break up the absolute ocean of green... I can understand the desire to be 'show accurate' but that's not to say that there cannot be some middle ground where it isn't so plain.
The biggest problem I have with it is the same as UW defensor. It has all these molded details, and they go unnoticed because they aren't painted, because the reference material was a rushed and sloppy mess.
But to be fair, going for show accuracy would inevitably leave every figure as plain and boring as their unpainted defensor - and while that's okay to some, using it as a crutch to defend lackluster deco's is still wrong in my opinion, I dunno, I'm having trouble putting my frustration into words
I think you are doing a great job expressing your frustration, since I can understand you very well. The deco you are referring to sounds a lot like a premium deco we would get from Hasbro Asia, where ladders and gears are painted. And I can totally see how that could have improved the figure. I dont mind it though since I get where they are coming from. But yes, wanting to be G1 accurate can lead to a lackluster deco, at least to some. Like Seibertron (the site owner) himself says, there is a such a ting as being too cartoon accurate. Everyone has their threshold and I guess you found yours
Burn wrote:Agamemnon wrote:Let's get back to talking about Burn's mammoth snout flopping...
Well I am Australian. It's kinda what we're known for.
Delta Magnus wrote:fenrir72 wrote:Delta Magnus wrote:Meh. They still look hollow as hell. The improvements are definitely nice but they can't make up for the fact that the molds just plain and simple suck.
Aaaaaaaaaaand you can do better? Just asking, you own the Hb version to be able to make a really unbiased opinion or is it based on just analyzing the images?
I watched Bobby Skullface's review of the Hasbro version, and quite frankly that was enough to put me off buying any version of these figures. Especially considering that far better alternatives exist- and ironically enough, far more readily available in this country.
william-james88 wrote:Hellscream9999 wrote:
Alright, how about (purposely[?]) lackluster? I don't need tons of paint, but maybe pick out some vents in black and ladders in silver, maybe some hazard stripes or something, just enough to break up the absolute ocean of green... I can understand the desire to be 'show accurate' but that's not to say that there cannot be some middle ground where it isn't so plain.
The biggest problem I have with it is the same as UW defensor. It has all these molded details, and they go unnoticed because they aren't painted, because the reference material was a rushed and sloppy mess.
But to be fair, going for show accuracy would inevitably leave every figure as plain and boring as their unpainted defensor - and while that's okay to some, using it as a crutch to defend lackluster deco's is still wrong in my opinion, I dunno, I'm having trouble putting my frustration into words
I think you are doing a great job expressing your frustration, since I can understand you very well. The deco you are referring to sounds a lot like a premium deco we would get from Hasbro Asia, where ladders and gears are painted. And I can totally see how that could have improved the figure. I dont mind it though since I get where they are coming from. But yes, wanting to be G1 accurate can lead to a lackluster deco, at least to some. Like Seibertron (the site owner) himself says, there is a such a ting as being too cartoon accurate. Everyone has their threshold and I guess you found yours
william-james88 wrote:If ever Sabrblade decides to go on vacation, I am glad to know we can rely on you.
william-james88 wrote:Hellscream9999 wrote:
Alright, how about (purposely[?]) lackluster? I don't need tons of paint, but maybe pick out some vents in black and ladders in silver, maybe some hazard stripes or something, just enough to break up the absolute ocean of green... I can understand the desire to be 'show accurate' but that's not to say that there cannot be some middle ground where it isn't so plain.
The biggest problem I have with it is the same as UW defensor. It has all these molded details, and they go unnoticed because they aren't painted, because the reference material was a rushed and sloppy mess.
But to be fair, going for show accuracy would inevitably leave every figure as plain and boring as their unpainted defensor - and while that's okay to some, using it as a crutch to defend lackluster deco's is still wrong in my opinion, I dunno, I'm having trouble putting my frustration into words
I think you are doing a great job expressing your frustration, since I can understand you very well. The deco you are referring to sounds a lot like a premium deco we would get from Hasbro Asia, where ladders and gears are painted. And I can totally see how that could have improved the figure. I dont mind it though since I get where they are coming from. But yes, wanting to be G1 accurate can lead to a lackluster deco, at least to some. Like Seibertron (the site owner) himself says, there is a such a ting as being too cartoon accurate. Everyone has their threshold and I guess you found yours
fenrir72 wrote:Delta Magnus wrote:fenrir72 wrote:Delta Magnus wrote:Meh. They still look hollow as hell. The improvements are definitely nice but they can't make up for the fact that the molds just plain and simple suck.
Aaaaaaaaaaand you can do better? Just asking, you own the Hb version to be able to make a really unbiased opinion or is it based on just analyzing the images?
I watched Bobby Skullface's review of the Hasbro version, and quite frankly that was enough to put me off buying any version of these figures. Especially considering that far better alternatives exist- and ironically enough, far more readily available in this country.
The reviewer too could be also biased against the mold. Just saying.......
