The Energon Pub

Burn wrote:At this point in time I can say "I won't miss Megan Fox's acting ability".

Once I see the new bimbo though i fimrly believe i'll be wishing for Megan Fox to come back.

MightyMagnus78 wrote:I also like the way Bay decided to call Sam's new girlfriend Carly in a blatant attempt to appease some of the Geewunners!

Again with assuming it was Bay ... Bay doesn't write!

I doubt I'll be wishing for her to come back. The new girl won't be any better, but at least she's not Megan Fox.

And yeah, Bay doesn't write the scripts. It's just easier to blame the director.

I really firmly believe that after we see the performance of the drugged up "model" we'll be wishing for Megan Fox to come back.

Burn wrote:I really firmly believe that after we see the performance of the drugged up "model" we'll be wishing for Megan Fox to come back.

You're implying there's a difference?

To me it's more that after two movies of one, it'll be nice to have a break and go with another even if she's just as lousy at acting and bad looking.

MightyMagnus, welcome to the madness. I see that you see what it is I'm trying to say, however we must remember that "Fallen" for me was the whole "emotional adolescent male ruled by his hormones" college deal. Hence why all the lines between Shia and Megan are pretty much, "Do you love me, how much do you love me, why don't you say you love me" and I think partially why alot of people see Megan in a negative, another scapegoat per say along with the writers to devert any attnetion or more so, blame to Bay about what others think is wrong with "Fallen". Even I was getting tired of her towards the end of the film....but that wasn't in no part her, but just her recycled lines.

Megan, for me, has the potential to be a good actress. In the first film I liked her, she did the whole Teen Hottie thing during the high school bits, and played a convincing "Everything has gone to hell" routine during the showdown in the first films finale. Because she wasn't bogged down with lines meant to cater too much around the "strained relationship" dynamic as it was in "Fallen", it worked better.

As for the new girl, I fear her lines will be bogged down with such nonsense or maybe even worse in terms of feeling a need to outshine Megan. I will say I am happy they didn't try to recast the character, I prefer a new character all together. However honestly; comparing this Calry character against Megan can't be helped. I've already spoken to a few people, and they already noted a loss of interest in "Moon" due to Megan's lack of presence.

As for her moxy as an actress, I've yet to really classify her. She's been playing nothing but catty highschool characters for a good duration of her career, but she has a film coming out with Mickey Rourke (SP?) as well as possibly playing the next Laura Croft. She also has shown interest in adapting the late great Michael Turners "Aspen" into a film, so she has drive. As far as Moon is concerned, her presence would have certainly helped, and I think moon will suffer from a lack of it.
~Josh

Wow, I actually read through this entire thread...

Anyway, I'm with Burn, based on acting ability (or lack of) I'll probably also be wishing for Megan Fox instead of Rosie. She looks better as well.

Rodimus Prime wrote:Wow, I actually read through this entire thread...

Anyway, I'm with Burn, based on acting ability (or lack of) I'll probably also be wishing for Megan Fox instead of Rosie. She looks better as well.

Ha ha ha, you get a cyber cookie for reading this whole experiment.

But seriously, Megan is alot more easy on the eyes....and this is coming from a guy who prefers Blonds over Raven Haired beauties....oh Megan, how I urned to see you in 3D


*Sigh*

Joshua Vallse wrote:oh Megan, how I urned to see you in 3D

Have you considered stalking?

Burn wrote:Have you considered stalking?

Ha ha, don't be jealous just because I have that option being I live in LA Besides, you can't tell me that you too wouldn't want to see that awesome opening shot of her on a motorcycle in crystal clear high definition 3D

pfffft. You damn kids these days wanting to see your half naked chicks in "crystal clear high definition 3D".

Why, back in my day we just went down to the beach!

hmmmm i just want to see more robots... everytime people start speaking in bay films it just fades into the old charlie brown teacher voice for me...

hot chicks no talkie, just...
more robots...

on a side note im kinda liking the new megatron look...

Burn wrote:pfffft. You damn kids these days wanting to see your half naked chicks in "crystal clear high definition 3D".

Why, back in my day we just went down to the beach!

And now you can do that in HD Sunglasses!

That's right, kids! Now you too can see the Real World™ in HD!

Midnight_Fox wrote:And now you can do that in HD Sunglasses!

That's right, kids! Now you too can see the Real World™ in HD!

OK, so they come in HD vision, but just like some hideous fifties throw back, can you get them in X-Ray vision?

MightyMagnus78 wrote:

Midnight_Fox wrote:

Burn wrote:pfffft. You damn kids these days wanting to see your half naked chicks in "crystal clear high definition 3D".

Why, back in my day we just went down to the beach!

And now you can do that in HD Sunglasses!

That's right, kids! Now you too can see the Real World™ in HD!

OK, so they come in HD vision, but just like some hideous fifties throw back, can you get them in X-Ray vision?

HD sunglasses with built-in X-Ray vision...at the beach. I can think of exactly ONE use for that. It is a very, very good use.

Shadowman wrote:

MightyMagnus78 wrote:

Midnight_Fox wrote:

Burn wrote:pfffft. You damn kids these days wanting to see your half naked chicks in "crystal clear high definition 3D".

