Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store














Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.
1984forever wrote:Forum rules only apply to me and Rated X. Apparently everyone else can say whatever they want.
Burn please...Burn wrote:1984forever wrote:Forum rules only apply to me and Rated X. Apparently everyone else can say whatever they want.
If you feel people are violating the rules, then by all means, PLEASE use the "Report this Post" button to call attention to the post so that it can be dealt with.
We're all busy, some times things don't get picked up. That's where the button comes in handy.
He told you what to do in case there are problems with posts. And if you have a problem with a certain member of the staff, you can discuss it with another staff member that you feel safe with.1984forever wrote:Burn please...Burn wrote:We're all busy, some times things don't get picked up. That's where the button comes in handy.
Rodimus Prime wrote:Back to Combiner Wars, it would have been nice to have had 4 1984 or 1986 Cons to go with Cyclonus.
Decepticon Sunstorm wrote:Rodimus Prime wrote:Back to Combiner Wars, it would have been nice to have had 4 1984 or 1986 Cons to go with Cyclonus.
Yeah. While I do favor the Autobots in general, there needs to be a balance of the two. In CW, there are 5 comfirmedcombiners and 2 confirmed
combiners (not counting UW and FunPub). That's not a good balance.
william-james88 wrote:Decepticon Sunstorm wrote:Rodimus Prime wrote:Back to Combiner Wars, it would have been nice to have had 4 1984 or 1986 Cons to go with Cyclonus.
Yeah. While I do favor the Autobots in general, there needs to be a balance of the two. In CW, there are 5 comfirmedcombiners and 2 confirmed
combiners (not counting UW and FunPub). That's not a good balance.
Well we know there is both a seeker head and a conehead head out there (safe assumption both owned by hasbro) so there is a certain potential of extra seeker limbs. It's easy money but I don't know if it would go down well with the fans who are kind of sick of repaints.
william-james88 wrote:Decepticon Sunstorm wrote:Rodimus Prime wrote:Back to Combiner Wars, it would have been nice to have had 4 1984 or 1986 Cons to go with Cyclonus.
Yeah. While I do favor the Autobots in general, there needs to be a balance of the two. In CW, there are 5 comfirmedcombiners and 2 confirmed
combiners (not counting UW and FunPub). That's not a good balance.
Well we know there is both a seeker head and a conehead head out there (safe assumption both owned by hasbro) so there is a certain potential of extra seeker limbs. It's easy money but I don't know if it would go down well with the fans who are kind of sick of repaints.
william-james88 wrote:If ever Sabrblade decides to go on vacation, I am glad to know we can rely on you.
Decepticon Sunstorm wrote:Rodimus Prime wrote:Back to Combiner Wars, it would have been nice to have had 4 1984 or 1986 Cons to go with Cyclonus.
Yeah. While I do favor the Autobots in general, there needs to be a balance of the two. In CW, there are 5 comfirmedcombiners and 2 confirmed
combiners (not counting UW and FunPub). That's not a good balance.
Tigertrack wrote:Decepticon Sunstorm wrote:Rodimus Prime wrote:Back to Combiner Wars, it would have been nice to have had 4 1984 or 1986 Cons to go with Cyclonus.
Yeah. While I do favor the Autobots in general, there needs to be a balance of the two. In CW, there are 5 comfirmedcombiners and 2 confirmed
combiners (not counting UW and FunPub). That's not a good balance.
Hmmm..
Grand Prime or Optimus Maximus and 1st Autobot car set
Superion and Aerialbots
Defensor and Protectobots
Sky Reign and 2nd Autobot car set
Scattershot with bots who will work with him
Bruticus and Combaticons
Menasor and Stunticons
Devastator and Constructicons
Cyclonus with possessed of his choice
Looks like 4 to 3 to me, with each having a random torso bot, although there is also an extra random Prime torso when not combined with Battle core or normal CW Prime. What did I miss?
Decepticon Sunstorm wrote:Tigertrack wrote:Decepticon Sunstorm wrote:Rodimus Prime wrote:Back to Combiner Wars, it would have been nice to have had 4 1984 or 1986 Cons to go with Cyclonus.
Yeah. While I do favor the Autobots in general, there needs to be a balance of the two. In CW, there are 5 comfirmedcombiners and 2 confirmed
combiners (not counting UW and FunPub). That's not a good balance.
Hmmm..