As you are entitled to your opinion, I'll put this forward:
I too detest hollow parts, It is quite distracting. And a way for the company to lessen the plastic content. Ugh! MP Lambor too had very overt hollow parts but it was ingeniusly covered by that "panel"
So yup, Devs will have them hollow parts and not gonna be defending it but to call the mold plain suckage? Is it that that too much? Kind of a put down on the efforts of the design team and given the parameters the TT engineers have to work with as compared to the 3rd party efforts.
william-james88 wrote:If ever Sabrblade decides to go on vacation, I am glad to know we can rely on you.
Cobotron wrote:Hey! Remember, there IS a Hasbro Asia premium deco coming. It has all that sweet battle damage, or work site soot, or both!william-james88 wrote:Hellscream9999 wrote:
Alright, how about (purposely[?]) lackluster? I don't need tons of paint, but maybe pick out some vents in black and ladders in silver, maybe some hazard stripes or something, just enough to break up the absolute ocean of green... I can understand the desire to be 'show accurate' but that's not to say that there cannot be some middle ground where it isn't so plain.
The biggest problem I have with it is the same as UW defensor. It has all these molded details, and they go unnoticed because they aren't painted, because the reference material was a rushed and sloppy mess.
But to be fair, going for show accuracy would inevitably leave every figure as plain and boring as their unpainted defensor - and while that's okay to some, using it as a crutch to defend lackluster deco's is still wrong in my opinion, I dunno, I'm having trouble putting my frustration into words
I think you are doing a great job expressing your frustration, since I can understand you very well. The deco you are referring to sounds a lot like a premium deco we would get from Hasbro Asia, where ladders and gears are painted. And I can totally see how that could have improved the figure. I dont mind it though since I get where they are coming from. But yes, wanting to be G1 accurate can lead to a lackluster deco, at least to some. Like Seibertron (the site owner) himself says, there is a such a ting as being too cartoon accurate. Everyone has their threshold and I guess you found yours
chuckdawg1999 wrote:Wait, There's an Asia exclusive coming? This is the first I've heard of this. Are pre-orders up?
My bad.william-james88 wrote:chuckdawg1999 wrote:Wait, There's an Asia exclusive coming? This is the first I've heard of this. Are pre-orders up?
Not really, as far as we know the battle damaged devastator seen at a toy show was a custom paint job.
Burn wrote:Agamemnon wrote:Let's get back to talking about Burn's mammoth snout flopping...
Well I am Australian. It's kinda what we're known for.
That Bot wrote:Going cartoon accurate for animation models that are often head-scratching interpretations of the original toys with limited color palates to ease animation is not always ideal.
william-james88 wrote:If ever Sabrblade decides to go on vacation, I am glad to know we can rely on you.
It's not black. It's the same dark gray as seen on the face of Takara's Devastator. The lighting in this makes it look close to black, but it isn't.Convoy wrote:
Why does Scrapper have a black face and why has nobody else mentioned it? Every single other thing is cartoon accurate. Paint jobs, weapons, retractable visor, joints!
Why the toy accurate head on the leader? Do I really need to buy the Hasbro version of Scrapper to swap heads with one darn figure?
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
Convoy wrote:
Why does Scrapper have a black face and why has nobody else mentioned it? Every single other thing is cartoon accurate. Paint jobs, weapons, retractable visor, joints!
Why the toy accurate head on the leader? Do I really need to buy the Hasbro version of Scrapper to swap heads with one darn figure?
Nemesis Destron wrote:I think the real issue that remains constant over all other opinions over this epic Devastator is how much longer we gotta wait for our orders to ship!![]()
Cobotron wrote:My bad.william-james88 wrote:chuckdawg1999 wrote:Wait, There's an Asia exclusive coming? This is the first I've heard of this. Are pre-orders up?
Not really, as far as we know the battle damaged devastator seen at a toy show was a custom paint job.![]()
chuckdawg1999 wrote:Cobotron wrote:My bad.william-james88 wrote:chuckdawg1999 wrote:Wait, There's an Asia exclusive coming? This is the first I've heard of this. Are pre-orders up?
Not really, as far as we know the battle damaged devastator seen at a toy show was a custom paint job.![]()
Actually Robot Kingdom's pre-order says it comes with coins. Perhaps there's one for each Constructicon and Devastator.
fenrir72 wrote:chuckdawg1999 wrote:Cobotron wrote:My bad.william-james88 wrote:chuckdawg1999 wrote:Wait, There's an Asia exclusive coming? This is the first I've heard of this. Are pre-orders up?
Not really, as far as we know the battle damaged devastator seen at a toy show was a custom paint job.![]()
Actually Robot Kingdom's pre-order says it comes with coins. Perhaps there's one for each Constructicon and Devastator.
That's just like 1 coin for the team. Similar to Encore 20A. Only one biocard instead of six
Return to Transformers Toys Discussion
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Bumblevivisector, Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, MSN [Bot], Sabrblade, Yahoo [Bot]