Why, back in my day we just went down to the beach!

And now you can do that in HD Sunglasses!

That's right, kids! Now you too can see the Real World™ in HD!

OK, so they come in HD vision, but just like some hideous fifties throw back, can you get them in X-Ray vision?

HD sunglasses with built-in X-Ray vision...at the beach. I can think of exactly ONE use for that. It is a very, very good use.

Yeah, Bird watching!

Burn wrote:pfffft. You damn kids these days wanting to see your half naked chicks in "crystal clear high definition 3D".

Why, back in my day we just went down to the beach!

We still do that today...uh...at least I do. I've got to drive a great while to get there though, since I'm in "King James'" old stomping grounds.
But still, you get to relax in the warm weather while you do it instead of sitting in a dark cold theater. And those of my generation sit at their computers searching for images of "Miley Cyrus" and "Justin Bieber". Pfffft. What a sad environment I live in.

MightyMagnus78 wrote:

Shadowman wrote:

MightyMagnus78 wrote:

Midnight_Fox wrote:

Burn wrote:pfffft. You damn kids these days wanting to see your half naked chicks in "crystal clear high definition 3D".

Why, back in my day we just went down to the beach!

And now you can do that in HD Sunglasses!

That's right, kids! Now you too can see the Real World™ in HD!

OK, so they come in HD vision, but just like some hideous fifties throw back, can you get them in X-Ray vision?

HD sunglasses with built-in X-Ray vision...at the beach. I can think of exactly ONE use for that. It is a very, very good use.

Yeah, Bird watching!

Rubbish, he's talking about protecting your eyes from the damaging sun!

OptiMagnus10 wrote:

Burn wrote:pfffft. You damn kids these days wanting to see your half naked chicks in "crystal clear high definition 3D".

Why, back in my day we just went down to the beach!

We still do that today...uh...at least I do. I've got to drive a great while to get there though, since I'm in "King James'" old stomping grounds.
But still, you get to relax in the warm weather while you do it instead of sitting in a dark cold theater. And those of my generation sit at their computers searching for images of "Miley Cyrus" and "Justin Bieber". Pfffft. What a sad environment I live in.

Some day, you're going to understand the concept of a "joke".

Well, actually i think DoTM will be better without Megan. More refined.

JetOptimus23 wrote:Well, actually i think DoTM will be better without Megan. More refined.

Elaboration?

How would you see it being more refined?

Joshua Vallse wrote:

JetOptimus23 wrote:Well, actually i think DoTM will be better without Megan. More refined.

Elaboration?

How would you see it being more refined?

Rosie's drugs are now of a higher Hollywood quality.

Burn wrote:Rosie's drugs are now of a higher Hollywood quality.

Oh hollywood, you and your impossible standards....

Joshua Vallse wrote:

Rodimus Prime wrote:Wow, I actually read through this entire thread...

Anyway, I'm with Burn, based on acting ability (or lack of) I'll probably also be wishing for Megan Fox instead of Rosie. She looks better as well.

Ha ha ha, you get a cyber cookie for reading this whole experiment.

But seriously, Megan is alot more easy on the eyes....and this is coming from a guy who prefers Blonds over Raven Haired beauties....oh Megan, how I urned to see you in 3D


*Sigh*

A cookie? A f**king cookie? I NEED NEW RETINAS AND BRAIN CELLS, YOU...!!!

*does anger management excercises*

I was never into blondes. Always liked the brunettes and...er...raven-haired beauties, as you put it. And the longer the hair the better.

And I get the concept of a joke every time I look in the mirror. God is a jester.

Rodimus Prime wrote:A cookie? A f**king cookie? I NEED NEW RETINAS AND BRAIN CELLS, YOU...!!!

*does anger management excercises*

I was never into blondes. Always liked the brunettes and...er...raven-haired beauties, as you put it. And the longer the hair the better.

And I get the concept of a joke every time I look in the mirror. God is a jester.

Oh my, I'm sorry. I calculated the amount of brain cells you would have burned through after such a task would leave you more then content with said cookie.

I know what would go good with that cookie though, some milk!



It does a cyber body good.

As for long hair..yessss! I luv it, I hate it when you get these starletts that just go choppin away....so so sad. Also note Megans raven locks, don't ever cut them luv, or pull a Natalie Portman special.

Oh, any further pics of Megan anyone feels like posting are more then welcomed. yay

You know, that other girl, Maggie (played by Rachael Taylor), seemed to be based off of G1 cartoon Carly. She was blond, a brilliant computer hacker, and a little older than Sam. Talk about dropping the ball by not bringing her back as the girl in this new film. They could have even made up a simple story about her name being a fake so that she could be Carly, or that she had to change her name to Carly because of her job and the secrecy involved. I don't normally like blonds over Brunettes, but she was much better than Megan Fox in all aspects. Such a shame...

Bradimus wrote:You know, that other girl, Maggie (played by Rachael Taylor), seemed to be based off of G1 cartoon Carly. She was blond, a brilliant computer hacker, and a little older than Sam.

Sam was 16 in the first movie. Maggie was probably well into her 20s.