Grand Prime or Optimus Maximus and 1st Autobot car set
Superion and Aerialbots
Defensor and Protectobots
Sky Reign and 2nd Autobot car set
Scattershot with bots who will work with him
Bruticus and Combaticons
Menasor and Stunticons
Devastator and Constructicons
Cyclonus with possessed of his choice
Looks like 4 to 3 to me, with each having a random torso bot, although there is also an extra random Prime torso when not combined with Battle core or normal CW Prime. What did I miss?
I don't count the extra torsos (since they are just that) or Devastator (as he is in a different size class and thus is out of scale with most of the line). And you forgot Victorion.
william-james88 wrote:If ever Sabrblade decides to go on vacation, I am glad to know we can rely on you.
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
Delta Magnus wrote:I had an idea for BCOP, actually.
Burn wrote:Agamemnon wrote:Let's get back to talking about Burn's mammoth snout flopping...
Well I am Australian. It's kinda what we're known for.
Cobotron wrote:Delta Magnus wrote:I had an idea for BCOP, actually.
Delta, you must have missed The White Knight the first time around.
A little different than the combo you said. Sorry I don't have any PE accessories, but Alpha bravo is this guys Herald.
"Hear ye! Hear ye! Prepare to be bested!"
Burn wrote:Agamemnon wrote:Let's get back to talking about Burn's mammoth snout flopping...
Well I am Australian. It's kinda what we're known for.
Cobotron wrote::APPLAUSE:![]()
Love the Strongarm idea!
I want one please.
william-james88 wrote:Delta Magnus, while it is a joy to see your passion about these toys, I think I would stick my head in an oven if Hasbro were to release those repaints. I really think I am the fan who is most sick of CW repaints out there.
Cobotron wrote:Decepticon Sunstorm wrote:Cobotron wrote:Wait. Which head? Robot or combiner?
Combiner.
Gotcha! So they could have painted it burgundy or rust or what have you, but didn't.
Hasbro'ed!
MemphisR56 wrote:On the 12th day of Christmas, transformers gave to me:
12 names of the Thirteen in IDW,
11 open Pre-Orders,
10 reviews of Bruticus before general retail,
9 years no new Hot Rod,
8 repaints of dead end,
7 third parties doing Dinobots,
6 female combiners,
Combaticons, ALLL 5 SOLD OOOOUT!
4 missing technobots
Three mismatched combiner limbs,
Two Skipped Waves,
and a Masterpiece of a Munkyyyy"
Someone on another board made these out of the non-G1-original CW toys:Delta Magnus wrote:william-james88 wrote:Delta Magnus, while it is a joy to see your passion about these toys, I think I would stick my head in an oven if Hasbro were to release those repaints. I really think I am the fan who is most sick of CW repaints out there.
Yeah, I am inclined to agree actually. Whilst I do love digibashing, I do have the occasional pang of guilt where I look at myself and think "am I any better than Hasbro? Why do I cry out for less useless repaints whilst producing ideas for them myself?" Though personally I'd rather see those repaints rather than some of the repaints we got. (I'm looking at you, Wheeljack and Smokescreen...)
TL;DR: Less useless crap like the entire 1984 Autobot cast as combiner limbs, more original stuff/unexpected homages. Or you know, some original molds now and again would be nice.
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
Sabrblade wrote:Some on another boar made these out of the non-G1-original CW toys:Delta Magnus wrote:william-james88 wrote:Delta Magnus, while it is a joy to see your passion about these toys, I think I would stick my head in an oven if Hasbro were to release those repaints. I really think I am the fan who is most sick of CW repaints out there.
Yeah, I am inclined to agree actually. Whilst I do love digibashing, I do have the occasional pang of guilt where I look at myself and think "am I any better than Hasbro? Why do I cry out for less useless repaints whilst producing ideas for them myself?" Though personally I'd rather see those repaints rather than some of the repaints we got. (I'm looking at you, Wheeljack and Smokescreen...)
TL;DR: Less useless crap like the entire 1984 Autobot cast as combiner limbs, more original stuff/unexpected homages. Or you know, some original molds now and again would be nice.
He just needs a Hound to use for Boulder.
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
william-james88 wrote:Cobotron wrote::APPLAUSE:![]()
Love the Strongarm idea!
I want one please.
Burn wrote:Agamemnon wrote:Let's get back to talking about Burn's mammoth snout flopping...
Well I am Australian. It's kinda what we're known for.
Return to Transformers Toys Discussion
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], MSN [Bot], sprockitz, Yahoo [Bot]